Steve Jobs' sneakiest statements

Summary: Wired went back and uncovered six of Steve Jobs "sneakiest" statements. I add a seventh. Is Apple being disingenuous or is it the job of the CEO to throw journalists off the scent?

Wired's got an interesting piece up today, titled Steve Jobs’ 6 Sneakiest Statements which outlines some of Apple's whimsical CEO's masterful misdirections over the years.

1. During a 2008 earnings call Jobs said that Apple could not make a $500 computer that was not a “piece of junk" fueling speculation that the tablet would cost $1,000. Irony: the iPad is a $500 computer.

2. During the 2003 All Things D conference Jobs told Walt Mossberg "There are no plans to make a tablet," and "It turns out people want keyboards…. We look at the tablet, and we think it is going to fail." Wow, fail is a pretty strong word these days, but then again seven years a long time ago.

3. Jobs panned the mobile phone in the same interview, saying "I get a lot of pressure to do a PDA. What people really seem to want to do with these is get the data out. We believe cellphones are going to carry this information. We didn’t think we’d do well in the cellphone business. What we’ve done instead is we’ve written what we think is some of the best software in the world to start syncing information between devices. We believe that mode is what cellphones need to get to. We chose to do the iPod instead of a PDA."

4. Jobs also panned the Kindle in 2008, saying "It doesn’t matter how good or bad the product is, the fact is that people don’t read anymore. Forty percent of the people in the U.S. read one book or less last year. The whole conception is flawed at the top because people don’t read any more."

... only to do a complete 180 degree turn in his Janaury 27, 2010 iPad launch event, saying "Amazon’s done a great job at pioneering this functionality with their Kindle, and we’re going to stand on their shoulders and go a bit further."

5. In January 2003, Jobs told Mossberg "I’m not convinced people want to watch movies on a tiny little screen," Jobs said. "To paraphrase Bill Clinton, 'It’s the music, stupid, it’s the music!' Music’s been around for a long time, will continue to be, it’s huge." In 2005 Apple released the fifth-generation iPod with a 2.7-inch screen that played video. Then in 2007 Apple released the third-generation iPod Nano with a 2-inch screen that played video.

6. When asked in September 2009 why Apple put a camera in the iPod nano and not in the new iPod Touch Jobs explained the lack of a camera was to keep the price down, so Apple could market the Touch as an inexpensive gaming device. "So what we were focused on is just reducing the price to $199. We don’t need to add new stuff. We need to get the price down where everyone can afford it."

Here's another one that Wired neglected to include:

7. Jobs said in 2004 that Apple wasn't going to make a flash-based iPod because their capacities were too small. Adding that flash-based digital music players are often received as gifts, are rarely used, and "end up in a drawer." Apple later released the flash-based iPod nano in 2005.

Topics: Tablets, Apple, Hardware, Laptops, Mobility

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

43 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Not irony

    If the iPad weren't a piece of junk it would be irony. The iPad is a piece of junk. Anything that proprietary and closed is a piece of junk in my book.
    Michael Kelly
    • Your junk book

      Must be mighty hefty by now ;)
      oncall
  • He's always been right...

    In those comments he bashed things that turned out to be great successes.

    He's been bashing Windows for years, and it's still King, with OSX barely holding on.
    TylerM89
    • Huh!?!

      Havent I been reading that the Macintosh's market share is growing?
      More importantly is the money Apple has been making? Market share is
      one thing but money is THE real factor here. In this Apple is a winner. In
      this I don't understand the whole "barely hanging on" statement? I would
      think that barely hanging on and growing are hardly one and the same.

      Pagan jim
      James Quinn
      • "Havent I been reading that the Macintosh's market share is growing?"

        Well...maybe not...

        http://www.pcworld.com/article/183325/windows_7_sales_beat_mac_os_x_market_share.html

        http://www.upi.com/Business_News/2009/11/29/Windows-7-tops-Mac-OS-X-market-share/UPI-80821259519614/
        IT_Guy_z
        • What does that have to do with OSX market share size?

          All those articles said was that Win7 passed OSX in market share... doesn't mean that OS X market share has stopped growing.

          I love how people read something and make little changes to the facts to work for their own agenda.
          Geuseppi
          • People read what they want to read, see what they want to see (NT)

            .
            themarty
      • You're right...

        ...Apple's market share over the last two to three years has grown from 'insignificant' to 'miniscule' and Windows has dropped from 'omnipresent' to 'overwhelming'.

        It's always good to get things in context.
        Sleeper Service
  • everybody has the right to change their mind.

    I'd rather see people realize they were mistaken about
    something and change direction than continue steering a
    straight course at all costs.
    lostarchitect
  • RE: Steve Jobs sneakiest statements

    "Anything that proprietary and closed is a piece of junk in my
    book."

    I have an old Dell laptop that I bought with Microsoft Office
    loaded on it. Maybe you can help me and tell how I can
    transfer it to my new Windows computer. I agree with you in
    that my Dell laptop has basically been a piece of junk.
    Prime Detailer
  • I guess he has to be "sneaky"

    Every blogger and analyst picks apart his every utterance for clues as to what Apple might be doing. It's kind of ridiculous, the only person I've seen who had his words dissected more than Jobs was Alan Greenspan.
    oncall
  • We could list the other Steve's dumbest statements

    that might be fun.
    CowLauncher
  • Possibly the only BIGGER meglomaniac in IT is Larry Ellison (nt)

    ...
    IT_Guy_z
    • Or Steve Ballmer

      etc... and so on

      The world has no shortage of huge egos. Some of those egos belong to successful people. Some of them belong to people in IT you've never even heard of.
      use_what_works_4_U
  • RE: Steve Jobs sneakiest statements

    Ever watch a magician? They use a technique called
    'misdirection'. That's where one hand is waving about while
    the magician is saying abracadabra and his lovely assistant is
    jiggling body parts his other hand pulls the rabbit from the
    hat.
    With apologies to Mr. Churchill, "Some rabbit. Some hat."
    dheady@...
  • RE: Steve Jobs sneakiest statements

    And don't forget when he was bashing Intel chips and saying
    how they were very happy with PowerPC... while in the
    background, working on Marklar.
    Ian.Betteridge
  • Who really pays attention to what Steve Jobs says anyway?

    Except for the kool-aid drinking converted followers, believers, fanatics, zealots fanbois. Bah, so few of them.

    Who really cares?

    But I thoroughly enjoyed your article. A breath of fresh air.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    He who laughs, lasts...
    WinTard
    • Well... quite many

      as far as I can see, most of the technology and gadget focused public
      have recently listened carefully to what this gamechanger says.

      World would be flat if the only innovator was Mr. Gates.
      Ondrax
      • B u l l s h i t

        And this is why Apple fanbois are charecterized as they are. Koolaid swilling introverts who can only speak out in groups as a group or behind the anonimity of the web.
        CrashPad
        • Fingers

          You point your finger at Mac users but the majority of what you wrote is also <i>very</i> applicable to you. Or is "CrashPad" your given name? The only thing clever or intelligent about your post was the use of spaces to get past the ZDNET censors. I didn't do it, but I was gratified to see that your post had already been reported as offensive by the time I read it.

          There are fanbois of all stripes. Loverock, NonZealot, LinuxGeek, etx... and so on. Personally, I am quite happy to live in a multi-platform, OS agnostic world of my own choosing.
          use_what_works_4_U