The Apple Core

Jason D. O'Grady & David Morgenstern

Better living without MS Office

By | August 10, 2007, 3:14pm PDT

Summary: Ten years ago, Apple called a truce in its market share war with Microsoft. But Apple’s new Numbers spreadsheet and the support for Tracking Changes in the updated Pages are huge for those who want to do without MS Office.

Ten years ago to this very week, Apple called a truce in its market share war with Microsoft. After all, the Mac then had a 5 percent market share or so and the company and its OS plans were in disarray.

But the cold war continues and the new iWork ‘08 is Cupertino’s latest shot at MS Office. The support for Tracking Changes in the updated Pages will make a big difference for pro users and switchers.

Back in the summer of 1997, the Mac market had two big annual shows, a Macworld Expo in January (which we still celebrate) and the other in Boston. Steve Jobs was shaking things up inside the company and outside with its developers and partners.

At the Expo keynote, Jobs told the audience that the “era of competition between Apple and Microsoft is over.” He then announced a patent sharing deal between the companies.

“Apple lives in an ecosystem. And it needs help from other partners; it needs to help other partners. Relationships that are destructive don’t help anybody in this industry as it is today. During the last several weeks, we’ve looked at relationships. One [relationship] stood out as one that hasn’t been going so well, but has the potential to be great for both companies: Microsoft,” Jobs said that day.

Of course, this news was greeted by boos from the crowd of Mac faithful. Really, it was almost a riot in some parts of the armory hall. You can view the moment on YouTube.

While I was (and continue to be) a Mac partisan, I didn’t join in the catcalls. Jobs was making sense. Finally, here was an Apple executive who was facing the market facts.

Then Bill Gates appeared on a huge overhead projection and made his own set of promises. First, was an investment of $150 million in Apple stock. For a reason I’ve never fully understood, this pitiful gesture reassured the Street and caused the stock price to rise from $19 to $26 following the keynote.

But the most important announcement of the hour — the one vital to the millions of users who used the Mac every day to get their work done — was Microsoft’s pledge to keep developing Microsoft Office for the Mac.

Worry over MS Office was a concern expressed then by the professional Mac community on the pages of MacWEEK where I worked as a senior editor. MS Word and Excel were used in all professional content workflows and Mac businesses. And in academia and government. And everywhere else. They were critical applications

In addition, Gates said the new version of Office would be real Mac program and not just a port of the Windows version.

Back then, this was all welcome news.

Today, however, this worry about Office seems to be fading. Many users can find acceptable substitutes for Office. Or they can purchase superior programs that still offer enough Office compatibility to get by.

And Microsoft has dropped the ball on its expected upgrade cycle. Office 2008 for the Mac is now expected in January 2008, the Mac Business Unit recently explained.

For example, Keynote continues to be the best presentation tool on the market. It’s been that way since its introduction and the update in iWork ‘08 just continues its progress. I was impressed with a demonstration following the iMac introduction earlier this week. And it reads and writes PowerPoint files.

I use an excellent Mac word processor from RedleX called Mellel. This program is great for long documents, encourages the use of styles (a good thing) and provides excellent support for Unicode right-left word processing, something I do often.

However, its Word compatibility is limited to RTF. And I admit that at times I am forced to go back to Word because documents I receive include tracking history.

So, I was very glad to see support for Tracking Changes in the new Pages. This feature adds a lot of value to iWork.

Looking at the iWork applications, they appear to start conceptually with the rich, finished document and then work backwards toward the data entry and construction. It seems to me that most productivity applications start with the data and data entry and then suddenly discover that we want to print highly formatted documents.

Pages recognizes that customers want to create polished documents with images, 2D graphics and flexible typography; and then it presents the combination of easy templates, tools and content integration that make it easy for the ordinary users to accomplish.

This is also well expressed in Apple’s Numbers. The grid and formulas are always present, but the primary goal in this spreadsheet is helping users understand the data they are manipulating and then communicate this data in some kind of output.

At the introduction event, I spoke with Alan Eyzaguirre, iWork product manager, and asked him about the UI. He said the evolution of these tools followed the media-centric focus of iLife and OS X. Even though they are productive apps, they were built “for a media age.”

This isn’t to say that easy isn’t also powerful.

“You launch the app and [the average user] should just be able to use it. But we also have all these pros. For them, a click on the Inspector opens up all these controls they need for their documents,” Eyzaguirre said.

