Mike Daisey caught lying about Foxconn; incinerates credibility
Summary: Even after the retraction, how many people will remember the lies that Daisey told? Did Daisey put a proverbial dent in Apple's global brand? What are the costs of his fabrications?
On Friday, popular public radio program (and podcast) This American Life was forced to retract an episode that it broadcast in January about Foxconn's factories in China.
The episode was excerpt of Mike Daisey's (pictured) acclaimed one-man show "The Agony and the Ecstasy of Steve Jobs," about visiting a Foxconn factory in China that makes iPhones and iPads for Apple (in addition to products for many tops electronics companies). It was the show's most popular episode.
Daisey made several claims about Foxconn and its labor practices that, upon further inspection, appear to be completely fabricated.
According to the New York Times:
After broadcasting the segment, the producers of This American Life had been alerted by Rob Schmitz, a reporter for another public-radio program, Marketplace, that some of the first-person testimony presented by Mr. Daisey in the radio version of the show was dubious.
The TAL blog explains the ruse:
The China correspondent for the public radio show Marketplace tracked down the interpreter that Daisey hired when he visited Shenzhen China. The interpreter disputed much of what Daisey has been saying on stage and on our show.
You can listen to the retraction episode as a podcast and it's a complete a train wreck. There's also a transcript (PDF), but I recommend the podcast so that you can hear Daisey's long, awkward pauses when asked the tough questions.
Even after the retraction, how many people will remember the lies that Daisey told? (How many birthers still believe that Obama's a Muslim?) And it's not just the damage caused by the TAL episode, Daisey was a popular guest on many of the major cable news shows after his episode of TAL aired and after the publication of the New York Times' controversial iECONOMY series on the treatment of workers at the Foxconn factories.
Did Daisey have an impact on Apple's global brand? Does Apple have a case for a slander suit?
Photo: Show Business Weekly
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Read the PDF
"We did factcheck the story before we put it on the radio. But in factchecking, our main
concern was whether the things Mike says about Apple and about its supplier Foxconn.
which makes this stuff, were true. That stuff is true. It???s been corroborated by
independent investigations by other journalists, studies by advocacy groups, and much of it has been corroborated by Apple itself in its own audit reports."
So Apple might like ti sue Daisey for implying armed guards or underaged workers, but the appalling low-paid and crampled living conditions still exist so that Apple can make a profit.
Misnomer of course
That doesn't excuse Apple or Daisey but let's keep things in perspective, shall we...
Article missing information?
I don't stalk Apple stuff so I don't know whats going on with this guy, or if he said good things that will help Apple or bad things that were against Apple (the end does suggest bad things were said, but I don't really know.)
Please add a little bit more context to this article please.
Try following the links provided...
ummm ... the point of reporting ...
I normally like Jason O'Grady's stories, however, I have to agree with x21x: this story is missing ... well ... everything. There's no context. I do follow Apple, and I know about the Foxconn issues, but I'm not familiar with this podcaster and I have no idea what he said that Apple might have liked or not. All I know from this story is that someone said something about Foxconn and apparently he trashed his reputation doing it. I can't tell if he was painting things at Foxconn in a rosy light, or whether he exaggerated how bad things are.
I shouldn't have to click all over the place to read 14 different other blogs and stories and web sites just to figure this out.
Jason: would you please provide a teensy bit of context for us in the story -- summarize what was said and why Apple might be unhappy or not? A sentence or two would be GREAT.
Thanks. :-)
You are so lazy
Well, fortunately, you don't have to do any of those things. You have to click once to go to listen to the podcast (or read the transcript). Why should anyone have to provide you with Cliffs Notes of everything on the Internet so you don't have to read or listen for yourself?
In the time it took you to type out your insipid and condescending reply wherein you whine about not being spoon-fed information you could have clicked the link and done the reading yourself.
@jscott69 and x21x
@Anthez
Talk about seriously lazy writing...
He was only imitating politicians
It's no secret that we have off-shored slavery
Why bother?
making things up is fashionable
Just because...
We KNOW that people who work there are still killing themselves, and that the only reason the numbers have gone down recently is because nets have been put up to stop suicidal workers taking their own lives via a rooftop jump, and *I* know from living here that it happens a lot more regularly than the western media acknowledges it.
I wonder why...
People do this
I'm actually apt to believe his fiction is closer to reality...
We all know that traveling to foxconn to get a first-hand impression will find you greeted with the same sort of carefully controlled facade the average visitor to pyonyang would receive.
Not that I care, the guy is a journalist, and they're all yellow.
Reality can be bought
Are you willing to tell HP and Dell that?
Don't tell me there's a double standard here, Wilie.
Sure can!
Not at all
HP, Dell, individually don't come close as Apple does in terms of money spent at Foxconn.
That would make Apple a "valued partner" above the others, and someone Foxcomm would bend over much farther for.
Sure ya can
What double standards. Nobody's letting Apple off the hook here. The problem is you're lying by omission about the others. Glad to see your starting to change a little bit.
[i]HP, Dell, individually don't come close as Apple does in terms of money spent at Foxconn.[/i]
Uh, last time I heard, HP, Dell etc...made 10 times more machines on those assembly lines than Apple did. What was that about money?
[i]That would make Apple a "valued partner" above the others, and someone Foxcomm would bend over much farther for.[/i]
Uh no, that sounds more like one of those fantasies you collected from your local p0rn site.
Say it ain't so, Wilie!
lol...