Microsoft Surface keynote vs. Apple iPad keynote
Summary: A video compares the Microsoft Surface keynote to the Apple iPad keynote two years prior. The main difference is that the iPad didn't crash.
The Verge has posted a video of Monday's Microsoft Surface keynote. As I watched it I was reminded of the original iPad keynote from 2010.
Read Write Web has posted a video of the similarities noting that Microsoft's getting rusty at stealing from Apple:
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Yawn
Key words being ignored ....
In other words, it is going to cost more than the Xoom did when it came out .... and look how well it did.
The ARM versions must be cheaper than the iPad
The one that will be priced competitively with the ultrabook
Skip IT !!!
Embarrassing
One of these men ...
Has MS' lighting crew never heard of amber filters to warm up things a bit and provide a healthy hue?
Talk about sucking the life out of a presentation?!
Of course, a lifeless presentation without any substance is even worse. MS provided only rough ballparks on pricing -- pricing that won't really be competitive with existing tablets (okay ... the iPad). And iffy specs -- which suggests that everything is still in flux. And a schizophrenic product line-up of a multitude of Windows flavors -- all of which look a lot alike, but aren't really compatible. And no firm launch date.
Has MS learned nothing? They need a grand-slam. They can't afford to screw this up. But coming out with a hollow announcement -- and a demo that crashed! -- delivered by ghostly (ghastly?) presenters after drumming up all kinds of excitement that was clearly over-dramatized just isn't the way to win friends and influence people.
Yikes.
That is NOT Balmer
He's talking the Fat bald guy in the blue shirt
So this "Surface" thingy
Last I checked
It might run hotter
Where do you get 3 times hotter?
The fool from Microsoft said it would be cost comparative
Microsoft Surface keynote vs. Apple iPad keynote
Microsoft is really loosing it's grip
Why is this website so heavily apple biased.
Correct me if I am wrong, but the ipad is a tablet!
So why does it have its own category.....
I can't be bothered with this website any more, it reminds me of an atheist (non apple believer) trying to talk to a christian (Apple follower) about there not being a god, or that all religions are the same (Apples are not the only fruit)...
All you get back is LA LA LA, not listening, we are the best everyone else must follow us as we are the supreme race, or are copying us, we invented everything(like christianity, using ideas from other religions, and the new testament being written by people who lived 200 years after jesus died, and seem to have first hand knowledge of him). The way apple fans talk reminds me of the Nazis and the Aryan race.
Not everything apple is amazing and good, and everything that is not apple is not rubbish or a copy. Every idea and concept is bought and sold for hard cash. all comapnies buy new technologies off people and then brand it as their own, and own the IP for it, a lot like religion. Why can't we all just get along.....
Good bye AppleNet.....
If everyone needs to use apple as they are the best, is like saying everyone should drive a hi-end sports car as they cost the most, look the nicest and work really well. Choice is what makes us unique.
Steve Jobs was the life force of Apple and all that is now left is businessmen with dollar signs for eyes, and its lost it hippy roots and turned the free thinking followers, in to zealot drones.
Sad times for technology progression....
Ridiculous...
If you weren't being such a hyporite
"The way apple fans talk reminds me of the Nazis and the Aryan race."
That's hilarious, considering it's the Windows/Microsoft fanboys that speak like Nazis/Aryains. They complain that anything not blessed by Microsoft, is inferior.
Actuall,y from my experience, it's the other way around
But I ageee that site has infact gone Apple biased during the past several weeks.
If you saw on the Windows 8 Pro demo they showed on the keynote, you had to look closely to see something. On the desktop he pulled up on the surface, there was a watermark. Now we don't see watermarks on final versions of Windows software, only betas and previews. And if you read that watermark, it said "This is for testing purposes only". It was obviously not the final software because the final OS is still being developed. So this had to apply for the Windows RT tablet that apparently crashed.
The iPad (the generations after the first one) most likely had the final firmware uploaded during its keynote because shortly after, the iPads shipped. There is a difference: Finished software (iPad) vs unfinished software (Surface). It is the keynote that was Microsoft's problem, NOT the product.
And speaking of keynotes, look at the many "Apple fail keynotes" on youtube. I assure you they are a great deal worse than this Surface "failure" especially when Steve Jobs blames the audience's usage of network data or wifi for his iPhone not being able to load up a page. He does not address his problems with humor because almost anything he says the audience will laugh at even if it's not funny. Jobs: "That's why we have backups". Audience: "Laugh". Is that funny? It's probably just me.
As always in the end it's the people who own the product that are actually in a way representing the product. If people brag about owning an iPad amd saying it's the best tablet that was ever made and ever will be made, that will steer many users to but an iPad. Let us hope that will not be the case with the Microsoft Surface.
Typing on a mobile device