Anonymous to launch Wikileaks clone TYLER

Anonymous to launch Wikileaks clone TYLER

Summary: Support is gone for Assange -- and now a new safe haven for whistleblowers may be on the cards.

SHARE:
TOPICS: Security
7

According to a member of the hacking collective, there are plans to set up a similar service to Wikileaks by the end of the year.

anonymous tyler project rival wikileaks

A Wikileaks competitor is in the works, and due to be launched on December 21 this year, according to The Hacker News. A representative of the loose hacktivist group -- who said he was representing the collective as a whole -- spoke about the project in an emailed interview with the Voice of Russia.

The project is called TYLER, and will be based on decentralized, peer-to-peer technology rather than fixed, dedicated servers. If successful, in the same way as torrents need seeding parties, user participation will be necessary to keep information flowing. The hackers claim that this kind of project setup will be next to impossible to close or eradicate.

It will be based on the same principles as Wikileaks -- a haven for whistleblowers or those with access to sensitive information to publish documents on a public platform.

When asked about the future of Wikileaks and the role of Anonymous, the "representative" said:

"Julian has threatened on at least one previous occasion to pull the plug on the project because the fundraising was not meeting his expectations. It was at that time that Anonymous began planning to field our own alternative disclosure platforms. Julian desperately needs WikiLeaks, and he is the only one that can pull the plug on the project. I rather think that so long as he is in dire straits, he will not do so despite any threats from him to the contrary."

It is necessary to keep in mind that by the nature of the anonymous group, this may not reflect the intentions or wishes of the entire Anonymous community.

However, according to the hacker, the project has been spurred on due to the forced funding techniques recently employed by Wikileaks through a paywall blocking access the Global Information files. A statement was released by one or more members of the collective, claiming that Wikileaks "betrayed" them by such "rabid scrounging for money", and withdrawing support not only for the site, but for Julian Assange -- who is currently taking refuge in the London-based Ecuadorian embassy.

Image credit: C.Osborne/ZDNet

Topic: Security

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

7 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Glad to hear this...

    Freedom needs to "adapt and overcome" (to use a military phrase) if it wishes to endure. Governments are becoming more and more Big Brotherish with their proposed laws such as CISPA, SOPA, PIPA, and others. We need a decentralized unstoppable organization like TYLER. I just hope it is coded well and lives up to expectations because if it does then it will be a powerful weapon in keeping the powerful in check.
    josh92
  • Hmmm.

    tyler.com domain

    Registrar: TUCOWS.COM CO.
    Whois Server: whois.tucows.com
    Creation Date: 11-MAY-1995
    Updated Date: 04-JAN-2007
    Expiration Date: 12-MAY-2013
    Nameserver: DNS1.SPYDERINTERNET.COM
    Nameserver: DNS2.SPYDERINTERNET.COM

    guess they may need a new name...
    SpankyFrost
    • Why would you assume .com?

      Obviously it would more than likely be a .org or a .net.
      dimonic
  • Re: Hmmm.

    tylerleaks.com domain

    -is available.
    1000154053
  • The problem with a peer-to-peer system...

    ...is that it is likely to become a convenient means to publish whatever dirt anyone might want to reveal about anyone else (which might not even be true). At least Wikileaks has an editor.

    If the Anons want TYLER to have any value at all, they will need to address the QC issue.

    But be careful what you wish for...
    John L. Ries
    • I should note...

      ...the problem I have with sites like Wikileaks is that they appear to be predicated on the notion that nobody should have any secrets; that there should be no such thing as confidentiality (which really means that there is no such thing as privacy); that we should all live in glass houses.

      I don't know about anyone else, but I don't want to live in siuch a world.
      John L. Ries
      • We already live in that world

        Just corporations and governments want exemption. Glass houses are just for ordinary citizens, not for the 1%.
        dimonic