Apple needs a thinbook in the lineup

Summary: On Friday 9to5Mac reported that new Apple notebooks are in development. They will be available in black and silver aluminum and "considerably slimmer than current MacBook and even a bit more than MacBook Pro" according to the post.

On Friday 9to5Mac reported that new Apple notebooks are in development. They will be available in black and silver aluminum and "considerably slimmer than current MacBook and even a bit more than MacBook Pro" according to the post. Where it gets interesting is the site's allusion to a mythical piece of Apple hardware never before seen:

we think they are MacBooks but aren't 100 percent sure they aren't the fabled Pro slim line.

I've been lusting after a thin Apple notebook ever since my first trip to Japan in 1999–preferably a subnotebook, which by definition weighs less than three pounds. In fact, I wanted a thin notebook so bad that I purchased a Japanese Sony Vaio 505.

The original Vaio 505 was the first ultraslim notebook; it featured a 17mm key pitch keyboard set atop a touchpad and a 10.4" screen. It was initially released only in Japan--and it was purple.

Sony Vaio 505 subnotebook

Apple has sold borderline subnotebooks before, but they've never offered a true pro slim notebook.

The closest thing to a subnotebook that Apple has ever released was their the PowerBook Duo line which measured 1.9 × 10.5 × 10.5 inches and weighed a svelt 4.4 pounds (Duo 210). That was later replaced by the short-lived, 4.4 pound PowerBook 2400, which was co-designed by IBM and made for Apple by IBM Japan in 1997.

There's no question that a ThinBook would sell. People that carry a notebook computer with them everywhere want it to be as light as possible. The Japanese have been using ultra slim notebooks forever, probably due to the tight quarters and long commutes via train, but they've never really taken off in the United States. Dynamism specializes in importing gadgets from places like Japan and sells a wide variety of ultraportable and ultraslim computers that they customize with English-version operating systems.

Miniaturization doesn't come cheap though. Typically, ultraslim notebooks cost as much as 50 percent more than a standard notebook with the same specifications. Sometimes you actually get less features for more money. For example, displays are typically smaller in subnotebooks due to physical constraints–usually topping out at 12-inches. Optical drives and ports can also become casualties of miniaturization.

I think that people would pay a premium for a thin Apple notebook. Apple could keep the current MacBook and MacBook Pro lines and add a new line (MacBook Thin?) that costs more. Don't want to pay the premium? Buy one of Apple's more affordable, value-priced notebooks instead.

If Apple made the equivalent of the new Sony Vaio TZ90 (complete with 32GB solid-state drive) I'd buy one in a heartbeat! What about you?

[poll id=66]

Topics: Laptops, Apple, Hardware, Mobility

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

10 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Thin is great, but what they really need...

    What Apple really needs to do is build a two-button mouse into the trackpad. The desktop line comes with the Mighty Mouse, which has multiple programmable buttons, but the notebook line still has one measly button. With all the innovations the company has made lately, one would think that a two-button, customizable trackpad would be a no-brainer.
    centre21_z
    • right-click on trackpads?

      Are you looking for right-clicking capabilities on the trackpad? If so, place two fingers on the trackpad and click the button. I actually find that easier than having two buttons.
      russguill
      • re: Right-click on trackpads?

        I agree, two buttons would be great. Until then check out SideTrack. It takes some
        getting used to, but once you do it is great. Not only does it give you the right-click
        feature but it also gives you scrolling and more. It's a $15 shareware product.

        http://www.ragingmenace.com/software/sidetrack/index.html
        tgarner
        • MBP driver > SideTrack

          I used SideTrack on my PowerBook G4 17", but when I upgraded to a MacBook Pro 17" I found that the new driver is better -- the two-finger gestures for scrolling and right-clicking are easier than SideTrack's gestures. And I get less inadvertent scrolling from my palm touching the trackpad too. (The trackpad really needs to be centered under the F and J keys, which would place it slightly to the left of the center of the case -- it wouldn't look as good but it would work better. Apple tends to emphasize design over ergonomics.)
          sburson
  • If Apple makes a thinbook

    It will be part of their normal lineup. Apple, despite it's very nice sales of late, is still a small player in the computer market. They simply cannot branch out into niche products.

    What I foresee is a MacBook Pro that Apple somehow manages to make about half as thick as now without sacrificing ports or optical drives.

    Oh, and watch for multitouch enabled trackpads.
    frgough
  • It's a great form design

    I used the IBM X-Series 3 pound notebook before moving to Macs and it is
    an excellent size for many users.

    A Mac ThinBook would work well for me - light and small for travel, yet
    providing a connection to a large display in the office or home when you
    need the real-estate.

    If Apple prices it with a 50% premium I think you'll probably see the
    business user buying it. If they can hold the price to $300 or less above
    the MacBook then you are going to see a lot of them on university
    campuses next year as well as business users.

    Either way it will sell well if it's equal to the MacBook and the Pro in terms
    of design and performance.
    Ken_z
  • I also had an X505 for a couple of years ...

    I also used a sony X505 for a couple of years, loved the size but just couldn't reliably read the screen anymore. Plus, the uber-slooooow hd made daily use just too tedious.

    Ended up biting the size penalty and switched to a 15" mbp & have been very satisfied. Simplified my computing life in another manner - the screen size, brightness, and readability were good enough that I got rid of the separate desk machine at work and home - so even though the new laptop was a bit bigger than the old, went from 3 machines to 1.
    boblozano
  • Instead of getting a price premium...

    ...Apple should look at price drops for both the MacBook and MacBook Pro if they
    release a ThinBook. Everyone know that, and especially after the release of the
    aluminum iMac, the MacBook and the MacBook Pro are both between $300 and $800
    more than they really should be (integrated graphics alone is the single reason a
    MacBook should be around $600 to start, WITH a DVD burner instead of that DVD read
    only/CD-R thing).
    nix_hed
  • Apple needs ANYTHING smaller than a MacBook in the line up.

    I bought the duo, then the 2400, then the G4 12". I
    love the "letter" size format, as well as, and most
    importantly, the reduced weight. I've always docked to
    a big screen when stationary.
    I'm not so excited by thin, as I would rather not own
    something so easily bent over the knee (case in point,
    1st Nano was too thin as well!).
    I am praying to Steve daily that Apple makes
    something smaller yet more powerful, than a MacBook
    (fw800, fast, and 3G ready?).
    In the meantime, my 12"PB takes a lickin' and keeps
    on tickin'!
    hmmmm, can I hook up a big screen to an iPhone?
    MiniBook?
    notacloneeither@...
  • RE: Apple needs a thinbook in the lineup

    Okay! Many <a href="http://www.reebok-football-jersey.com" style="text-decoration: none; color: black;">football jersey</a> thanks! I continuously very important to publish on my on-line web site anything like that. Can I place into apply a component of your respective submit to my web page?
    tomlin21-24319035676893835085146735905770