The Apple Core

Jason D. O'Grady & David Morgenstern

WWDC 2011: iMessage sticks it to mobile carriers

By | June 7, 2011, 9:42am PDT

Summary: iMessage is completely carrier agnostic and since Apple controls the server — not AT&T, Verizon or any other carrier — it’s completely free. Let’s hope that Apple rolls it our for Lion as well.

San Francisco — Its not easy to pick a favorite new feature of iOS 5, announced here at WWDC yesterday, but iMessage is on my short list.

For the unfamiliar, iMessage is Apple’s new SMS/MMS client app that will ship with iOS 5 in the Fall. Pictured at right are some iMessages displayed on the lock screen with the new “slide to reply” slider.

But why is iMessage significant?

iMessage allows iOS 5 users to send text messages, photos, videos and contact information to a person or a group over Wi-Fi or 3G and because it’s not tied to a carrier or network it just works with all iOS devices (iPhone, iPad and iPod touch).

iMessages are automatically synced to all your iOS 5 devices, making it easy to follow your conversations across your iPhone, iPad and iPod touch. iMessage also features delivery and read receipts, typing indication and secure end-to-end encryption.

But easily the most significant aspect of iMessage is the fact that it’s completely carrier agnostic. In other words, Apple controls the server — not AT&T, Verizon or any other carrier — which means that it’s completely free.

This means that the exorbitant SMS/MMS fees carriers charge are thing of the past — when you message other iOS 5 users. Since you also text people that aren’t using iOS, Apple built iMessage into its native iOS Messages app transparently so messages sent to iOS 5 users are free, but you can still text your friends on Blackberries, WinMo and WebOS from within the same app.

Although Apple’s only announced iMessage for iOS 5 so far, I suspect that it won’t be long before it rolls out for Mac OS X Lion as well. Think of it as FaceTime for messages.

So, is iMessage a Blackberry Messenger killer?

See related coverage:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Jason O'Grady is a journalist and author specializing in mobile technology. He has published six books on Apple and mobile gadgets and his PowerPage blog has been publishing for over 15 years.

Disclosure

Jason D. O'Grady

Jason D. O'Grady is the creator and editor of O'Grady's PowerPage, which has been publishing mobile technology news since 1995. He maintains an advertising relationship with the following legacy advertisers on the PowerPage:

  • Amazon Associates
  • Google Adsense
  • Tekserve
  • Advertising on the PowerPage is brokered by a third-party agency (BackBeat Media) and he recuses himself from these negotiations.

Biography

Jason D. O'Grady

Jason D. O'Grady developed an affinity for Apple computers after using the original Lisa, and this affinity turned into a bona-fide obsession when he got the original 128 KB Macintosh in 1984.

He started writing one of the first Web sites about Apple (O'Grady's PowerPage) in 1995 and is considered to be one of the fathers of blogging. He has been a frequent speaker at the Macworld Expo conference and a member of the conference faculty. He also co-founded the first dedicated PowerBook User Group (PPUG) in the United States.

After winning a major legal battle with Apple in 2006, he set the precedent that independent journalists are entitled to the same protections under the First Amendment as members of the mainstream media.

O'Grady is the author of The Nexus One Pocket Guide, The Droid Pocket Guide, The Google Phone Pocket Guide, and The Garmin nuvi Pocket Guide (Peachpit Press), the author of Corporations That Changed the World: Apple Inc. (Greenwood Press), and a contributor to The Mac Bible (Peachpit Press). In addition, he has contributed to numerous Mac publications over the years, including MacWEEK, Macworld, and MacPower (Japan).

When he's not writing about Apple for ZDNet at The Apple Core, he enjoys spending time with his family in New Jersey.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
33
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: WWDC 2011: iMessage sticks it to mobile carriers
jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812 10th Oct
Many thanks, I've not lengthy back been attempting to mulberry alexa seek out details of this issue for ages and yours stands out since the greatest I've observed therefore far.
0 Votes
+ -
good but...
tatiGmail 7th Jun
this only works with iOS devices. why not an open protocol that talks to other devices? will Facebook roll out its own?
Additionally, you need a data network to send messages, be it wifi or mobile broadband. SMS is different because you can send them without a data connection. This is absolutely no different from whatsapp, google talk, etc. Google Voice remains a better option.
@hoaxoner: just read the description: "The service is configured and maintained by the user in a web-based application" -- it is a total opposite to Apple's offer, where people should not configure, should not maintain, should have nothing to do with "web applications".
@DeRSSS
Google voice is only a web based application in a browser, not on mobile devices. The mobile device version is a standalone app.
0 Votes
+ -
Absolutely no different??
Bruizer Updated - 7th Jun
@hoaxoner

Google koolaid much or hyperbola?
0 Votes
+ -
So how is it different then
John Zern 7th Jun
Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook, Google, Twitter...
0 Votes
+ -
Universality
use_what_works_4_U 7th Jun
@John Zern
Not everyone I know uses Amazon, MS, FB, Google, or Twitter. Heck I only use one of those products myself. By contrast, *everyone* I know has a cell phone. Now I can SMS or MMS them and if they use an iDevice it's free - something I don't even need to be aware of until the bill comes.

Of course, for *me* with my Sprint Everything plan and my EVO Shift, this is a non-issue. But since you asked I thought I'd call out the obvious...
it is BBM light at best
all of this is and has been present for BB users for years - nothing new despite what the fanboys may think.
data is date and as I assume this will not be compressed as it is on BB, the carriers will still make their money
0 Votes
+ -
What's different
use_what_works_4_U 7th Jun
@blackman.dave
is that now everyone with an iDevice can SMS/MMS/BBM to any other iDevice without worrying about the double hit of data caps *and* messaging limits. It's a new implementation of an old idea, but isn't that true of most tech these days?
This will not catch on because of the lock in... It sucks that you cannot use this like Google Talk.
0 Votes
+ -
And Android will fail...
Bruizer 7th Jun
@Peter Perry

Both silly statements. You really think there is no life outside your limited worldview.
0 Votes
+ -
@Peter Perry I tend to agree - I have a few friends with iOS 5 compatible devices but the rest either have iPhone 3G devices which are incompatible with iOS 5 or other devices altogether (BB, Android, feature phones). For me this is a cool but personally useless feature until it's opened up beyond iOS 5 devices.
0 Votes
+ -
Agreed
Schoolboy Bob 8th Jun
@Peter Perry
The audience is limited to people who have a compatible device and who don't already have another way of doing the same thing or for some reason don't like the way they were doing the same thing. That would be nobody I know.
@Peter Perry The fact that it integrates into the standard text messaging app is what will make it catch on. If I can set those I know to have iOS 5 devices to use this method moving forward there will be no perceived difference whenever I send somebody a message. I could see it not catching on if you had to use a different app to iMessage other than the standard text app.
very likely you will have to still pay for the full data plan at the carriers, so....
0 Votes
+ -
^
Tigertank 8th Jun
@dasilvagm
yup.
Mediocre if not Useless. Whatsapp and Viber alike are way better coz they are cross-platform.
Quote: 2011 is "year of CopyCat". Steve Job is a hypocrite
Opt to pay per text and you're home free
This is not "Completely Free" The App might be but your paying someone for WiFi and Wireless service. The carriers won't shed too many tears as your data plan has caps and the more you send (pictures / video) the more data you use.

I guess this is fantastic if you sit around a Starbucks sucking up the free WiFi all day with your grande and Mac Rulez T-Shirt.

BBM killer? I guess if RIM hasn't been building out BBM to provide more, new API's, AR functionality etc. How is this any different then iChat?
iMessenger will fail like Ping. So does BBM and all other platform locked in messaging client.

With so many instant Messenger clients nowadays, all we really need is an unified instant messaging protocol, not yet-another-proprietary-messaging-client.

I think WP7 is stepping in the right direction by supporting multi-network chat feature. Granted, it doesn't solve the problem but at least not fracturing the instant messaging landscape even more.

I wonder why Apple still doesn't get social. Walled garden and social networking just don't mix.
Only for iOS devices? No thanks. Nobody I know even has one.

There are a billion IM applications out there... why use one that only works on one type of device?
@Droid101 Nobody I know even has one.
You would have to get out of your grandmother's basement from time to time to meet people if you want that statement to carry any weight wink
This doesn?t appear to be very useful for me. I have a mix of people I send messages to - some on iOS devices, some not and some unknown. If I have to pay for unlimited textign with AT&T anyway, how does this benefit me? Of course I could tell eveyone that I refuse to send or receive texts if you aren?t using an iOS device but that won?t get me very far!!
0 Votes
+ -
Android fanboys are quaking with this one and feeling left out in the cold. This will allow millions to save $15/month or $360 over two years. Sweet deal for the 150,000,000 iOS devices out there that can get this update.
"Apple sticks it to mobile carriers"? Hardly, AT&T and other carriers have been sticking it to us for years. Messaging is one of the cheapest "units" of data it can handle and yet under my AT&T plan, since I do not need unlimited, they charge me 20 cents per message. This should be free up to a reasonable monthly limit. And even with Apple's, one will still need a plan to communicate with non-Apple friends.

Also, how much different is iMessage from AOL's AIM or even iChat?
This will probably put a nail in the coffin for RIM. The only reason now that I stick with my Blackberry is it on Sprint. My daughter is an International Model, BBM allows me to communicate with her all over the planet and Sprint allows me to keep from going broke. AT&T has the worse customer service and there pricing is expensive. BBM (Blackberry Messenger) is 'free' SMS/MMS/plus she can MMS be from all the places she is and with Sprint it only cost me $20 month extra. AT&T charges hundred's for the same data! ALL wireless company charge huge markups for text messages someone will now maybe move (probably Sprint!) and reduce then down to there true cost 2 cents (they would still make 1/2 cent) I'd be happy with 5 cents a piece.
Who pays for text messaging anymore? Every plan that I've seen in the past few years had unlimited messages included.
The carriers gouge you on data now, they don't need to gouge you on messaging anymore.
@lokii0 Sure they have unlimited texting but there is a charge for it so who pays for text messaging anymore, most everyone.
EVERYONE who uses text messages PAYS for text messages. It's just included in an "everything" plan or billed seperately. I do not know where you have been looking, but while there are many "everything" plans, there are just as many, if not more plans where you pay per text or pay X dollars for X texts. We do the latter as $5/month for 250 texts more then covers our usage. Why pay for unlimited if you do not need it?
So Apple just discovered the Blackberry Messenger.
Again, Apple is late to the party, but the fanboys are there to applaud the "innovation". Enough already.
0 Votes
+ -
Well done! Thank you very much for professional templates and community edition
sesli chat sesli sohbet
0 Votes
+ -
RE: WWDC 2011: iMessage sticks it to mobile carriers
jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812 10th Oct
Many thanks, I've not lengthy back been attempting to mulberry alexa seek out details of this issue for ages and yours stands out since the greatest I've observed therefore far.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix