Bitcoin: More ideology than trustworthy currency
Summary: Bitcoin's appeal is its promise to fulfil certain libertarian geek fantasies, but right now, there's little to distinguish this digital currency from an elaborate scam.
The four-year-old digital currency Bitcoin is riding an all-time high right now. As I write this, a single Bitcoin buys more than US$125, valuing the total Bitcoin circulation at more than $1 billion. But I won't be buying Bitcoin any time soon, because it seems little more than hype built on a fantasy.
I can understand Bitcoin's appeal. It's supposedly untraceable, allowing you to buy illegal drugs online — or trade in more legitimate products and services without having to pay those pesky taxes. You can make your own Bitcoins out of processor cycles, like some fiscal perpetual motion machine.
And, perhaps more importantly, Bitcoin is an embodiment of disruption — in the strange, mutated startup-speak understanding of that word, where disruption is apparently a Good Thing in and of itself.
"Soon, whether via Bitcoin or whatever comes next, it will be possible to strip banking away from bankers and money away from governments," wrote Hugo Rifkind in conservative British publication The Spectator. "There's a whole emerging political philosophy here, similar to the crypto-anarchism of the likes of Julian Assange."
Rickard Falkvinge, founder of the first Pirate Party, went even further, claiming that Bitcoin will change society more than the internet itself. "The net, after all, only allowed people to talk and shop more efficiently. By comparison, Bitcoin eradicates the government's ability to operate," he wrote.
Now, the urge to eradicate governments run deep through internet culture, or at least certain parts of it. I've written previously how Silicon Valley culture was, in part, a collision of the freedom-loving hippie counter-culture and the freedom-loving geek followers of Ayn Rand — neither of whom were fans of The Man. Once more, I recommend Adam Curtis' three-part documentary, All Watched Over By Machines Of Loving Grace. And let's not forget John Perry Barlow's overblown A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace of 1996. Read and laugh.
But I don't want my money to make some crypto-anarchist political statement. I just want to use it — to get paid for the work I do, to pay for the stuff I buy — and then get on with my life. I want a currency I can trust — and Bitcoin fails to deliver.
It's not that Bitcoin is a "made-up" currency, because every fiat currency is essentially made up. But when I pull some banknotes from my pocket, it's pretty clear who I need to trust: the nation-state whose central banker's signature sits in the corner. I can look at the world around me and decide that, yes, Australia, or the United States, or Singapore looks like a thing that exists and will last long enough to back up the promise implicit in those coloured rectangles. With Bitcoin, I have to trust some damnably obscure mathematics, and hope that the crypto never gets cracked. Yeah, right.
When something goes wrong with a transaction in boring old traceable dollars, euros or yen, it's their very traceability that helps me get my money back. As F-Secure's Mikko Hypponen tweeted just hours ago, "When you have highly valuable, completely virtual, and almost entirely untraceable currency, there will naturally be a lot of theft". I'm not sure that a decentralised, anonymous network of untraceable anti-authoritarian players will be interested in helping me out.
Even Falkvinge admits that Bitcoin is "still far from ready for prime time", hardly a ringing endorsement. Witness its wild swings in value this week as Mt Gox, the biggest Bitcoin exchange, suffered a denial of service attack. Why did that happen, exactly, and who profited from those sudden surges? The Economist reckons we're looking at a bubble, noting that Bitcoin's price seems to track the number of people searching for it on Google.
And then there's the fascinating little fact that there'll be fewer new Bitcoins available over time. Bitcoin enthusiasts reassure us that early adopters aren't unfairly rewarded by this scheme, and that it's not a Ponzi scheme. But then, they would say that.
"In more pragmatic terms, 'fairness' is an arbitrary concept that is improbable to be agreed upon by a large population. Establishing 'fairness' is no goal of Bitcoin, as this would be impossible. By starting to mine or acquire Bitcoins today, you too can become an early adopter," they write. Gosh.
There may well be an anonymous digital currency in our future, but I'm leaving Bitcoin well alone.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
WOW
The real world where objects like government are things that you can touch.
This is kind of a Personal question... Do you "touch" government?
Maybe more interesting, does government "touch" you? Where? Did you like it?
I am not going to argue that we cannot smell government. It smells to high heaven!
I am bookmarking this...
In the meantime, I hope you enjoy being robbed of 40% of what you make every year, by the organized criminals who do business under the name "government", and seeing half of that money be used to bomb brown children you've never met. Because, "what about the roads" and "godvernment protects me". Haha.
Argument so weak I'm filing you under "Lost Causes"
The weaknesses you attribute to bitcoin are all applicable, in equal measure, to the system you laud for its trustworthiness - CASH.
Bitcoin is analogous to CASH.
CASH is easily stolen.
CASH requires secure storage facilities to guard against theft.
CASH is almost impossible to recover once stolen.
CASH transactions are virtually untraceable.
CASH is often used to finance nefarious activities, such as the drug trade.
So by your rationale we should get everyone in the world to burn their bills, melt down their coins and we can all go back to a barter economy.
Oh and by the way, just ask a Zimbabwean, a Cypriot or a Greek about those "promises implicit in the coloured rectangles".
So far my thoughts are being reinforced
If Bitcoin really is, or can become, a useful workaday currency (not just cash, but a monetary system with all the infrastructure around it), then I'd have thought that more joined-up arguments would emerge straight away.
Is it possible to do better than this?
And is it possible to do so without confusing a working monetary system with currency speculation?
Do more research into fractional reserve banking
If you were a Cypriot with your money being held in a Cypriot bank, would you be trusting the security of your cash/banks/govt. right now? What about if you were an Argentinian? How would you be securing your money to ensure the govt doesn't steal it by means of capital controls? This is not fairy tale stuff. It is happening right now, in the real world. If capital controls can happen in Cyprus and Argentina it can happen in America, England and Australia too.
The fact is, and it has happened countless times throughout history, governments can and will steal citizens assets by means of capital controls. This usually happens when they get into too much debt. How much debt are world governments in right now? How are governments going to repay this debt? Answer: they won't. They will just inflate and inflate and inflate until your cash savings are worth nothing. Zimbabwe is a perfect example of this. America are in the process of doing exactly the same thing with the US dollar only they are calling it quantative easing. A fancy name for eroding the value of the dollar.
Once people start to lose faith in fiat currency and banking system (like they are doing now), the people will move to another form of currency, even if that means reverting back to gold and silver. Bitcoin, as a currency, is probably the most secure choice there is right now, whether you choose to agree or not.
The fact is, the central bankers, whom you regard so highly, are nothing more than white collar terrorists stealing your money. The whole banking system is designed to erode the value of cash and transfer it to the central bankers/government.
The benefits of Bitcoin far outweigh fiat. The fact is the genie is out of the bottle and Bitcoin will make governments very scared. I expect to see a lot more articles such as yours denigrating Bitcoin. It is all part of the propaganda machine.
Why must Banks be involved in every transaction?
Why wouldn't we want a technology that allows transactions between parties that doesn't incur a banking fee, charge, delay, etc.
I told my Dentist about Bitcoin, and then he proceeded to fill a cavity. He talked the entire time about the various fees and charges he pays just to do business, and a guy that dropped 10K in cash for some dental work. He was so excited about a tech that might give him some control of his business that I thought he was going to take off the rest of the day to do research.
I get that reaction frequently when I tell business owners about the tech. They don't want drugs. They just want to make a fair an profitable business work outside dramatic and sometimes crushing bank fees.
OK I'll try again..
And hey, not all us bitcoiners are anarchists. I'm not anarchist. I respect the rule of law and the need for order. But I do not think that governments and laws should be exempt from criticism.
I'm no conspiracy theorist. I understand that we need a monetary system and that, so far, the third-party-regulated physical token system has been a robust and reasonably well-implemented solution. However, it is not perfect. In fact, many areas of the monetary system are grossly inefficient. Bitcoin addresses these issues. Bitcoin is progress. Bitcoin removes the difficulties associated with cross-border transactions, time taken for transactions, costs of making transactions, security of transactions.
It is an elegant solution. An EFFICIENT solution.
No, it's not perfect, but whoever said it was?
To be honest, I'm surprised BitCoin lasted this long.
Your old and probably a Keynesian
Typo
Credibility problem
So how are we supposed to take your support for Bitcoin seriously?
You say deflation, I say inflation
Yes, the hyperinflation that many fear hasn't hit the West.... yet. But 100 years of the Fed hasn't brought about fair and distributed prosperity for all either, despite its promises to do so.
I don't think you know what a Ponzi scheme is
The Bitcoin system sounds familiar.
Familiarity breeds complacency
The author obviously doesn't even understand old money
And what's unfair about bitcoin? That old people like the author who are unable to think and appreciate innovation will buy into it only when it's too late? Early adopters of a crypto currency take a risk and should be rewarded for it. Like the current system is fair, where all the new money goes to a bunch of politically well connected bankers.
Maybe
In much the same way I think crypto currencies will be a game changer. At the moment it's pure speculation, it's not like I can go down to the local pub and use bitcoins to buy beer. What I could do though, if I didn't like my tax rate or the fact that countries (Cyprus) can arbitrarily steal money off me, is put it into bitcoins and retrieve it later for hard cash or goods.
It's probably a silly argument to be having at the moment; anyone who has tried to buy bitcoins can tell you, it's a pain in the rear. mtgox has a huge waiting list now and other places require cash deposits.
At any rate, if it fails it will pave the way for better digital currencies.
Who do you trust?
Well, every Defense Department in the world relies on those "damnably obscure mathematics" to keep you safe. Math is the stuff that builds the technology that underlies your job. Your car. The energy you use.
And yes, Bitcoin.
On the other hand, the Banks and Wall Street brought you the 2008 market crash. And that crash isn't even over yet! They brought you the bank bail outs, and an income gap that has grown steadily over the last 40 years.
Seriously, how can you even make an argument based on Trust against Math!?!
A lot of strawmen.