Are virtual currencies reality or illusion?

Are virtual currencies reality or illusion?

Summary: We are still talking about the potential of virtual currencies, despite all the considerable advances in technology over the last 20 years, the significant spread of globalization, and how it might impact financial transactions.

TOPICS: E-Commerce

Last week's U.S. Senate hearings on virtual currencies may, in time, be seen to be a significant step in legitimizing virtual currencies.


Bitcoin's value soared off the back of Senator Chuck Schumer's "endorsement" highlighting the potential for a new payment platform and the rise of alternative currencies and Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke's earlier statement that such currencies "may hold long-term promise, particularly if the innovations promote a faster, more secure and more efficient payment system".

But a cautionary note inevitably follows as regulators continue to struggle with how virtual currencies will be regulated and law enforcement agencies warn of the danger of illegal use. Within days of all this optimism, a collapse in the yuan-denominated market for Bitcoins in China, triggered by a wave of panic and profit-taking, brought investors back down to earth.

In addition, virtual currencies face competition from other digital payment initiatives. As reported in ZDNet last week, PayPal expressed the view that digital wallets could be more successful than Bitcoin to become the biggest payment innovation since credit cards and ATMs.

Mondex, 20 years ahead of its time?

In the early 1990s, two executives (Tim Jones and Graham Higgins) at the U.K. bank, National Westminster, invented Mondex, a form of electronic cash. Mondex’s strap-line at the time (which I remember well, as I was involved in that initiative) was "Mondex, the alternative to cash". The Mondex initiative was ambitious with global aspirations. The Mondex card system was proclaimed as "the only electronic cash system in the world to operate with a single technology allowing for cross-border payments. It allows up to five different currencies to be carried on the card at any one time in separate electronic pockets".

Although Mondex was hugely innovative, it did not succeed in delivering on its ambition. Perhaps it was 20 years ahead of its time.

The interesting reality is that, despite all the considerable advances in technology over the last 20 years and the significant spread of globalization, we are still talking about the potential of virtual currencies and digital payments.  

The biggest challenge to virtual currencies and digital payments is persuading large numbers of people that these payment methods are a genuine alternative to cash. There is undoubtedly a market for both innovations and in time they will become part of mainstream commerce and every-day life. Regulators and law enforcement agencies will continue to agonize over how these payment methods can be controlled and legitimate use ensured--but innovations will always present these challenges

At the end of the day, success of virtual currencies will be determined by market confidence and ubiquity. Innovation in payments is exciting but at some point in the payment life-cycle, there will be a desire to "cash-out" and, as a consequence, cash remains king in the eyes of many. According to the U.S. Federal Reserve there was US$1.22 trillion in circulation as of 20 November, 2013. That's an awful lot of cash to compete with.

Topic: E-Commerce

Ian JA Ferguson

About Ian JA Ferguson

Ian Ferguson is a partner at Olswang, specializing in commercial transactions including in relation to sourcing, technology, and telecommunications. He has advised on sourcing transactions involving business processes, IT services, communication services, and facilities management.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Illegal use?

    That is a bit hypocritical isn't it? The US Law Enforcement agencies saying that virtual currencies could be used for illegal purposes. The same is true for the US Dollar, AFAIK, it is the preferred currency for drug and arms deals in most parts of the world. That doesn't stop police officers using the dollar for their own purchases, both departmental and private purchases.
  • Nearly all currencies are "illusion".

    They are only backed by the countries governments willingness to exchange one currency for another.

    Which is also why inflation exists.
  • If nothing else...

    ...they can be seen as large scale economic experiments. In Bitcoin, for example, we get to see how a monetary unit behaves with out any state intervention (value is strictly determined by supply and demand). It's probably not surprising that it's vulnerable to the same sorts of boom/bust cycles that precious metal standards were (only more so, since nobody has to accept it...never true of official currency).

    One thing we've forgotten over the last century is that while inflation is bad, deflation is in some ways worse (unless, of course, you outlaw lending on usury, as the Law of Moses did).
    John L. Ries