Napster: Judge misinterpreted law

Summary:In a brief submitted late Friday to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Napster's lawyers argued that an injunction issued last month by U.

In a brief submitted late Friday to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Napster's lawyers argued that an injunction issued last month by U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel was based on faulty interpretation of the laws. The order was put on hold after the appeals court issued a stay. Full story. -- Charles Cooper, ZDNet News

Topics: Legal

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Related Stories

The best of ZDNet, delivered

You have been successfully signed up. To sign up for more newsletters or to manage your account, visit the Newsletter Subscription Center.
Subscription failed.