Don't get me wrong. I think it's great that the FCC has approved the use of "white spaces" for wireless networking. But, come on people, it's neither "Wi-Fi on Steroids" nor is it "Super Wi-Fi." Not yet anyway.
Maybe someday it will be, but right now the only thing that's "Super" about it is its range of 30 to 100 kilometers. The speed though-and isn't that what we always end up caring about when it comes to networking-is a rather pedestrian 1.5Mbps (Megabits per second) and 384 Kbps (Kilobits per second).
That presumes, of course, that the ISP behind such a wireless network has the infrastructure in place to support that kind of speed for say a hundred-thousand customers. They might not. One of the big reasons why WiMAX has been so slow to deploy in the U.S. and LTE (Long Term Evolution) is barely out of the starting blocks, is that the ultra-high-speed Internet backbones needed to support them are still being built.
Still, white space networking is currently based on IEEE 802.22 Wireless Regional Area Network. It will need to be replaced by a much faster standard before I'll get excited about it.
On the plus side, 802.22 isn't tied to phone companies the way that WiMAX and LTE are. White space networking also has a lot of industry powerhouses behind it, including, far from least, Google. It could end up being the kind of real high-speed bandwidth, say 10Mbps up and down over square miles instead of square yards, that so many of crave. Even in the best case though that won't be for years.
As it is, I think that 802.22 has real possibilities for rural neighborhoods where pigeons are sometimes faster than the local Internet connections. But, "Super?" I don't see "Super." Not yet anyway.