Art and anarchy: understanding a computer center suicide bombing

Art and anarchy: understanding a computer center suicide bombing

Summary: A new exhibition explores the meanings of the 1982 suicide bombing at the Wanganui Computer Centre in New Zealand.

SHARE:

In 1982 virtually no one used a computer. Roberts may never have even seen one. Computers were easy to fear.

We are mostly familiar and comfortable with information technology today and value it as a tool for creativity, communications and productivity. But the Snowden leaks give pause for thought.

They show we are being watched, we are being recorded and we have been kept in the dark about what our governments have been doing. They also show at least some of that international surveillance was illegal, as it was in New Zealand when targeted at Mega Upload founder Kim Dotcom.

After apologising to Dotcom, the New Zealand government corrected its errors by legalising surveillance against citizens and permanent residents, a move that sparked nationwide protests.

Now the meanings of Roberts’ action are being reassessed.

A new art exhibition, “doublethink” by Ann Shelton, has recreated in sparklers the words Roberts painted on the toilet wall, erecting a series of photographs, one word on each, along the route he took between his home in Taranaki and his target in Wanganui.

doublethink-1
Ann Shelton's doublethink at Midhurst on the road to Whanganui.

 

The words are a translation from an 1809 proclamation of independence from the Spanish by South America’s first independent government, the Junta Tuitiva in La Paz, in what is now Bolivia.

Over two centuries later, Shelton asks questions about the message’s relevance and meaning in 1982 and to us today.

The exhibition catalogue (pdf), by curator Meredith Robertshawe, offers a quote from Snowden that seems to eerily echo the graffiti Roberts left behind.

“We are actually involved in misleading the public and misleading all the publics, not just the American public, to create a certain mindset in the global consciousness… but the structures of power that exist are working to their own ends to extend their capabilities at the expense of the freedoms of all publics.”

Very little was known about Roberts. He was a blank canvas on which others could and continue to write their own meanings.

He worked in a restaurant in Auckland before moving to Taranaki. He used the name “Null” rather than Neil. He had a dog called Umbrella that was sent to Auckland by train before Roberts went to Wanganui.

But there was that message: “We have maintained a silence closely resembling stupidity.”

In the end, the Computer Centre Roberts hated wasn’t killed by protests or bombs, but by new, more powerful and more ubiquitous technology. The agencies using it were able to set up their own datacentres with vastly more storage capabilities and link these together through high-speed networks.

The Wanganui Computer Centre closed in 1995. But the computers keep humming.

Topics: Data Centers, Privacy, New Zealand, Disaster Recovery

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

5 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Waiting for your sympathetic article on

    Timothy Mcveigh, nobly avenging the death of those murdered by government tyranny at Waco and Ruby Ridge. Because, after all, if the cause is right, terrorist bombings are heroic, right?
    baggins_z
    • Why...

      Why do I suspect that you've written sympathetic pieces on McVeigh?
      dsf3g
      • Thanks for proving my point.

        McVeigh is a monster because we agree with what the government did, the Unabomber is a hero, because we hate evil corporations.

        The reality is, both are murdering terrorists.
        baggins_z
  • Just another nut case

    I am always amazed at the egos of people like Roberts. Who do they think they are to believe that they, and only they, are empowered to do whatever is necessary to bring society into line with their world-view. Not like millions of other people shouldn't get a say.

    Now he's some kind of hero? He's a loser who was willing to kill everyone in that facility. People who had families; people who were someone's sons and daughters. By all accounts he failed at that only because it seems like he detonated prematurely.

    Before the hug-a-thug groupies go out a put flowers on his grave for being some kind of anti-establishment hero, we might want to consider that guys like Roberts are swimming in a sea of their own hypocrisy. Our government has checks and balances, and at the end of the day governments fall, new people run for office, etc. It doesn't work perfectly, or even properly, but it was designed by people, for people.

    Contrast that to our urban hero Roberts. Judge, jury, and executioner. Because he knows the one true path. He is self-empowered. He is a visionary. Only he is best suited to decide. Forget everyone else. In reality at best he's a nut job, and at worst he's no better than the most corrupt government official.

    And that's the real issue. If we think we should be striving for anything, it should be for something better. To think that swapping the self-righteousness of a politician for the self-righteousness of some pimple-faced kid makes any difference at all is insane.
    ITTech001
    • Hug a thug.

      Brilliant. Officially stealing this.
      baggins_z