Apple fans face a big iWait on new product categories, services
Summary: Apple teased new products and services in the year ahead, but it's unclear whether a better dividend and shareholder cash will buy the company more patience.
Apple entered its fiscal second quarter earnings report with a bevy of questions and now faces even more.
The second quarter was solid relative to expectations and the outlook was light, but CEO Tim Cook also teased new products and services but in 2014 most likely. Cook said:
We see great opportunities in front of us, particularly given the long-term prospects of the smartphone and tablet markets, the strength of our incredible ecosystem, which we plan to continue to augment with new services, our plans for expanded distribution, and the potential of exciting new product categories.
After the report, we're all left with the following questions:
- What does the product innovation pipeline look like?
- Can Apple generate new software and services hits?
- Does Apple begin to monetize its customer base---and those iTunes and App Store accounts---to look more like PayPal or Amazon?
- And can Apple deliver game changing products in the post-Steve Jobs era?
That latter question is the one that dangles. William Blair analyst Anil Doradla cuts to the chase:
From our point of view, the Apple story boils down to one thing—the ability to generate new product cycles over the next six months, enabling revenue reacceleration and leverage.
Apple's outlook already tells you what's coming in the fall---a low cost iPhone for the emerging markets. The company said its gross margins in the June quarter will fall from 36 percent from 37 percent. Analysts expect gross margins to fall from there. Apple needs the emerging markets and will sacrifice profit margins for them.
Why would Apple chase market share? Because the user base may become more important than the devices. Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty said in a research report:
Perhaps most interesting was Apple’s increased focus on content/software/services, which hit a $16B+ annual revenue run rate, up 30% Y/Y. Apple also broadened its comments on product pipeline to include software, services, and new product categories. Most interesting to us is the potential for a killer service, like mobile payments, to better monetize the 500M+ account base and drive further differentiation and share gains in mobile devices.
So far the payments thing for Apple has been lackluster, but you see where the company is going. In the future, Apple may be more about services than devices. The iPhone and iPad could just be the lure that hooks you.
This revenue mix, outlined by Deutsche Bank, would materially change away from hardware.

In the end, content, services, cloud and payments all sound promising. The issue is Apple hasn't proven it can deliver more than content services and great devices so far. Apple is handing over more cash to shareholders---the company's dividend yield will be on par with Coca-Cola's after a 15 percent increase in the dividend---to alleviate the worries, but the company has a bit more to prove.
Barclays analyst Ben Reitzes said:
While the reception of the iPhone 5 and execution of late has tested our patience, the cash announcement, performance and guidance set Apple up better into product cycles predicated on platform/service innovations.
Indeed, a $100 billion capital return program is nothing to sneeze at, but Deutsche Bank analyst Chris Whitmore noted it only goes so far. "Shareholder friendly initiatives will certainly appeal to investors but does not hide the fact that Apple needs to introduce a 5 inch iPhone, a new 5S and a low cost iPhone for emerging markets," said Whitmore.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
iDumbs.
And yet
I can tell you
Surface ReTard
Surface Pro
Owllllllllllllturd
OPINION
Congratulations!
"Many analysts are also predicting..."
Huh.
Yes but...
So, lets say that Apple stinks, they don't, but lets just say for the minute. For the reasons above they will still retain the vast majority of their customers.
A material factor that gets left out of most of the type of discussion going on in blogs like this is that Apple is a business, and not a theory based think tank or a P.R. firm. That is not to say that Apple doesn't take those types of factors into consideration, but that is not the primary focus of their business.
The real down side for all the IT equipment /solution produces / providers is that much like the evolution of automobiles, the industry as a whole is reaching the point where customer's real needs are already being met. Instead of great new inovattion, like the V-8 engine, automatic transmissions, / 3g -4g, high res screens, now they are fighting over extra cup holders, a stock sub-woofer for the radio, the speakers in the front not the back on the phone / the camera in this or that positon, thumb accessible icons.
Another example of the same concept is what happened to digital watches and calculators from the time they were introduced for big money until now when you can get choice of functional models for under $10.
Apple has built a loyal following
Everyone is trying to beat Apple sales numbers...
Feeling a bit defensive
True true
True, some other day
Apparently, Apple products are good for the users, or they will not be spending their hard earned money and buy -- even during difficult economic times.
...good sales, rubbish products...
Steve Jobs
Try some other explanation. This does not hold water. Again, that NA cars "phenomena" was before the Internet.
rubbish
I hoped Mickeysoft would have "stolen" more for OS 10 but no, they keep throwing crap on the market.
Everytime someone talks about how great OS X is....
No version of Windows has ever completely destroyed whole volumes on a HD
Great. They helped to standardize computer architecture on the Intel 8080-based processor instead of the (at the time) superior 6502 architecture that was already in widespread use in nearly every home in America. We owe them for that.
Great. We developers had to deal with some bonehead statement by a Harvard dropout who said "No program will ever require more than 640K to run." That piece of computing history stuck with us for twenty years. Incidentally, that same Harvard dropout just released a scaled down operating system that only takes 2GB of system memory and works on a touchscreen that he 'modestly' calls THE Surface.
Great. Microsoft has recently rewritten their code to 'allow' Linux to run as a 'guest' OS on their system, but you have to use Windows as the host OS. Excuse me? A single-user, GUI-based OS running as a host for a multi-user, command-line-or-gui OS? Microsoft did not miss the boat on that one, they booked passage on the Titanic.
Great. Microsoft freed me from the ability of having development tools readily available when I turn on my computer. Now I have to buy them (or download free ones) separately. Gone are the days of the BASIC interpreter, the C compiler, and even the scripting languages coming with the computer when I pick it up at Best Buy or Wal-Mart. No, now I have to license the language or IDE, and of course the only one that works right in Windows is one made by Microsoft. In fact, the tools that develop cross-platform code are often prevented from being used in cross-platform development by screwed up Microsoft-specific restrictions, like limiting the amount of memory available for the Java stack + heap to 2GB of contiguous memory and allowing a third GB if it is split off and specially accessed, requiring the Windows JVM to be used completely differently from the others.
Yeah, Microsoft is so superior to Apple in those regards. I do agree that Apple overprices their products in many cases, but to say Microsoft never did anything wrong is like saying that the two suspects in the Boston Marathon bombings were just 'boys being boys'.
what the
"Great. They helped to standardize computer architecture on the Intel 8080-based processor instead of the (at the time) superior 6502 architecture that was already in widespread use in nearly every home in America. We owe them for that.:-) "
the 6502 and the Apple 2 in particular was rubbish. I did a ton of machine code on the Apple 2 and developers had to workaround the stupifying architecture of the Apple 2.
the fact it sold in great numbers proves that inferior design can be compensated with superior marketing.
Crappy hodge-podge ..
Nothing better to do and your self esteem needing a boost?