A $99 Kindle Fire would annihilate the Android tablet competition

Summary: Could Amazon break the deep-rooted psychological $100 price point with the Kindle Fire HD? And if it can, what effect would this have on the Android tablet market?

Rumors are abound that Amazon is working on bringing to market a 7-inch Kindle Fire HD tablet with a price tag of only $99. This would be the beginning of the end for the competition.

(Image: Amazon)

Currently, the 7-inch Kindle Fire HD costs $199, so the price drop would be a very significant one, taking it below the price point of $159 that Amazon currently asks for the older Kindle Fire tablet. Earlier this month, Amazon slashed the price of its 8.9-inch Kindle Fire, taking the wi-fi version down from $299 to $269, and the LTE version from $499 to $399.

Amazon is in a unique position to be able to bring cheap, yet high-quality tablets to market because it is not reliant on the hardware itself to turn a profit. The Kindle family of devices are a way of making existing Amazon customers buy more stuff.

According to an IHS iSuppli virtual teardown, the current 16GB 7-inch Kindle Fire HD is estimated to cost Amazon $174 to make, and this was based on November 2012 component costs. Most components have fallen in price during this time, so this will undoubtedly help bring the cost down.

Another factor that may help Amazon bring down the cost — in the short term, at any rate — is the fact that Texas Instruments, the company that manufactures the processor for the Kindle Fire, is looking to get out of the fabrication business. Speculation is that Amazon may have make a deal with TI to buy remaining stock of processors at a cut price.

Another possibility is that Amazon has approached another chipmaker — such as TSMC — to build processors for the Kindle Fire HD.

Another place that Amazon could shave a few dollars off the price of the Kindle Fire HD is with the display and touchscreen, which, based on the IHS numbers, represented the bulk of the component costs, totaling $64.

How disruptive would a $99 Android tablet be? Enormously so, and the biggest thing a mainstream name could do, short of going completely free — which might sound crazy, but could be doable under the right conditions.

Amazon has shown itself to be a company that's not afraid to experiment when it comes to hardware, and it has taken the Kindle brand and shaped it into a set of products that have had a profound impact on the e-reader and tablet markets, essentially shaping it from top to bottom. A $99 tablet would be the next step in that disruptive pattern.

The sub-$100 price point is a deep-rooted psychological one, and if Amazon can break it with the Kindle Fire HD, then not only is the retailer putting pressure on the likes of Apple and Samsung, but also on the myriad of low-quality cheap-and-nasty tablets flooding the market from China. $99 Android-powered tablets already exist, so the question is not whether Amazon can make a sub-$100 tablet — it can — but whether it can make a good one. Given the quality of current hardware, I would say that if Amazon does indeed come out with a $99 tablet, it will be a good product.

Or put it another way, it would have the biggest effect on the tablet market since Apple released the iPad.

UPDATE:

An Amazon spokesperson said in a statement that "it's not happening--we are already at the lowest price points possible for that hardware." What I find interesting about this statement is the reference to "that hardware," which I take to mean the current incarnation of the 7-inch Kindle Fire HD.

Topics: Amazon, Android, Hardware, Tablets

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

87 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Why couldn't Google do the same?

    Amazon uses the Fire as a razor and their products and services, including ads, as blades.

    Google can go toe-to-toe with Amazon in this game because of its considerable advertising revenue.

    In reality, this will make it even more difficult for Microsoft to get any traction in the 7 to 8-inch form factor tablet market.
    Rabid Howler Monkey
    • With a Prime membership Fire should be free

      If that's not enough for Amazon they could require a 2 year Prime contract for a free Fire. Amazon should think about this. Prime can repay the hardware costs.
      T1Oracle
      • Primed for profit

        There is little doubt the Prime Membership will be a requirement. B&N partnered with the NYT in a promo last year. Free Nook with a 1 year subscription to the paper. Final cost - $249.00 for a $99.00 reader.
        dlangdon01
      • antonygeee@gmail.com

        This is an even better idea. My wife is antsy about getting a notebook but cannot make peace with the price. As a family, we have all the desktops I can build! I don't need another computer as I am not Leo Laporte. Having said that, we cut the cord two years ago and now just stream away every night using the computer I built for the job and two different blu-ray players plugged iinto an HDMI-ready Yamaha receiver. Netflix would quake in its' boots if our world were flooded with 7" Kindles and folks clutching Amazon subscriptions. Bring it on!
        Anthony Genco
    • Google could if...

      they make a huge investment in learning how to retail. Right now they suck at it.

      Example: Buy a Google Nexus7 from the Play store. Do you want an extended protection warranty? Do you want peripherals ( such as a keyboard/case)?

      You can't buy the warranty (though you can get it if you buy the N7 at WalMart), and if you want the case, you will probably go to Amazon to buy it (as I did).

      That's inexcusable...Amazon is a one stop shopping experience - Google has to build their retail infrastructure from the ground up. They've begun, but poorly.
      louishelps
      • Why buy your Nexus from the PlayStore???

        OK, so I get the point about Google not offering the extended warranty and needed accessories... inexcuseable, and needs to change!

        But having purchased 2 Nexi 7's (that is the plural of Nexus, isn't it?)... I kind of wish I had bought them directly from Google. Turns out, when you need help, you just enter your name and phone number and Google calls you (almost instantly), and a tech comes online shortly thereafter.

        Unfortunately, if you bought your tablet from a retail partner, they won't support the hardware. So I had to labor (stumble) through the Asus web site (it really sucks) and send the device to them to have it serviced. No updates along the way and no real info about what was done, just a repaired device shipped back to me. If I had purchased the hardware from Google, I believe it would have gone much better and easier.

        Now they are a little quick on the "restore to factory default" "last option" "solution". But I pretty much always assume there is a better answer than that!
        mlwinnig@...
    • Kindle's Not Android

      One key issue however is the Kindle is a closed - system -- you can not access the Android market - only use Kindle's Proprietary System - this is a huge disadvantage to a lot of users.

      I recently purchased a Novo 7 Venus Android tablet for $149 through a site called TabletSprint -- this tablet rivals the Nexus 7 for a lot less -- with most of the same features, including a Quad Core processor and a hi-res 1280x800 IPS screen display - Plus a microSD card slot, HDMI, and Front and Rear Cameras, all of which the Nexus 7 doesn't feature --

      Maybe if the Kindle tablets gets better specs like the Venus tablet as well in the future allows open access -- but for now, it's really limited in what you can do with a Kindle tablet and what you do have access to.
      Rick Martin
      • Kindle is Android

        Kindle only allows access to Amazon - true. This does not make Kindle a Proprietary system. It is instead a closed marketplace, but it still remains a android device. Not all android apps are suited for the Kindle - for instance it is not a smartphone so apps for the market may not be suitable.

        Amazon provides a protected market in much the same way that Apple does.
        kyron.gustafson@...
        • Agree with Kyron.Gustafson - "Closed" Kindle market is a plus to me

          I like the fact that Amazon is vetting the apps and that they're guaranteed to work on the Kindle. Bought my daughter a Galaxy Tab 2 and I'm sick to death of intrusive advertising, unreliable app performance and constantly having to worry if I'm getting a malicious app. I'm willing to trade freedom for control on my tablet (unlike my personal life, where I rebel at the increasing police state actions of our government... sorry to digress into soap-box mode, everyone).
          JimboNobody
          • Closed to outside USA = Open Slather for Android

            As long as Kindle Fire etc. are bound to the USA, there will always be a market - a few hundred million people in China, India, Southeast Asia, Pacific, Europe...
            Even if Google abandoned the USA I estimate they could outsell the Kindle by about 5 to 1 if they played it smart.
            Remind me again whats so good about Kindle's closed market?
            alan_r_cam
          • Closed maybe your way, thank god we have a choice

            Yes, closed markets like Apple's and Amazon's can be very well suited for some, but others (like me), like to have an open ecosystem to play in!
            And by the way Android was built to be open .. just in case you forgot.
            Freedom to do what you want ..
            CND-Dude
      • And your budget tablet runs WHAT version of Android???

        Running the very latest version of JB on mine. What are you up to? 4.0.0???
        mlwinnig@...
        • Agree... but

          I agree with you, but the Kindle was not made to be a Android device, like we love.
          It's like taking a perfectly good dog and shrinking it to fit in you purse. You can do it but does it make it better? No, it makes it a stupid rodent!
          I suspect you get my sarcasm ... lol
          CND-Dude
      • Wrong.

        While you don't have the Google Play, you can load other stores like 1mobile market.

        The face is, the interface is smooth and it never crashes or hangs like the Nexus 7. Everything is easy to find, unlike the fragmentation and poor UI design of most Android devices.

        Amazon has made the best Android tablet by far, IMO. I would buy another if I were in the market for another tablet.
        Turismo
        • Want to buy mine?

          I have a Kindle Fire HD 10.1, and an older Archos A9. In every HARDWARE way, the Kindle is far superior to the Archos. But the Archos runs Android 4.1, and the Kindle runs Amazon's dumbed down, crappy UI and provides access to a tiny sliver of the apps that my Archos (and Galaxy Note II phone) can use, and in some cases, the Amazon store versions of the apps are older, buggier ones. And let's not even talk about Silk vs. Chrome (or even Opera.) The bottom line is that my Kindle gets used for occasional book reading and movie watching, and the Archos gets used for everything else. As soon as Android 5 comes out, I'm going to buy a tablet with that and sell the Kindle.

          As far as the subject of this article, remember that if the hardware gets cheap enough for Amazon to sell Kindle Fires for $100, it'll be cheap enough for Archos, Samsung, Asus, and the others to sell their tablets for $100 too.
          Steve Summers
    • At $199, $99. or Free, it's not going to matter.

      Amazon is really just giving people a vehicle to order their online products. If I have $199 or $99 free cash to throw around, how is that really different than it being free?
      Joe.Smetona
  • sub $100

    At sub $100 prices a tablet could be a toy worth playing with, at current prices, I see no real utility for me.

    I played with some of the el cheapo under $100 tablets at Fry's and while they were under powered, missing features like Bluetooth, and had pretty lame displays, I actually found the resistive touch screen was actually better for my fingers than the capacitive ones on phones.

    I'm sure I'm in the minority, but I just don't know why most touch screens and pads don't work worth a crap with my fingers.
    wally_333
    • wash your hands.

      Cheetos dust doesn't work well with touch screens. :)
      Komplex
      • LOL

        I like it, and your totally right, they don't work well with anything on your fingers. I hate it when I get smears and crap all over the screen.
        Sean Buckman
      • komplex .. LOL, yes siree!

        ... there's also naked, eating Cheetos and sitting in a bean-bag - while surfing cable.

        (DISCLAIMER: this is NOT based on personal experience, just a thought (brought to mind) based on Ron White's "testimony" on the Blue Collar Comedy Tour @ 2000 through 2006 ;P )
        thx-1138_