The Apple Core

Jason D. O'Grady & David Morgenstern

Microsoft’s improvement strategy for Windows 8: Think like Apple!

By | June 29, 2010, 2:18pm PDT

According to reportedly super-secret documents discovered in a PowerPoint presentation, Microsoft’s answer to Windows 7 failings is to be more like a Mac. No kidding. Could it be that Redmond has been deconstructing Apple’s new “Why you’ll love a Mac” advertising campaign? Then again, maybe not.

The slide in question describes the “Virtuous Cycle,” a well-known economic term that describes a positive feedback loop. You may remember it being used in relation to signs of hoped-for recovery from the current recession. One good thing leads to another and the cycle repeats itself.

In the reported Windows 8 slide, there’s an illustration of the loop with the following points in order:

-Brand Promise,
-UX is low in friction,
-Confidence in ability to use,
-Realized value,
-High satisfaction, which leads to Brand Promise all over again.

The bullet points expand on the illustration:

-Apple brand is known for high quality, uncomplicated, “It just works.”
-Product UX is designed to hlp people realize value.
-Realized value leads to product satisfaction, which in turn feeds brand loyalty.
-This is something people will pay for.

Keep trying guys! One of these years you’ll figure it out. Or not.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

David Morgenstern has covered the Mac market and other technology segments for 20 years.

Disclosure

David Morgenstern

Freelance journalist/blogger David Morgenstern has nothing to disclose.

Biography

David Morgenstern

David Morgenstern has covered the Mac market and other technology segments for 20 years. In the recent past, he founded Ziff-Davis' Storage Supersite, served as news editor for Ziff Davis Internet and held several executive editorial positions at eWEEK. In the 1990s, David was editor of Ziff Davis' award-winning MacWEEK news publication as well as its successor title, eMediaWEEKly, which focused on multiplatform professional content creation. His byline can be found online and in print publications including CreativePro.com, Peachpit Press' Mac Bible and Popular Photography.

32
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Microsoft's improvement strategy for Windows 8: Think like Apple!
DeusExMachina Updated - 4th Jul 2010
@kdsandeep@...
1) Nokia had NOTHING similar to the iPhone. Their silly touchscreen notwithstanding.
2) eBooks existed LONG before Amazon. The raison d'etre for the iPad is NOT just eBooks, so what is your point, exactly?
3) the iPhone OS has multitasked from day one. Apple was not waiting for Android to lead the way, they were waiting for hardware technologies to catch up. They haven't really, which is why Android is having the issues it is having.
3) As someone who actually USED the XEROX Alto, I can assure you, you don't know WTF you are talking about.
4) what does Media Access Control (MAC) have to do with anything?
0 Votes
+ -
Yep, everyone is copying Apple
iPad-awan 29th Jun 2010
First its Google, now it's Microsoft and Cisco (with the iPad-like device). Can't really blame them.
@iPad-awan

first nokia in phones then apple, first amazon in ebooks, then apple ibook, first xerox in GUI, then apple MAC, first multitasking in Android, then multitasking in Apple etc
@kdsandeep@... As a customer, I like this cycle: it helps keeping prices low and innovations high.
0 Votes
+ -
It does work like that.
Ktroje 30th Jun 2010
@kdsandeep@... The commonality about all of those? Apple saw flaws in those previous designs, and decided that in order to do it right, they had to do it themselves.

Nokia had phones? wow. Apple made a phone, with an App Store, easy-to-use user interface and design, and put some classic features from the iPod into it like iTunes library sync with all our songs, videos, and podcasts.

Amazon made a cruddy eReader. You pay $10 for a book to be displayed on a thick, semi-expensive (for it's purposes) E-Ink reading experience. Apple saw opportunity to leapfrog that. They added a REAL browser, the App Store, legacy capability (run iPhone apps) and to produce a truly netbook-like experience, without the lag of an actual netbook. All with a widely considered better eBook reading experience.

If Xerox was first to make a GUI, Apple surely one-up'd them. It's widely respected that (and as previously stated in a recent article - Windows vs. OS X - Copy and Paste, here in ZDNet) a Mac's (no, "Mac" is not an acronym) GUI is one of the most advanced, user-friendly options available.

Yes, Android had multitasking first, but as Steve Jobs said - "We're not the first to this party, but we've done it the best." iOS 4 implements multitasking doesn't drain the battery as was the case in older WinMo phones, and even early Android devices.

Yes, I heavily support Apple, and find them highly superior is most (most, not all) areas. Yes, I'm a fanboy. Save yourselves the trouble.
0 Votes
+ -
@kdsandeep@...
1) Nokia had NOTHING similar to the iPhone. Their silly touchscreen notwithstanding.
2) eBooks existed LONG before Amazon. The raison d'etre for the iPad is NOT just eBooks, so what is your point, exactly?
3) the iPhone OS has multitasked from day one. Apple was not waiting for Android to lead the way, they were waiting for hardware technologies to catch up. They haven't really, which is why Android is having the issues it is having.
3) As someone who actually USED the XEROX Alto, I can assure you, you don't know WTF you are talking about.
4) what does Media Access Control (MAC) have to do with anything?
I hope Microsoft doesn't think like Apple. I'm perfectly fine with the prices of Microsoft's software and hardware, I don't need them to jack that up. I also don't need a bunch of smug Microsoft people walking around either. I'm perfectly fine with the way Microsoft is conducting business right now.
@Loverock Davidson

"I'm perfectly fine with the prices of Microsoft's software and hardware, I don't need them to jack that up"

Microsoft's prices of their software is the highest in the industry. If they think like Apple, the software prices would go down.

" I also don't need a bunch of smug Microsoft people walking around either."

Too late, their are more smug Microsoft people than there is for Apple and Linux combined.

"I'm perfectly fine with the way Microsoft is conducting business right now."

You mean utterly lost with no direction?
0 Votes
+ -
Microsoft hardware?
davebarnes 29th Jun 2010
@Loverock Davidson

MS hardware?
Mice? Keyboards? Zune? X-box?

Computers? Nope.
Phones? Nope.
Tablets? Nope.

So you like MS prices on hardware except that they don't make any hardware for THE major segment and 2 of the fastest growing segments.

Am I missing something here?
I wonder what made Bill Gates choose the name "Loverock Davidson" for hist posts here?
@Loverock Davidson Micro$oft is not playing fair, that's why every government starts a court versus Microsoft.

Micro$oft doesn't invent stuff (maybe one thing a year), but steals it. When you steal stuff, you don't have many costs. When you don't have many costs, you should lower the prices. Micro$oft ain't doing that, however.

Google does a bit the same with Android, taking stuff from Apple. However, Google holds on to lower prices, I think
Um, what? Windows 7 hasn't failed. What the **** are you talking about?
@Droid101,
So, you're saying Windows 7 has failed? How so?
0 Votes
+ -
Windows 7 hasn't failed
use_what_works_4_U 30th Jun 2010
@Droid101
If the measure of improving a product is that you have to wait until you fail to do so, where would we be? OS X 10.2 was not a fail (for those who used it) but 10.6 is infinitely improved.

I agree, Windows 7 is a fine OS. That doesn't mean I should wait until the next MS Bob to see something better come along.
0 Votes
+ -
Windows 7 failed?
Cylon Centurion 29th Jun 2010
When did that happen?

Anyway, the thing I wish Microsoft would take from Apple was a unified Control Panel. Otherwise, they are finally coming to terms with a unified UI (Ribbon, no menu bars), and a more simplified use of techno-babble.

EDIT: Oh yeah, I wish Microsoft would pound the hell out of OEM's who destroy decent machines with crapware. That **** destroys Windows' image and leads to nothing but problems.
0 Votes
+ -
@NStalnecker

OEM's played and will continue to play a huge part in defining a Microsoft branded PC experience. Good luck trying to control the PC OEMs like they want to do with their phone.
0 Votes
+ -
@NStalnecker
When you live on undercutting price and make razor thin margins you have to take $0.05 for every unit that you install "trial-ware" on. This is one reason Apple stopped doing that. If you want a pristine PC, then shop the upper-middle and upper price ranges. You'll get better built, more reliable hardware too.
0 Votes
+ -
Good point
Ktroje 30th Jun 2010
@NStalnecker Windows in and of itself isn't all that bad an OS. I heavily prefer OS X for iPhone/iPad development, and the general user experience Macs offer.

I do like your point about OEMs messing with Windows' image by installing their $h!tware before you're even able to boot it up for the first time. Dell and HP have "Docks" that try to mirror OS X's - the problem? Microsoft didn't intend for Windows to have a dock, therefore it's a terrible, slow piece of bloatware. HP makes a point of installing as much useless photo$hit on their computers. Last I checked, my sister's HP notebook came with 3.6 GB of HP photo applications she's never used in the 2 years she's had this laptop.

If those OEMs could sell their hardware with Microsoft's untampered OS, it would actually be a pristine experience. One thing I enjoy about OS X - I'm free of the bloatware. Any application I have was intentionally installed. For what it's worth, drag-and-drop installation/uninstallation is just wonderful.
Microsoft will never "be like Apple". Apple are a hardware company while Microsoft are a "one size fits all" software company.
0 Votes
+ -
I agree with you on...
Dave32265 29th Jun 2010
your post except for the "one size fits all" comment. Sorry to disappoint you here but they do not fit all. They don't fit my needs or wants and I can say the same of many others. Perhaps if they actually listen to their customers wants and needs, they might even come close.

Lose Ballmer and the stale "think tank" MS has in its employ and replace them with fresh blood (and a CEO that actually has tech background), you might see fresh new ideas come out of Redmond. Until then, MS will continue to flatline on stock prices and will also continue being a "me too" company.
0 Votes
+ -
If you think...
Boozer007 Updated - 29th Jun 2010
If you think, "Think like Apple", then you're not thinking like Apple.

Think again.
@Boozer007

Well put, well put!
"Keep trying guys! One of these years you?ll figure it out. Or not."

Last I checked, Apple doesn't seem to be too terribly interested in selling computers anymore. I wonder what impact that'll have on their ~6% market share?!?!
0 Votes
+ -
It's not about market share for Apple
use_what_works_4_U 30th Jun 2010
@digital838
For Apple it's not about market share, and it really never has been when Steve is there. For Apple it's about designing the products that they believe people want, doing it in the way that makes the most sense to Apple, and making a profit. On those metrics Apple is very successful indeed.
0 Votes
+ -
Do Microsoft's plans include.....
Userama 29th Jun 2010
dressing up Steve Ballmer in a black sweater and jeans?
0 Votes
+ -
That would be...
Dave32265 29th Jun 2010
scary indeed. It's bad enough people have to endure his pit stains in his regular attire.
Yes - failure! Windows 7 passed SL only two weeks after its introduction and has now sold more copies than Mac OS has over apple's entire existence. A real failure!

Keep up your moronic trolling - you'll get it right!
@Helio99000
So MS has created a Powerpoint presentation about how an OS should work. The fact that they have been at this game for over 20 years and they just now realized what the average user wants, is pathetic at best. Ditto for their mobile efforts... last time I checked they were into ring tones.

Meanwhile, Apple is the most innovative company in the Tech world. They managed to blur lines between hardware and software in a way that MS could only dream about.

Bravo Apple...
0 Votes
+ -
No one said Windows 7 was a failure
use_what_works_4_U 30th Jun 2010
@Helio99000
Microsoft created a presentation which said it has failings . In other words, Microsoft not Jason sees room for improvement.

You can obviously read, but before attacking Jason for a statement made by Microsoft, you might try thinking about the text a little.

Critical thinking - the skill we most need but is not being taught in U.S. schools.
Even for a blog titled apple core this is a pathetic way of getting hits by saying Windows 7 is a failure, unless you are that stupid.
Wrong - the slide is about how the product brand would work better if OEM's - to whom the slide is directed - raised their game. Also, the slide has nothing to do with the original poster calling Win 7 a failure which is most certainly is not. Trashy link bait like that is actually what I'm responding to.
why would you want to copy a company that only has a 10% market share in the computer industry? Just sayin.
0 Votes
+ -
Because they are extremely profitable
use_what_works_4_U 30th Jun 2010
@Doin ur mom
And in a more or less capitalistic society (such as the U.S. where both these corporations exist) making a profit is the goal.

Critical thinking - try it sometime.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix