Government report slams ACCC's NBN advice

Government report slams ACCC's NBN advice

Summary: The latest of the government's six inquiries into the National Broadband Network after close to a year since coming into power has confirmed its existing assumptions about the establishment of the NBN project.


In the latest of the Coalition government's six inquiries into the former Labor government's National Broadband Network (NBN) has confirmed the Coalition's criticism of the planning process around the NBN and Labor's decision to roll out fibre to the premises to 93 percent of the population.

Since coming to government in September last year, Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has launched approximately six inquiries into the NBN and broadband in Australia. The latest report, tabled in Parliament yesterday, was conducted by former Telstra corporate affairs head Bill Scales and examined the public policy process between April 2008 when the former Labor government issued a request for proposals for the NBN up to May 2010 when the NBN implementation study was released.

The report (PDF) breaks down NBN planning into two stages: NBN Mk I, and NBN Mk II.

The first was the fibre-to-the-node NBN policy Labor took to the 2007 election, and subsequently held a tender process for after coming to government. Scales found that this tender process was conducted in the traditional way with a panel of experts evaluating various proposals for value for money.

The report claims that Telstra's original 12-page proposal for the FttN project in 2008, which was part of the reason the company was excluded from the original tender process, was not the full proposal from the incumbent, with a much larger and detailed response prepared.

Although Scales admits that Telstra's exclusion from the tender process was legitimate, it "effectively and practically derailed" the entire tender process, he said.

Scales said it is unclear whether Telstra was deliberately attempting to derail the process or whether it was a simple administrative error by the telco in not submitting a fully-compliant proposal.

The NBN Mk II project was developed in the context of a completely broken down relationship between the government and Telstra under former CEO Sol Trujillo, before current CEO David Thodey assumed the role in 2009, and the company became much more cooperative with the government.

Scales was critical of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) "overstepping its authority" in telling the panel of experts that fibre to the node "was not a stepping stone" to fibre to the premises.

He said that the ACCC's evidence to the committee was never fully tested by the committee, and ultimately resulted in the panel advising the government to go to full FttP in 2009.

NBN Mk II's planning process, as a result, Scales said was "rushed, chaotic, and inadequate" with 11 weeks of consideration in 2009 before the new NBN Co company was officially established in April 2009. Contrary to the popular myth that former Communications Minister Stephen Conroy and former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd established the project on the back of a coaster on a domestic air flight.

The full Cabinet was not involved in the planning of the NBN, according to the documents, with the policy developed by Rudd, former Prime Minister Julia Gillard, former Treasurer Wayne Swan, and former finance minister Lindsay Tanner. The full Cabinet was not consulted on the NBN Mk II policy until April 7, 2009, on the date that the policy was announced to the public, according to the report.

Scales said NBN Co was a start-up company that was not fit for purpose, and only a well-established large telecommunications company would have been able to take on the task of rolling out fibre to the premises to 93 percent of the population.

Scales recommended that all future large infrastructure projects be subject to a full independent analysis by the Productivity Commission or Infrastructure Australia, and departments should ensure they have expert advice before pursuing such large projects.

Topics: NBN, Government, Government AU, Telstra, Australia


Armed with a degree in Computer Science and a Masters in Journalism, Josh keeps a close eye on the telecommunications industry, the National Broadband Network, and all the goings on in government IT.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • I got nothing, Except Lol

    I need to read this report further, but the nuggets presented are gold. If it wasn't about a large nation building project, that could well position Australia to compete in the digital age I would be rolling on the floor.

    I mean come on:

    "Scales said NBN Co was a start-up company that was not fit for purpose, and only a well-established large telecommunications company would have been able to take on the task of rolling out fibre to the premises to 93 percent of the population."

    Well why didn't they? Why, because the Telco that has the monopoly on the fixed infrastructure wasn't interested in investing in it. Their "Administrative" error submitting that application in 2008 was a joke.

    The Government of the time stepped in and setup a company that could be run like a company. It's had it's issues and a fair amount of Government meddling, but on the whole was travelling in a positive direction for the country.

    What we currently have is heading towards a short sighted hodge podge mess of inequality that will cost this country more in the long run and potentially further tie us to the Monopoly whose only interest is returning value for it's share holders.
  • Woops goes Telstra?

    When you hire a few right wing nutters to write your reports, you have to expect advice that is not supportive of full equal access for consumers, or the ACCC which regulates private monopolies.

    And I'm sorry, but FTTN is not a stepping stone to a full efficient fibre rollout, perhaps it might reduce the cost by a low double digit%, in that you have access to ducts some of the way to the home, but you throw out all the nodes, and the VDSL2 modems we were forced to purchase, and then do the hard part, fibre to the last mile.

    Amazing that 11 weeks is to short a time for a gov to decide policy, yet Malcolm can have a fully costed ready to go policy with no expert advice while in opposition.

    Hows that working out for you Malcolm, little harder now you have to do more then criticise?
    Paul Krueger