This has been the Mac paradigm from the beginning, yet the result still seems fresh. Some things haven’t changed in 10 or 20 years.

A Historical Note: Here’s a funny sidelight that was told by my late MacWEEK colleague Don Crabb about the infamous Jobs and Gates address. He said the dialog between them was fake and done via a packaged video tape. It fooled me at the time.

“One last note: Bill Gates, whose 25-foot-high video image filled the Castle midway through the Jobs keynote to bless the Apple/Microsoft agreement, was not live, not on satellite. He was, dear friends, on a videotape. It was a good tape, and it was made to look like Bill was just then “calling in.” But it was still just a tape, all the ‘gee whiz’ aside. The lack of a downlink dish ought to have given it away! Still, it was a nice touch … A nice bit of PR spin,” Crabb wrote in MacWEEK back in 1997.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

David Morgenstern has covered the Mac market and other technology segments for 20 years.

Disclosure

David Morgenstern

Freelance journalist/blogger David Morgenstern has nothing to disclose.

Biography

David Morgenstern

David Morgenstern has covered the Mac market and other technology segments for 20 years. In the recent past, he founded Ziff-Davis' Storage Supersite, served as news editor for Ziff Davis Internet and held several executive editorial positions at eWEEK. In the 1990s, David was editor of Ziff Davis' award-winning MacWEEK news publication as well as its successor title, eMediaWEEKly, which focused on multiplatform professional content creation. His byline can be found online and in print publications including CreativePro.com, Peachpit Press' Mac Bible and Popular Photography.

59
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Better living without MS Office
tomlin21-24319035676893835085146735905770 11th Oct
Remarkable Weblog I like the lay out along with the shade scheme could it be very likely to obtain a duplicate nfl football jerseys of one's strategy?
0 Votes
+ -
All beside the point
Yagotta B. Kidding 10th Aug 2007
None of the above matters, because Microsoft is well on its way to making MSOffice2K7 file formats (ECMA-376) a de jure standard required for all interactions with government and by extension just about anything else (quite possibly including filing your taxes.)

Since ECMA-376 is so tightly bound to MSWindows that MS can't even get it to work on the Mac versions of their own office suite, you're just going to have to bite the bullet and use the only platform that supports it.
0 Votes
+ -
Ok.. Splain Lucy...
Wolfie2K3 13th Aug 2007
Ok.. I read the article. What I don't get is why it's supposed to be a big embarassment for Microsoft...

Office 2007 documents are nothing more than freakin' ZIP files. That's right. PK Zip/WinZIP files. With extensions like DOCX, XLSX, etc... instead of DOC, XLS or ZIP.

How is this an embarassment? How many years have standard ZIP files been useable on the Mac? It'd be embarassing if Mac apps could NOT open it.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
I guess we will see how this transition proceeds. From the formats that arrive in my
mailbox and when I'm onsite, I find that many Windows-based businesses are using
PDF in their document interchange workflows without problems.

DaviD m.
0 Votes
+ -
what!!!
ericsami 10th Aug 2007
I always enjoy reading anti MS consipracy thories.

a file is a freaking file. it is consisted of file header and then the data follows. and that can be any number of bytes.

anybody who knows the protocol can just simply start reading the data and parse it.

how is tied to windows??????

When I read zdnet and other online publication I am suprized how many people have no clue and they comment on everything.

I have been developer for last ten years and I refuse to comment on some areas because I lack enough knowledge.

yet I see hundres of people here commenting whehter C# is better or java, whehter windwos is better or linux.
Is little endian better or big endian.

Sometimes It makes feel so dumb after ten years of software development and making good money at it too. I actually need to think about an issue. yet others so freaking smart they can spit out self made facts.
0 Votes
+ -
Since you ask
Yagotta B. Kidding 10th Aug 2007

a file is a freaking file. it is consisted of file header and then the data follows. and that can be any number of bytes.

anybody who knows the protocol can just simply start reading the data and parse it.

how is tied to windows??????


Because the file format requires access to Microsoft-specific functions. Think LaunchInternetExplorer or DoThisLikeWord95.
0 Votes
+ -
umm, no . . .
CobraA1 12th Aug 2007
A file format is just data. It's not an executable - it's doesn't call functions.
0 Votes
+ -
But the decoder does.
Patrick Jones 13th Aug 2007
And without a proper decoder, the data does not really do you any good. Granted, if one of the codes is "call internet explorer with this data" it could probably be reproduced for another browser.
0 Votes
+ -
No it doesn't.
CobraA1 13th Aug 2007
It's just basic word processing stuff that's already implemented into other Office suites. Place text here, make it bold, I want a formula in this cell, I want this transition for this slide, etc. How much are these really tied to Windows?

