Why Java won't be GPL'd

Summary:Rumors have been swirling lately about what license Sun will choose for open source Java. One thing's clear to me - it won't be GPLv3.

Rumors have been swirling lately about what license Sun will choose for open source Java. One thing's clear to me - it won't be GPLv3. I know Jonathan Schwartz says that "using a GPL license is very much *on* the table", but the DRM restrictions famously pointed out by Linus Torvalds will almost certainly put the kibosh on that. I suppose they could use GPLv2, but it would be very unusual for a large contribution like the JDK to be stuck at a back-level of the license (Linux is the only other example that comes to mind).

The problem is that GPLv3 section 3 (2nd draft) says "no permission is given for modes of conveying that deny users that run covered works the full exercise of the legal rights granted by this License". RMS wants to make sure that users can switch the software in their hardware devices that run GPL code, to prevent vendor lock-in. But this is the bread and butter of cell phone makers. Most won't even allow you to make your own ring tones for goodness sakes.

Now, whether that's a user-friendly thing to do is beside the point---this is the "pragmatic" open source column, remember? Cell phones are a huge market for Java, and cell phone makers have alternatives to Java they could use if Java adopted a license that forced them to change their business model. Therefore I would be very surprised if Sun adopted this license for Java.

In my opinion, RMS's stance, while commendable in the abstract, falls down under practical considerations. For example, could GPL code be used in voting machines? If I'm reading GPLv3 correctly, a voting machine maker could not lock down covered software in the machine to prevent modification. But as recent voting security problems have shown, this kind of lock down is absolutely necessary to preserve the integrity of the vote.

So what will Sun use? My bet is on CDDL, which is a perfectly reasonable OSI-approved license based on MPL (the Mozilla license). Of course, my favorite is still EPL (the Eclipse Public License), but Sun's about as likely to use anything with "Eclipse" in the name as RMS is likely to accept a job at Microsoft.

Topics: Open Source

About

Ed Burnette has been hooked on computers ever since he laid eyes on a TRS-80 in the local Radio Shack. Since graduating from NC State University he has programmed everything from serial device drivers and debuggers to web servers. After a delightful break working on commercial video games, Ed reluctantly returned to business software. He... Full Bio

zdnet_core.socialButton.googleLabel Contact Disclosure

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Related Stories

The best of ZDNet, delivered

You have been successfully signed up. To sign up for more newsletters or to manage your account, visit the Newsletter Subscription Center.
Subscription failed.