ie8 fix
madison

Bing ads lead to more malware; new Mac Trojan in the wild

By | August 9, 2011, 5:28am PDT

Summary: Malware authors will do just about anything to fool you into installing their software. A popular target is search engine advertising, which one gang is using on Microsoft’s search results. In a separate attack, Mac users are being targeted by a Trojan that mimics a Flash installer.

Yesterday, I showed you details of an ad on Microsoft’s Bing search engine that led unwary visitors to a site serving up malware.

Several hours after I reported that ad to Microsoft, it was removed, and a spokesperson told me that Bing’s ad network will “continue to directly work with our agency media partners to verify and confirm any suspicious orders.”

Looks like there’s more work to do.

This morning, I’ve found multiple ads on Bing that go through seemingly innocent intermediary sites to the same malicious server in Russia.

Here, for example, is a pair of ads that appeared at the top of the Bing search results for firefox download:

Clicking the second ad in that block leads to a site called ipcfiles.info. The landing page is just as convincing as the fake Google Chrome downloads I identified yesterday:

Likewise, a Bing search for flash player displays this block of ads above the search results.

Clicking the second ad in this group, which is served from a site called oeachot.info, leads to this landing page:

Again, this is convincing social engineering.

Both intermediary sites use scripts that redirect an unwary user to the same Russian server I flagged yesterday.

I found similar ads, all leading to the same server, when I searched Bing for adobe reader, utorrent, and google earth.

This sort of attack has a higher than average probability of success, because casual Internet users have become accustomed to using search engines as a jumping-off point, and both Bing and Google place ads in prominent positions above search results, where they’re more likely to be clicked.

And because this gang uses a polymorphic engine, the files it delivers are not detected by conventional antivirus scanners. When I submitted both of these samples to VirusTotal today, only 3 of 43 scanning engines detected them as suspicious.

Currently, these ads lead only to Windows malware, but it’s possible that Mac users will be targeted by similar types of attacks. Last week, F-Secure identified a fake Flash Player installer delivered as a Mac package that is actually a DNS-changing Trojan.

Over the weekend, a customer on Apple’s support forums reported finding this on his Mac, and this morning I confirmed that Apple has updated its XProtect signatures to include a definition that flags and removes this threat, which it calls OSX.QHost.WB.A. This is the first definition update for OS X since the takedown of the Mac Defender gang on June 23.

Related posts:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

118
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Bing ads lead to more malware; new Mac Trojan in the wild
kiwisewi77 24th Aug
Orbably because there are so many of the damn things and they allare pop gliz and glamour and easy to infiltrate.
With regard to Adobe, download direct from Adobe and you will never have trouble, keep the system clean of old Adobe dloads also.
With regard to Facebook - don't use the spysite everytime one visits Facebook memeber or not Facebook stores the user info of the person up for at least 2 weeks from the day kilikd.
So klik the next day and the 2week cycle begins again, kilik it after a week of non use and the 2 week cycle begins again it is a scam site.
Facebook knows where u go simply by the klik on a keyboard.
Google is the best search engine and that is nor use it's applications which are simply toys for the children.
Well..., haft to admit, this made me chuckle a little.
Why is it that 1 in 5 Facebook pages contain [links to] a Java exploit? I am CONSTANTLY fixing customer machines where they pick up some kind of new Java exploit from Facebook links and/or ads. I can literally track their history back to wall posts and ads running on Facebook pages. Last week I cleaned a machine that had 18 exploits on it (some were variations of others, but they were uniquely identified). This is why I advocate against Java use for the masses.
0 Votes
+ -
Hate to point the finger
Joe_Raby 9th Aug
...well, not really...

but anyway, CBS doesn't exactly have a pristine record either. I can recount no less than 6 in the past 24 months where they had poisoned ads - and each time was when I opened ZDnet at the start of the day.

And they were all Flash ads.

This is the reason why I advocate against Flash ads. You can easily filter HTML, but I haven't seen any automatic systems that can search through Flash (and Java) ads for malicious content.
0 Votes
+ -
@Joe_Raby
I also have seen poisoned Flash ads at legitimate sites. They get taken care of quickly when reported, but it's too late for a machine that they've infected. This gives a lot of credence to using Adblock and Flashblock plugins/add-ons for your browser (especially in Windows which is usually targeted by these ads). I would think that the sandbox in new versions of IE would help with this kind of attack (as well as having the latest version of Flash, though I wouldn't count on that being enough), but I haven't seen one of these ads on a sandboxed system yet.
0 Votes
+ -
@Joe_Raby

"CBS" = CBS Interactive, which owns CNet and ZDnet.

...unless you were calling CBS Interactive "illegitimate".... wink
0 Votes
+ -
Yes, I Know
CFWhitman 9th Aug
@Joe_Raby
I knew you meant legitimate sites. That's why I said "I also have seen poisoned Flash ads at legitimate sites." I can change the title as well to make it more clear that I was just chiming in.
0 Votes
+ -
My bad
Joe_Raby 9th Aug
@CFWhitman

Sandboxing doesn't always work. Most of the fake AV software just installs in the user folder, which can f* up Windows as soon as you log in (just like on a Mac). Sure, it may not be running in other user accounts, but if only have one user account in Windows, you're going to be the admin. If you can't use Windows properly once you log in, then you don't have any option to create additional user accounts, etc. Usually you have to use some kind of offline servicing tool to remove the malware. I use Standalone System Sweeper in DaRT for this reason. I read about the new standalone beta for SSS, which I think is great news for end users, but it's still too complicated. Microsoft should just implement some kind of offline scanning ability in the default WinRE setup in every Win7 install though. DaRT can be deployed to a WinRE partition but it requires IT knowledge and costs extra. It's too bad that MSE can't just integrate itself into WinRE automatically so that the tools will also be there. I'm gonna suggest this feature to Microsoft for future Windows versions. A lot of the suggestions I made were actually implemented. They've made the feedback process much more difficult in recent years though.
@Joe_Raby

The entire internet is poison. These "corporations" profit from ads...they don't care who or what's being pitched they just pitch it and make a buck in the process which leads to people spending money on new computers, new security software and more wasted money. It's a cycle to create more money!
@Joe_Raby

Using Windows, I can ask - What's Java? I'm afraid if you install this slow, buggy VM, you reap what you sow. Best MS decision ever, dumping Java.
@tonymcs@...
Totally agree. I will never miss playing the 10 games that require it.
@tonymcs@...
Yes, exactly. Now if I could just talk friends/family out of it.
0 Votes
+ -
Frankly it is not irrelevant
rbethell 9th Aug
@Ed Bott Yes, it is good for you to point out these social engineering attacks, as they are particularly insidious. But it also isn't wrong to point out that the Mac is not (yet) known to be vulnerable to involuntary payloads in the wild, such as buffer overruns, etc.

That's not everything. But it is something.
@LoverockDavidson One problem with that analysis is so much legitimate software throws the same warnings. This isn't a dig at Windows (or Mac OS X), just shows how difficult this problem is to fully address.
@Jeremy-UK
Good point. Windows will even warm you of opening of Microsoft's own software.
@Zc456

" Windows will even warm you of opening of Microsoft's own software."

Oh yeah? Not unless said software is set to execute with administrative privileges. Which is exactly when it should warn you.

Because you are not claiming that Word, Excel, Visio, Expression, Visual Studio 2010, Access, Internet Explorer or Outlook are throwing up UAC prompts, are you?

Are you at all familar with Windows?
@honeymonset, I'm pretty sure he was talking about IE9's download filter, which works on a reputation basis. Not even Microsoft software gets away from that.
@honeymonster
Jee, what bone did I pick with you? I've been using Windows since 98 SE but that's not the point. Yes, UAC will prompt up for MS' own software. Not saying it's a bad thing, more of a double edged sword.
@honeymonster Dude, take your medication and realize that he was talking about IE9
So is the point of this article that Google has better malware checking than Bing?
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
No
Ed Bott 9th Aug
@rfoto

Google was hammered by these gangs in April and May. It's Bing's turn this month.
@Ed Bott
I bet Google is just laughing and saying, "join the club."
0 Votes
+ -
Microsoft should be flattered
honeymonster 9th Aug
@Ed Bott
Bing has become "big enough" to be worth poisoning.
0 Votes
+ -
LMAO!!!
UrNotPayingAttention 9th Aug
@Ed Bott

I'm curious as to who the idiot is that keeps flagging Ed's posts?

Yeah, as if the moderator is gonna really delete the author's posts on his blog
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@rbethell

I don't know where you get the idea that Macs are invulnerable. Charlie Miller proves that to be untrue every year at CanSecWest, and I dealt with it in a post recently.

Most malware on Windows comes via social engineering. Drive-by downloads are less and less important.

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/trojans-viruses-worms-how-does-malware-get-on-pcs-and-macs/3491
I never click on ads
Looks as if all these websites end with a .info TDL. If that's the case, it should be pretty easy to block them, no?

I'd say for Bing to just block those all. I don't think I've ever seen a legit .info site.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@Cylon Centurion

But yes, for a long time I filtered all .info sites. Probably still a wise idea.
@Ed Bott

Hmm, my .info site is our company server, but I have no problem with people filtering it out, makes my server more secure wink
@Jeremy-UK

Sounds like it. It's pretty hard to be victimized by a drive-by, or browser re-direct anymore.
@shellcodes_coder

Ignorance is bliss, I guess.
@Ed Bott

The more recent variants of Mac Defender didn't require user authentication to install.

Also, Apple has been slammed before about the setting to automatically launch "safe" downloads in Safari, even though malware takes advantage of this.
0 Votes
+ -
My sentiments exactly
Joe_Raby 9th Aug
@Tommy S.

I've always told people to type addresses into the address bar instead of relying on search all the time. What's dumb is that there is this whole division of new Internet users that still want to find their search engine page to type in a web address, and it's painful to witness.

This is the reason why I sometimes say that people should be required to own an operators license to use a computer.
@Joe_Raby The only problem is I've mistyped a site name in the address bar only to be taken to something I didn't want whether it be porn or malware or whatever. So I always type the site name in a search engine to make sure I am getting the name right and then I click on that link.
@oldsguy Try NoScript, if you mistype the URL while failing to use your bookmarks, the misspelled page will simply not load properly. No script will be executed (no java, no flash, no nothing).
0 Votes
+ -
Not an excuse.
Joe_Raby 9th Aug
@oldsguy:

If you can't learn to spell, who else can you blame?
0 Votes
+ -
@Jeremy-UK

A lot of ISP's are now doing DNS filtering to hijack browser autosearch pages. Mine does it (Rogers). So does Bell Canada, and I know many US providers do to. Rogers is particularly sneaky in that they actively hijack IE's autosearch page by looking for certain text in the URL. For instance, if it has the term "=IEAddress", it will forward the page to their search engine, which used to be Yahoo, but is now Ask. IE9 doesn't use this technique, but I still use the trusty old '?' for keyword searches. That was introduced in IE3. This whole thing about having a separate Search Bar just seems stupid to me.
@Joe_Raby

Just use OpenDNS or google Public DNS!
0 Votes
+ -
People actually use Bing?
rag@... 9th Aug
But
It's
Not
Google
@rag@... 3 letters. YES !
@rag@...
LMAO grin

Bing is getting more and more popular because Microsoft no longer makes it easy to get Google as a default search provider; they've removed it from the list of search providers on the IE Addons page.
0 Votes
+ -
BING?
fatman65535 9th Aug
@rag@...

(chuckle)
@fatman65535

BING

Because It's Not Google

You have watched Mad Men right?

wink
@rag@...
And that's the best part. happy Google will slowly slip into the same infamy of fads like Nike, Puma, Members Only. It's not my rule. But it is a rule.
I'll assume my post was deleted accidentally so here is a recap of what I posted. ZDNet if you want to keep your readers you might want to read the posts first before deleting them.

I'm not going to worry abut this malware too much and neither should you. It requires a social attack and people are afraid to go to sites outside of the normal 6 sites they visit. Not only that but Microsoft Windows and IE have built in protections to prevent this, and give multipe warnings so you deliberately have to install it.
@LoverockDavidson New internet users dont even know that the face book is not the backbone of the intarwebz.
WTF happened?

I was submitting a reply and the page refreshed automatically, dumping all of my message.

Is this the way it's supposed to work?
0 Votes
+ -
Welcome to ZDNet
CFWhitman 9th Aug
@Andrew Sheppard
Their comment software is very buggy on this site, especially since they updated it a while back.

One thing I've noticed about editing posts is that if the page changes at all between when you view (or refresh) your original post and when you hit "Save," it will toss your edit and claim your message was flagged as spam (although it won't really be flagged).
@Andrew Sheppard
LOL, I suggest you get the Lazarus extension for your browser (not sure if there's one for IE), it sure has saved me from having to retype tones of text; thus it's a must have for any ZDNet commenter happy
This is why URLs should be simple and easily identifiable. With ICANNs proliferation of URLS and some browser's idea (forgot which one) to render the URL bar redundant, normal users would have a hard time trying to recognise phishing attacks like this.
0 Votes
+ -
Why do people do this?
jscott418 9th Aug
I am still amazed at why people click these ads? I always go to the correct site to download or check for any updates or get plugins and software. Still their must be plenty of users out there that will click.
Orbably because there are so many of the damn things and they allare pop gliz and glamour and easy to infiltrate.
With regard to Adobe, download direct from Adobe and you will never have trouble, keep the system clean of old Adobe dloads also.
With regard to Facebook - don't use the spysite everytime one visits Facebook memeber or not Facebook stores the user info of the person up for at least 2 weeks from the day kilikd.
So klik the next day and the 2week cycle begins again, kilik it after a week of non use and the 2 week cycle begins again it is a scam site.
Facebook knows where u go simply by the klik on a keyboard.
Google is the best search engine and that is nor use it's applications which are simply toys for the children.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix