SOAPformally started out, and still technically stands for, "Simple ObjectAccess Protocol." This jumble of words isn't going to impress anyone atparties, is it?
We have SOA now, so doesn't just make sense to tie SOAP to SOA? For some time, some folks in the Microsoft camphave, in fact, preferred to call it "Service-Oriented ArchitectureProtocol," which makes infinitely more sense. Sure it's only semantics,but it provides more cohesion to the Web services-to-SOA concept.
Mike Champion of Software AG, in a post on the W3C site, valiantly attempts to attach meaning to both acronyms. In the Simple Object Access Protocol, a SOAP message invokes a remote object from a local host. In the Service Oriented Architecture Protocol, a SOAP message represents the information needed to invoke a service.
Soundsgood. But many in the industry have simply dispensed with this wholeformality and have taken to just calling SOAP "SOAP," and not mentionthat it stands for something. What really matters, of course, is ifSOAP does its job and improves our business and systems transactions.And washes the grime out.