Australian government requests to Google increase fivefold

Australian government requests to Google increase fivefold

Summary: The number of requests to Google for user information from Australian government and law enforcement agencies has increased fivefold between 2009 and the end of 2013.


Australian law enforcement and government agencies have ramped up their requests to Google for user information since Google began disclosing the number requests it receives in 2009 by a factor of five.

In the latest transparency report statistics released by the internet giant overnight, the number of times Australian government agencies that requested user information for criminal investigations was up to 780 requests relating to 944 accounts for the six months ending December 31, 2013.

This is up from 645 requests for 807 accounts in the previous six-month period.

Google handed over some information from those requests in the last six months of 2013 around 70 percent of the time, the company said.

Accessing information from Google is increasingly becoming a tool used by law enforcement agencies in Australia, with the number of requests over the past four years increasing fivefold from 155 requests in the six months to December 31 2009, up to 780 in the last six months of 2013.

The figure puts Australia well above the average for the increase in government requests. Broadly, Google reported today that there had been a 120 percent increase in requests to Google from governments across the globe since 2009.

Google's legal director for law enforcement and information security, Richard Salgado, said in a blog post that while the rise in the number of Google users in that time period could explain some of the rise in requests, it was undeniable that governments were increasingly exercising their authority to make requests to Google for user information. He said Google continues to fight against governments demanding broad personal information.

"We consistently push back against overly broad requests for your personal information, but it's also important for laws to explicitly protect you from government overreach. That's why we’re working alongside eight other companies to push for surveillance reform, including more transparency."

It comes as the parliament is reviewing the access Australian government agencies have to telecommunications customer data. Law enforcement agencies and the Attorney-General's Department have argued that telecommunications companies should be required to keep customer information for up to two years, with some even arguing for browsing history to be retained for criminal investigations.

Privacy advocates and ISPs have, however, argued that such a regime would be a breach of personal privacy, and would potentially put ISPs in breach of the new Australian Privacy Principles in the Privacy Act.

Topics: Government, Google, Government AU, Australia


Armed with a degree in Computer Science and a Masters in Journalism, Josh keeps a close eye on the telecommunications industry, the National Broadband Network, and all the goings on in government IT.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • What's next?

    The government will be allowing CTV cameras to be placed in every room of our homes and offices next. Brandis is an advocate for freedom of speech but not for freedoms as far as our privacy is concerned. They can't search our homes (for now) without a search warrant so why should they be able to search our browser history, emails or anything else for that matter without any just cause or warrant?
  • Brandis wants absolute powers because

    he's a closet dictator & loves the power so much, he let's it corrupt his attitude to our personal privacy & freedom.

    Law enforcement is necessary to prevent the criminals from using the technology, however, giving them absolute powers to snoop on our use of the Internet & technology, because they say so, without appropriate justification and court approval, is not the way to go !

    Sen Brandis is a bureaucrat & politician who loves to wield the power he has, forgetting he was elected by the people for the people, not for his own personal control over our lives.

    Absolute power corrupts absolutely !

    Have we forgotten, so quickly, what absolute power did to the world, during the 3rd Reich's reign of terror. Millions were murdered during a period of total genocide.

    Sen Brandis needs to be reminded, in no uncertain terms, what happens when so called law enforcement agencies are given absolute power.

    The jackboots, grey shirts & Gestapo are stark reminders of what absolute power will do, once they are given unfettered access & control over the lives they are supposed to protect!