The Apple Core

Jason D. O'Grady & David Morgenstern

Why does the MacBook Air make so many so dumb?

By | January 16, 2008, 11:40pm PST

Summary: Believe it, Apple’s new ultralight notebook is perfect technology. It’s an elite product, something that seems appears to drive populist Mac fans crazy. But this notebook will be Apple’s next step in a strategy to infiltrate the enterprise.

Why does the MacBook Air make so many so dumb?Believe it, Apple’s new ultralight notebook is perfect technology. It’s an elite product, something that seems to drive populist Mac fans crazy. But this notebook will be Apple’s next step in a strategy to infiltrate the enterprise.

Smart people at parties and on the show floor here at the Macworld Expo keep complaining about the MacBook Air. They are outraged.

“It’s just not right,” they say. The battery is all wrong. Or it’s incomprehensible that any Mac notebook would lack Gigabit Ethernet (or any Ethernet for that matter) or FireWire. Or that there’s no RAM upgrade slot.

This machine is so beautiful, but it’s unusable! How can this be happening to us?

Sadly, all of these complaints are dumb. There’s nothing at all wrong with the MacBook Air and everything is right about it. It’s an amazing piece of design and engineering. This machine will be a museum piece, no doubt.

It’s also sturdy. Pick up a comparable Windows-market machine by one hand at the corner and you may worry a bit from the squeaks and creaks. On the other hand, the MacBook Air is light and solid. And beautiful.

Somehow, longtime Mac users were deluded that this new machine would be some kind of a replacement for a MacBook Pro. Sorry, it isn’t the replacement for anything. The MacBook Air is something different.

(A brief sidetrack: I add that the whole notion that notebooks can be a “desktop replacement” is marketing nonsense, one that most computer users have bought into. Notebooks are designed for mobility and they make many serious trade-offs when compared with desktop machine, whether professional or consumer grade.

For example, my MacBook Pro is a fantastic machine, however, it can’t touch an 8-core Mac Pro’s amazing processor performance, networking and storage expansion, video performance and reliability. At the same time, it’s not so convenient to carry around a Mac Pro.

Now, if I had the money, I would have two machines, one for power and another for mobility; but I make do with one and by necessity, it’s a mobile machine. Still, in no way is it a “desktop replacement” other than by necessity that it’s used for all my primary computing — until I win the lottery.)

Instead, the MacBook Air is aimed at a narrow upscale segment of the market. These customers care about style and what that style says about them. It’s all a part of their personal brand.

These customers want excellent design and will value the drama created by the MacBook Air. When they open this machine at a meeting, it may say more about them than a $300 haircut, or a bespoke suit.

Will these users worry about connecting FireWire for digital video or external storage? They may worry more that a heavy briefcase filled with a heavy notebook could wrinkle their suit before a meeting. Listen, if one of these persons needs an power outlet because the battery is heading towards critical, someone will find them an outlet. And besides, there’s plenty of juice for notebooks and mimosas in the first class cabin.

What’s great about the MacBook Air is that this machine appears to be a new twist in Apple’s stealth campaign into the enterprise. The MacBook Air is all about switchers.

Who will be customers of this classy machine? Captains of enterprise and commerce. Traditionally, these customers have been Windows users. But now they will buy Apple’s new ultralight and join the ranks of switchers.

Read related story: Do switchers now rule the Mac?

These executives are helping to drive the adoption of the Mac in the enterprise and mid-market companies. I pointed this out a year ago, with the observation that project-centric software companies such as Mindjet were offering Mac versions. The company this week announced a Leopard-compatible update to Mindjet MindManager 7 at the Macworld Expo.

Mindjet does “mind-mapping,” or brainstorming for top-level execs. Brook Stein, senior product manager, told me last year that some of the demand for Mac compatibility came from switchers in the executive ranks.

“The biggest market we’re seeing growth in are people who use Windows at work [because they have to], but who buy Macs for home,” he said.

Now, with the MacBook Air in the briefcase (or manila interoffice mailer), these executives aren’t going to want to keep the Mac at home. It’s going to go straight into the board room.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

David Morgenstern has covered the Mac market and other technology segments for 20 years.

Disclosure

David Morgenstern

Freelance journalist/blogger David Morgenstern has nothing to disclose.

Biography

David Morgenstern

David Morgenstern has covered the Mac market and other technology segments for 20 years. In the recent past, he founded Ziff-Davis' Storage Supersite, served as news editor for Ziff Davis Internet and held several executive editorial positions at eWEEK. In the 1990s, David was editor of Ziff Davis' award-winning MacWEEK news publication as well as its successor title, eMediaWEEKly, which focused on multiplatform professional content creation. His byline can be found online and in print publications including CreativePro.com, Peachpit Press' Mac Bible and Popular Photography.

386
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Why does the MacBook Air make so many so dumb?
amakrejktt34 18th Nov
tigtgw,good luck! it's tigtgw.
0 Votes
+ -
The market will decide..
TheTruthGiver 17th Jan 2008
Let face it, Apple has always gone for form over function. The Air is just their latest status piece for the masses. It doesn?t have to actually work well, it just has to look good in your home or office. The problem for Apple is that people are waking up and expecting more than a pretty face in the morning. It isn?t good enough to just look good when you need to get some work done.

Anyone who owns a laptop knows that battery life is measured in discharge/charge cycles. Most batteries only last a year. What are you going to do when facing a deadline and you don?t have time to take your laptop in for repair for a new battery? That is the real drama with owning this laptop.

Apple has brought new meaning to the phrase ?A fool and his money shall soon be parted?.
0 Votes
+ -
Please stop with the ongoing nonsense
MacCanuck 17th Jan 2008
>>> Let face it, Apple has always gone for form over function. >>>

Apple has, for years, gone for form AND function. Something "PC" OEMs are just discovering.

Since the late '80's Apple has paid attention to industrial design, engineering and usability but also performance and features/function. Anyone who claims otherwise either hasn't used a Mac (much or at all) or is simply an uninformed Apple basher.

ONE of the reasons Apple products have traditionally cost more is the thought and extra effort put towards industrial/engineering design (ie, since the IIcx (circa '89), Macs have generally been easy to open and maintain/upgrade vs typical "PC" boxes that required follow-up trips to the emergency ward for cuts, scrapes and stress-related problems).

IIcx - case easily slid off and innards opened like a book to reveal the "guts" of the machine; 9600 (mid-90s) - laid on it's side, again opened like a book (some thought clam shell) to reveal it's workings; G3/G4 towers (late '90s/early 2000s) - drawbridge side opened to reveal insides; G5 tower - side panel easily removed; most components pull/slide out with plug connections for easy access and swapping; etc. Only relatively recently have other OEMs paid attention to such "access" detail and especially attention to external design (Dell being perhaps the most noticeable).

Macs have also been very usable and full featured vs comparable "PC" counterparts. Since Apple has moved away from unusual or "proprietary" technology (ie, NuBus, SCSI, ADB, etc), prices have also fallen in line with comparable "PC"s.

So I disagree with the ongoing "myth" (or slam) that Apple has just paid attention to form over function.

In all the years I've used a Mac I have never felt "deprived" or short changed of functionality and capability (other than visiting those web sites designed exclusively for Windows and IExplorer... whose designers should be tarred, feathered and shot happy )

In fact, for many multi-media applications (creation and playback), IMO I've enjoyed a long time advantage by using a Mac.

>>. Apple has brought new meaning to the phrase ?A fool and his money shall soon be parted? >>>

You're confusing Apple with Microsoft. Which "fools" keeps buying flawed, "just good enough", "much hyped and promised but often devoid and late" products from MS? Is it lock-in, stupidity, masochism, a combination of the preceding... what?

...
0 Votes
+ -
The original Quadra 8 series and PowerMac 8 series (800, 840av, 8100-8500).

It was actually worse than a PC tower. In most cases, you had to completely disassemble them and remove the logic boards just to install a RAM or VRAM upgrade.

I know. I sold and upgraded thousands of these things prior to shipment to the customer back in the 90's happy
0 Votes
+ -
Don't forget...
itpro_z 17th Jan 2008
...the original Mac and the "fat" Mac, which required special tools just to open the case, and motherboard modification to add RAM.
0 Votes
+ -
Umm, not quite
jimfrost 17th Jan 2008
Clearly you have never tried to do a drive replacement on a Powerbook. It wasn't until the Macbook that Apple considered servicability of the devices, and even the Macbook had some early stumbles.

I did a drive replacement on a 12" Powerbook a few weeks ago. You basically have to peel the thing completely apart to get the drive out. I didn't count but I believe it was upwards of a hundred tiny screws, both phillips and torx, and I think five tiny and easy to break connectors -- most of which were taped down with aluminum tape. It took more than an hour, and only that short because I had a step-by-step guide. If I were working it out on my own it would have taken several times as long.

My Quad is brilliantly designed, extremely easy to service ... but not so other Macs. Even the mini is something of a pain and they really didn't have any good reason not to just use screws to hold the case together on that one *except* to make it hard to service.

As for the Air, I think they probably hit their market on the nose. This is a terrific remote access device. The only real complaint I have with it is that you are going to need an external battery to pull a cross-country flight, but you'd have to carry a spare anyway so it's kind of six-of-one, half-a-dozen of the other. Along those lines the quip about first-class power outlets is the kind of thing you say only if you don't fly in first class often; many planes have not had them retrofitted.

For myself if I had to replace the Macbook I'd almost certainly get one of these. It's not quite what I want -- I want a 13" Macbook Pro -- but it's close and looks to be a lot more durable than the Macbook I use now. We'll see how it evolves over the next couple of years.
0 Votes
+ -
Yes, I'm not saying or claiming
MacCanuck 17th Jan 2008
ALL Macs were easy to service but from the late '80s on (my IIcx was great), many machines (particularly "pro" models) were made more easily "serviceable" (upgradeable).

My main point was that Apple did try to pay attention to the "form" (in "form over function") by trying to address maintenance and accessibility issues. Up until recently, such attention to detail was unknown or ignored by most (if not all) other "PC" OEMs. The same goes for exterior design.

Anyone who has seen and/or worked on the inside of a G5 (now Intel) Pro tower can appreciate the engineering, thought and build quality that went into them.

And certainly not all models are easy to access (consumer-oriented models mainly, many of which are not thought or expected to be highly customized/altered by "ma & pa" user).

...
0 Votes
+ -
Why...
djchandler 17th Jan 2008
do Mac users insist on calling a motherboard a logic board? Is this part of Apple's brainwashing? Are Macs soooooo sophisticated they can't use simple off-the-shelf parts with commonplace technical names? Believe it or not, I've used ram from a Mac and put it on commodity grade motherboards and vice-versa, way back when I owned Mac IIs of a couple of flavors. The old Motorola 680x0 CPUs just ignored parity bits.

It's just the sizzle you Mac users are buying. I bought it too for a while. Jobs laughs all the way to the bank--he has a great deal in common with P. T. Barnum. What a showman!
0 Votes
+ -
Not the 8500
Jkirk3279 17th Jan 2008
I have an 8500, and it has the side-door approach.

Push the button and the side door opens.

The Blue and White G3 series perfected and simplified the side-door access. But the
8500 was the first to have it.

http://www.insanely-great.com/reviews/b&wg3.html

"As an PM 8500 owner, the side-opening case is just beautiful. Sometime I just feel like
opening it up to take a look in side. The four DIMM slots are easily accessible as are the
three PCI slots. Drives can be a little tricky to add or replace since all the drives must be
removed, but I feel the caddy is a clever idea. "
0 Votes
+ -
$$$
The_Curmudgeon 18th Jan 2008
Wasn't that done so Apple could charge there ridiculous upgrade charges for memory? Grin!
0 Votes
+ -
so Mac_Canadian we meet again
Paul Fletcher 17th Jan 2008
if Apple has been so successful with Form and Function - as opposed to Form over Function. How come it is MS not Apple that controls the market.

