BBC slipped up over outsourcing savings

BBC slipped up over outsourcing savings

Summary: The BBC has been rebuked for miscalculating the money it would save by outsourcing BBC Technology

TOPICS: Tech Industry

The National Audit Office (NAO) has revealed that the BBC miscalculated the savings it would make through its outsourcing deal with Siemens Business Services (SBS).

The BBC had originally projected that the deal would generate savings of £35.2m.  It has now admitted it overestimated the cost of running its IT in-house by £7.7m, after mistakenly including a one-off cost in its calculations.

The revelation has angered union officials, who had warned in 2004 that the outsourcing deal would not generate the cost savings the BBC claimed.

"BBC Management accepts the savings figure should have been updated, and regrets that this was not identified so that it could be reported to the Executive and the Governors," said the NAO in its report. "Management are satisfied that appropriate controls and processes are in place to ensure this will not recur."

The BBC declined to tell ZDNet UK what that £7.7m one-off expenditure was for, but the NAO report said it was dropped from the baseline as it was a "one-off project which could not reasonably be attributable to the Siemens contract".

"The savings weren't guaranteed, and changed when the baseline changed," admitted a BBC spokeswoman. "The outsourcing deal has still represented huge value for money — £27.5m is a huge saving," the spokeswoman said.

The National Audit Office also criticised the BBC for saying it could "guarantee savings", which the BBC recognised was not apt.

"It's an inappropriate term to use as you can't guarantee in a rapidly changing technology environment what savings can be made," the BBC spokeswoman told ZDNet UK

The BBC said it had invited the NAO to conduct the report as it had "never undertaken an outsourcing deal of this scale", and admitted that "some lessons can be learnt about developing large outsourcing deals".

The Broadcasting Entertainment Cinematograph and Theatre Union (Bectu), which represented approximately 370 of the IT staff the BBC sold to Siemens, fiercely criticised the BBC for its miscalculation of cost savings.

"The NAO report bears out some of our worst fears," said a senior BBC official at Bectu. "The BBC was grossly optimistic about the level of savings that could be achieved [through outsourcing]. In the heat of the moment the BBC failed to specify a contract which could deliver the alleged savings."

The union said its fear was that in subsequent outsourcing deals "similarly inflated claims have been made for potential savings, to justify these sell-offs".

Siemens controversially won the contract for providing BBC Technology for £150m in 2004, for 10 years. The BBC has signed similar deals with Siemens for BBC Scotland, and is expected to sign deals for Wales and Northern Ireland.

Bectu said that it was concerned that the savings for outsourcing in Scotland would be minimal.

"It has been reported to us that in Scotland the savings will be less than £1m over 10 years," said the official. "We remain to be convinced that the BBC genuinely does save money through outsourcing," the official added.

Topic: Tech Industry

Tom Espiner

About Tom Espiner

Tom is a technology reporter for He covers the security beat, writing about everything from hacking and cybercrime to threats and mitigation. He also focuses on open source and emerging technologies, all the while trying to cut through greenwash.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • "The Broadcasting Entertainment Cinematograph and Theatre Union (Bectu), which represented approximately 370 of the IT staff the BBC sold to Siemens... fiercely criticised the BBC for its miscalculation of cost savings."

    Seems to me BECTU could've taken a more direct approach to protecting the interests of its members in this case than quibbling over the exact amount of cost savings: IANAL but I'd guess the 1807 Anti-Slave Trade Act, the 1833 Slavery Abolition |Act and Article 4 of the 1998 Human Rights Act could be applicable here.
  • actually i doubt they can, and it does show yanal!
    dont make rediculous claims again. ;)