ie8 fix
madison

An inside look at Apple's sneaky iTunes 8 upgrade

By | September 10, 2008, 2:52pm PDT

Summary: I’m reading lots of complaints about the new iTunes 8 update causing horrific problems on Windows machines, including widespread reports of STOP errors, aka the Blue Screen of Death. So how can a supposedly simple software update cause a fatal crash? Maybe because this isn’t a simple software update. Once again, Apple is using its automatic update process to deliver multiple software packages, including a device driver that has a long and checkered history of causing the Blue Screen Of Death to appear. And it’s delivering this massive payload without even a pretense of proper disclosure and without asking consent from its users. I was able to reproduce a crash and put together a gallery that shows the whole sordid process.

Update, 12-September, 5:45AM PDT: Apple has issued a revised download for iTunes 8 intended to correct this problem. My analysis is in this follow-up post.

I’m reading lots of complaints about the new iTunes 8 update causing horrific problems on Windows machines, including widespread reports of STOP errors, aka the Blue Screen of Death. My colleague Adrian Kingsley-Hughes has asked readers for reports and Gizmodo has a sketchy post as well. How can this be happening? Assuming that the underlying hardware is working correctly, STOP errors can only be caused by kernel-level drivers or system services. A poorly written program can crash itself but not the entire system. So how can a supposedly simple software update cause a fatal crash?

Maybe because this isn’t a simple software update. Once again, Apple is using its automatic update process to deliver massive amounts of new software to users, including a device driver that has a long and checkered history of causing the Blue Screen Of Death to appear. And it’s delivering this massive payload without even a pretense of proper disclosure and without asking consent from its users.

I was able to reproduce a crash using an iPod and iTunes 8 and fixed it by removing the suspicious driver. I’ve dissected the process and put together a gallery that shows how extensive the infiltration is and where you can find the likely culprit.

To see what software is sneaking along with the upgrade,
see my image gallery: Apple’s sneaky iTunes 8 install

Apple’s sneaky iTunes 8 install

Here’s a blow-by-blow analysis of what happens when you allow Apple Software Update to install iTunes 8:

The first thing you see is a notice from Apple Software Update. It promises an update to iTunes+QuickTime and says nothing about any other software.

itunes_small01.jpg

Next, you accept a license agreement, which also makes no mention of anything other than iTunes. According to a code at the end of the license agreement, it has not been updated since October 2007.

After you enter your administrator’s credentials in a dialog box, the download and installation proceed automatically. The downloader dialog box notes that the complete install package is nearly 80MB in size, but the size shown in its progress bar changes several times.

itunes_small02.jpg

Opening the folder where Apple Software Update stores its temporary files reveals what’s really going on. The download consists of five installer packages and a master setup program. In addition to iTunes and QuickTime, the package includes the Bonjour service (which has been a part of iTunes for a long time), plus Apple Mobile Device Support and MobileMe. The latter two packages appeared for the first time, according to Ars Technica and other sources, in the July update to iTunes. And a look inside Control Panel shows that this time around, Apple is giving Windows users an opportunity to uninstall MobileMe, which they didn’t do in the previous update.

When I used an antispyware tool (Sunbelt Software’s VIPRE), it detected that a new Apple program was loading at startup. Although it went by the prosaic name AppleSyncNotifier, its icon reveals that it’s actually MobileMe.

But in addition to all that software, Apple is also sneaking a couple of driver updates onto the system. One is a USB controller update, which is apparently used when connecting an iPod or iPhone to the system. On my system, this driver file was copied to the system but was not installed until I connected an iPod Mini via a USB port. Most of the trouble reports on the Apple forum indicate that this driver is identifying itself in the text that appears on the STOP error page. The only clue that this driver is being installed is in the System Restore dialog box.

In addition to this driver, the system also updates the GEARAspiWDM.sys driver (in Windows\System32\Drivers). I had to dig deep to discover this change, which is not documented anywhere. This driver is typically used with third-party programs that write to CD and DVD drives. The old iTunes versions of this driver is dated January 29, 2008. The new one is from April 17, 2008. This driver has a long and colorful history of causing Windows crashes. [Update 17-Sep: After looking deeper, I can confirm that Apple's driver is the culprit and that Gear's driver is unrelated to these crashes. In fact, Gear's signed driver might even be an innocent bystander in a separate iTunes support issue. See my follow-up post "Apple, not Gear, deserves the blame for iTunes crashes" for details.] I remember dealing with it back in Windows 2000 days. And sure enough, a search for GEARAspiWDM.sys BSOD turns up thousands of hits. I’ve also found anecdotal reports of this driver causing iTunes to crash, including this one from the Gear Software forum last May. The image below shows the Previous Versions dialog box, which I used to determine that the file had been updated.

itunes_small03.jpg

When I plugged an iPod Nano into my Windows Vista system for the first time, it offered to install a driver and then asked me to reboot. When I restarted, I plugged in the iPod again and the machine locked up solid. No blue screen, just a black screen that didn’t respond to any input. After a restart, I tried again and got the same result when I attempted to open iTunes.

For the third try, I decided to replace the GEARAspiWDM.sys driver file with its earlier version. I used the Previous Versions feature of Windows Vista Ultimate to find the older version, copied it to my desktop, deleted the newer driver, and then copied the January version to the Drivers folder. This time iTunes opened just fine, displaying the contents of the iPod. (When I simply deleted the driver file, I got an error upon starting iTunes warning me that my installation was incomplete and that I might not be able to burn CDs or DVDs until I completed it.)

I can’t say my tests are conclusive, but my long history with this file suggests that it might well be at the root of the problem for others as well.

An even bigger problem is Apple’s attitude toward its Windows customers. These additional software packages and drivers are being installed with no disclosure and no consent. A pile of software, including the troubled MobileMe service, is also being installed and enabled at startup on Windows machines, even where the user has no MobileMe account and, for that matter, no mobile device.

Apple’s Get a Mac ads love to tweak Microsoft for its frequent crashes. Someone from Apple needs to look in the mirror and realize that they’re the problem in this case.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

271
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: An inside look at Apple's sneaky iTunes 8 upgrade
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
Ed,

While, I agree that there is no reason for apple to install a long list of programs in your computer when you just want iTunes; it is common practice. Hell, everyone seems to be in bed with Google and their silly browser bar. No I do not want the google desktop installed when I am installing Java or any other program for that matter. And for that matter tell Microsoft that I don't want Silverlight or their download center either.

However, I disagree on the point of drivers. In many chases they are neccesary. Has Apple been doing a poor QC job the last year or so, yes. Should they tell you every file that they are sending your way, only if they are not going to QC it first. Like I would want to say yes or no to the hundreds of files that the average program comes with these days. No one has that kind of time.

In all I would tend to think that every software company is sneaky. But are they breaking your PC that is the question. I give you an A for finding the suspect driver and reporting it so we can avoid it, but a D for paranoia.
0 Votes
+ -
The driver is not neccessary
soonerproud Updated - 10th Sep 2008
However, I disagree on the point of drivers. In many chases they are neccesary.

Not in this case they are not. Plenty of people use both Quicktime and iTunes that do not own an iPod or iPhone. There is no excuse for Apple, or anyone for that matter to install drivers on your system without your knowledge.

Apple is proving it is as bad if not worse than companies like Gator in installing malware and other junk. I for one will NEVER install Apple's crappy software again on my PC's.
0 Votes
+ -
Did you miss the part
frgough 11th Sep 2008
about the driver only installing when you plug in your iPod/iPhone
for the first time?
0 Votes
+ -
The fact is
soonerproud Updated - 11th Sep 2008
I have installed iTunes many times and the Apple mobile device support is installed and present in the add remove programs under the control panel. I don't own an iPod or have never connected one to my PC's, yet Apple's crap for an iPod is installed on my PC. Before making your snide remarks, please do some more research first before criticizing someone's post.

Edit: I meant Apple Mobile Device Support, not Apple USB storage driver.
0 Votes
+ -
Then why don't you just uninstall it through control panel
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 11th Sep 2008
At least you have that option.

I agree with you Apple's iTunes is crap, but you're making the USB storage driver a mountain out of a molehill if you never use an iPod.

Chill, dude...
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
No such option
Ed Bott 11th Sep 2008
The USB driver is not an individual option in the Programs Control Panel.
0 Votes
+ -
soonerproud just said there was
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 11th Sep 2008
"the Apple USB storage driver is installed and present in the add remove programs under the control panel."
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Look at the picture
Ed Bott 11th Sep 2008
I actually showed a picture of the Control Panel, so you tell me.
0 Votes
+ -
So you're saying he's wrong then (nt)
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 11th Sep 2008
?
0 Votes
+ -
@ b8375629@...
soonerproud Updated - 11th Sep 2008
I meant Apple Mobile Device Support. This is still a iPod/iPhone service that is unnecessary and is installed without consent on both iTunes and Quicktime. I deselected for Apple to install automatic updates, yet it is still there in the control panel along with Bonjour which I also never consented to be installed.
0 Votes
+ -
Ditto....
FranC. 11th Sep 2008
I turned off the Apple update for QuickTime. And now I am glad I did because I don't use Ipod or I whatever, just QuickTime. Don't need the I-whatever-flavor-of-the-month-crap upgrade bundle. I'll update it when I need it or want it.
0 Votes
+ -
If you only use Quicktime
tikigawd 11th Sep 2008
I'd get Quicktime alternative instead:
http://www.free-codecs.com/download/quicktime_alternative.htm

no need having a holy (as in Swiss cheese) piece of software like that on your PC if you can help it
0 Votes
+ -
Well...
techboy_z 11th Sep 2008
Most people have zero idea what a device driver is. You can't go the route of asking permission to install a device driver without freaking out 85% of users. This would be a step back towards Linux in this regard - needing to know OS technical details of that sort.
0 Votes
+ -
Right
Joeman57 11th Sep 2008
So just let it break stuff instead. That's definitely the better route eh?
0 Votes
+ -
"A step back towards Linux"?
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 11th Sep 2008
That's hilarious...

grin
the Windows API call installing a driver requires the hardware to be present for the driver to be installed.

If Ed doesn't have an iPod connected, then there is no driver being installed. And in any case

(1) how does this get into kernel mode. Vista isn't supposed to allow kernel mode drivers is it? Otherwise what on earth was the point of it all.

(2) These drivers are WHQL certified. I guess this means they don't bother testing anything, and just get their $$$ and party it up as many have expected over the years.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
The GEARAspiWDM.sys driver is a file-system filter driver. It is a kernel-level driver that works with the CD/DVD drive and the file system. Go look it up. I explained it here: http://content.zdnet.com/2346-12354_22-220803-12.html.)

And then go read the part where I talked about plugging in an iPod and locking up my system as a driver installed.

And again, who told you these drivers are WHQL-certified? And who told you Vista banned kernel mode drivers? You do realize you are now just making stuff up?
You told me before you'd "given me the link already" not that I could see. Point me to the place in microsoft.com where I get my driver WHQL certified for $240 (or signed or whatever).

So you're effectively saying that vista isn't as secure as Windows NT 3.51 since kernel level drivers CAN be installed. (even on vista x64).
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Already did that
Ed Bott Updated - 11th Sep 2008
I did that the last time we had this stupid discussion, Stevey. Pay attention.

You posted exactly the same challenge on July 17 as part of the same discussion. I posted two links for you that explain the WHQL program and its costs in detail. If you had actually read these links, you would know that nothing you have posted today is true.

I know you follow these things up, almost obsessively, it seems. But you never seem to remember the answers to the questions you ask. That sure is curious.

Oh, and I was wrong. It's $250. Sorry.
0 Votes
+ -
OK please please post it again now.
stevey_d 11th Sep 2008
Seriously, I'd like you to post the link, and I'll never mention it again.
I've tried going around and around hundreds of pages at microsoft.com.
0 Votes
+ -
It's on the Winqual site.
Sleeper Service 11th Sep 2008
(NT)
0 Votes
+ -
Links for you
cybrsage13@... 12th Sep 2008
His google-fu is low, it took me all of 3 minutes to find this:

"Test fee of up to US $250 is waived for the first 150 passing tests through June 25, 2009.* "
http://www.innovateon.com/product_server2008.aspx

It does require a $350 VeriSign 'Microsoft Authenticode' Code Signing Digital ID, though.
https://winqual.microsoft.com/download/Post%20HCT%2012%20DTM%20Global%20WHQL %20POLICY%20v1.1.doc

I hope this is the last time I have to read his whining.
0 Votes
+ -
No iPod, no driver right?
0Hboy 11th Sep 2008
Maybe I'm confused, but I have to agree with Stevey - Since the post he was probably referring to was about a guy complaining about apple software in his installed apps who said he didn't have an ipod. Was the original reply clarifying that the driver wasn't installed anyway for this user? Even Ed said that he had to connect his ipod to get the driver to install so I don't see the point in saying that someone doesn't know what he's talking about when it appears that someone didn't read the comments that prompted stevey's post.
0 Votes
+ -
You still get
soonerproud 11th Sep 2008
Apple Mobile Device Support with no option to opt out.
0 Votes
+ -
True true
0Hboy 12th Sep 2008
I don't agree with the lack of customizing the install. Any install for that matter. When the options for customization are to choose the install location and if the app is installed at all it leaves a lot to be desired. I tend to disable or uninstall things that I don't want/need. Recently did a clean install of Vista Ultimate 64-bit and only installed the apps and services that I wanted (Asus notebook) - and it boots and runs much faster.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Consent and disclosure
Ed Bott 10th Sep 2008
I don't like being offered the Google Toolbar every time I turn around either, but at least it's disclosed to me, and I get a chance to uncheck the box. No such opportunity here. All of a sudden, MobileMe is running on my PC. I didn't ask for or authorize that, ever.

As for the drivers, there is at least an eight-year history of this particular CD/DVD-burning driver causing problems on PCs. Anyone writing code that uses it should be testing for those scenarios. To ship it out to 50, 60, 70 million users withlut testing is software malpractice.
0 Votes
+ -
Absolutely Right
Harry Bardal 10th Sep 2008
There should be a disclosure of Mobile Me. There should
not be the use of a driver with known issues. The software
shouldn't have shipped to users. This is clearly another
black mark on Apple's Windows Software record.

I would expect you all to remove iTunes out of principle, If
you see it as software malpractice, it shouldn't be
tolerated. I'd expect you to promptly remove Vista, acting
under the same principle. A flawed release characterized
by driver problems is not unheard of as it turns out.

Then we'd expect you to apply the same standards to your
"disclosure" that you would see from Apple and disclose
how you know no testing was done.

The mesh between a managed experience and a "less"
managed one, doesn't always work well. Call it a culture
clash. The last Apple Safari spam to Windows was railed
against as well. It also raised the Safari user base. It
worked in other words. None of us should condone it
regardless. Apple has everything to lose if it BSODs too
many Windows boxes, but it's also true, that children of a
monopoly are not known to act on market effronteries. If it
makes more sense to see Apple as the polluter of the PC
experience, okay. Ditch iTunes, don't fix it, ditch it. Tell
others to ditch it as well. Since it was free software,
nothing's lost beyond the time to reboot and trash it.

In the midst of calling for a Microsoft move towards a
hardware reference spec, and therefore a move towards
the Apple model, you'd think it would occur to give that
model try. Like I say, if driver issues are a deal breaker,
Vista would have broken the deal first, so clearly, folks do
have some tolerance for software malpractice.

iTunes works well under OSX. Full disclosure is less of an
issue for most non technical users and a good many
technical ones. Within a managed experience, we expect
any claims to meet our human needs to be met in the
larger sense. If they are not, we ditch the software, log it
as a negative, and add it to the collective experience.
Within the managed experience, accountability, is never an
issue. Within a market free of monopoly maintenance,
substantive choice will always be available. Ditching
software is a right and a pleasure.

Apple is wrong to have shipped this update. Getting iTunes
to work on Windows has been difficult. They may be ill
equipped to do Windows software. None of that's an
excuse. No more than market success is an excuse for
abuse of monopoly. Apple is abusing Windows users. OEMs
abuse Windows users. Microsoft itself abuses Windows
users. Literally everyone does it. It's wrong. More power to
Ed for logging these continued and widespread patterns of
this abuse.
0 Votes
+ -
And do not overlook
GuidingLight Updated - 11th Sep 2008
The fact that Apple abuses everyone, even their own users, period.

To create the buggy, error ridden software for Windows machines in an attempt to con users into purchasing an Apple machine that should remain an unnessecary fix to allow the function of purchased external harware devices is an outrage that should not be tolerated in any day or age.

The logical move for most would be to scarp the inferior product (iPod) for a brand that does not require the use of Apple's software, but unfortuneatly, downloaded iTunes will not function straight away on other players the all to familiar and dredded ASOP (Apple's Standard Operating Procedure)

But a good effort none the less, for yet another attempt to shift the blame to Microsoft and their user base as part of the problem with Apple inability to create products and software worthy of the price we are asked to pay out for
0 Votes
+ -
What a surprise...
Hallowed are the Ori 11th Sep 2008
I would expect you all to remove iTunes out of principle, If you see it as software malpractice, it shouldn't be tolerated. I'd expect you to promptly remove Vista, acting under the same principle. A flawed release characterized by driver problems is not unheard of as it turns out.


You would absolutely die if you didn't try to twist an argument around to shift focus, blame, or whatever on Microsoft, wouldn't you.

A shill is as a shill does, I suppose.
0 Votes
+ -
Not really.
frgough 11th Sep 2008
What Harry did, in his usual long-winded way, was point out the
double-standard that exists among folks like Ed Bott. I'll lay
money now that installing the Zune desktop installs similar
dependencies as well, including a special driver for the device.
0 Votes
+ -
Except...
Sleeper Service Updated - 11th Sep 2008
...we know that MS are a bit dodgy, however they don't pretend to be the company that 'just works'.

Apple's s**t stinks too. Deal with it.
0 Votes
+ -
Well
Hallowed are the Ori 11th Sep 2008
What Harry did, in his usual long-winded way, was point out the double-standard that exists among folks like Ed Bott.

Well in the name off all that is holy, why couldn't he have just said it like you just did, instead of one of his long-winded diatribes?
0 Votes
+ -
re: well
Badgered 11th Sep 2008
Well in the name off all that is holy, why couldn't he have just said it like you just did, instead of one of his long-winded diatribes?

Please..... it wouldn't be Harry if it wasn't sermon-esque.

Though I wonder if he talks like that in face to face conversations, or just on the talk-backs.
0 Votes
+ -
lol
Yax_to_the_Max 12th Sep 2008
I went into blah, blah, blah mode after the first paragraph...

Is it too hard to ask posters to state a point and back it up with some facts. Or at the very least, keep it short if you're just gonna blast off on someone.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Bad bet
Ed Bott 11th Sep 2008
Zune install a user-mode DLL, with no kernel-mode drivers. As far as I can tell it connects via standard USB ports and uses existing Windows media-burning services. It installs two services but doesn't enable them until they're used. It has a user-mode launcher program, but that's it.

So, you lose that bet.
apart from massive built in windows media player & the DRM infrastructure, Zune only installs a usermode DLL.

I really thought the bit thing with Vista was that Kernel mode drivers were no longer allowed, otherwise how come all the pain?

Also, how can drivers be installed without the hardware present. Not possible in Windows API.
0 Votes
+ -
stevey raises some good questions, Ed...
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 11th Sep 2008
What's the deal with what he just said...
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Just click the Flat View button and search.
0 Votes
+ -
Last I checked, the "generic Windows drivers" worked. Granted there weren't generic drivers for everything, but honestly, writing drivers for other people's equipment isn't really Microsoft's job.
Microsoft is not to blame for nVidia's fouled drivers, or for ATI's nearly non-existant drivers until the release of Vista. Wondows isn't at fault for the hardware manufacturers inability to keep up. That belongs with the hardware manufacturers, and the writers of those drivers.
Apple released failed drivers. They added extra software without asking permission for them. The same with Google Toolbar or Google Desktop, where you have the ability to "opt out," Apple didn't give anyone the choice. They forced it on people, without even letting them know they were doing it..
That is a foul on Apple's part.

As far as your driver issues, stop buying hardware without proper drivers and you won't have driver problems...
0 Votes
+ -
Blame
Harry Bardal 11th Sep 2008
No Microsoft isn't to blame for 3rd party drivers. What they
are responsible for is the promotion and proliferation of
open architecture through broad licensing. In this manner,
they are responsible, albeit indirectly, for literally every
driver failure that arises out of these complexities. Some
very large and capable companies had some tough times
writing Vista drivers. Why? Patterns of lax and undisciplined programming have been tacitly encouraged
by Microsoft prior to Vista to shorten dev time and speed
up the software gold rush. The number of possible
hardware configurations is now ridiculously high. The
legacy has stuck with us. Ed himself has started to
advocate a hardware reference spec which is a clear move
to prevent these problems. It's also a clear move towards
an Apple model.

Apple is a closed loop. It provides accountability. This new
issue is very clearly Apple's fault. I said as much. The
problem is, fault finding is not a solution. Neither is fixing
Apple's software for them. For the principled user the
solution is to dump the software, and throw support
behind another vendor. In the mean time, the system itself
must provide some accountability, feedback, and
management that prevents this kind of thing happening.
Increasingly the OS needs to take responsibility for the
user experience. Any platform will have this problem to
the extent that it is "open". Free applications are obliged to
give you what you pay for them.

This is just one of a huge number of driver related
problems that provides the Windows user with grief.
Windows can't now take responsibility for the users
experience. Now it has to openly compete with a system
that can. Someone for whom the iTunes app is of great
importance, does not ditch the app. They will ditch the
platform it fails on.
0 Votes
+ -
That would help a lot really. Then make sure all drivers can only run in usermode, and therefore cannot possibly crash the system.
That would do very well.
0 Votes
+ -
Getting ANYTHING to work...
arminw 11th Sep 2008
on Windows is difficult, not just iTunes. Writing a
rock-solid device driver for the almost infinite
variations of hardware in the PC world is difficult.
Because Apple has control of the hardware and their
software, they can and do produce a more reliable
overall system. Apple is now getting a taste of what
Microsoft and peripherals manufacturers face with
PC hardware and software variability.
0 Votes
+ -
I thought...
McDave 11th Sep 2008
...MobileMe was now an integral part of the local and, if
purchased, extended sync architecture for their apps.
Bonjour to discover devices and MM to sync. It's not an
option, it's integral.

McD
0 Votes
+ -
That was in 2005. I didn't like the continually bloat of iTunes over the last few years, but I put up with it because I could hide/disable everything but the parts I wanted. Now, iTunes is installing crap I didn't know about. It's also forcing its store on me.

If I want to shop in iTunes, I'll click the link. I don't need iTunes to keep offering to sell me the music I own.

I purged my system of APple software last night. Anyone know a good iPod management software besides winamp? Anything better?
0 Votes
+ -
iPod management
Norcross 11th Sep 2008
If you're willing to roll up your sleeves a bit, foobar2000 is an open-source music app that had the ability to sync / update most iPods (I think the shuffle doesn't quite work) with the available plug-in. I got rid of Apple at the Safari mess, and haven't looked back. Foobar2000 has been more stable, it's completely scriptable, has a smaller footprint, and doesn't crash due to a large music library like iTunes did.
0 Votes
+ -
iTunes Sucks...Can I Get an AMEN!
mtomazic 11th Sep 2008
Agreed! I originally liked iTunes - nothing too fancy, but a good way to manage my music. Now? It is a horror show. Frankly, I've had issues with it for about a year now. To the point that I will only open iTunes when I ABSOLUTELY need it (import music, sync my iPod). I had previously avoided upgrading it but was caught be the allure of v8. Alas! Would also love some advice on another music management software (or at least some advice on rolling iTunes back)?
0 Votes
+ -
AMEN brother! - & Quicktime is even worse!
TheBottomLineIsAllThatMatters 11th Sep 2008
iTunes is slow and just horrible!
0 Votes
+ -
Go here for rolling back iTunes
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 11th Sep 2008
http://www.oldapps.com/

After you delete the latest iTunes mess, you can reinstall an older version and turn off the automatic updates so you won't be bugged by 'em again...
0 Votes
+ -
A-freaking-MEN
tikigawd 11th Sep 2008
I too got rid of it shortly after the Safari BS.
It also helped that my old iPod (monochrome with clickwheel) died and I just bought a Zune.

I'm happy with the Zune software so far. Way faster than iTunes, actively syncs (wired or wireless!) with the Zune as I mess around my library (provided it's connected to the computer, of course), it's visually more appealing IMO, and it already included a bunch of the "new" features Jobs bragged about adding ago to his lovely iTunes 8 a couple of days.

As for an iPod sync alternative software, I used one called Sharepod a year or two back. I'm not sure if they've kept updating it as new iPods have come out,l but you might want to check it out.
0 Votes
+ -
Preach it Brother! AMEN!
Bacon 3000 12th Sep 2008
It sucks so bad it crashed my MAC mini (V1)so bad I had to reinstall MAC OS X to get anything to work again. I bought a Mini to see what all this MAC hype was all about. What a waste of money. CRApple fanboys are simply victims of marketing..ie. SUCKERS.
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix