auDA urges Australian businesses to back .au

auDA urges Australian businesses to back .au

Summary: Australian privately run domain regulator auDA said it would like to see more local companies supporting the nation's top level commercial domain suffix, .com.

Australian privately run domain regulator auDA said it would like to see more local companies supporting the nation's top level commercial domain suffix,

auDA CEO, Chris Disspain, says that while most of Australia's flagship companies control versions of their trademark or brand within both the and .com domain -- widely perceived to be a United States domain -- some are marrying it to the latter.

Disspain believes it would be more beneficial for Australian companies to give their patronage to the Australian commercial domain rather than "branding themselves as generic" on the Internet.

"Some of the bigger companies should be demonstrating to their customers and their fellow businesses that they support the Australian market, and advertising and branding a name does that", said Disspain.

Telstra's online branding typifies the marketing credo Disspain believes should be discouraged. Telstra licenses its domain name under both and .com, but aligns its brand with the latter

The practice isn't universal however, in addition to Telstra, there are other notable absences from that group such as Qantas, the NRMA and Westfield.

auDA claims the list of Australian companies that have allied their marketing with .com is extensive including L.J. Hooker, ANZ, Big Pond, Jet Star and leading wine brands Penfolds, Lindemans and Rosemount.

However, Michelle Holland, director of online marketing with Clemenger Proximity said being restricted to the local domain contradicts the Webs biggest commercial attraction.

"I perceive the Web as being world-wide so it not something that people see as being a localised domain -- yes it is and we do work that way -- but I guess the whole point of where the internet and digital is going is that it gives us access to the rest of the world," said Holland.

According to Holland, companyies choose domain names on the basis of customer convenience, not patriotism.

However, Disspain believes domain has the upper hand over .com in that areana as well. He believes lack of regulation in the .com domain -- and hence protection for trademarks -- makes the URLs it produces less friendly for consumers than locally registered domain names.

In the .com space miscreants often usurp brands, and abuse ignorance and clumsiness to contrive ways to channel Web traffic to their preferred sites. Disspain said it was more difficult to achieve run these operations within the space.

However, Holland says companies often register names within the .com domains because of its lack of regulations rather than in spite of it.

"If you're a small business and you're out there trying to promote yourself and you can get the .com [name] you want, you're going to get up [on the Web] a lot quicker," she said.

auDA plans to examine these issues in a review of its domain regulations slated to take place later this year.

However, the Federal government will have to start asking itself questions about the merits of choosing a .com name over the home-grown domain much sooner.

According to reports of recent senate estimates hearing, the Federal government last year paid a former ranking bureaucrat AU$201,000 for domain name -- shunning a cheaper local alternative already owned by the government,

Topics: Legal, Enterprise 2.0

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Honestly, its a company's personal choice. Given it costs at least $99 to secure a .AU domain name (is that 1 or 2 years, it probably doesn't matter as either is expensive!) when for the same amount you can also receive exceptional quality HOSTING and a FREE domain name in the USA, why would anybody bother. A shorter domain name is easier to read and therefore easier to remember. Any Aussie domain name regulator obviously wants to push .AU names. Its a business in its self. I can see absolutely no justification for the prices on .AU names. Our clients regularly had been paying hundreds for their .AU names and then hundres for domain hosting. Now through relationships with US suppliers we can give them both, for less than what their .AU domain was costing individually. Saying all of that, the whole point of the internet is not to regionalise something. If a particular business wants to have "Australia" somehow tied to their internet presence, then that is also obviously fine. But I think 95% of internet based businesses, want a top level name - so they don't look like some small business in Australia.
  • It is also possible to have flexibility in offering both .com and at the sametime. For instance regardless of which domain you type you still go to the same website. This is called 'domain parking'. Some customers use the .com to communicate with their export partners overseas and the with your local customers.

    The good news about domain parking is you do not need to host anything extra. You simply 'park' it on your current hosted account.

    The bad news is some hosting companies charge for domain parking when it is not using any additional resource from the hosted server. Here is some prices:

    Webcentral Telstra: 120/yr
    Telstra: 120/yr
    MelbourneIT URL forwarding: $99/yr
    SmartyHost: free
  • $20 for a .com $100 for a now which would you choose.