The Apple Core

Jason D. O'Grady & David Morgenstern

MacDefender taken down in raid by Russian authorities?

By | August 4, 2011, 9:19pm PDT

Summary: MacDefender caused a malware crisis for the Mac in June 2011 but went suspiciously silent in July. Russian authorities may have busted the group responsible for supporting the fake AV program.

MacDefender caused a malware crisis for the Mac back in June 2011. At the time it seemed like an epidemic, but then after a short round of update Whack-A-Mole with Apple, MacDefender seemed to disappear entirely. In fact, Apple last updated its malware definitions on June 18.

On August 1, my ZDNet colleague Ed Bott wrote “Where did all the Mac malware go?

The last time I saw Mac Defender in the wild was on June 23rd. This nasty bit of Mac malware made life miserable for Apple and its support technicians for the entire month of May, before fading away in mid-June.

New information suggests that Russian authorities may have busted the group responsible for one of the biggest scourges that the Mac has ever seen.

Brian Krebs appears to have linked ChronoPay to Mac Defender (via MacRumors)

On June 23, Russian police arrested Pavel Vrublevsky, the co-founder of Russian online payment giant ChronoPay and a major player in the fake AV market…

In May, I wrote about evidence showing that ChronoPay employees were involved in pushing MacDefender — fake AV software targeting Mac users. ChronoPay later issued a statement denying it had any involvement in the MacDefender scourge.

But last week, Russian cops who raided ChronoPay’s offices in Moscow found otherwise. According to a source who was involved in the raid, police found mountains of evidence that ChronoPay employees were running technical and customer support for a variety of fake AV programs, including MacDefender.

The last release of MacDefender occurred on June 18. ChronoPay’s offices are raided June 23. A coincidence perhaps, or Russian law enforcement saving Mac users from fake antivirus software.

This would be great news if it turns out to be true.

Photo: PS3hax

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Jason O'Grady is a journalist and author specializing in mobile technology. He has published six books on Apple and mobile gadgets and his PowerPage blog has been publishing for over 15 years.

Disclosure

Jason D. O'Grady

Jason D. O'Grady is the creator and editor of O'Grady's PowerPage, which has been publishing mobile technology news since 1995. He maintains an advertising relationship with the following legacy advertisers on the PowerPage:

  • Amazon Associates
  • Google Adsense
  • Tekserve
  • Advertising on the PowerPage is brokered by a third-party agency (BackBeat Media) and he recuses himself from these negotiations.

Biography

Jason D. O'Grady

Jason D. O'Grady developed an affinity for Apple computers after using the original Lisa, and this affinity turned into a bona-fide obsession when he got the original 128 KB Macintosh in 1984.

He started writing one of the first Web sites about Apple (O'Grady's PowerPage) in 1995 and is considered to be one of the fathers of blogging. He has been a frequent speaker at the Macworld Expo conference and a member of the conference faculty. He also co-founded the first dedicated PowerBook User Group (PPUG) in the United States.

After winning a major legal battle with Apple in 2006, he set the precedent that independent journalists are entitled to the same protections under the First Amendment as members of the mainstream media.

O'Grady is the author of The Nexus One Pocket Guide, The Droid Pocket Guide, The Google Phone Pocket Guide, and The Garmin nuvi Pocket Guide (Peachpit Press), the author of Corporations That Changed the World: Apple Inc. (Greenwood Press), and a contributor to The Mac Bible (Peachpit Press). In addition, he has contributed to numerous Mac publications over the years, including MacWEEK, Macworld, and MacPower (Japan).

When he's not writing about Apple for ZDNet at The Apple Core, he enjoys spending time with his family in New Jersey.

41
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: MacDefender taken down in raid by Russian authorities?
jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812 10th Oct
It's a good,ordinary sensation submit.Particularly fairly practical to 1 that could be just getting the resouces about this aspect.It will nfl wholesale unquestionably assistance educate me.
0 Votes
+ -
Word to the wise, hackers..
Tigertank 4th Aug
in Russia, computer monitor is watching you.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Word to the wise.....
fatman65535 5th Aug
@Tigertank

Wouldn't it be so nice if those behind this malware family suddenly ended up at a Siberian prison?
@Tigertank To me its no shock that Russians were involved. If you look into Hacking and who's getting big in the world for it, Russia and China are the rising stars. More and more hacks are coming from those nations. I'd be more than willing to bet that the PSN hack came out of Russia or China and not from Anon.
@Relorian@... Chinese crap IMO is on the decline and has been for about 4 years ever since they started turning off out of border transmissions. Now what comes from China are the tougher actual criminals as opposed to mountanis of Chinese jacks.
Busted!!
0 Votes
+ -
Crisis, what crisis?
ego.sum.stig@... 5th Aug
There was a massive flurry on a few blog sites. Lots of assertions about "vast hordes" seeking help to get rid of this MacDefender thing. And yet, Apple's wares are flying off the shelves in ever greater numbers. Much the same thing happened with the huge furor over "Antenna-gate."

It seems that more and more the tech sites have succumbed to petty and long lasting vendettas. And this combined with ever greater efforts at inducing shock and horror and to hell with thought etc.

For such "award winning" bloggers, one does wonder if their glory days are long since gone, or whether they were ever worthy of anything.
0 Votes
+ -
@ego.sum.stig@...
Who go's into peoples homes
I saw Mac Defender and it's like on 3 different Macs
and I hardly ever see any Macs
you are kidding yourself
@zmud

And I have not seen it on any.

The ratio of infected PCs to uninfected PCs that I have experienced has always been high.

The ratio of Infected Mac to uninfected mac I have seen has been and still is very low.

Like about 4 infections on Macs since 1984 - and time to fix of between 5 mins and 15 mins.

Compare that with hours to days to need to rebuild many many PCs.

So seriously - I think you are kidding us.
@zmud Thank you, I've always contended that Windows is "job security" for IT people! What you've said pretty much re-enforces that statement.
@zmud - incorrect, you didn't see it on 3 Macs, so quit lying. It took a lot of work to get it installed, so it's more likely you have seen zero Macs that were ever affected. Be more truthful next time.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Quit Lying
bobiroc 5th Aug
@Pederson

How do you know?... were you there? Between May and June I took in about 8 Macs for repair and 7 of them were infected with this type of Malware but I guess I am lying too. Just because you didn't see it happen doesn't make it a lie. I don't get malware on my systems and haven't for many years but I know it is out there and that people are victims to it. Most of the time because of their own neglect and understanding.
@zmud And if you're a real Mac tech support person, then you know that people don't call you and say - "Hey, my computer doesn't have a problem. Fix it!"
@ego.sum.stig@...

It was bigger than you think it to be. I took in more Macs in May and June than I typically take in for an entire year. All of them had the MacDefender or a variant that needed to be removed and all the users were novices and fell for the scam and a couple entered their credit card info.

It happened, Apple Patched, and now they are busted it seems. Similar things happen with Windows Malware. Bust a couple and new ones come up.
0 Votes
+ -
@bobiroc ... to play whack-a-mole.

I've been a Mac user since 1984, and used Apple II's back to 1978. I prefer them for general use to my Windows, Linux and (other) Unix boxes, and I wouldn't give them up for anything.

BUT I'm also a realist and I've been in IT long enough to know that creating malware -- especially attacks that trick clueless users -- into corrupting their own machines is not difficult, in the scheme of things, and there's seemingly little that Apple or anyone else can do about it, except play catch-up after an attack comes out.

I love my Macs, but even I wouldn't be foolish enough to say the Macs are impervious to attacks, especially when users have proven repeatedly that they're the biggest security weakness for any system.
@jscott69

I too have been using Apples and Macs since the 80's but find I prefer Windows for my primary OS. In this day and age it is mainly a preference thing as most average consumers can use either. Businesses, Schools and other organizations have to be a bit more picky as they usually have specialized software that is not always cross platform compatible. I have a 5 year old MacBook that I use for work bootcamped with Windows 7 as I have to support both platforms at my job as a Systems Admin for a High School District. I find Windows easier to set up and manage in an enterprise or large networked environment and that is one of it's biggest advantages.

Glad to hear that you are a realist like me and understand that the security of your computer systems is your responsibility and you cannot assume the OS or the software you use will protect you. If an attacker or Malware organization has something to gain and it is worth their effort they will find a way in if you let down your guard.
0 Votes
+ -
@bobiroc

If you think that the number of machines you see infected that you take in for REPAIR is in ANY way indicative of the level of penetration of MacDefender, you are seriously in need of either a Research Methods or Intro to Statistics class.
Numerous sources actually have looked at the issue, and have shown conclusively that almost no one, with in statistical significance, was affected by MacDefender. I saw it on zero machines (though I tend to deal more with hardware) and only encountered an actual infection vector once, during a google image search.
You claims are mathematically bogus, and pragmatically irrelevant.

@jscott69, no one in this thread claimed macs were impervious to attack, so your post has little to no relevance, or merit.
@bobiroc The fact that you saw 7 in 2 months doesn't make it a wide spread infection. You saw an increase and that is understandable. I am not saying that only a couple of systems in the world were infected but I don't believe it was the wide spread infection that some bloggers have made it out to be. In perspective it might have been wide spread for Macs but in the big picture it was.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
Bruizer Updated - 5th Aug
@ego.sum.stig@...
Most established products are "flying off the shelves." Check out windows 7! But, what does that have to do with malware distributors??
@ego.sum.stig@... at our service shop we had several calls (10 or so) from people when the installer came up, about 5 others brought in infected systems. Since then I have seen another 2 or 3 while doing other work on computers. Most of this was in a 2 or 3 week period.
It has essentially stopped, so that is nice.
0 Votes
+ -
@ego.sum.stig@... Your attempt to correlate the issue with the Mac Defender malware and the sales of Apple wares is futile. Nor is this like "antennagate" as "antennagate" was completely overblown, the Mac Defender malware issue is a real issue.
0 Votes
+ -
As predicted
ego.sum.stig@... 5th Aug
The responses saying it (MacDefender) is a problem don't really support the assertion that it is (or was). That and "antennagate" was just as hyped.

Anyhow, it is my continued assertion that the concept of blogging/journalism on tech has devolved to and is devolving further into sensation (page hits) first and anything like thought, facts, analysis an extremely distant second.
@ego.sum.stig@...
Go to Warp 6, #1!
If I were writing malware aimed specifically at a company with BILLIONS of ready cash reserves, I would think twice about doing it. Apple could easily offer a Million dollar (unpublicized) "reward" to whoever busted the malware creator. It would protect Apple's "virus proof" image with the masses and thereby protect Apple sales. It would also serve to warn other malware writers that they just might not want to get Apple on THEIR case.
@pyrdek

Actually this is a good idea - maybe this should happen more often to all OSes?

Better than supporting an AV industry.
@richardw66

Who says it doesn't? It's hard to track these guys in obscure foreign locations however. Especially where the law doesn't easily assist you.
@pyrdek

At which point I would write some code, hire someone to take the hit (for many, a year or so in jail and a fine would be worth it for the 100k I would pay them) and then proceed to "bust" this nefarious evil doer.

An easy .9M for me.
@deusexmachina?? I was thinking the same thing happy
0 Votes
+ -
Mac Users
GoofPuff 5th Aug
The reality is that Macs are geared not for the techies, but for the people who want intuitive usage, who don't want to know how a laptop really works or how to change anything out. Its geared for the technically un-gifted or lazy. Which is why THOSE people are falling victim to the virus because they trust blindly everything. Tech-savvy mac users know better than to fall victim to the fraud. As more people buy MAC, we're going to see more and more viruses/trojans/etc to exploit the non-tech-saavy popuation of Apple users.
0 Votes
+ -
not to be able to teach yourself how to use a Mac and how to look after it. I am my own IT person and I've looked after my own Macs for the last 16 years. I am completely self-taught.
@GoofPuff


Blah blah blah security through obscurity blah blah blah.

Yeah, we've already heard that thousands of times, but thanks for the insight.

BTW, first, it is not true, and is PROVABLY so.
Second, please inform all the theoretical physicists, neuroscientists (my field) bioengineers, pharmaceutical designers, cryptographers, and UNIX administrators that OSX is for people who are "technically un-gifted or lazy".
As a full POSIX compliant UNIX, your assertion is absurd.
And as almost NO ONE was infected with MacDefender, contrary to the claims made by the likes of Ed Bott, even the non-technical mac users seem to have known better.
0 Votes
+ -
@deusexmachina?? And as almost NO ONE was infected with MacDefender, contrary to the claims made by the likes of Ed Bott, even the non-technical mac users seem to have known better.

Usually I agree with you but I cannot with this point. If this was indeed the case then Apple would not have had to come up with their own antimalware software and would not have had to subsequently keep it updated. While the actual numbers affected are likely less than reported I'm certain they are higher than you think.
@athynz

The mechanism Apple used was part of Snow Leopard at its release years ago. It is a signatures list that is continually checked against downloaded content. They added a number of things to the list when it first was created, and simply added "Mac Guardian" to the list of signatures for which it checks. Like the Antenna-gate issue, the degree to which it was publicized had far more to do with the press blowing the story out of proportion than it did with it being an actual issue. One only needs read Ed Bott's misinformed fear mongering for a case in point.
I suppose to some here I come off as an Apple zealot (though mostly this is due to the role I have chosen to play, namely that of errata-hound) I really am not. I take Apple to task for many things, in the appropriate place. But ZDNet, it seems, Is not the place where these issues get aired. Instead, it is full of these click bait articles, and as such, all I end up doing is defending them. That said, the Mac Defender issue truly was a non-issue, other than the fact that it was here and gone, but still puts the lie to the security through obscurity myth.
@GoofPuff
Macs are geared for the non-techies? Well my Mac doesn't hold my hand and ask me if I would like my desktop cleaned up and my non-used shortcuts deleted like another operating system I have used.
@GoofPuff Macs my be easy to use/understand but that does not mean they are geared for none techies or lazy. I actually know at least 10 computer illiterate Windows users for ever illiterate Mac user. All trojans/malware are targeted at people that don't know any better, doesn't matter if they are on a Mac or a Windows machine.
Crime and punishment: If there's no punishment for committing a crime, and you can profit from harming total strangers, why not go for the gold?

Most of "us" whom you IT's denigrate for being clueless are the 95% who support the industry. There's a better solution than simply letting the criminals whack "uis".

The element I constantly miss in the IT expert's dialogue about security is the PUNISHMENT part of the equation. This may be a dumb statement and question from a non-IT expert, but here it is anyway: stealing my time and causing me financial grief above a certain amount of money is a felony. Experts in law enforcement can ascertain beyond a reasonable doubt that a certain criminal has harmed society, whether through malware, spamming or theft via computer. Yet, we rarely read about perpetrators being arraigned and punished. If a hacker-thief-virus promulgator is looking through bars, he can't be finding ways to look through my computer business.

In my less than humble opinion, being caught and severely punished IS the ultimate solution to illegal computer actions.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Punish the crooks....
fatman65535 5th Aug
@scald321

Excellent idea; I suggest a .357 through the head. Problem solved.
Mac business set ups use none Apple VOIP and also have to use some Microsft based kit so there will always be a need for IT tech support. I had an iPad freeze and the user did not not want to read a self-help article on how to hold down the start and home button at the same time. I was asked to goto site to do this for them and it was chargeable.
Also, as mentioned above, as Apple takes over market from Microsoft, there will be a lot more malware written to attack Mac's and the systems they use. It really is true that whoever has the largest slice of the pie gets all the hassle and attacks.
The fact of the matter is that no system is immune to malware, not even Unix-Linux boxes.
We all know the reason why there are so many viruses and other forms of malware out-there hitting on Win machines is because of the overwhelming majority of win systems in the world. It has nothing to do with which system is better or safer. Wait for the Mac to increase its market share and you will see the increase in malware being developed for the Mac. It has to be worth its while for the hackers and other pirates, otherwise there is not reason for them to develop those malware softs.

I agree with all of you. The weakest link in the chain here is the end-user.
"police found mountains of evidence that ChronoPay employees were running technical and customer support for a variety of fake AV programs, including MacDefender"

Since when can you get tech support for malware?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: MacDefender taken down in raid by Russian authorities?
jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812 10th Oct
It's a good,ordinary sensation submit.Particularly fairly practical to 1 that could be just getting the resouces about this aspect.It will nfl wholesale unquestionably assistance educate me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix