Apple needs a thinbook in the lineup
Summary: On Friday 9to5Mac reported that new Apple notebooks are in development. They will be available in black and silver aluminum and "considerably slimmer than current MacBook and even a bit more than MacBook Pro" according to the post.
On Friday 9to5Mac reported that new Apple notebooks are in development. They will be available in black and silver aluminum and "considerably slimmer than current MacBook and even a bit more than MacBook Pro" according to the post. Where it gets interesting is the site's allusion to a mythical piece of Apple hardware never before seen:
we think they are MacBooks but aren't 100 percent sure they aren't the fabled Pro slim line.
I've been lusting after a thin Apple notebook ever since my first trip to Japan in 1999–preferably a subnotebook, which by definition weighs less than three pounds. In fact, I wanted a thin notebook so bad that I purchased a Japanese Sony Vaio 505.
The original Vaio 505 was the first ultraslim notebook; it featured a 17mm key pitch keyboard set atop a touchpad and a 10.4" screen. It was initially released only in Japan--and it was purple.

Apple has sold borderline subnotebooks before, but they've never offered a true pro slim notebook.
The closest thing to a subnotebook that Apple has ever released was their the PowerBook Duo line which measured 1.9 × 10.5 × 10.5 inches and weighed a svelt 4.4 pounds (Duo 210). That was later replaced by the short-lived, 4.4 pound PowerBook 2400, which was co-designed by IBM and made for Apple by IBM Japan in 1997.
There's no question that a ThinBook would sell. People that carry a notebook computer with them everywhere want it to be as light as possible. The Japanese have been using ultra slim notebooks forever, probably due to the tight quarters and long commutes via train, but they've never really taken off in the United States. Dynamism specializes in importing gadgets from places like Japan and sells a wide variety of ultraportable and ultraslim computers that they customize with English-version operating systems.
Miniaturization doesn't come cheap though. Typically, ultraslim notebooks cost as much as 50 percent more than a standard notebook with the same specifications. Sometimes you actually get less features for more money. For example, displays are typically smaller in subnotebooks due to physical constraints–usually topping out at 12-inches. Optical drives and ports can also become casualties of miniaturization.
I think that people would pay a premium for a thin Apple notebook. Apple could keep the current MacBook and MacBook Pro lines and add a new line (MacBook Thin?) that costs more. Don't want to pay the premium? Buy one of Apple's more affordable, value-priced notebooks instead.
If Apple made the equivalent of the new Sony Vaio TZ90 (complete with 32GB solid-state drive) I'd buy one in a heartbeat! What about you?
[poll id=66]
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Thin is great, but what they really need...
right-click on trackpads?
re: Right-click on trackpads?
getting used to, but once you do it is great. Not only does it give you the right-click
feature but it also gives you scrolling and more. It's a $15 shareware product.
http://www.ragingmenace.com/software/sidetrack/index.html
MBP driver > SideTrack
If Apple makes a thinbook
What I foresee is a MacBook Pro that Apple somehow manages to make about half as thick as now without sacrificing ports or optical drives.
Oh, and watch for multitouch enabled trackpads.
It's a great form design
an excellent size for many users.
A Mac ThinBook would work well for me - light and small for travel, yet
providing a connection to a large display in the office or home when you
need the real-estate.
If Apple prices it with a 50% premium I think you'll probably see the
business user buying it. If they can hold the price to $300 or less above
the MacBook then you are going to see a lot of them on university
campuses next year as well as business users.
Either way it will sell well if it's equal to the MacBook and the Pro in terms
of design and performance.
I also had an X505 for a couple of years ...
Ended up biting the size penalty and switched to a 15" mbp & have been very satisfied. Simplified my computing life in another manner - the screen size, brightness, and readability were good enough that I got rid of the separate desk machine at work and home - so even though the new laptop was a bit bigger than the old, went from 3 machines to 1.
Instead of getting a price premium...
release a ThinBook. Everyone know that, and especially after the release of the
aluminum iMac, the MacBook and the MacBook Pro are both between $300 and $800
more than they really should be (integrated graphics alone is the single reason a
MacBook should be around $600 to start, WITH a DVD burner instead of that DVD read
only/CD-R thing).
Apple needs ANYTHING smaller than a MacBook in the line up.
love the "letter" size format, as well as, and most
importantly, the reduced weight. I've always docked to
a big screen when stationary.
I'm not so excited by thin, as I would rather not own
something so easily bent over the knee (case in point,
1st Nano was too thin as well!).
I am praying to Steve daily that Apple makes
something smaller yet more powerful, than a MacBook
(fw800, fast, and 3G ready?).
In the meantime, my 12"PB takes a lickin' and keeps
on tickin'!
hmmmm, can I hook up a big screen to an iPhone?
MiniBook?
RE: Apple needs a thinbook in the lineup