Battery life WILL be an issue for these systems and I am not sure how that thin a keyboard would feel - but will travel to take a look.
0 Votes
+ -
The story starts when Microsoft was young and their only project was a basic compiler for a programmable HP calculator. Microsoft took a contract with IBM to build an operating system for the micro computer system it was working on. Which Microsoft did. This gave Microsoft instant penetration into the boardrooms and executive suites because it was pulled in by IBM. IBM in a long line of foolish mistakes allowed both it's PC design and the OS to fall into other hands. This gave rise to cheap clones which were powered by the same OS with the same software available. This pulled Microsoft rather than the technically superior Apple into the fore in the operating system competition.

You can say what you want but Microsoft didn't achieve it's market dominance due to building a superior product. That dominance was achieved by riding the coat tails of another company and basically hoodwinking, legally of course, that company out a product it had paid for by IBM not requiring the license for the software developed for them.

In the end, the Apple products have almost always been technically superior but due to forces unrelated to quality, price, fit or finish Apple has been kept out of the business arena except in very specialized areas.

This has pretty much been the story of the personal computing since it's inception with the original Apple computer.
0 Votes
+ -
funny you should say that
Paul Fletcher 17th Jan 2008
I had a personal computer before the Apple appeared. I also remember those early days and MS wasn't working on a basic for an HP calculator - try Altair.

Apple had issues with the G series systems - even though Steve said they were the fastest thing out there 3rd party tests proved they were not. Eventually going to X86 to make up the difference
0 Votes
+ -
I would agree with most of that
brble 17th Jan 2008
But I think Apple is not completely without fault. Their choices, especially in the '90s, did not result in the best reputation (remember the Scully years?), and choosing a closed architecture limited many of the uses for Macs where PCs could have cards plugged in to add new capability.

But MS really just got lucky, and of course they didn't even develop the OS themselves, they bought it from someone else. Then there's the whole Digital Research thing that dumped IBM into MS's hands...
0 Votes
+ -
Clearer History
roog 17th Jan 2008
A little more history, IBM went to Bill Gates to provide some application for the future PC. Bill referred IBM to Gary Kildall and asked him to provide the operating system (CPM) for its new PC, Gary would not sign a confidentiality agreement, IBM went to Microsoft, which purchased QDOS (Quick & Dirty Operating System) from Seattle Computer Products and turned it into PC-DOS and MS-DOS. The rest is history. The irony is that Microsoft's DOS was modeled after CP/M.
0 Votes
+ -
Actually Microsoft did not build DOS
jorjitop 17th Jan 2008
They licensed it from Digital Research which is why there were always three DOS's available; MS-DOS, IBM-DOS, and DR-DOS. DR-DOS usually lead the way with advances. Microsoft never created anything original in their history.
0 Votes
+ -
Check your facts....
InnocentBystander 17th Jan 2008
Microsoft had nothing to do with DR-DOS. Please do a minimal fact check before you post. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ms-dos
0 Votes
+ -
Aren't you Nervous?
Jkirk3279 17th Jan 2008
After all, I keep hearing about "Innocent Bystanders" being killed in all kinds of
hideous accidents.

If I were you, I'd be very nervous !

M$ was only involved with DrDos to the extent of successfully stamping it out.
0 Votes
+ -
Wikipedia....
kennethpotts@... 25th Jan 2008
I'm sorry but you tell someone to check their facts.. but you put in w Wikipedia
link...how silly http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Hemisphere herein states in the
fifth paragraph last sentence of that paragraph that the Sun rises in the West and sets
in the east.... Maybe you should pick a better source to check facts.... I don't care who
invented DR-Dos I just thought it was funny you choose such a bogus site to have
someone look up for Facts and that don't even know what direction the sun moves...
How very funny.
0 Votes
+ -
Quite obviously...
Spiritusindomit@... 17th Jan 2008
You aren't a developer. Please stop living in the 80's. That's the problem with you people, you can't see to get it through you head that in order to compete in today's market you have to be concerned with today's issues. Microsoft has released visual studio, the .NET framework, WPF, WF, WCF, XAML, and Silverlight just recently to name a few. I defy you to show me anything that they're 'copying.' Don't bother pointing out the SVG spec btw, it's just that, a spec. If you go there, I'll rip you apart with a few simple facts about it.

