Frankston: Who's pirating bandwidth these days? You or AT&T (and peers)

By | September 7, 2007, 11:12am PDT

Bob Frankston (co-inventor of the electronic spreadsheet) has been tirelessly spending the last few years trying to shed light on the fact that there’s plenty of network capacity out there and that anybody (particularly the carriers and ISPs) that tell you something different are full of it. They’re just reserving 99 percent of what’s basically government granted (via rights-of-way) bandwidth for other services that they want to shove down our throats in an effort to drive up the all-magical ARPU (average revenue per user/unit).

Every time Frankston writes about this issue, you can sense his frustration. Just the fact that he’s constantly rephrasing the same message over and over and over again is an indicator that it’s not registering with the ordinary people like you and me that should be outraged. Outraged because the companies that control our hardwired access to the Internet are pretending that bandwidth is scarce when, in many cases, it’s not. In his latest treatise, Frankston articulates the issue from slightly different perspective. He asks who the real pirates are? Those of us who use legitimate innovations like BitTorrent to move data between nodes? Or the carriers who, in the course of preventing (under false pretenses) innovations like BitTorrent or Meraki from running on their networks are actually stifling innovation and ultimately, the elegance of the Internet’s design in the first place. Wrote Frankston:

Piracy is indeed a big problem – or perhaps I should use the term privateers – those that the government has deputized as legitimate raiders who willfully hold capacity off the marketplace and then blame the users. Companies like ATT force you to use an entire multimegabit copper wire for a single bit and then blame those who use a thousandths of the real capacity (via modems) for tying up whole wire? Yes, these are pirates and we must put an end to such games.

Please, don’t aid and abet their piracy by saying that those who make effective use of the existing abundant resources are abusers – no, they are the heroes who are using effective protocols in order to exchange information past the pirates’ blockades….

….Join us in enabling the future rather than preserving an arbitrary past. Perhaps the problem is that there isn’t a role for an ISP as a gatekeeper in such a world. ISPs need to be *SPs without relying on doling out scarce Internet as their primary source of added value.

Via phone today, I asked Frankston how to join and who “us” was. As it turns out, “us” is more of a collective consciousness than it is an organization that you can join. Frankston says taking back control of that which is rightfully ours (the wiring in our streets) starts with “recognizing that the network in your house is just as much ‘the Internet’ as anything else out there.” Once you realize that, it becomes clear that the local cable and phone companies are no more entitled to dictate the allocation of bandwidth in the street than you are.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

AT&T Piracy in the SFBA
Old Timer 8080 10th Sep 2007
AT&T will NEVER admit that it has institutionalized bandwidth piracy, EVEN TO THIRD PARTY ISP companies that have to use those lines!
They maintain that monopoly idea and as a result, service often suffers in the SFBA even when you move to a more open ISP..That is what I did in order to get better service and the advertised bandwidth.....BUT, I had to deal with the same morons that created the techincal problem in the first place, AT&T!!! The top people of that independent ISP found out how difficult it was when a KNOWLEDGEABLE customer caught AT&T with it's pants down. AT&T stonewalled them, too.
AT&T has cheated the general public for so long that it is an institution and is Standard Operating Proceedure now. They even lie to your face when confronted about it...
0 Votes
+ -
Unfortunately wired capacity is not in the "public domain" like
the radio spectrum which the government either allocates for
free for public service or auctions off for a fee for "for profit"
use.
The ISPs invested money into wiring our cities and country so they
can legitimately say that they "own" the wires and lease the right
of way from the government.
0 Votes
+ -
ISP's such as Telco's...
bjbrock 7th Sep 2007
built their infrastructure under utility laws. They were guaranteed a profit. They did not have to compete in an open market. Their infrastructure was built by rate payers.

I agree with this article totally.
0 Votes
+ -
From
http://itheresies.blogspot.com/2006_07_01_archive.html

In California there was an outrage when it was disclosed that electricity companies had deliberately idled plants while supplies were tight and then waited for prices to skyrocket on the spot market. If the current Internet network infrastructure provided by the backbone providers and Internet service providers can currently support much higher speeds and data quantities to current customers, then is the act of packet filtering and setting arbitrary low speed and data caps also effectively providing an "idled" service? Is a tiered Internet service, where content providers would be effectively competing on a similar market to the electricity "spot market", a market based entirely on Artificial Scarcity?
0 Votes
+ -
True, BUT
Sagax- 10th Sep 2007
For the moment we have a high cost infrastructure network. Hanging fiber costs big dollars and a place to hang it can becomes a problem. (After all, those power poles all belong to someone.) Fortunately, technology will (sooner or later) come to our aid. Perhaps satellite, perhaps WiMax or something else will do it.
0 Votes
+ -
AT&T Piracy in the SFBA
Old Timer 8080 10th Sep 2007
AT&T will NEVER admit that it has institutionalized bandwidth piracy, EVEN TO THIRD PARTY ISP companies that have to use those lines!
They maintain that monopoly idea and as a result, service often suffers in the SFBA even when you move to a more open ISP..That is what I did in order to get better service and the advertised bandwidth.....BUT, I had to deal with the same morons that created the techincal problem in the first place, AT&T!!! The top people of that independent ISP found out how difficult it was when a KNOWLEDGEABLE customer caught AT&T with it's pants down. AT&T stonewalled them, too.
AT&T has cheated the general public for so long that it is an institution and is Standard Operating Proceedure now. They even lie to your face when confronted about it...

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix