Dingell tries to slow white spaces vote

Here come the Congress-critters to carry water for the giant corporations that broadcast what they call television and are crazy to stop a national wireless network delivered over the so-called "white spaces," those unused portions of the analog TV spectrum. Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, issued a letter last week challenging the FCC's plans for a formal vote on Tuesday, Nov. 4.

Well, here come the Congress-critters to carry water for the giant corporations that broadcast what they call television and are crazy to stop a national wireless network delivered over the so-called "white spaces," those unused portions of the analog TV spectrum.

Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, issued a letter last week challenging the FCC's plans for a formal vote on Tuesday, Nov. 4, Reuters reported.

Dingell wanted to know whether the FCC's technical analysis was peer-reviewed and why the FCC didn't just license the white spaces out.

"Why did the Commission decline to adopt a licensed approach to some of all of this spectrum?"

Peer reviewed? Does Dingell think the analysis was funded by Google? Or that white space Internet is the equivalent of selling a drug? The FCC has conducted independent analyses and tests of the devices and come to technical conclusions. The idea of peer review is tantamount to a pointless and obstructionist delay.

The vote should be conducted on Nov. 4. There is no reason to delay.

Newsletters

You have been successfully signed up. To sign up for more newsletters or to manage your account, visit the Newsletter Subscription Center.
See All
See All