Banks, ISPs may be online gambling police

Banks, ISPs may be online gambling police

Summary: Banks and internet service providers will be asked to reduce Australian punters' access to overseas online gambling sites under recommendations made in a government report.

SHARE:

Banks and internet service providers will be asked to reduce Australian punters' access to overseas online gambling sites under recommendations made in a government report.

The interim report (PDF), commissioned in May last year by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) Select Council on Gambling Reform, was published by the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy yesterday. It estimated that there are 2200 online gambling services in breach of the Interactive Gaming Act, reaping around $1 billion a year from Australians.

To combat this, the department has recommended the establishment of a national standard for interactive gambling providers, which would establish harm minimisation measures around responsible gambling, lines of credit and a pre-commitment on the amount a gambler intends to spend in one session. There would also be a consumer protection framework with protections of customer funds, customer information, identity and age verification and spend-tracking facilities. Providers that don't sign up to this standard would be banned under the Act, and penalties for breaching the Act would be administered by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA).

The banned gambling websites will be added to the ACMA's blacklist website, to be blocked by voluntary software-based filters. The department also suggested that internet service providers (ISPs) could have a warning page pop up whenever such a site was visited, but stopped short of calling for the pages to be blocked, as part of the government's controversial mandatory internet filtering proposal.

"This approach places ISPs in a position where they would be enforcing prohibitions on gambling with overseas providers, where there is no law that currently prevents Australian citizens from gambling on these sites. Implementing such blocking tools would be strongly opposed by ISPs and other key stakeholders," the report stated.

"The Australian Government has clearly stated its position, that [the] blocking of websites by ISPs should target child sexual abuse material."

The department said that banks could also voluntarily block payments to recognised illegal websites. But, in order to do that, the banks would need to be given safe harbour under the Act so as to be protected against potential unintended consequences from the blocking of those transactions — such as, accidentally blocking a legitimate transaction. The report noted that, while this method may deter some gamblers, others would just find alternative methods of transferring money, such as using third-party payment companies like PayPal or Western Union.

Communications Minister Stephen Conroy said that the government had not yet made any decisions on whether to act on the recommendations and called on interested parties to make a comment on the interim report by 25 June.

"This is an interim report only. The government has made no decisions about possible changes to the [Act] and will not do so until we have had further public consultation with interested parties."

Topics: Government, Government AU, Tech Industry

About

Armed with a degree in Computer Science and a Masters in Journalism, Josh keeps a close eye on the telecommunications industry, the National Broadband Network, and all the goings on in government IT.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

3 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • That's a rippa idea!Give banks another reason to charge more fees. I buy a Euromillions ticket online every week. I have to use my CC. The Westpac bank ( indeed, all banks ) charge a "service" fee for using my CC for "gambling". I have had issues with them on their moral judgment that I am using my money to gamble and should be charged for it. When the legal class action comes to grab back these awful illegal fees I will feel vindicated. It will. It happened in the UK in 2004.
    Meanwhile if some sort of check system utilizes the banks they will charge for it. Great idea! I think not.
    sir.gwayne
  • Soooo...

    Forget the children, now its 'won't someone think of the gamblers?'

    ...and to do that we need...

    A FILTER!!!

    yay...
    btone-c5d11
  • Another government grab for power (read Another Conjob con!). Bureaucrats & politicians just love to control the population with restrictive legislation. Laws which are never rescinded!

    It gives them more power to play with & control peoples behaviour. They all forget, they are elected by the people for the people..not for their own benefit!
    Huntsman.ks