The double standard on Apple's behavior

Considering the fact that Microsoft has received a MASSIVE beating on ZDNet and just about every other technology publication and that there has been virtually no coverage on Apple's behavior, there is absolutely nothing left for me to say on Microsoft WGA and that it's only right that someone makes a single blog entry covering Apple. I also haven't done a very good job of "sucking up to Microsoft" since I've criticized Microsoft plenty in the past not to mention the fact that listing all of these negative stories probably doesn't go over very well with Microsoft PR. So either I'm telling the truth that I treat Microsoft like everyone else or I'm the world's most incompetent shill ever.

When I dared criticize Apple's own version of the WGA fiasco yesterday, I was swamped with criticism that I was picking on poor old Apple.  Some like Dave.Leigh defended Apple's actions as "normal" while others like mvora writes:

Contrary to your claims to "call out companies" when they do wrong, you don't have a single blog entry about Microsoft's intrusive WGA program.

Considering the fact that Microsoft has received a MASSIVE beating on ZDNet and just about every other technology publication and that there has been virtually no coverage on Apple's behavior, there is absolutely nothing left for me to say on Microsoft WGA and it's only right that someone makes a single blog entry covering Apple.  A quick search on "Microsoft WGA" on news.zdnet.com came up with the following results for news stories and blogs:

ZDNet news items on Microsoft WGA fiasco:

ZDNet blog items on Microsoft WGA fiasco:

Now this certainly doesn't look like Apple is being unfairly picked because of a single blog posting criticizing their strange and unauthorized every-8-hour phone-home behavior.  Of course I'm not saying that Microsoft doesn't deserve to be criticized, just that we need to hold all companies equally accountable when they do something dumb or bad.

Still, reader barsteward is still unsatisfied and is accusing me of being "too scared to do a MS bashing" and that I'm sucking up to Microsoft for a job.  Well I can say with certainty that I am enjoying my role here at TechRepublic and ZDNet and that I am not looking for alternative employment.  I also haven't done a very good job of "sucking up to Microsoft" since I've criticized Microsoft plenty in the past not to mention the fact that listing all of these negative stories probably doesn't go over very well with Microsoft PR.  So either I'm telling the truth that I treat Microsoft like everyone else or I'm the world's most incompetent shill ever.  Here are a few examples of my criticism on Microsoft:

So barsteward, are you going to suggest that these four blog entries are bought and paid for by Microsoft?  Perhaps you think they would look good on a resume that I can submit to Microsoft?

Something that I have noticed is that whenever I do criticize Microsoft, I don't get an army of apologists bashing me that I'm wrong in doing so and why Microsoft doesn't deserve the criticism.  I certainly don't have people demanding that I make an obligatory bashing of Microsoft's competitors to put Microsoft's bashing in the right context otherwise known as "spin control".  So long as Apple's users insist on apologizing and rationalizing Apple's mistakes rather than hold them accountable, Apple will continue to behave in this manner.

Newsletters

You have been successfully signed up. To sign up for more newsletters or to manage your account, visit the Newsletter Subscription Center.
See All
See All