Also, Apple ripped off all their designs from the braun products of the 1960s. They copied most of their product's architecture from the leavings and discards of Sun Microsystems, and they flagrantly go about making absurd and completely invalid claims publicly, not really caring if they lose in court because they can afford to pay, especially if their slander pays off. Real classy group you run with.
0 Votes
+ -
Quite obviously...indeed
scott@... 17th Jan 2008
I liken reading these posts to an addiction, a quick mindless diversion. I am not quite sure what the posters do for a living but the drivel that spills out is not based in fact.

Notice nobody responded to your post? Simple, you stated a fact about MS development tools.

The nauseating debates over platforms follow any story on a particular product/feature/platform (circle one). Then out come the legion of MS v. Apple v. Open Source advocates that seem to live in a world where that ignores one simple reality, professionals make choices depending on applications and consumers make choices with their money.

Those two groups, Enterprise/institutional computing and consumer computer represent the two major markets. The products then fall into categories. The MacBook Air is obviously not designed for a techie or a power user.

Apple knows their customer, I will give one example. The Apple iPhone is the most visible and desirable smart phone. However the truth is their are far more Motorola Q's and Palm Treo's in users hands. Stop the next person you see with a Smartphone and ask them what three drivers made them chose Winmobile/iPhone/PalmOS (circle one).

Apple builds awareness not on technical excellence or application suitability, demand for Apple products is based on desire Apple creates. Form over function.

I clearly see the niche the Apple built this machine for, the author of the article hit it on the head. I am sure my wife would love one of these. It would look great in her Tumi portfolio. When the battery goes bad or any problem it can be taken to the cool Apple store and they will repair it and she can check her email on one of our other machines. That is why the Apple store is next to Nordstrom's not Wal Mart.

I have no doubt that Apple's market research and product managers are capable of doing their homework. The market will tell if the machine is sexy/desirable/relevant (circle one).

Wow, it's late, I could go on and on. Thanks for a good post.
0 Votes
+ -
Two reasons MSFT won over AAPL...
alieninvader@... 17th Jan 2008
There are two reasons that Microsoft won the first generation (ie: 25 years) of the personal computer:

1) Microsoft's strategy has always been to win on price. This goes all the way back to their win over Gary Kildall, to win IBM's business for DOS on the IBM PC.

2) Even though Apple pioneered the concept of a robust developer program, Apple has always had a relatively closed environment in which hardware and software are tightly integrated.

...and here's why Apple is winning share back from MSFT:

Finally, Apple has a rock-solid operating system and has persisted with human factors design as to make Windows seem unusable in comparison.

Why does Windows still lose file/application associations so often? Why does it ask whether you want to run a wizard when you attach a thumb drive or detect WiFi? Open the Mac and it simply works. That's why people switch.

I do Tech Support for three Windows users in my household (actually two because one of my sons just bought a MacBook Pro), and I own a MacBook Pro - having been a Mac user since 1984 and a Lisa user before that).
Just inserted a thumb drive in and no wizard. Just added a new drive silently. I would recommend you should check the "Always do the selected action" checkbox in the "wizard" (actually dialog box) if you don't want to see it any longer. Not sure what you mean by running a wizard to detect wifi.
0 Votes
+ -
I never had to run any Wizard to use
GuidingLight 17th Jan 2008
external thumb drives or hard drives, I plug them in and "they just work", so I am not sure what you are getting at.
0 Votes
+ -
only if...
lostarchitect 17th Jan 2008
they "just work" only if the manufacturer of the USB drive has provided software on them to make them "just work". Many are doing this now, but not all. I have 2 USB flash drives, one works instantly. The other required an annoying drive mapping procedure (no wizard! i would have liked one!) that i didn't know how to do, and it took me a while to figure it out. (this is on XP pro)

both of these drives are recognized instantly on my mac.
0 Votes
+ -
McLies
Paul Fletcher 17th Jan 2008
I have several drives including one that came free from Staples - they just work - no drivers - no hassle - just work...
0 Votes
+ -
Linux...
djchandler 17th Jan 2008
sees those same drives without a problem. Maybe it's because you've plugged them into a Mac that you're having problems when you plug them into something else.
0 Votes
+ -
I dread the thought
Paul Fletcher 17th Jan 2008
of you doing windows support... we have a mix of XP, Vista, Ubuntu and OSX and I never see a wizard when plugging in a USB drive or a camera or with wifi.

The one thing I love about Windows is the way people screw it up and blame the OS - I just don't see the problems you CLAIM to have - I do have problems finding inexpensive hardware with drivers for the OSX system though....
0 Votes
+ -
So....
Spiritusindomit@... 17th Jan 2008
I take it 243 high level security patches since the release of leopard qualifies as solid?

How about a lack of an efficient developer IDE?

Why does it ask wizard, blah blah.

a: it doesn't if you take two seconds to disable it. Oh, but that's right, anything annoying in OSX can't be disabled without editing hidden/secured system configuration files and/or running command line functions from shell mode.

I've NEVER had windows lose one file or application association. Perhaps it happens to you, because you don't bother to read anything before you sit down and start doing stupid things on your computer. I have, however, had my apple machines completely destabilize installs, to the point where I had to reload the OS.
0 Votes
+ -
Microsoft is proof of that.

Betamax (chosen by and until recently (still by some?) the choice of the broadcast industry) was considered superior to VHS but lost out in the VCR wars and it all came down to cost. Overall, people are penny-pinchers and go for cheap over quality (a reason Chinese and other overseas imports are killing N American manufacturing). So the market leader (winner) does not automatically equate to quality.

>>> How come it is MS not Apple that controls the market. >>>

Irrelevant in comparing Apple and MS as we're talking hardware "form" and MS does not "make" (computer, other than the XBox360) hardware.

The above posters have capably explained reason's for MS's success... connections (Gates' mother on the IBM Board got his foot in the door), luck, purchases/"theft" (of technology/IP), unethical conduct, mis-steps by IBM, Apple & others, etc.

Hardly superior products (often termed as "just good enough" (eg, IExplorer) but modern day continued success due at least in part to IT intransigence (and self-serving agendas) and technological lock-in (well planned and implemented by MS).

...
0 Votes
+ -
Apple and MS v Xerox
Paul Fletcher 17th Jan 2008
Apple visited and stole the ideas, MS visited and stole the people. Are ethics somehow different in Canada?
0 Votes
+ -
Stole?
YaBaby 17th Jan 2008
Well I suppose one could say Apple "stole" the Idea, but only if you leave out the fact that Apple "gave" Xerox $1,000,000 dollars of pre IPO stock for the right to study the Xerox system. Do you suppose Xerox was being naive when they took the money and let a bunch of Apple engineers ?steal? their system?
I think Xerox knew what Apple?s intentions were and accepted the ramification of their decision. Perhaps Xerox made a poor tatical decision.
0 Votes
+ -
You're an idiot
Kid Icarus-21097050858087920245213802267493 18th Jan 2008
spewing ignorance. Read up on the subject. Apple was invited to come look at the progress Xerox had made with their products and Apple gave them money for doing so. Xerox and Apple were going completely different routes and Xerox knew exactly what Steve Jobs was looking at and why they were there.

http://www.mackido.com/Interface/ui_history.html
0 Votes
+ -
>>> Are ethics somehow different in Canada? >>>

With you being a supporter of Microsoft with it's history of lawsuits, IP "borrowing" (cough "theft" cough), ethically challenged behaviour and anti-trust actions (and findings) on practically every continent... how do you justify supporting such a morally bankrupt outfit? Do you also support the local Hell's Angels and Mafia? MS is simply a thug in a business suit.

After all, MS is the one found in violation of EU and U.S. Sherman anti-trust actions (and also in Taiwan and Japan???).

>>> Apple visited and stole the ideas, MS visited and stole the people. >>>

See previous posts to teach you some GUI history.

Apple was working on it's own GUI, Xerox agreed to the Jobs/Apple visit to view it's work, Apple paid Xerox for use of some of it's technology, Apple changed (and made many improvements) to that technology in creating the Mac GUI.

Compared to MS, which saw the Mac crown-jewels (the GUI) during development of early Mac software). Gates liked what he saw and basically "stole" it thru threats (no GUI, no software... sound familiar to anti-trust trial evidence?) and a typically MS slanted and vague contractual agreement. (Blame Apple lawyers here for not seeing future ramifications (and knowing Gates) ie, agreeing to let MS use parts of the Apple GUI in future Windows).

Apple paid for some of Xerox's technology and made it better. MS "stole" the resultant GUI from Apple, as it's done to many tech firms, and made it worse.

...
0 Votes
+ -
And yet Apple tells people what TO do...
HypnoToad72 17th Jan 2008
MacOS 8 and 9 were clear examples lack-of-quantity didn't equate to quality either...

MS succeeded for projecting business trends and getting there first. Just having a product (and the scruples necessary to win at all costs) is all that matters.

Also, aren't you being disingenuous? Apple likes to lock in people with their iGarbage as well... or tie in itunes with quicktime and other non-necessities. (then try to remove it from windows and chances are, you'll see they're no better at writing code than MS is. Not a good way to show you're the superior company...)
0 Votes
+ -
Yeah...
Spiritusindomit@... 17th Jan 2008
That argument is convenient when you want it, but next week you'll be back to saying 'I combine microsft+gateway and submit apple r bettir!'

The above posters haven't said anything that wasn't misinformation or out and out pamphlet grade inaccuracy.

It's iexplore dumbass, if you;re going to insult something, at least learn the name.

Apple is a very competent hardware company that cobbles together a shoddy os to package with its vastly overpriced hardware. As it stands, you can legally load windows on a Boxx Apexx 8. Therefore, nothing apple has can be benchmarked against the max capabilities of windows. Now please list a few of your laughable 'my mac pro beat a 4 year old hp xw4200!' statements..
0 Votes
+ -
the above posters....
doh123 18th Jan 2008
"The above posters haven't said anything that wasn't misinformation or out and out
pamphlet grade inaccuracy."

thats funny, then you go on to add to them, and become just another!
0 Votes
+ -
Pardon me "dumbass"...
MacCanuck 18th Jan 2008
>>> It's iexplore dumbass, if you;re going to insult something, at least learn the name. >>>

I used a short form for Internet Explorer... IExplorer (to differentiate from Windows Explorer). I don't know what you're babbling about.

Perhaps "iexplore intelligence" should be your mantra.

Which explains and dismisses the remainder of your rant.

...
0 Votes
+ -
Macky.....
xuniL_z 18th Jan 2008
calm down. And realize Vista is now the way to go.

You know you want a Vista Machine and the power of Windows.

A windows that has a small fraction of the patches OSX has been bandaided with heavily in 2007. mega, monster, super....those are not the adjectives or prefixes you want on your OSes patch names....



wink
0 Votes
+ -
Xuni
Kid Icarus-21097050858087920245213802267493 21st Jan 2008
heheh, the power of Windows....what power would that be? The power to be locked into the same dull crap that is laden with DRM and a sanction to buy new hardware as the only way to give you this "Power". Hahahahah....

Yeah, I'll take my patches, at least I know they are ironing out any issues that are being found by the community. Windows on the other hand, well, closed as closed can be, you can never patch me..HAHAHAHA..Security through REAL obscurity!

I sure hope they just stop patching Windows all together. Then you can pretend it is the safest OS ever created!! DOOF.
0 Votes
+ -
Wrong comparison
frabjous 17th Jan 2008
Paul said, "if Apple has been so successful with Form and Function - as
opposed to Form over Function. How come it is MS not Apple that controls
the market."

He apparently doesn't realize that Microsoft does not make computers, they
just make using computers difficult.
0 Votes
+ -
Where do you guys get this stuff?
mlindl 25th Jan 2008
Since when does controlling the market mean anything other than you are the
biggest?

Since Paul Fletcher is NOT the biggest does that make him worthless? Did Paul
Fletcher grow anything other than his waist by 58% this year?

You really need to stop showing everyone how shallow and simplistic you are.

Apple IS controlling the market and if you don't believe it just look at the Vista
features OS X has had for years!

Bigger is a tribute to marketing and sales policies. Controlling the market goes to
the innovators.
0 Votes
+ -
Form AND function?
marmaj@... 17th Jan 2008
>>> Apple has, for years, gone for form AND function. Something "PC" OEMs are just discovering.>>>

Waitasec - in my book (and my NOTEBOOK) network connectivity is pure function, it has nothing to do with form. I understand that the AIR has ZERO Ethernet ports. I hardly call this function, nor I will call it form. USB-to-Ethernet adapter is going to be limited by the USB data transfer speed. Again, poor function, and a lousy form.

Sorry - while I may be on a market for a Mac notebook, Air is just too full of hot air for me. Pretty, but unusable.
0 Votes
+ -
Ethernet is not necessary any longer
rdawson@... 17th Jan 2008
I run an IT department for a medium sized business and I push people to use the wireless based on how quickly we filled offices and wired ports for the desktop users. All of our executives use wireless and do not plug into ethernet in the office or in their home offices.

I fail to see the point about an ethernet port not being available now when wireless networking is now so cost effective and most people have it at home and in the office. I never plug my laptop in to an ethernet port at home or in the office...or traveling unless absolutely necessary, and in that case a USB to ethernet adapter would be suitable.
0 Votes
+ -
Unnecessary Ethernet
tikigawd 17th Jan 2008
If you're in a business environment where the network is wireless then you might not need an ethernet port.

But what is you work somewhere that doesn't have wireless for security reasons (as in the company where I work)?
What if you're at home and you need to set or modify your router settings, and there's no other computer around?

Although I guess that is not necessarily the target audience. This blog seems to portray the MBA as a shiny, pretty gadget for the ?ber-rich CEOs of the world.
0 Votes
+ -
No ethernet port? No problem.
jimfrost 17th Jan 2008
USB ethernet dongles are like $20. Problem solved.

jim
0 Votes
+ -
Are you going to use....
DCMann 17th Jan 2008
..the single USB port for this or buy a USB hub as well?

I agree that in most cases an Ethernet port is NOT necessary, but all the things lacking on this system simply make it a limited system for a MORE than full laptop price.

This is just like every other product Apple puts out, there will be those that overlook all the limitations and overpriced sleekness just because it has and Apple lighting up on the lid. No system is perfect, but if you can't even bring yourself to admit when a missing function just MIGHT end up being a pain, you may qualify for an official MAC fanboi merit badge.
0 Votes
+ -
if security...
doh123 18th Jan 2008
if security is so tight you have to run wired and not wireless, you shouldn't be allowed
to have a portable for security reasons anyway. just because people making the
decisions for company networks and computers are stupid, doesn't mean Apple has to
squirm into their stupidity.
0 Votes
+ -
Why is not being able to use wireless, stupid?
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 18th Jan 2008
He just said, many places don't allow it. And that includes my own.

If you're so 'smart', maybe you should work for Apple.
0 Votes
+ -
funny...
doh123 18th Jan 2008
you don't know who I work for...

I never said that not running Wireless is stupid... I said if a network is so secure that
they do not allow wireless (for security reasons) then they shouldn't allow laptops
coming and going connected to the network either.
0 Votes
+ -
Here's a scenario
tikigawd 18th Jan 2008
My company doesn't have wireless since it would unnecessarily broadcast the network. No wireless network is more snoop-proof than the one that doesn't exist.

We also perform some work off-site, for which we need computers sometimes. Maybe if you ran the company you'd come up with a policy to get really cheap carts to haul desktops around because getting laptops that have gigabit ethernet ports is stupid.
tigtgw,good luck! it's tigtgw.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix