I liked what I've seen of HP's Linux-based webOS. Still I did not think, given Apple and Android's leading in cutting edge smartphones and tablets, that webOS had much of a shot. Maybe I was wrong. I'm not the only doubter who after HP's latest webOS presentation now thinks that HP's webOS devices may yet find a place in the red-hot smartphone and tablet markets.
The devices, including the tiny HP Veer smartphone; the Pre 3 with its HD video recording and powered by a 1.4GHz Qualcomm CPU, and the 9.7-inch TouchPad with its Qualcomm Snapdragon dual-CPU APQ8060 1.2-GHz processor and 16 to 32GBs of storage all sounded and looked great at HP's great webOS device unveiling party.
What I found most interesting though was that HP is planning on taking webOS 3.0 to laptops and desktops as well. What's this!? HP wants to get into the Linux-based desktop operating system business!? As my buddy from the Washington Post, Rob Pegoraro put it, "'We're going to bring webOS to PCs'" almost two hours into a keynote raises the bar on burying the lede."
I wonder what Microsoft thinks about one of their more faithful partners going into direct competition with them on the desktop? Not much I'll bet you. My ZDNet compadre Sam Diaz thinks HP's move will send "shockwaves through some glass offices" in Redmond. I think it may shatter some of them.
It was annoying to Microsoft when Dell decided to start shipping Ubuntu Linux, but for HP to not only start shipping a Linux desktop, but a house-brand Linux of its very own? This is not news that Microsoft wants to hear.
But, while all this new webOS gear sure looks nifty and neat, I'd sure like to know a lot more about such little things as price, battery life, and availability. I'd also like to know a lot more about webOS 3.0, its application programming interface (API), and its software development kit (SDK).
Sure webOS' built-in suite of applications, such as the HP Synergy unified communications app. Suite that keeps email, instant messaging, contacts, calendar, videos and video calling looks better than ever, but how does an indy developer do that kind of stuff?
In time, HP will deliver all that, and let's say I develop a killer app. how am I going to get it to the webOS users? If it were an iPad app, I'd start jumping through the Apple iTunes App Store hoops or, far more easily, getting his or her program onto the Google Android Market. But, how do I go about easily reaching webOS customers? Good question, HP doesn't seem to have a good answer: Not yet anyway.
Which is why, at the end of the day, while I think webOS could be a contender; I don't say that it's going to be one. HP, behind all the flash and glitter, has a lot of important questions yet to answer both for consumers-price, battery life, ship dates-and for developers--an operating system refresh, SDKs, and APIs.