X
Business

MySpace + Facebook = $14 billion?

Is it irresponsible of CEOs of public corporations to tout seemingly unattainable  valuations of corporate properties? Are corporate Directors harming the companies they advise by publicly declaring outsized self-valuations?
Written by Donna Bogatin, Contributor
dmm82406sc.jpg
Is it irresponsible of CEOs of public corporations to tout seemingly unattainable  valuations of corporate properties? Are corporate Directors harming the companies they advise by publicly declaring outsized self-valuations?

Facebook board member Peter Thiel said last week: “The site's college-aged users make it worth $8 billion or more, as much as Viacom Inc.'s MTV music video channel," according to Bloomberg reports.

Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, News Corp., touted a $6 billion MySpace “flip” price tag to shareholders in Australia last month (see “$6 billion MySpace: Will this Levinsohn cash in?”), a year after acquiring the Web property for $580 million.

As a privately-held company, Facebook is not bound by all of the strict SEC and Sarbanes-Oxley disclosure requirements that publicly traded News Corp. must adhere to.

In “News on Digg acquisition? How about MySpace?” I dissect Murdoch’s claim that the MySpace multi-year outsourced search deal with Google “more than pays for the MySpace acquisition.”

Rather than the touted “landmark agreement,” I characterize  the MySpace search services agreement with Google as a normal course of business change of vendor decision and ask: “Have News Corporation shareholders been mislead?”

Thiel does not risk misleading public shareholders by waving multi-billion dollar valuation wishes, but he does risk tarnishing his credibility and that of the company he serves.

TAKE THE POLL: Facebook: Sale, or no sale?

ALSO: Exclusive: Glam.com Samir Arora on new media valuations

Editorial standards