Airspan: WiMax critic chose cost over performance

Airspan: WiMax critic chose cost over performance

Summary: After one ISP reportedly claimed WiMax was a "disaster" that didn't perform, its network equipment supplier Airspan has hit back, defending the technology and labelling the ISP cheap.

SHARE:

After one ISP reportedly claimed WiMax was a "disaster" that didn't perform, its network equipment supplier Airspan has hit back, defending the technology and labelling the ISP cheap.

Speaking at a WiMax conference in Bangkok last week Garth Freeman, CEO of Buzz Broadband, disparaged the technology, according to a report in Communications Day. Freeman said that WiMax's range was limited to two kilometres and it was unable to support VoIP, the report said.

The small Queensland ISP previously provided WiMax-based broadband to around 200 users in regional Queensland, according to its kit supplier Airspan. The ISP had received funding under the Federal government's Broadband Connect initiative until last year, when it was replaced by the Australian Broadband Guarantee (ABG) in April 2007. Buzz Broadband is not listed under the government's official ABG suppliers.

"Mr Freeman's recent statements highlighted two complaints: the range of the solution, and the quality of service capabilities for voice traffic," said a spokesperson for wireless technology manufacturer Airspan in a statement.

"Airspan offers both micro-cell and macro-cell base station solutions, Buzz Broadband opted to go with the less expensive micro-cell technology in order to reduce cost. This was a well understood trade off of cost versus range," the spokesperson said.

The manufacturer has claimed that Buzz's network was under provisioned and was never going to provide the coverage and quality of service that had been promised to its users, with its spokesperson saying the company "doesn't know" how Freeman could have been surprised with the coverage and associated latency issues.

"In the case of Buzz Broadband, we know that there were significant under-provisioning issues in the core network which connected the Airspan equipment to the Internet," said the company's spokesperson.

"Very early in the relationship, Airspan technical services determined that Buzz's backhaul network was considerably under-dimensioned — again to save cost — and lacked sufficient quality of service, and that these factors were the direct cause of VoIP quality issues in the network."

Airspan Australia's managing director, Grant Stepa, told ZDNet.com.au today that the company had offered to fund independent analysis from a group of telecommunications "industry veterans" to determine what needed to be done to correct problems with Buzz's service and improve its coverage.

"They made no attempt whatsoever to follow our course of action; we gave them [Buzz] advice on what to do with their backend network infrastructure and suggested ways to rectify the other problems they were having," said Stepa.

The Airspan managing director said that it has other significant Australian customers using the "exactly the same technology" with no such complaints, such as South Australian based ISP Internode.

"We're not talking to them [Buzz] anymore, obviously comments like the ones he made would hurt the relationship... they've not replied to our specific concerns with their network and the ways to fix them, ultimately we just want to see the technology work," he said.

Buzz CEO Garth Freeman was unavailable when ZDNet.com.au contacted Buzz's head office today. Another Buzz representative declined a request for comment.

ZDNet.co.uk's David Meyer contributed to this report.

Topics: Broadband, Government, Government AU, Networking, Unified Comms, NBN, Wi-Fi

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

2 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Cost v Features

    So here we go - a small insight into the ISP world - it is seen as a high margin business - but only if you have scale - so the smaller ISP's buy cheap stuff to deliver their services - and 9 times out of 10 it doesn't matter.

    Lets see how the OPEL network goes?
    anonymous
  • Independant testing

    Reponse times during my companies test showed 20-300ms response times, and with 2 Linksys VoIP adaptors set up for direct IP dialing plugged directly into the SDA's with allowances for VERY HIGH jitter, still had a considerable impact on VoIP quality even when compared to a standard 256/64 DSL link.
    It was also the same type of equipment Buzz is using, and since we had no load on ours I would suggest that Freemans comments are spot on.
    anonymous