Apple announces most profitable quarter ever: Q4 2009
Summary: Apple announced record Mac and iPhone sales and its most profitable quarter ever in its Q4 2009 earnings conference call today.The Company posted revenue of $9.
Apple announced record Mac and iPhone sales and its most profitable quarter ever in its Q4 2009 earnings conference call today.
The Company posted revenue of $9.87 billion and a net quarterly profit of $1.67 billion, or $1.82 per diluted share. These results compare to revenue of $7.9 billion and net quarterly profit of $1.14 billion, or $1.26 per diluted share, in the year-ago quarter. Gross margin was 36.6 percent, up from 34.7 percent in the year-ago quarter.
Jobs also noted that the company has some “really great new products in the pipeline for 2010.” Tablet, anyone?
As always, the most interesting comments happen when they open the conference call to questions. When asked about competition for the iPhone in the holiday season (i.e. Android), Apple responded:
Almost 21 million for the fiscal year sold now in terms of iPhones, so we have momentum. Plus the App Store with 85,000 apps is so far beyond anyone else. We feel good about competing with anyone. I think people are still trying to catch up with the first iPhone, announced 2 years ago. We’ve moved beyond that.
You can listen to a rebroadcast of the call in QuickTime, it will be posted later as a podcast in iTunes.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Q4 early?
ya
their earnings before the Quarter is even over?
RE: Q4 early?
Thanks
But it would have been such a simple thing to use the word "fiscal" in this story!
Basic
First of all, smacdonald@ could have Googled Apple's fiscal year, instead
of posting a fatuous post on here, and Jimster480 could have done the
same before empathising.
But even possessing the the ability to google "fiscal year for apple"
doesn't seem to exempt them from the urge to request that the author
stated the obvious.
Assuming we're all adults here, isn't it stark staringly obvious that a
company will be posting financial results in time with their financial or
fiscal year - not the calendar year?
And for those who aren't adults, don't know how to use Google, or are
simply too stupid to use lateral thinking, business trading, financial or
fiscal years usually begin on their date of incorporation.
Insult anyone lately
Lighten up
Eeeeeeeaaaasy.....
From the vacuum came forth...
Why bother to learn anything? No, really. Why bother thinking
even? Why not just blunder on through life, ignorant of everything that's around you and everything that's possible.
That way you can be utterly average in an absolutely average
world, and have all the average examples of everything you
could not be bothered to want.
Or, you can be curious, enjoy the learning process and avoid
appearing dumb by defending and empathising with
stupidity.
The first road leads to a world of Windoze PeeCees,
stagnated development, ugly, unimaginative products and
unadventurous business models, basement prices, microscopic profits, flatlining stock prices, failing businesses
and redundancies.
The second gives you Apple and Google: models of innovation, beautiful, imaginative products and adventurous
business models, fantastic, market trend-defying margins
and meteoric market results on Wall Street and the High
Street.
It's your choice. But criticising someone who knows the
difference is really retarded.
And all I asked was that they recognise one simple, basic
detail about how businesses return quarterly results.
Graham, if you want to be taken seriously...
Just a thought.
Huh?
write copy for a living.
You miss my point
the tone of your commentary which is condescending and mean
spirited. Rather than lifting up the prior posters by simply sharing
your knowledge, or suggesting sources of information you choose to
chastise them for not already knowing all the answers.
Yes, Google is a source which will tell you what dates Apple's fiscal
year is based upon. It is also true that every day people - actual
human beings - teach each other through <i>discourse</i>. Rather
than encourage the exchange of information by people you denigrate
others for daring to ask questions. Bear in mind that these could be
your peers, but they might just as easily be teenagers who may not
have taken Econ 101 yet. Do you really want to discourage someone
seeking knowledge from asking questions?
I am in fact very curious, and I do enjoy the learning process. If you
read through posts I leave here you will find quite a few eloquent
passages. You will also find quite a few where I don't know as much
as I think I do and I become educated <i>through the discourse that
follows</i>. You will also find some where I "merely" ask questions
hoping that someone will enlighten me. Are you saying that asking
questions is bad?
I am not criticizing you for knowing the difference between doing your
own research and asking questions of others. I am criticizing you for
the mean spirited way you reply. That mean-spiritedness has the
effect of making people not want to engage and learn from each other.
Discouragement of the inquisitive nature of human discourse is how
we end up with people "educating" themselves in a vacuum and
forming opinions based on half-truths. Google and Wikipedia are not
the fonts of all wisdom and the implication that one should seek their
knowledge there rather than from other people is short-sighted at the
least.
Inferring that I am mentally delayed because I call you out for putting
others down is hardly taking the "Intellectual High Road". In one of
your other posts you mention that you write copy for a living, I
believe. I can't see it as I type this but I think that was you. If that's
the case then you should be embarrassed. I mean, really, is "really
retarded" actually the best descriptive phrase you can come up with? I
expect that from my son and his peers, but they are in the first grade.
Once again you resort to taunts, insults, and name calling in a
pathetic attempt to appear superior. I could tell you that it sounds
moronic but I won't. That would sound too much like something from
the elementary school playground. Come to think of it, it sounds
much like something you would say.
RE: Apple announces most profitable quarter ever: Q4 2009
perhaps the US should investigate Apple.
Thanks for Surveying Millions of Mac Users
surveying tens of millions of Mac users to discover what the
typical one is like. However, I fear there is some flaw in your
data. The only thing I know about Berkinstocks is that they are
some kind of footwear. Of course, I live in the mountains of
Tennessee and, as everyone knows, we don?t wear shoes.
And I don?t hate profits; I only hate greedy corporations that
rake in obscene amounts of money while contributing little to
society. Like, say, Microsoft which has avoided innovation,
except in marketing. The large software company I used to
work for spoke admiringly of ?The Microsoft Model,? letting
small, creative companies break new trails and take all the
risks, then going in and producing a knock-off product and
undercutting and outmarketing them.
I would not be so foolish as to try to characterize all Windows
users. Except, of course, that they are sheep-like conformists,
not comfortable with the new and the unfamiliar. And, too, in
general, a lower class of people, but entitled to compassion
and understanding.
http://news.cnet.com/2100-1040-943519.html
Ummm.... What???
What the hell is Berkinstock?"
"granola eating"
Wrong - I love pizza and Macallan
"Profit hating"
Not me, gimmie money.
"hippy"
Wrong again - SUV driving, sports loving, nut scratchin', cursing madman here!
"all is forgiven"
Nope - Eye for an eye!
You couldn't be more wrong in your "typical user" statement! :)
zeeboid are you a complete retard or just a troll?
perhaps the US should investigate Apple.[/b]
The word is spelled interesting... this could be a very common keyboard slip but at the same time one could proofread prior to hitting the "submit" key. Okay so...
Birkenstocks... those are shoes, right? I wear steel toed boots at work and usually barefoot at home - I think my wife might have a pair.
Granola eating? Sure, I like granola - it's healthy. But I also eat pizza, thai food, hot dogs, baklava, and a lot of other things that are not good for me.
Profit hating? Not at all - I feel like some CEO profits and pay ratios to worker pay is really off but I have nothing against anyone who makes a buck.
Hippy? The music and free love was great from what I understand - it was a bit before my time.
Apple making WICKED (the work is spelled WICKED not wickid BTW) profits... see above for that. If or rather when they do something asinine such as charging the iPod touch users a fee to upgrade their OS, no that is screwed up. Since they made this profit it would not hurt them to stop charging the iPod users for that update.
[b]Perhaps the US should investigate Apple. [/b]For what exactly? A "monopoly" with iTunes? One CAN always sync anything purchased or downloaded from iTunes with any other smartphone or MP3 player - they just can't use the iTunes software to do it. The fact they made a profit? Then the US better investigate EVERYONE who made a profit... I made a profit does that mean I need to be investigated? Bring it on.
This isn't a zoo...
zeeboid can't spell, indicating he has as much respect for others, and
for detail, as he does for Apple.
Who, but a fascist would dream of classifying people in such a
narrow-minded way? unless he was paid to do so?
Fast car driving, profit creating, red meat eating, Mac user since 1985,
who happens to know that the German shoe company is spelled BIRKENSTOCK, not "birkinstock.
Perhaps your spellchecker isn't working either?
<b>... this could be a very common keyboard slip but at the same time one could proofread prior to hitting the "submit" key. Okay so...</b>
You are indeed correct...
All Ready Happened
Then again, they technically have an OS that is locked into systems that cost 3 times the amount they normally would to anyone else - again unless you are tech savvy and technically breaking the law.
There's always two sides of every arguement.
Right wing apple users
images much. Rush Limbaugh is a pretty famous mac user. Steve Jobs
has been asked about the ideological breakdown of mac users and he
says it's 50/50 left/right.
Do you really think that it should be on Apple to fix the fact that there
are rabid lefties that would boycott them if they plastered Rush
Limbaugh or the Vatican (who encourage mac use among the priests they
train there) on their advertisements?