New Thunderbolt RAID iMac: lessons learned

Summary:The Thunderbolt RAID/iMac out of the box experience isn't up to Apple standards. But how is it once the system stands up?

The Thunderbolt RAID/iMac out of the box experience isn't up to Apple standards. But what happens after the system stands up?

(Read my 1st report for background on some of the issues I talk about here.)

RAM up The standard 4GB of RAM is inadequate for the 3.4GHz Sandy Bridge I7 quad-core. The Mac activity monitor shows that 8 GB should be the minimum - unless you do nothing more taxing than open 1 browser tab and read your mail - and if you want a workstation 16 GB is your sweet spot.

With 16 GB installed - which took me about 10 minutes and doesn't void the warranty - it was a new system. My normal workload uses over 9 GB of physical RAM and swap file size stayed near 0. Once I'm back to video production I expect to use it all.

Update: I'm refering to this specific, top-of-the-line iMac configuration, not Macs in general. My MacBook Air is a real workhorse on 4GB. If you're going to invest $2200 in this iMac, plan on adding at least 4GB or better yet, 12GB of RAM to get all the performance you're paying for. End update.

FCP 7 My problem with Final Cut Pro was more serious than I'd hoped: I had to reinstall the entire suite from 6 DVDs. This knowledge base note explains how to recover from a failed FCP migration to a new system.

System performance I ran Xbench on both the old system and the new iMac. The old system was a quad-core 2.66 GHz Mac Pro with some major upgrades: 300GB 10k Velociraptor drive; 1GB ATI Radeon 5770 graphics card; and 12GB RAM.

The iMac has the standard 1TB hard drive, short-stroked by partitioning, the standard 1 GB AMD Radeon HD 6970M video card, 16GB RAM, and the upgraded BTO 3.4 GHz I7 processor.

The overall Xbench score jumped from 185.51 to 269.65, a solid 45% boost. Transcoding a 2 hour, 4GB video file to H.264 took about 40 minutes - way faster than the old Mac Pro.

Thunderbolt array performance I ran the Blackmagic Design disk speed test a couple of times on the 4 drive Promise Pegasus Thunderbolt RAID 5: once with an empty array and again when it was more than ? full. There was little difference in the results.

Here's the over-third-full results:

The little array can handle full 1080p at maximum color depth and space - for a single user workstation - and more in more common formats. Which means it could support a couple of workstations in a shared storage environment - such as with the soon-to-be-free Xsan 2 cluster file system.

Whether Xsan support for shared Thunderbolt storage will materialize is another question, but the potential is tantalizing. Imagine a couple of quad-core MacBook Pros coming in from the field, plugging into a Thunderbolt array and Xsan cluster, and sharing storage and computes with the rest of the shop. Nice.

The little array would be even faster - and safer (see RAIDfail: don't use RAID 5 on small arrays) - configured as a RAID 0 with frequent backups. I plan to do that once I get the requisite hardware.

Running the numbers Was it worth it? Here's how I look at the math.

The entire kit came ?$3,450 - BTO iMac, Thunderbolt cable, Pegasus array and 16GB RAM - plus tax. I sold my Mac Pro tower for $2k, leaving a net cost of $1450. Since the 27" 2560x1440 display I wanted lists at $1k or more, my net cost for 45% more performance, dual Thunderbolt ports and what I expect will be a long-lived array expandable to 12TB or more is $450.

That's a steal.

The Storage Bits take Lessons learned:

  • Thunderbolt works as advertised: fast and seamless. I plugged my 3rd HD display into the array with no problems.
  • The latest iMacs need at least 8GB RAM to function anywhere near their potential - and 16GB is better. Luckily, non-Apple RAM is about $10/GB.
  • Surprised at how hot the iMac runs: 135 degrees F at idle. Increased fan speeds with SMCfancontrol and now it is much cooler and slightly noisier.
  • While Promise has done an admirable job on the management interface, RAID arrays are complex and non-intuitive. If you use the array as configured from the factory it is a simple plug, wait and play process. Otherwise non-sysadmins will face a steep learning curve.
  • The set-up time for a workstation-class iMac is longer than a standard iMac. Allow a day or 2 to get fully configured, data transferred and everything else configured to your liking.

Much of my long-term satisfaction with this buy depends on how Thunderbolt evolves. If it flops I won't have the I/O options I'd like - or they'll be expensive. But after the initial surprises - see yesterday's report - I'm pleased today.

Comments welcome, of course. I'll continue reporting on Thunderbolt and my experiences using it here.

Topics: Processors, Hardware, Storage

About

Harris has been working with computers for over 35 years and selling and marketing data storage for over 30 in companies large and small. He introduced a couple of multi-billion dollar storage products (DLT, the first Fibre Channel array) to market, as well as a many smaller ones. Earlier he spent 10 years marketing servers and networks.... Full Bio

zdnet_core.socialButton.googleLabel Contact Disclosure

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Related Stories

The best of ZDNet, delivered

You have been successfully signed up. To sign up for more newsletters or to manage your account, visit the Newsletter Subscription Center.
Subscription failed.