Part Three - Misses for HR Software in 2012
Where are the women, minorities, youth, etc. in HR software leadership? I took this picture at Oracle Open World this year. With the red background, it looked too much like a Republican National Convention Panel than what I’d expect from a hip, cool, Californian HR vendor. While I suspect there was nothing intentional by Oracle of this, I do believe they need to address the issue before next year’s event.
Confusing Acquisitions with Innovation or Cloud Leadership – Okay, so a big ol’ on-premise software company went and bought a cloud HR product. Does that make the big on-premise vendor a cloud leader? I don’t think so.
You can give an on-premise vendor a blood transfusion but that doesn’t change its DNA. It’s an on-premise vendor with an acquired cloud application. It takes time for a tiger to change its stripes, if it even can.
Cloud-ignorant HR processes - As was alluded to in Part 1, all sorts of new cloud-based apps and data sources are impacting HR processes. I wrote about this phenomena months ago and even shared some graphics I developed with the consultancy Baker Tilly.
HR (and most every other business process) is being changed and traditional HR software vendors are NOT aware or caring about the changes. This is why LinkedIn is displacing ATS software. It's why third parties are creating the personal curation tools that are tied to workers (not employers). If HR vendors don't snap to, they'll find they're selling into one half of the HR software marketplace (for employers) and totally ignoring the other (for employees, job seekers and free-agents). The latter may become a bigger and bigger part of the picture.
Cloud Johnny Come Lately – Likewise, when an on-premise vendor has a track record of bashing cloud solutions, multi-tenancy and other potential threats to their kingdom and then, voila, suddenly reverses course, are we supposed to celebrate? I don’t think so.
How predictable are some vendors in their attacks on forward leaning technologies. First, they absolutely disparage the new technology. Then, they qualify their disdain to a portion of the new technology until they finally develop their own version of the technology. Only then is the technology an approved technology which, to hear them tell it, they supported all along.
Too much focus on “customer-driven” product direction – Whenever you hear this from a software vendor, run. This vendor is waiting on you, the customer, to tell them what to do. Apple anticipates and designs products you didn’t know you wanted or needed. Who needs a vendor with zero imagination and innovation to give you something you’re already seeing from other vendors and, worse still, give it to you years late?
One vendor executive told me that it would be “suicide” for them to craft a vision for their customers. Really?
Some focus on customer-driven product direction is appropriate but abdicating total direction to the customers that a vendor already has is a prescription for failure long-term.
Disclosure: Information for this year-end summary came from a variety of vendor interactions over the course of the year. Many were from telephone and internet briefings. Some occurred as a result of attending vendor or analyst events. For some of those, vendors may have reimbursed travel and/or lodging costs. Some did none of that. No vendors paid for my time in covering their events or announcements nor do I accept compensation for that. I do own a few shares of Workday stock.