Ban piracy liability from trade talks: Telstra

Ban piracy liability from trade talks: Telstra

Summary: Telstra has voiced its opposition to new intellectual property regulation making internet service providers (ISPs) liable for customers downloading pirate material in a submission to the government on a regional trade agreement currently being forged between the United States, Australia and seven other south-east Asian countries.

SHARE:
2

Telstra has voiced its opposition to new intellectual property regulation making internet service providers (ISPs) liable for customers downloading pirate material in a submission to the government on a regional trade agreement currently being forged between the United States, Australia and seven other south-east Asian countries.

Negotiations for the agreement, called the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA), started in March 2010 in Melbourne, between Australia, Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, Singapore, Peru, the United States and Vietnam. Malaysia joined the negotiations later. The aim of the agreement is to develop a comprehensive 21st century free trade agreement (FTA) that increases economic integration in the Asia-Pacific region.

In a submission to the government, Telstra said the intellectual property chapter of the TPPA should not include matters which haven't been settled under Australian law.

Specifically, it opposed any negotiations around secondary liability for copyright infringement, which would in essence make ISPs responsible if customers download illegal and pirated content.

"There is no agreed international solution to the issue, including no agreed solution in Australia where the matter is currently before the full Federal Court of Australia," Telstra wrote in its submission.

The issue is currently before the courts in the form of a copyright case between the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) and iiNet. AFACT sought to show that iiNet authorised its users to infringe copyright; however, the court ruled that iiNet did not do so. The matter is currently at the appeal stage.

"It would therefore be inconsistent for Australia to negotiate and agree clauses on these types of issues in the TPPA before they are settled under Australian law," Telstra said. "Telstra cautions against the TPAA [sic] seeking to impose legal remedies to commercial issues, particularly those which may be the result of market failures."

Telstra was the only technology company to answer a call for submissions by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. It had already petitioned the government on the issue in a submission to the government's review on communications and media regulations.

TPPA members are meeting this week in Chile to continue the fifth round of discussions over the region's future trade agreement with the US, negotiations that have remained largely secret.

So far there has been no release of draft texts or publications following negotiations, but a leaked document (PDF) showed that the New Zealand Government opposed strengthening intellectual property (IP) regulation beyond the current standards (known as TRIPS), and warned that for technology-importing countries over protection of IP rights "will detract from innovation rather than promote it".

Topics: Piracy, Security, Telcos, Telstra

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

2 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • So does this include voice traffic as well as Internet, or is there a difference between playing a song illegally on the phone and streaming it illegally over the internet?

    I can see a law making ISPs responsible for user content killing the networks.

    Alternatively everyone becomes a criminal - you don't always know if content is illegal. Download a photo that was placed inappropriately on any site and suddenly both the downloaded and the network are guilty.
    Craigthomler
  • That's the trouble with copyright laws currently in effect. These copyright enforcers want to brand the widest possible number of people as criminals, in order to rake in the cash from court settlements.

    Rather than criminalising everyone, they should be more looking at how they can utilise the technologies available to their advantage. Make it easier to access LEGALLY downloadable content (such as is the case of iTunes (Apple) and Bandit.fm (Sony) music stores), make the prices reasonable, and you find that 99% of your "criminals" are turning honest almost immediately, and willing to pay the cash for it.
    dmh_paul