The Apple Core

Jason D. O'Grady & David Morgenstern

Is a shake-up coming to the Mac CAD market?

By | February 9, 2010, 9:08am PST

Summary: A longtime German CAD developer on Tuesday introduced a new cross-platform, AutoCAD-compatible program built with a fresh codebase. Could this be the knock on the door (or head) to spur Autodesk to really committing to the Mac?

A longtime German CAD developer on Tuesday introduced a new cross-platform, AutoCAD-compatible program built with a fresh codebase. Could this be the knock on the door (or head) to spur Autodesk to really committing to the Mac?

The ARES CAD platform will be offered in native versions for Mac, Windows and Linux, according to Graebert, the maker of PowerCAD. The company said the new product supports AutoCAD-compatible command line and scripts as well as a wide range of programming I/O.

From the company’s release:

ARES development has focused on a number of core benchmarks, with performance being a leading criterion: ARES is typically 3-5X faster in operations such as open and save than other CAD packages on any platform. With more than a year of intensive beta testing by more than 100 major corporations and leading CAD users, ARES is the end-result of more than 250 man-years of development (5 calendar years) from Graebert, one of the pioneers in CAD software development since 1983.

Graebert is well known internationally for leading mobile CAD solutions such as SiteMaster™ as well as having more than 500,000 estimated users of PowerCAD™, its previous-generation CAD product. The company has more than 50 active VARs and OEMs on six continents, and is working with these and new partners to distribute ARES worldwide.

According to Graebert, ARES for Mac will be offered in two versions: ARES ($495) and ARES Commander Edition ($995), the latter supporting programmability and 3D support. The Windows version is available now and the Mac and Linux versions are expected to ship in Q2.

The Mac position at Autodesk is spotty. Last April, the company announced a poll and asked its CAD users for “feedback and opinions to shape the future of the next generation of AutoCAD products for the Apple Mac OS X Operation System and hardware.”

Aside from a few native programs, the company’s current story is support for AutoCAD running on Parallels. Of course, this runs, but Mac users want native applications.

Certainly, a product like Autodesk Softimage, the 3D modeling, animation and rendering package is long overdue for a Mac version. It’s insane that its still Windows only (this is from its Avid history).

When asked couple of years ago what Apple should do with its cash nest egg, I suggested that Apple buy Autodesk. That logic still holds, it appears to me. In fact, with the increasing interest in 3D content, the proposition might be sweeter.

Perhaps the ARES release by Graebert will put some fire under Autodesk about Mac support. Or down in Cupertino. In the meantime, Mac users wanting a native solution can check out ARES.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

David Morgenstern has covered the Mac market and other technology segments for 20 years.

Disclosure

David Morgenstern

Freelance journalist/blogger David Morgenstern has nothing to disclose.

Biography

David Morgenstern

David Morgenstern has covered the Mac market and other technology segments for 20 years. In the recent past, he founded Ziff-Davis' Storage Supersite, served as news editor for Ziff Davis Internet and held several executive editorial positions at eWEEK. In the 1990s, David was editor of Ziff Davis' award-winning MacWEEK news publication as well as its successor title, eMediaWEEKly, which focused on multiplatform professional content creation. His byline can be found online and in print publications including CreativePro.com, Peachpit Press' Mac Bible and Popular Photography.

13
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Is a shake-up coming to the Mac CAD market?
IDkad 13th Feb 2010
There is more to the world of CAD than Autodesk. Autocad
is very last century in its user interface, and other ways too
(sorry, can't go into all that right now). However, there is a
large 3rd party investment for add-ons, plug-ins,
workflows and what not. So trying to overcome that inertia
will take a while. Open and smart CAD formats should be a
huge goal of all CAD makers to encourage interoperability
between industries so that specific CAD apps can focus on
what they do best but not have to be everything to
everybody and still be able to communicate with other
industries.
0 Votes
+ -
There has to be money in it
John Zern 9th Feb 2010
Apple could buy AutoDesk, but would it be worth the investement?

If CAD software for a Mac is not something people are interested in, all they would have achieved is buying a Windows software company.
0 Votes
+ -
and there is money to be made...
GrimmReaperSound 9th Feb 2010
Look at the Autodesk Media and Entertainement products. Products like Maya and MotionBuilder that made the movie Avatar possible can certainly generate a fair revenu stream. These products could go very well with other Mac software like Avid's MediaComposer for video or Digidesign ProTools for audio.
Autodesk is not just CAD anymore.
0 Votes
+ -
There has really been no pro-level CAD available on LInux
up till now, though there are other wonderful design and
engineering programs. And a fraction of the cost of
AutoCAD. Finally. Frankly I'm not too happy at all with
the virtual monopoly position that AutoCAD has held all
these years over the pro CAD market and the ridiculous
prices and upgrade manipulations they put people through.
It's high time there was real choice and alternatives in
professional CAD apps - and platforms.
please, please make this reality!
0 Votes
+ -
SaaS is the future of CAD
gogaddy 9th Feb 2010
Platform-independent CAD delivered via the web is the ideal scenario, so users can collaborate regardless of whether they're using Macs or PCs. Check out www.siteops.com for a great example of this.
take a royalty-free copy of the data for their own use. Never mind if this upstart goes out of business, all that money goes down the drain.

We're an ownership society. not a leased one. Especially under such flimsy conditions to begin with.

SaaS makes an aaSS out of people who use it, I'm sorry.
0 Votes
+ -
AutoCAD on Parallels is not really useable
lostarchitect 9th Feb 2010
I've tried it extensively, and I always end up booting into
Windows via Bootcamp instead. It's choppy and has lots of
odd quirks under parallels that don't manifest natively.

I'm very interested in this ARES software. At $500, it sounds
like it's priced reasonably, too. I'll be looking into it.
0 Votes
+ -
It runs better on VMWare than Parallel's, but...
nix_hed Updated - 9th Feb 2010
... either way it's still slower than molasses. This will definitely be good
for architects that use Macs, however, since the hard-core engineers will
stick to AutoCAD and Windows.

BTW, try typing hard-core without a hyphen and it censors it. That would
be a ZDNet fail.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is a shake-up coming to the Mac CAD market?
scott.sheppard@... 10th Feb 2010
Autodesk Labs has the Project Butterfly (http://labs.autodesk.com/technologies/butterfly) technology preview that Mac users can try using their browsers.
....someone will take over and (hopefully) provide mac users a solution that DOES work (in contrary to bootcamp, vmware fusion or parallels).
I'm very eager to give it a try, and say Autodesk GOODBYE!
0 Votes
+ -
AutoCAD is a necessary evil in my career. Bloatcode. Every
iteration of AutoCAD is less and less responsive than the one
before. AutoDesk needs to break free from it's past and develop
fresh code - instead of just buying other companies.
Having worked for 2 very large retailers, I can tell you that
Autodesk aredoing nothing except pushing REVIT - So why would
they invest in a Mac CAD program?
There is more to the world of CAD than Autodesk. Autocad
is very last century in its user interface, and other ways too
(sorry, can't go into all that right now). However, there is a
large 3rd party investment for add-ons, plug-ins,
workflows and what not. So trying to overcome that inertia
will take a while. Open and smart CAD formats should be a
huge goal of all CAD makers to encourage interoperability
between industries so that specific CAD apps can focus on
what they do best but not have to be everything to
everybody and still be able to communicate with other
industries.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix