ie8 fix
madison

10 top tweaks for Windows Vista

By | June 11, 2008, 12:23pm PDT

Summary: The best ways to enhance performance and productivity with Windows are usually fairly simple. They don’t require registry edits or custom code; instead, they involve learning how the basic building blocks of Windows work, and then rearranging those components to cut steps out of the tasks you perform most often. Vista changed some of those building blocks, and many people are struggling because they’re trying to use the new tools with the old techniques. In that spirit, I’ve put together this list of my 10 favorite tweaks to Windows Vista. In Part 1 of a two-part series, I explain how to make the list of installed programs easier to work with and how to tweak the taskbar, the Start menu, the Quick Launch toolbar, and Windows Explorer. I also cover the most important time-saving technique for any user of any computer: how to create an easy, automatic backup routine that works.

[Update 17-June: Part 2 is now available.]
Part 1: In nearly two decades of working with and writing about Windows, one lesson I’ve learned above all others is that the best ways to enhance performance and productivity are usually fairly simple. They don’t require registry edits or custom code; instead, they involve learning how the basic building blocks of Windows work, and then rearranging those components to cut steps out of the tasks you perform most often.

Vista changed some of those building blocks, and many people are struggling because they’re trying to use the new tools with the old techniques.

In that spirit, I’ve put together this list of my 10 favorite tweaks to Windows Vista. It covers a lot of ground, so I’ve split it into two parts, each containing five entries. In today’s installment, I explain how to make the list of installed programs easier to work with, how to tweak the taskbar, the Start menu, the Quick Launch toolbar, and Windows Explorer. And I also cover the most important time-saving technique for any user of any computer: how to create an automatic backup routine that works.


  Image Gallery: These screenshots show these top tweaks for Windows Vista, step by step.   The Programs and Features list before tweaking   Tweaking the taskbar and desktop  

Each tweak gets its own page in this post. I’ve also put together a gallery of instructions, each one annotated with step-by-step instructions so you can follow along. The two pieces are a matched set for each entry in the list; if you look only at the text or only at the gallery, you’re missing the complete picture.

Here’s a quick list of what’s in part 1:

1. Get installed programs organized and up-to-date

The default format for the list of installed programs in Control Panel is a dull, gray list that matches its Windows XP predecessor. But with a few clicks, you can add a wealth of useful information (like current version numbers for every program in the list) and group entries in ways that are more useful.

2. Tweak the taskbar and desktop

The first thing I do with every new Windows system I set up is to make the task bar taller. I also make desktop clutter vanish completely without losing access to files and shortcuts on the desktop. Here’s how.

3. Set up a smart, automated backup system

How often should you have to reinstall Windows? The correct answer is “Never.” Using built-in backup tools that are included with some Vista editions, you can save a system image that can be restored from disk – complete with drivers and your installed programs - in a fraction of the time it would take to reinstall.

4. Get fast access to common tasks

I constantly hear that some tasks in Windows Vista take too long, especially those that have to do with networking. Want one-click access to network settings and other useful tasks, complete with automatic keyboard shortcuts? Follow the step-by-step instructions.

5. Fine-tune Windows Explorer

Vista’s version of Windows Explorer is a radical reworking of the XP-style Explorer you know and probably don’t love. With three tweaks and a slightly adjusted mindset (hint: think of a modern airline’s hub-and-spoke model), you’ll find most file-management tasks significantly easier.

If you have feedback, questions, or suggestions for topics you think I should cover later in this series, please leave them in the TalkBack section below.

Tweak #1: A smart Programs and Features list –>

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

133
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: 10 top tweaks for Windows Vista
beijing2008 14th Sep
Nice Post! Very Thanks Replica Patek Philippe Watches
0 Votes
+ -
Nice - thanks for putting this together Ed! any chance of making this a down loadable document?
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Working on it
Ed Bott 11th Jun 2008
The ZDNet tech team was working on this a while back but I don't know where that project stands. I'll check in.
0 Votes
+ -
Yes, very well done, Ed!
mustang_z 12th Jun 2008
Thanks, Ed, very much for the first 5. Will be looking for the next 5.

Oh, and I know for a fact Vista's selected file backup works just fine, as I had to reinstall Vista after a failed SP1 install attempt on my RAID 0 boot setup. Bought a new WD Raptor drive to use for boot instead of WD Raptor RAID drives, installed Vista and ran the backup file from my external HD. Worked like a charm. Now if I had done an image instead, it would have been even easier.
0 Votes
+ -
Nice Post! Very Thanks Replica Patek Philippe Watches
0 Votes
+ -
Smart power user setup
klumper Updated - 12th Jun 2008
This should provide a lot of folks a number of "easy access" ideas and handy shortcuts for better Vistaland management. If you don't customize and tweak the basic desktop/toolbars layout on -ALL- versions of Windows (and IE), you don't know what you're missing.

lol at the double row taskbar. Ain't it the truth nowadays. Not as streamlined looking as one row perhaps, or even using the 'group similar taskbar buttons' option, but more readily functional IMO. I sometimes (temporarily) lift it to three on smaller monitors. Ouch.

But a desktop w/o at least one column of primary icons? That's blasphemy! (naked into the bargain)

Populating the Quick Launch area to create a clickable pop-up menu with shortcuts to things like drives or partitions, and preferred programs and utilities, has always been handy. I don't know how folks manage without utilizing this feature. Your 10 QL icons in sync with Win+[x] keystroke access is clever. I also prefer to push a New Toolbar comprised of Documents (renamed Docs) to the left side of the taskbar for quick menu-driven access to my personal Documents folder.

IIRC this particular feature has worked going back to what, Win98? I seem to remember similar taskbar tweaks also worked on NT4 & W95 if the WDU (Windows Desktop Update) AD shell enhancement from IE4 was installed, but can't find an old box to check.

A few annoyances remain: Although the Programs and Features list allows you to display links to update and support sites (as supplied by a program's publisher), those links aren't live, and there's no way to copy them to the Clipboard.

There's also no easy way to save a list of installed programs (complete with version numbers) from the Programs and Features list.


Why? Why? Why? Why aren't ALL Explorer/UI dialog boxes, links, error messages and entries' lists capable of C + P [highlight- + copy- able], and basic export?

Some day MS, some day!
0 Votes
+ -
ok, now in vista, drag this toolbar to the desktop and see what happens. absolutely nothing. try it in xp, you can actually succeed.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
And your point is...?
Ed Bott 11th Jun 2008
Different desktop model. No longer supports floating toolbars. So?
0 Votes
+ -
It's a user preference thing
klumper Updated - 12th Jun 2008
Different desktop model. No longer supports floating toolbars. So?

Some folks liked that feature, even if it was a YMMV preference thing at best. Besides, I thought MS micro-ported EVERYTHING? You mean 'legacy' has its limits, even in the Microsoft cosmos? happy

Vista also appears to have changed XP's 'group similar taskbar buttons' feature, which prevented the taskbar from becoming overly cluttered with icons of multiple instances of the same application (e.g. browser windows). If you were to fire up MS TweakUI for XP, you could also control how many instances of one appie could be opened before grouping would kick in. Of course not everyone cares for this particular feature, some actually hate it.

In Vista (and unless something's changed, or I've overlooked it, which could be the case since I don't normally use the grouping option), these same taskbar buttons are left ungrouped until you have so many applications open that you no longer have room on the taskbar to hold more; only then does grouping kick in. When using large monitors, this can become something of an annoyance for those who preferred the way this feature used to be in XP.

To my knowledge, the only way to get this kind of precise control back is through a registry hack, i.e. by creating a TaskbarGroupSize DWORD value in the HKEY CURRENT USER hive [per Software > Microsoft > Windows > CurrentVersion > Explorer > Advanced] and assigning it a desired instance(s) value [2, 3, 4, etc.].

There's also a 3rd party option in Nerd Cave's Taskbar Shuffle, which has become a fairly popular Vista freebie:
http://www.freewebs.com/nerdcave/taskbarshuffle.htm
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Always hated taskbar grouping
Ed Bott 12th Jun 2008
Makes it impossible to do "drag and hover" operations.

And TweakUI was simply a front-end for various registry tweaks, including the one you mention. Thanks for the pointer to Taskbar Shuffle. Will check it out.
0 Votes
+ -
Floating Toolbars
CreepinJesus 12th Jun 2008
No support for this, as you said, but you can make gadgets that have lots of shortcuts in.

What makes that useful is that a quick press of the Windows key + [Space] brings the gadgets to the front for quick access.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Good point
Ed Bott 12th Jun 2008
And a good illustration of my basic thesis, which is that some people get stuck trying to use the old tools and techniques to solve a problem, when the model has changed. The problem can still be solved if you look at the new techniques and figure out the new way to do it.

Thanks for pointing that out!
0 Votes
+ -
It's also good to TALK about these things
Michael Kelly 12th Jun 2008
or blog about them in this case. Some of these gadgets are not necessarily as intuitive to some people as they are to others.

One thing I had hoped for in Vista was a Recycle Bin icon built into the toolbar, the way OS X and KDE have it, rather than have to show the desktop to see the Recycle Bin icon. Well when it didn't show up I started poking around to find ways that I could get a Recycle Bin icon on the toolbar. So I made a folder somewhere and created a custom toolbar and only have a shortcut to the Recycle Bin and put that on the toolbar where I wanted it. And as long as you don't accidentally delete the shortcut by hitting the wrong selection (Delete instead of Empty Recycle Bin) it works just like the ones in OS X and KDE.

And here's the funny part. I could have done this all along. The feature of making a custom toolbar goes way back to Windows 98. And I knew that, but I never thought of using the toolbar in this way until I got frustrated enough to start finding a non-obvious (at least to me) solution myself.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Completely agree
Ed Bott 12th Jun 2008
I think one problem with our world is people are so busy saying how much things suck that they've stopped sharing information about how to make things better.

Good idea with the Recycle Bin icon. There are several sidebar gadgets for Vista that offer similar functionality.
0 Votes
+ -
Recycle Bin blues
klumper 12th Jun 2008
One thing I had hoped for in Vista was a Recycle Bin icon built into the toolbar, the way OS X and KDE have it, rather than have to show the desktop to see the Recycle Bin icon.

That's funny you mention this. I've always pinned a shortcut of the RB to the top of the start menu, along with a few other handy things like Fast Shutdown, Device Manager, Recent Docs, and Admin Tools (customized and expanded), for quicker access. Funny how some of us will do anything to avoid the Desktop (and Programs Menu, at least as much as possible).

When I build systems, I encourage users to try to rely more on the Quick Launch and Start Menu areas, and less on the "catch-all" Desktop and Systray notification areas. When I see a cluttered desktop and bullet-ridden wallpaper filled with mindless icons everywhere, I immediately know the kind of user I'm dealing with. Unfortunately, it still remains most.

This also includes downloading and then keeping things on the desktop, which has to be one of the most novice and winky dink things imaginable. On any platform!
0 Votes
+ -
toolbars
g_keramidas@... 22nd Jun 2008
i get a lot more functionality by dragging my toolbars to the desktop, docking them on the right side and having them autohide than anything a vista gadget can do. it can't even auto hide. requested it long before the beta ended, response: maybe in a future version. just more stupid decisions, in my opinion.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Save the tips and tweaks
karihouse 12th Jun 2008
I will wait a while before upgrading. There will be lots of tweaks and fixes - can you create a folder for them which can be downloaded when I am ready to upgrade.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Just bookmark
Ed Bott 12th Jun 2008
You can bookmark individual articles or bookmark the Tips category:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?cat=20
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks, and some opintions
CobraA1 12th Jun 2008
Thanks, although I knew about some before, I guess I've been lazy sad.

And they REALLY should add Vista's complete backup system to the Home editions of Windows - quite frankly, there's no reason why a home user shouldn't be allowed to use one of the best backup tools that has Vista has to offer.

That's one of the things that frankly annoys me about Microsoft: The choice of what should be a "business" feature and what should be a "home" feature seems to be irrational sometimes. I often settle on the business version simply because there's a lot of control I get with it that I can't get with the home version.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Completely agreed
Ed Bott Updated - 12th Jun 2008
"And they REALLY should add Vista's complete backup system to the Home editions of Windows - quite frankly, there's no reason why a home user shouldn't be allowed to use one of the best backup tools that has Vista has to offer."

Amen.

I wrote this back in April 2007:

"I?ve been saying for as long as I can remember that the existence of three separate backup programs in Vista is stupid and user-hostile. [...] Although [Home Basic users] can perform a backup manually, they can?t schedule a file-based backup, so they can?t have their files automatically protected. Home Premium users can. And Ultimate users get the ability to do image-based backups.

"Nothing, but nothing will buy you user loyalty like saving someone?s ass. Microsoft knows that, so whoever made the design decision to cripple the backup utility for home users was not thinking clearly at all, and the decision they wound up making (bare-bones backup in Home Basic, slightly improved backup in Home Premium, full access to all features in Ultimate) was bad for Microsoft and bad for its customers."

I might have to write another post on this subject...
0 Votes
+ -
Ed...
mustang_z 12th Jun 2008
Please do.

I run Vista Ultimate so I get all the goodies (have 2 copies of Vista Home for other home desktops).

In my opinion, strong, easy-to-use thorough backup capabilities are a must, not an option. Vista Home and Basic users should have all the backup features of Vista Ultimate. Unfortunately, those opting for Vista Business to get such backup capabilities must sacrifice Windows Media Center, included in both Ultimate and Home Premium. happy
0 Votes
+ -
Home Vesions Vs Business Versions
chessmen 12th Jun 2008
With Vista, Microsoft has made more of an effort to separate entertainment features from so called business versions. For example, Vista home premium can't join a domain. I agree that it is annoying. To get the full range of features that were previously available in windows XP Professional, you would pay extra and get the Vista Ultimate edition. I guess that's the main idea, pay extra.
0 Votes
+ -
Beyond that...
klumper 12th Jun 2008
With Vista, Microsoft has made more of an effort to separate entertainment features from so called business versions.

Exactly. And to the confusion of all with no less than five Vista versions, four being consumer targetted variants. Can you spell L*A*M*E from C*H*I*N*C*Y?

To get the full range of features that were previously available in windows XP Professional, you would pay extra and get the Vista Ultimate edition. I guess that's the main idea, pay extra.

That's exactly the idea, drawing maximum blood for minimal features delivery. Home Basic versus Home Premium is already lame enough. Beyond cutting out the system image backup + recovery tool for all Home based editions, they also cut out Remote Desktop for host and client from the Home Premium ed, thereby requiring Business, Enterprise or Ultimate editions for that (now) all-purpose feature.

So what exactly does the Premium supposed to denote? Oh yeah, that Home Basic is basically useless, and Home Premium is just a bit less basic, and therefore not quite as useless. RD exclusion was the height of chincyness as we now embark upon the 21st century in integrated computing and communications, the very thing the Microboys emphasize in their dreamy sales pitches over and over. But you want remote computer communications? Ha! Then pay more buddy!

But of course, this IS in perfect lockstep with the well-honed, suck 'em dry, MS way. wink
0 Votes
+ -
Maybe I should look again at MS Backup?
I am Gorby 12th Jun 2008
I tried the backup program in XP Pro. It seemed OK but was a pain to recover data. I had also used Arcserve backup, but that is a bit big for home use.
I ended up getting "Retrospect backup", and love it.

My home now has 1 Vista home premium and 2 XP Pro PCs. All get backed up via the network onto 1 external USB drive. (actually I have 3 drives and rotate them. One is always kept away from home-in case the whole house goes)

And I've recovered my data easily from these backups.

Important data such as years of digital photos, school and university papers, and even the family journal are constantly backed up.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Complete rewrite. If you looked at XP backup, you should look again at Vista Backup.
0 Votes
+ -
Remove all icons from the desktop?
DaveMorris 12th Jun 2008
What the heck is the desktop for, then?
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
wink

(PS: they're not removed, just hidden)
0 Votes
+ -
Icons on desktop are useless...
Narg 12th Jun 2008
Personally, I try not to ever use icons on a desktop. They usually lead to problems anyway, no matter what OS you use. It's rare that my programs are not opened up full screen anyway, so a desktop is basically useless to me. So I always open programs from the start menu, launcher, whatever on whatever OS I'm using. Much more organized and simplified than a jumbled mess of Icons IMHO.
0 Votes
+ -
It's your choice
mustang_z 12th Jun 2008
Some like a really clean desktop and would rather use the Icons in the taskbar for one-click launching. On the Desktop you must double-click to start an app.

It's certainly a matter of personal choice. happy
0 Votes
+ -
Really now...
Jeremy W 12th Jun 2008
after the plethora of "fixit" articles we get a tweak
article?

Who in his right mind has time for all of this?

How about an OS that works right out of the box
without all the fixing and tweaking?

Vista is supposed to be a top of the line product, a
Mercedes or Lexus. Do Mercedes or Lexus owners
spend all their days "fixing" and "tweaking?"

The entire premise of these articles is, at very best,
questionable.

People who buy top of the line goods do not spend
endless near minimum-wage time on all this "fixing"
and "tweaking."
0 Votes
+ -
you mean like XP or Leopard or Ubuntu?
marks055@... 12th Jun 2008
Right, I use all the above and Vista. Vista has been more stable and ran better since I started using it May of 07 than any of the above when they first released. Leopard is still a joke Ubuntu take a week to get all the drivers and crap worked out, and XP was and is a security nightmare.
0 Votes
+ -
Ditto
CreepinJesus 12th Jun 2008
I've been using it a month longer than you. I have to say it is so, so much quicker to get things done than in XP. That start menu search thing IS Vista, really.

I haven't used Leopard, but we use Ubuntu on a lot of minor servers at work - it takes forever to get anything done, then just when you think its ok... ERROR: Must be root. *kicks computer*
0 Votes
+ -
My experience as well -
ItsTheBottomLine 12th Jun 2008
Don't use Leopard, but the above has been my experience as well.
0 Votes
+ -
The Voice of Experience
chessmen 12th Jun 2008
If you haven't used Leopard, then how would you know if it was any good? I have used Leopard, Vista, and Ubuntu. Speaking from EXPERIENCE, I can say that Leopard and Ubuntu are first rate operating systems. I would also say the same about Windows XP. Vista, however, is lacking. There is no feature of Vista which I see as a meaningful motivator for upgrading. Plus, the cost of software, expensive hardware upgrades, program incompatibilities, and driver problems with older peripherals, make Vista a loser.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The Voice of Experience
Narg 12th Jun 2008
chessmen, I too have used all 3 of the OSes you refer too. OSx and Ubuntu are definitely great operating systems. But, for you to strongly berate Vista against those two obviously shows bias. Each has their pluses, and each has very notable negatives. But, in the end none is better than the rest based only on their own merits. Add to that the external support and community, then Vista is obviously the best. Ed here shows only a pin head of the improvements Vista has over XP. There are far too many to list in a Talkback post, so I won't bother. Try http://microsoft.com/vista for the info I don't need to go into here. OSx is an easier OS to use, but it doesn't quite give the full abilities that Vista does for a true power user. Ubuntu, as much as I like it, is still more of a toy than a true contender. For some, they can make Ubuntu shine. For the average user, unless you do nothing more than super basic computer, it won't cut it.

Your "Experience" seems more from anger than from reality. I'm sorry you have such poor judgment and knowledge of Vista. I suggest you stay away from it, and away from these discussions. You truly don't add any useful information.
0 Votes
+ -
"Leopard is the least stable OS I've used"
marks055@... 12th Jun 2008
That quote came from one of the guys doing the Macbreak Weekly podcast on the twit network a couple of weeks ago. It was my experience as well. Ubuntu takes a lot more to get it running smooth with 1/2 the features and capabilities of Vista. If you have the right wireless card and it has driver available to get advanced graphics then its a fine OS I agree. XP was a total POS until SP2 and that took 6 months before many people could get it to run on their machine, and it's still not secure especially for people who run as admin for day to day computing. Vista had driver issues but not for everyone. My Vista desktop I built a year ago has always run fine. The drivers and 3rd party apps are getting better all the time. The biggest problem Vista has is it took so damn long people forgot the hassle of upgrading and XP was so mature everything was working fine. That wasn't the case in 2001-2002.
0 Votes
+ -
The Voice Of Experience
bvonr@... Updated - 12th Jun 2008
I use Ubuntu and Vista 64 on a AthlonX2 64 4400 with a ATI X1800XL AIW and have had no problems with hardware. I built this compter in 2005 and as of October 2007 when ATI finally put the T200 AV drivers out put the finishing touches on a great OS. Notice I had to wait for ATI not Microsoft. BTW the tweaks are great Thanks ED
0 Votes
+ -
I like to tweak my goods
frank_s 12th Jun 2008
Well perhaps you're happy with things as you buy them, but most of us like to change them to suit the way we work or the way we use them--and that goes for cars as well as computers regardless of their cost. It's not an endless process, we just do it until we get things they way we like. In the case of Ed's suggestions, I had already done most of the things he suggested. I'm guessing that maybe I spent 3 or 4 hours max over the last two years (I was a beta tester) trying things and then getting them the way I wanted in Vista.
0 Votes
+ -
fixin' and tweakin'
jtimouri 12th Jun 2008
My feelings exactly. Most tweaks and fixits don't address the problems I see in working with the operating system. That is certainly the case with the 10 "must does". All they are is one person's experience of how he likes to work - and he is willing to put in the time to get things as he wants. What really annoys me is that articles such as these are read by the software producers, who conclude that some of these tweaks are needed default features, so we end up with taskbars that have far too much information on them, screen taken up by this bar or that bar. Most people I know who work with Windows leave the defaults and lose productivity because of it. They will have a string of meaningless icons looking like a bead necklace or Christmas decorations running along the bottom of their screen, quick launch menus they never use, I could go on.
0 Votes
+ -
I upset that every machine doesn't boot up into the command line and that I have to work on a GUI. I work on the command line and don't like using GUIs, so every other user should The way you use your computer is not the same as the way I use my computer.

Being able to tweak a system allows many different users the ability to change the system to their needs. If a user decides that the default is good enough for them, then that's their decision, but being able to change the default allows for better flexibility.
0 Votes
+ -
Well . . .
CobraA1 12th Jun 2008
You mean those cars where you have have fancy stuff like having preset seat and mirror positions for each driver? Yeah, I'd tweak that to perfection.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
How to adjust car mirrors
Ed Bott 12th Jun 2008
Funny thing, but I was thinking of this as I wrote this post. Don't know whether you've ever seen the Car Talk post on how to adjust your car's mirrors the right way:

http://www.cartalk.com/content/features/mirrors/step1.html

Amazingly, they're right. Although some mirrors won't move far enough out to allow these settings.

Cars and computers. Same as it ever was.
0 Votes
+ -
Totally agreed.
CobraA1 12th Jun 2008
Totally agreed - the mirrors should always be set up to minimize, if not eliminate, blind spots. If your own car appears in the mirror, you haven't set it up correctly.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm with you on that one...
storm14k 12th Jun 2008
The first argument I see for XP/Vista against any other OS is the fact that it works right out of the box. Yet I see here a series of articles on how to get Vista up to par. Now I have no problem with performance tweaking and getting things to your liking...but don't sell wolf tickets and then blatantly show that you are.

So at this point the "out of the box" argument is moot.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Pay attention
Ed Bott Updated - 12th Jun 2008
Vista works just fine "out of the box." If you had actually read this story instead of just reacting to a word in the headline and launching into attack mode, you would have seen this:



"[T]he best ways to enhance performance and productivity are usually fairly simple. They don?t require registry edits or custom code; instead, they involve learning how the basic building blocks of Windows work, and then rearranging those components to cut steps out of the tasks you perform most often.



"Vista changed some of those building blocks, and many people are struggling because they?re trying to use the new tools with the old techniques." [emphasis added]



That is true with any activity, including those that have nothing to do with computers. I watch lots of cooking shows, because great chefs teach me how to simplify the process of doing common things like chopping vegetables or preparing a pie crust. Do I have a defective knife because I haven't learned how to use it effectively or haven't discovered a timesaving technique? Don't be ridiculous.
0 Votes
+ -
Totally agree!
mustang_z 12th Jun 2008
I couldn't have said better - thanks!
0 Votes
+ -
You missed the point...
storm14k 13th Jun 2008
I have read the story and read most of the others. You have not only made mods to the way you do things but to the system itself. As I said in my previous post (or at least meant to mention) this is perfectly FINE. What is not fine is the Microbrains that run around ranting about needing to tweak Linux when it to can work just fine out of the box as well. The level of tweaking I see here is no different than the tweaking I have done in Ubuntu and none of them were for performance reasons by the way. But let a Microbrain tell it and tweaks are a sin.

So as I stated before the "out of the box" argument it moot.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Microbrains?
Ed Bott 13th Jun 2008
Why are you posting this here?

"What is not fine is the Microbrains that run around ranting about needing to tweak Linux..."

Where do you see that in this post? Who are you talking about?
0 Votes
+ -
For instance...
storm14k 15th Jun 2008
...the ones that just showed up on a blog post detailing multimedia support in Ubuntu. You do know yours is not the only blog on this site correct?
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
No idea what you're talking about
Ed Bott 16th Jun 2008
If you have a problem with what someone else wrote, go post a comment on their site. There are dozens and dozens of bloggers at ZDNt. We're all independent, and I certainly don't expect any of them to take responsibility for what I write.

So, I repeat: If you have a gripe about something I wrote here, feel free to use the TalkBack forum here to comment on it. If you're bugged by what someone else wrote, go leave a comment at his site.
0 Votes
+ -
The PC world
klumper 12th Jun 2008
The first argument I see for XP/Vista against any other OS is the fact that it works right out of the box. Yet I see here a series of articles on how to get Vista up to par.

The PC world never evolved from a basic 'out of the box' experience like say the Mac has. It evolved from wanting the maximum latitude possible, while minimizing the pain required to get there. There's a few inherent trade-offs in that mix. One platform does not necessarily trump the other, it simply comes down to what the user - and equally important, power user - wants. This is further emphasized by endless stripes of white box and DIY installations and configurations still available today, to include fully customized rigs.

Linux has traditionally required too much fussing. It's gotten better in recent years, but the learning curve - and perception it cast from years back - cut it at its knees early on, and that perception largely remains to this day. The Mac is well structured from the get-go, but requires a greater acceptance of the "lock-in" principle. Being more costly to boot, that equates to a no-go for many. PC's and the WinTel world remain a compromise solution to the other two platforms, which began with the IBM PC 25+ years ago and was quickly broadened - and superseded - by the now ubiquitous WinTel clones.

You can have basic "out of the box" stability with Windows, it just isn't fully realized or optimized until it is tweaked a bit (OEM or RTM/retail disk installed), regardless of whether authors like Ed claim it is. But the nuts and bolts are all there in place, as EB takes pains to emphasize. All advanced PCers know some degree tweaking is a must -IF- you want maximum performance and ease of use. It's actually part of the fun, since once it's set up to your liking, you're basically good to go from that point on. With improved core security in place since XP SP2, Windows is arguably a better package than ever.

I've always said it, to Microsoft and anyone else who will listen, choice is GOOD. The more choices we have in ways large and small (with exception of OS versions leveraged solely for maximum $$ returns), the better our overall computer experience will be. Here I suspect even TCO MacBardal would agree.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix