The Apple Core

Jason D. O'Grady & David Morgenstern

Kindle takes a jab at iPad’s glossy screen and high price

By | September 14, 2010, 10:09pm PDT

Summary: A new Amazon Kindle ad goes for the jugular and attacks the iPad’s glossy screen and high price.

A new television ad promoting the Amazon Kindle directly targets the iPad’s glossy screen and high price. In it, a pretty woman and a goofy guy in a white t-shirt have an ackward conversation about using their book readers as they sit outside by the pool.

The video’s embedded below, but it pretty much goes like this:

The guy notices the Kindle being read by a woman next to him at a pool. The hapless dude’s ”iPad” suffers from an intense glare from the iPad’s glossy screen. iScreen glare is worst when used outside in direct sunlight while wearing a white t-shirt.

After not being able to read his device he turns to the woman next to him (reading the Kindle) and says:

“Excuse me, how are you reading that – in this light?”

She replies:

“It’s a Kindle.

It’s $139.

I actually paid more for these sunglasses”

The new TV ad is going after a feature that I’ve complained about since it came out — glossy screens. I hate ‘em.

Glossy screens are great on stationary computers (iMacs) and on monitors (like the new 27″ ACD) where you can control the lighting. But they are terrible on mobile devices (iPhone, iPod, iPad MacBook) when they’re used outdoors or near a window in direct sunlight.

For some people, it’s not a big deal, but for me it’s a dealbreaker on a notebook computer. I will only buy a matte screen MacBook, because glossy screens are terrible outdoors and almost as bad in the passenger seat of a car — depending on the amount of sunlight.

Luckily Apple currently offers an antiglare finish on its MacBook Pros, but it charges an absurd $50 penalty for something that should be the default configuration. I tolerate glare on my iDevices but would prefer an anti-glare iPad any day.

No matter where you stand on the glossy/antiglare screen debate, one feature Apple will have a tough time competing on is price.

The new Kindle ad points out that it starts at $139 (it’s also worth noting that it’s sold out). The iPad starts at $499 — a 260 percent premium over the Kindle. In the current economy, that’s enough of a gap for Amazon to put a serious dent into iPad sales this holiday season.

Discuss.

Tip: PC Magazine

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Jason O'Grady is a journalist and author specializing in mobile technology. He has published six books on Apple and mobile gadgets and his PowerPage blog has been publishing for over 15 years.

Disclosure

Jason D. O'Grady

Jason D. O'Grady is the creator and editor of O'Grady's PowerPage, which has been publishing mobile technology news since 1995. He maintains an advertising relationship with the following legacy advertisers on the PowerPage:

  • Amazon Associates
  • Google Adsense
  • Tekserve
  • Advertising on the PowerPage is brokered by a third-party agency (BackBeat Media) and he recuses himself from these negotiations.

Biography

Jason D. O'Grady

Jason D. O'Grady developed an affinity for Apple computers after using the original Lisa, and this affinity turned into a bona-fide obsession when he got the original 128 KB Macintosh in 1984.

He started writing one of the first Web sites about Apple (O'Grady's PowerPage) in 1995 and is considered to be one of the fathers of blogging. He has been a frequent speaker at the Macworld Expo conference and a member of the conference faculty. He also co-founded the first dedicated PowerBook User Group (PPUG) in the United States.

After winning a major legal battle with Apple in 2006, he set the precedent that independent journalists are entitled to the same protections under the First Amendment as members of the mainstream media.

O'Grady is the author of The Nexus One Pocket Guide, The Droid Pocket Guide, The Google Phone Pocket Guide, and The Garmin nuvi Pocket Guide (Peachpit Press), the author of Corporations That Changed the World: Apple Inc. (Greenwood Press), and a contributor to The Mac Bible (Peachpit Press). In addition, he has contributed to numerous Mac publications over the years, including MacWEEK, Macworld, and MacPower (Japan).

When he's not writing about Apple for ZDNet at The Apple Core, he enjoys spending time with his family in New Jersey.

32
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Kindle takes a jab at iPad's glossy screen and high price
jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812 11th Oct
Your site web page is remarkably enjoyable. I am loving all the details that chestnut ugg you happen to be sharing with many people!
While both can be used for reading books -- with Kindle being better in bright light, and iPad being better in dim light (people sometimes need to buy lamps just to read on Kindle), as well as bringing colour -- iPad is totally different universe of capabilities and use, comparing to Kindle.

And reading books is like fifth use priority for iPad.

So it is stupid to face-to-face compare it and Amazon will hardly win with it.
@denisrs
No it isn't. Most people who are looking for an eBook reader hear about the iPad. Then, if they have smart friends, are told to buy a way better, more affordable, Kindle.
http://fogz.eu/skqqd

I tide fashion

Good-looking, not expensive
0 Votes
+ -
up until this story, I always thought the ipad started at $399.

Hell no I would never pay $500 for a 16gb ipod touch
0 Votes
+ -
Haha, what a GREAT commercial!!!
NonZealot 14th Sep 2010
Suck it iPad! happy
0 Votes
+ -
A pointless comparison
gillico Updated - 14th Sep 2010
The comparison is like saying your car sucks because it has leather seats instead of being a bicycle. I'll stick with my iPad and my cool sunglasses, thanks.
0 Votes
+ -
Comparable
pabajo 15th Sep 2010
Yes they are comparable, and they share part of the same market. Lot's of users are getting Ipad to read and that makes it a kindle rival. So yeah, it's a good comercial and yes everyone that has an Ipad and saw this comercial are gonna be pissed. Yeah all those users that use their Ipad to check email next to their real computer , hehe
0 Votes
+ -
compare
banned from zdnet 15th Sep 2010
@pabajo
amazon makes the the worst mistake you can make in an ad: mentioning your competition. people will ask themselves, yeah sure a black&white, flickering-one-second-every-time-you-turn-a-page, dedicated e-reader is better in direct sunlight, but with an ipad i could do so much more. like a universe of possibilities in comparison with these 25.000 apps and color and email and internet and games and movies and music and and and.

hmmm? touch choice (kidding).
@banned from zdnet

Who really gives a rip 'how much more' the iPad can do? If they wanted all that stuff they can get an iPod Touch or a netbook for less money. For people who are interested in e-readers (and there are MANY such people) the fact that the iPad can do more is pretty close to meaningless if they can't use it AS AN E-READER.
0 Votes
+ -
I dig the commercial... but
x21x 15th Sep 2010
is it just me or is the "paid for sunglasses" part dubbed and ackward since your not seeing her lips move?
0 Votes
+ -
@x21x I have to admit I was not watching her lips... LOL
Isn't a better analogy a "Word Processor" (remember those?) and a PC? Sure you can compare that one feature of the PC, and if all you will ever need to do it write letters, yeah - the word processor is probably fine for you. But advance yourself a 6 months to a year and you'll be wanting to do more. So compare these two devices fairly and the iPad destroys Kindle. And will. This is an old story. Kindle is not a good or advanced enough device, with enough functionality to warrant owning in the face of such hugely more powerful, useful devices.
0 Votes
+ -
Apples vs. Bananas
egidioleitao 15th Sep 2010
Well, the devices do different things (the iPad is more than a book reader). Nevertheless, this is a great ad poking fun at Apple's high device price and glossy screen.
0 Votes
+ -
The ad is just sophmoric.
james@... 15th Sep 2010
It is a shame that Kindle has defined their user base as a group of people that are too stupid to "get" the utility of their device. It is insulting.
I also have to agree with the other comments. Comparing these two devices is absurd. If you are using an I-pad then you are likely using it as a book reader probably less then %10 of the time. That implies that the user base is leveraging the other functionality the rest of the time. It is the 90% functionality usage that makes the iPad a compelling tool.

If you choose a Kindle "over" and iPad then you are really limiting yourself to substantial functionality. However if you buy both then you have really got the best of both worlds.... YES?

P.S.
Apple please embrace the matte screen... Like the author I hate glare.
@james@... While I'm not a huge fan of screen glare Apple probably won't abandon it until someone invents an oleophobic matte surface. Glare is better than annoying fingerprints.
0 Votes
+ -
@dheady@... Given the choice I'd rather have an anti-glare screen and use a microfiber towel to wipe off fingerprints.
@james@...

Except that Apple IS marketing the iPad as an e-reader, so it isn't Amazon comparing the Kindle to the iPad, it's Apple. Amazon is merely responding.
"The iPad starts at $499 ? a 360 percent premium over the Kindle". No, a $499 device is a 260% premium over a $139 device.

499 / 139 = 3.59 = 359% (round to 360%). The "premium" then would be 260% (=360% - 100%).

To verify, the student can check the "premium" of a $139 device over a $139 device - we know the answer will be zero:
139 / 139 = 1.00 = 100%. The premium is thus 0% (=100% - 100%).
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@Patrick462

duly noted and corrected!
- jason
The real math is in what the device does for you. The iPad certainly justifies the 'premium' over the Kindle in increased features and usability. Frankly, even at $139 the Kindle is over prices for a one trick pony. Besides, who the heck reads at a beach? The glare from even an old paper book is enough to give one a headache. Not to mention the neck spasms from trying to read and watch bikini clad lasses sashay along the beach. Get real. Put the readers where most people read. Uh, well, perhaps being water resistant would be a 'feature' in that case also. But the lighting should cease to be an issue.
@dheady@... That's why you position the top of reading device just below your direct line of sight- easy bikini watching with bonus plausible deniability!
0 Votes
+ -
Typical. ZDNet blogger writes an anti iDevice article, Apple Haters cheer it, Apple Zealots deride it by saying the iDevice has XYZ over the Kindle and the iPad is used as an e reader about 10%of the time... all well and good BUT what about the other 90% of the time? One is STILL dealing with that screen glare... and in the context of that commercial the iPad IS being used as a e reader...
@athynz I have no dog in this hunt - I use both windows and OS X and think both do a good job. I may prefer one over the other, but they're tools, not religions.

The kindle IS a better eReader. The iPad is an ok one. But it shines in other areas. For what some describe as a glorified iPod (a moniker I don't agree with, btw) it seems to be selling like hot cakes.

Again, the other 90% of the time depends on what that is. For some, because of their usage habits/requirements, the screen may never be an issue. Others may find it a deal breaker.

Guess what - if it fits your needs buy it. If it doesn't don't.

I suspect this marketplace will begin heating up as others release their iPad killers.
0 Votes
+ -
I agree with the author. Glossy looks pretty inside but the glare really sucks when out in the real world. I have a MBP with a anti-glare screen and love it. I would consider a iPad if it was offered with a anti-glare screen without the $50 up charge Apple is now charging for the MBP screens.
0 Votes
+ -
Do you know why Apple called it the iPad
hubivedder 15th Sep 2010
because iPathetic was too close to home
0 Votes
+ -
Come off it, Amazon!
Laraine Anne Barker 15th Sep 2010
Compare your products with more appropriate competition--the Sony e-readers for instance--if you don't want to look like complete idiots.
0 Votes
+ -
I guess it comes down to, if your want a device, just to read, get a kindle. If you want a device that does a lot lot more, get an ipad.
I think its funny. I don't think Apple will bother with a commercial taking a jab at Kindle's inability to recommend nearby restaurants. I think the piggy squeals loudest who is getting his tail pulled.
My next question would be how can you watch your movie/tv, check your email, surf the web ..... in this light? Oh wait you can't. It's a Kindle isn't it? No glare surface would be nice. You can buy anti glare film for a few dollars. Need something to protect the screen anyway.
Silly comparison. I have both, but never use the Kindle anymore because the reading experience is so much better on the iPad - easier navigation, color pictures, faster page turning, web browing, e-mail, hundreds of apps, need I say more? (I can still read my Kindle books as well)
0 Votes
+ -
dumb kindle ad
eldernorm 17th Sep 2010
I think its funny. Kindle was priced at $400-$500 right before they came down in price. The lady should have said, "and I was dumb enough to pay $500 for this book only reader".

So, while its nice that the price came down, the guy can be reading a $4.95 book in the sun and be the life of the party that evening with his "amazing" iPad... happy

Just a thought about commercials that do not think far enough ahead. happy

en
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Kindle takes a jab at iPad's glossy screen and high price
jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812 11th Oct
Your site web page is remarkably enjoyable. I am loving all the details that chestnut ugg you happen to be sharing with many people!

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix