Office for Mac 2011 SP2 update creating database issues for some Outlook users

Summary: Microsoft introduced Office for Mac 2011 Service Pack 2 about a week ago, and according to the company, the "majority of our customers have been delighted with the improvements." However, some not so much, particularly Outlook users. So the other day, Microsoft stopped pushing the update through its AutoUpdate client.

Microsoft introduced Office for Mac 2011 Service Pack 2 about a week ago, and according to the company, the "majority of our customers have been delighted with the improvements." However, some not so much, particularly Outlook users. So the other day, Microsoft said it had stopped pushing the update through its AutoUpdate client.

Our goal is provide the simplest update experience for everyone – so we have temporarily stopped pushing out the SP2 update through Microsoft AutoUpdate while we investigate the issue. Customers are still able to obtain the SP2 update via the Microsoft Downloads site by clicking here. We encourage you to either wait for the AutoUpdate, or follow the directions in the above blog post before manually updating to ensure you don’t experience issues. We will provide an update once we have more information to share.

Some five days after the release, Microsoft officially noted the problem on its Office For Mac blog. It warned Outlook customers to rebuild the Outlook for Mac 2011 database file and offered a workaround for folks who had already upgraded.

The Office 2011 SP2 release improves database resiliency and detects inconsistencies that went unnoticed prior to this release; however some users have experienced issues related to corrupted databases after the latest updates. We have support and workarounds available for you in the following situations:

The hold on AutoUpdate happened a few days later. A reader of the Office For Mac blog, Don Montalvo, was grateful for the hold.

Thanks for pulling this updater from Auto Update. It makes it a lot easier for us supporting thousands of Macs where the users have admin rights.

Um, thanks for something?

Topics: Software, Apple, Collaboration, Hardware, Microsoft

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

5 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Um, thanks for something?

    OK.
    William Farrel
  • Actually, I had a stranger bug with this update

    When I purchased my build to order (BTO) iMac almost two years ago, I also bought Microsoft Office for Mac 2011. Doing it this way saved me the hassle of installing the software from DVD disks.

    When I installed this particular update, the Office Suite mysteriously requested my activation codes once again. I typed in those codes but the software refused to acknowledge them.

    Now, before I go on, let me state that I didn't try to contact MS customer support. What I did do was restore my previous Office software state from my latest Time Machine backup.

    The backup Office software works perfectly .. as it did prior to this SP2 update.

    After reading about the problems associated with this update, I will wait until MS releases a corrected update patch. No big deal.

    BTW, I believe most computers users that respond on ZDNet realize that unforeseen errors occur from time to time on any software platform. When certain persons throw a dig at a particular platform due to situations like this, I often wonder why that person wasted his time posting that "fanboi" type comment.
    kenosha77a
  • This sounds terrible

    [i]It makes it a lot easier for us supporting thousands of Macs where [b]the users have admin rights[/b].[/i]

    What? OS X has failed that company if they needed to give thousands of users admin rights on their machines. I'd be curious to know why they did that.
    toddbottom3
    • Nice spin job, Todd

      I'm impressed that you successfully turned the topic about a pulled and faulty update to an opinion about a "perceived" failure of an operating system. Well done.
      kenosha77a
      • He's just using the same tactics that the anti-MS crowd uses

        but the difference is that he actually had a valid point in there.
        William Farrel