Show me in the specs these "Microsoft only" things, don't just imagine and invent them.
0 Votes
+ -
You're right.
Wolfie2K3 13th Aug 2007
It's just basic word processing stuff that's already implemented into other Office suites. Place text here, make it bold, I want a formula in this cell, I want this transition for this slide, etc. How much are these really tied to Windows?

Show me in the specs these "Microsoft only" things, don't just imagine and invent them.


The specs were made available during the Office 2k7 beta. They explained via a flash presentation exactly how Office 2k7 files were stored. It's a plain old ZIP file, with folders that contain various elements - data here, formatting there, XML in the 3rd folder, etc..

In fact, they showed how you can rename a DOCX or other 2k7 file with a ZIP extension and use Winzip (or whatever ZIP utility) to open and examine the contents.

Me thinks someone's been spreading the FUD. Thickly even.
0 Votes
+ -
The politics of I.T.
leigh@... 13th Aug 2007
forbid that M$ should do any thing to hold back its percieved rivals. And they have been bit by (ongoing)legal action which depending on your position is justified or an example of the degradation of the American way.
I do not personally care about the religious fanaticism of either 'side'. I have to know windows and work in a M$ 'shop'.
I love OSX and think its really good, and I think any I.T. pro who dosn't get his head around basic linux skills is short sighted. What I do not like is the fact that M$ rewrote the networking stack in Vista in such a way that it is now much harder to make it work with mac or linux. Office 2007 similarly does not play nice with the opposition out of the box. And all press releases to the contrary, this is unlikely to be an accident. It occurs to me that a port of office to a nix based OS like OSX is an invitation to the opposition to 'catch up' again. Hence the M$ reluctance to actually do it.
What do we, the consumers want? We want to be able to easily exchange information with each other regardless of what OS we use. We do not want to get down to data parsing, we just want to open that sucker! click click.
Any company that focuses on holding back its rivals by 'lock in' ideologies runs the risk of failing to deliver. A company that successfully focusses on delivery dosn't need to worry. Microsoft should remember how they got here.
0 Votes
+ -
...filing your taxes.
Henry Miller 10th Aug 2007
I'd be perfectly content to have the Feds require a communications method I have no way of using--it would be all the excuse I'd need not to deal with the blood-suckers.
0 Votes
+ -
Unfortunately the blood sucker's need for wallet nourishment doesn't allow them to recognize your inability to communicate, in fact, they would count on it as interest and penalties can slam you much harder than any taxes.
0 Votes
+ -
... they will have to provide a means for you to use office on whatever system you are currently using. The government CAN NOT compel any person to use any specific software unless they provide it. And it must be available on whatever system you are using... such as Mac or Linux or Unix.
0 Votes
+ -
Actually, they don't
frabjous 13th Aug 2007
I'm a Mac user since 1984 and a veteran tax professional--and the
government has no such requirement to play well with any OS. Some of the
states are worse than the IRS, with websites that only display well with
Internet Explorer. Much as that honks me off, I realize that they could not
make such a requirement, as new OS and browser options appear all the
time. Sadly, what they do is acknowledge the dominant OS (and the one
they use) and take the easy and cheap way out, favoring Windows/IE.

By the way, did you notice that the IRS and some states now have most of
their online fill-in forms in a variation of Adobe Acrobat that lets you save
the completed file to your hard drive? Being able to save, not just print, is
new this year, at least for the IRS
0 Votes
+ -
Word, at least, isn't an issue
Ian.Betteridge 11th Aug 2007
Office 2007 Word documents can be read and written by both Pages and Leopard's
version of TextEdit. TextEdit will also support ODF.
0 Votes
+ -
Perhaps you did not see this.
Update victim 14th Aug 2007
URL: http://www.sciencemag.org/about/authors/prep/docx.dtl

URL: http://www.nature.com/nature/authors/submissions/template/index.html

Instructions for Users of Word 2007/DOCX
Because of changes Microsoft has made in its recent Word release that are incompatible with our internal workflow, which was built around previous versions of the software, Science cannot at present accept any files in the new .docx format produced through Microsoft Word 2007, either for initial submission or for revision. Users of this release of Word should convert these files to a format compatible with Word 2003 or Word for Macintosh 2004 (or, for initial submission, to a PDF file) before submitting to Science.
Users of Word 2007 should also be aware that equations created with the default equation editor included in Microsoft Word 2007 will be unacceptable in revision, even if the file is converted to a format compatible with earlier versions of Word; this is because conversion will render equations as graphics and prevent electronic printing of equations. Regrettably, we will be forced to return any revised manuscript created with the Word 2007 default equation editor to authors for re-editing. To get around this, please use the MathType equation editor or the legacy equation editor included in previous versions of Microsoft Word, which can be accessed from "Insert Object" from the "Insert" ribbon in Word 2007.
0 Votes
+ -
Apple could make things a wee bit easier
j.m.galvin 10th Aug 2007
It would be really neat if Apple would build a pref that allowed the user to simply save into .doc or .xls (or MSXML if it ever takes hold) rather than use the Save As.

We always had ClarisWorks and I personally preferred it to Office. But the save as was something that are users kept botching up ? ticking off clients. That?s how we ended up with Office.

With the mac set to simply save into Office formats and set to open all .doc into Pages and all .xls into Numbers, it would make one less step for people to remember if they have to send something in that format out.
0 Votes
+ -
not so easy
buddhistMonkey 10th Aug 2007
Numbers' layout capability is significantly richer than
Excel's. You can have any number of spreadsheets on a
page in Numbers, all of different sizes, and all formatted
differently. When you save to Excel format, though, the
tables all get saved as individual Excel spreadsheets in a
workbook, and you lose your custom layout. That's why
you wouldn't want to save natively in .xls format. The
export-to-Excel functionality is there if you need it, but
the native format retains all of your custom sheet
layouts.
0 Votes
+ -
Believe it or not
j.m.galvin 11th Aug 2007
We never get any Excel docs, nor create any, that anything more than lists. Things like name, title, publications, etc. The last one we got was a list of company loactions from a client. Most of these are actually pretty short.

The only reason we create list in excel is because the clients tell us to. In mast cases it would be just as easy to just place a table in a word processing doc, but we're told to use excel.

I know it might seem silly, but our people just seem to have this mental block against Save As.
0 Votes
+ -
Your people aren't the only ones
maldain 13th Aug 2007
However, using inferior technology to make up for the inability of users to learn just seems wrong. If anybody comes up with a way around this please post it.
0 Votes
+ -
Spreadsheet sizes
levinson 13th Aug 2007
If you think that's cool (different size sheets on a page) you should look at RagTime:
round spreadsheets, trapezoidal, stars, any shape you want! Mind you, I've been
using RT for years and have only used rectangular sheets, myself. But still, the ability
to use any shape is cool! And no, I don't own stock in the company or anything like
that.
www.ragtime-online.com.
0 Votes
+ -
Design Difference
fde101 13th Aug 2007
It seems to me that iWork was not designed to fit in, but rather to stand out.

It sounds like your needs may be best served by enhanced user education, but alternately by openoffice.org.

Personally, I just ordered the iWork '08 package and am eagerly anticipating some of the new features...

I just hope they managed to speed up pages somewhat; the previous versions are somewhat slow.
0 Votes
+ -
All The Complexity
DannyO_0x98 11th Aug 2007
So Pages 08 brings OOXML to the Mac five months before Microsoft does. I
wonder if there's some licensing arrangement between Apple and Redmond. Could
MacOffice have been delayed to give iWork '08 a clear lane? Could Microsoft make
more money from Pages licensing fees when compared with Mac Office revenues
less trial version placement costs less development costs?

Did you see that Apple was one of the members voting Yes on OOXML at INCITS.
(It failed to achieve 2/3ds approval which means the US vote at the ISO will be to
recommend rejection.) Whether there's a business quid pro quo (there is a case to
be made that Apple are partnered with Microsoft in some respects) or Apple really
thinks OOXML should be an ISO standard (the mind boggles), Apple apparently is
not concerned if this becomes a standard de facto or endorsed data interchange
format.

Let's also note that OOXML detractors who say OOXML is implemented by only one
company have had that rug pulled out from underneath. Completely pulled, if
Apple implemented it by istself. A little tugged if Redmond assisted with the
implementation.

Highly speculative and I know nothing beyond what everyone else is reading.
0 Votes
+ -
I got the demo and am loving it.
ITGuy04 13th Aug 2007
Pages is great - has better DTP/Page Layout than the POS Word that everyone tries to do layout in.

Numbers is leaps ahead of Excel it's not funny. MS should buy a couple copies and copy it. The UI and interaction is 1000000x better than Office 2007.
0 Votes
+ -
Numbers has a bug.
Jyrki Brotherus 14th Aug 2007
The binding (=$A$1) doesn't work properly if your "International" settings is other than "US". Mine is "Finnish" and that ends my use of "Numbers" until the bug is corrected.
0 Votes
+ -
Does Pages support ODF?
PMDubuc 13th Aug 2007
I've been using NeoOffice (http://www.neooffice.org) for years as free substitute for MS Office It's office compatibility works just fine for me. I've got a lot of documents stored in NeoOffice's native ODF (.odt files). Can Pages work with that? I can't find any info on this at Apple's web site.
0 Votes
+ -
WAKE UP!
mott85 13th Aug 2007
Steve Jobs needs to wake up Office is the accepted standard worldwide. Adding yet another non compatible format is just going to give more network admins in the corp workforce more headaches when having to deal with NON office members sending docs in non compatible formats.
0 Votes
+ -
it's interesting that you mention...
msalzberg 13th Aug 2007
'another non compatible format.' Isn't the newest version of Office incompatible with previous versions? Isn't that one of the reasons for the delay of Mac Office 2008?
0 Votes
+ -
Some people
mlindl 13th Aug 2007
juat don't like/want progress!

Technology isn't like religion where you use 1400 or 2000 or 5000 year old stories
and expect things to never change!

Pages and Keynote are great, FAR easier to work with and I used them both to do
my website (private, for potential customers only).

Crisp, beautiful, easy to use formats, they really impress people. Just don't get the
same "wow" factor from Office but get LOADS of crap I never use.

I'm convinced and will get iWork pronto. Numbers looks far better than Excel for
both spreadsheet, analysis and graphic work. I hate having to make graphs in
Excel, they are ugly and you can't reformat.
0 Votes
+ -
Steve Jobs has to wake up...
Gordon Gonsalves 13th Aug 2007
... to the fact that DOS is the standard. A new user interface with a mouse and little
pointer on screen just won't cut it.
0 Votes
+ -
Office suite standard?
shraven 14th Aug 2007
I've got to think that something like editable PDF format is the wave of the future. Universal presentation, platform agnostic. Why care about ANY company specific standard?

Office is a 9000 lb bloated gorilla. Yes I use it, yes I like it just fine, but the cost and the bloat are way out of hand. If it wasn't supplied by work, no way would I buy it.
0 Votes
+ -
Office for Mac
tomshere 13th Aug 2007
I'm sick of Microsoft for many reasons. I can't even pay for support for Office X now. I lost important files in Entourage and I find it's a problem that's gone on for awhile. They won't even take the call! Just so I should buy the nothing upgrade? On to I-Life!
0 Votes
+ -
What baffles me is why Microsoft products have to be so expensive. iWorks 08 is
priced in NZ at $108, Office 2004 is $890 and Office X $1187. The Windows versions
are no cheaper.
0 Votes
+ -
Yawn
TechinMN 13th Aug 2007
Oh gee - another office productivity suite. Yawn.
0 Votes
+ -
I agree
Skullet 13th Aug 2007
What a thoroughly boring article, are we meant to be impressed that after all these years Steve Jobs is finally accepting that when it comes to Microsoft you either get on board or get mowed down. Also who really cares about yet another boring office suite for a platform that holds such a small market share? It just means that the other 90 odd percent of the world wont be able to read your documents.
0 Votes
+ -
I agree
aussieblnd@... 13th Aug 2007
Now all that needs to be done is make a version for the PC then things will get intresting!
0 Votes
+ -
Good call \\iWork'08 ; the risk is over.!
RobeTirm@... 13th Aug 2007
"People for the people is what does not happen very often." Though, the Xen and KVM square-off is of retail importance: less this 'Monopoly' style of anti-trust levels the consumer market's exporter to a limited arrangment. As named by others, Ltd.(Adobe)
0 Votes
+ -
That all sound nice but...
Snarfiorix 13th Aug 2007
How will it deal with the 700+ excel sheets I am using, with embedded VBA and all?

This has stopped me from going Open Office. Although it is often said that OppenOffice or whatever suite can do the same, but need to be build up from scratch to have the same functionality. I don't know about you guys, buy my boss is keen on me production and counting the minutes I spend on anything that is not aimed at production, so let alone I will have time to figure how things work with this new suite...and yes, I DO have a life outside of work
0 Votes
+ -
Since MS decided to totally F-up the UI.

At that point you may look at other office suites.
0 Votes
+ -
Double Yawn
Baer 13th Aug 2007
Come on, this is the real world, 95% of my clients use office (At Least). No one wants to deal with compatability issues. Dealing with the few (yes the few in the overall sceme of things, Macs is bad enough. You are trying to convert the cunstr)uction industry to using torx screws, it just is not going to happen.
Hearing about Macs from the press that uses them is like hearing about global warning causing hurricanes, Next Year it will be bad, opps, The year after, opps, well it will really get bad in 09.
How about telling us about some real world issues and not preach about Macs. I have a client that is going all PC's in a few months because of the incompatability issues with their customers, anyone want a bunch of almost new Macs????
0 Votes
+ -
You want Real World issue?
Mitch 74 13th Aug 2007
Get this: Office 2008 won't support Visual Basic for Applications. It will instead make use of AppleScript.

So much for support. Deal with it.
0 Votes
+ -
Double Yawn Fool
brewster_13@... 13th Aug 2007
For over 20 years I've been using both platforms and Macs have always just worked easier. Compatability problems? Man, that lame excuse is soooo 1980's. You really ought to open your eyes, try them for yourself, get a clue and join the world in this millenium. Learning how to spell would also help your cause. You are using metaphores which have nothing to do with the current state of computing. So your client is getting rid of their Macs just because you have no idea on how to overcome your supposed incompatability problems? There are a lot of solutions out there, when you know where to look.
0 Votes
+ -
Speaking of spelling...
scottz29 13th Aug 2007
Learning how to spell would also help your cause. You are using metaphores which have nothing to do with the current state of computing.

You mean "metaphors"...lol...
0 Votes
+ -
Ooops
brewster_13@... 13th Aug 2007
I knew I should have double checked that one... wink
0 Votes
+ -
I hate when that happens!
handydan918@... 13th Aug 2007
And you just KNOW it's gonna itch when it dries...
0 Votes
+ -
The point is THEIR customers, My clients customers, not me, are complaining and have threatned to not due business with them if they continue the Mac path. Right or wrong the cvustomer rules. These are not computer companies just multimillion dollar customers that just do not want to mess with it.
Believe it or not. I really don't care.
0 Votes
+ -
Inmates running the asylum
frabjous 13th Aug 2007
Why would customers care, or dare, to define what brand of computers
your company uses when there has been transparent file compatibility for
decades? I ran a Mac-only group in a Windows-centric Japanese
corporation 20 years ago and we routinely sent Mac-Word/Excel files back
and forth to PCs using Windows-Word/Excel, opening and editing each
other's files and simply using Save-As when necessary. The amount of
ignorance out there is scary.

By the way, when Gates "invested" $150 million in Apple stock, that was, at
the time, equal to only 4 days worth of revenue for Apple. It was symbolic,
not "company saving" but the decision to continue support for Office for
Mac was very important. Now Apple's iWork '08 has made even that issue
moot, at least for me. I don't expect to pay for an MS upgrade ever again,
but I will still be able to exchange files with Office for Windows users, as
necessary. What's not to like?
There are two reasons why Bill Gates bought share stock form Apple. 1-To avoid Antitrust Monopoly and 2-To have some control on Apple.

Now with this iWork suite one might want to wait 2 or 3 years of improvement before thinking to consider this Apple suite of Applications on his iMac. And for thinking to install it on a Widows base system one my think twice to do so and the reason is that actually and before Apple was building his softwares application with minimalism features compare to M$ and all the others Windows developers.

For example just take the iTunes that work fine on an iPod and Mac system but offer a minimal software application work on Windows PC base. Now take the Anapod Explorer that was build on a Windows system that offer lots of more features to work with the iPod and that also work on many others Mobile Multimedia appliances.
Have a look on those two Web pages:
http://www.redchairsoftware.com/anapod/ctable.php
Evaluation by PCMag:
http://buyersguide.eweek.com/bguide/Whitepaper/WpDetails.asp?wpId=NTc1MA&hidrestypeid=14&category=817
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Better living without MS Office
tomlin21-24319035676893835085146735905770 11th Oct
Remarkable Weblog I like the lay out along with the shade scheme could it be very likely to obtain a duplicate nfl football jerseys of one's strategy?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix