If you've read what Google's Rajen Sheth had to say about Chromebooks for business, you may be interested in some extra details he gave us about how the monthly subscription scheme will work - and some colourful ways he found of explaining what Google sees as the advantage of a Chromebook.What would happen if a business wanted to cancel the three year contract?
500 words into the future
Unapologetically opinionated views on technology, in the office and out
Simon Bisson is a freelance technology journalist. He specialises in architecture and enterprise IT. He ran one of the UK's first national ISPs and moved to writing around the time of the collapse of the first dotcom boom. He still writes code.
Mary Branscombe is a freelance tech journalist. Mary has been a technology writer for nearly two decades, covering everything from early versions of Windows and Office to the first smartphones, the arrival of the web and most things inbetween.
We’ve spent the last week at Microsoft’s TechEd 2011 conference. Like previous years this wasn’t an event for big news stories, more a week-long university, full of deep dives into existing technologies, and a chance to see how tools and technologies from all parts of the Redmond giant fit and work together.
For businesses, Chromebooks aren't about what you get - they're about what's left out. The knee jerk response is 'the operating system' (it's Linux underneath but you'll never see it) but the omission that appealed to most of the businesses talking up Chromebooks at Google IO is complexity.
WiFi is a wonderful thing. Turn on a laptop, connect to a SSID, and you're online.
Big data - turning masses of data into useful information - is by definition too big to handle individually. You don't care what speed five drivers are doing around the M25 - you care what speed 5,000 drivers are travelling at and whether the 5,000 travellers who drove the same route yesterday and the same day last week and the same day last month went faster or slower so you know if there's something unusual about the traffic.
I'm carrying an extra device this week, juggling a PlayBook alongside my tablet PC, multiple smartphones, digital recorder and Exilim digital camera.There's a lot of redundancy between those devices, and not just because I have more than one phone.
RIM showed off what consumers see as the missing pieces for the PlayBook at its BlackBerry World conference today; email that's not in a Web page or coming over Bridge from a BlackBerry and BlackBerry apps (and indeed Android apps) running on the tablet. Both of those run in what RIM calls 'players' - Java environments that run on QNX - and they're both still under development; the Android player doesn't support multi-tasking yet although that's the aim.
If privacy is dead (as a number of technology executives in whose interest it is for us not to care about privacy have opined), there wouldn't have been much fuss over the most recent time researchers discovered that iPhones - like pretty much every other phones in the world - track your location and use it to build up maps and traffic information.
Let's start this anecdote with a confession, as all good war stories must.As much as I like IE9, I've not really got the hang of pinned sites.
It's been a few days since the news about iPhones (and other smartphones) storing device locations came out again. This time, however, it hit the mainstream press, rather than staying in the more refined heights of the computer forensics world - and simple tools for exploring the data followed quickly.