The IDC white paper outlines the immense local ecosystem that Windows has allowed to flourish in Europe.
Within the six countries, more than 20 percent of all IT employment will be Windows Vista-related in the first 12 months of deployment, a figure that will grow substantially in 2008, when IDC expects Vista to account for 80 percent of Microsoft client operating systems shipped to enterprises. Thirty million computers in the six countries will run Vista in its first 12 months, and 105 million worldwide.
Moreover, for every euro of revenue that Microsoft makes, companies within the IT ecosystem will, on average, make more than 13 euros, IDC found. In the UK, hardware companies are expected to see 7.24 euros of revenue, software companies 3.64 euros and services companies 2.74 euros per euro of Microsoft's Vista revenue, for a total of 13.62 euros.
According to Microsoft, that's not a bad payback for an investment that's such a modest part of companies' overall IT budgets - 1 percent of the 214bn euros the region will spend on IT in 2007 and roughly 5 percent of the packaged software spend.
"The economic opportunity Windows Vista creates for small and large companies across the region is clearly much more significant," stated Jean-Philippe Courtois, president of Microsoft International.
European companies may not be directly involved in developing Vista, but they are participants nonetheless, IDC said.
"Windows Vista is not just a product of Microsoft. In the marketplace, it will be a constellation of solutions and services delivered by an entire ecosystem," wrote Gantz, Gillen and Warmerdam. "The launch of Windows Vista will precipitate cascading economic benefits, from increased employment in the region and increased taxes to a stronger economic base for those 150,000+ local firms that will be selling and servicing products that run on Windows Vista."
Such benefits may help explain why Microsoft has only faced antitrust actions relatively recently. "Microsoft does create economic opportunities, and that's probably why they didn't get slapped around by the Department of Justice sooner - it wasn't taking all the money for itself," said RedMonk principal analyst James Governor.
In 2000 the Department of Justice found that Windows was an illegal monopoly, and originally intended to break up the company. The European Commission in 2004 found that Microsoft had illegally used its Windows client monopoly to expand its market share in servers. Microsoft has not yet complied with all antitrust remedies, according to the Commission.
Critics of Microsoft say that looking at jobs and economic growth doesn't tell the full story. For instance, a monopoly may create jobs, but can harm innovation, according to antitrust authorities. "If you want to foster a local product-based economy, there is certainly an argument that says it may not be beneficial if there are companies with aggressive policies that try to limit local companies' ability to grow and innovate," Governor said.
Open source advocates, particularly in poorer countries, argue that dependence on Microsoft and other overseas-based, proprietary software companies may not allow the development of high-level IT skills in the local economy. That was the argument made in a famous open letter written to Microsoft by Peruvian congressman Dr. Edgar Villanueva in 2002.
"In respect of the jobs generated by proprietary software in countries like ours, these mainly concern technical tasks of little aggregate value," Villanueva wrote. In September 2005 Peru approved a Villanueva-sponsored bill promoting the use of open source software by the government, despite criticism from Microsoft.