ie8 fix
madison

Faster networks, please

By | May 30, 2006, 9:10am PDT

You can’t be too rich or too thin, or have a network that’s too fast. I struggled over the weekend trying to tweak the performance of an Xbox 360 connected to a PC running the new Media Center software in Windows Vista. (I’ll have a closer look at Vista Media Center later this week.)

The experience was amazing and frustrating at the same time. Vista Media Center pumps a lot of data over the wire, at true HDTV quality levels. That means even a few small hiccups in network performance can turn into skips in music and pixelated on-screen images. Using the Xbox 360 as a Media Center Extender, I wasn’t able to get through more than a few minutes of TV without dropouts and glitches.

And this is over a wired network. I pity anyone trying to stream a high-def picture over a wireless connection, especially using an 802.11g connection that’s also trying to serve the rest of the network.

Now, the problem could be on the somewhat tortured network connection between these two devices, with a router, two switches, and several long cable runs to deal with. This could be the incentive I need to reexamine those wiring paths and simplify, simplify, simplify.

A few months back, I tossed away a whole bag full of obsolete network cards, routers, hubs, and other gear. With one exception, every intermediary link in the network chain is now capable of running at Gigabit Ethernet speeds. It’s made a big difference in throughput, but nothing is fast enough.

So I was interested in this morning’s report on Ultrawideband (UWB) technology, prepared by Scottsdale-based market research firm In-Stat. In theory, at least, UWB devices can deliver data at gigabit rates over short distances, which makes them ideal for PC media center applications.

In-Stat says UWB chipsets will first start appearing in wireless USB dongles later this year and will then start to show up as PCMCIA cards on PC motherboards. Eventually, they’ll end up on cell phones and, presumably, iPods and other portable music players.

I can’t wait.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Faster networks, please
cheap mp3 players 4th Sep
It is really cell phone batteries point in time to boost the cheap electronics years
By means of russian brides and metal buildings as might relate to this site | here | this | here
0 Votes
+ -
You got some other problems Ed.
georgeou 30th May 2006
UWB is great for in-room stuff, but no way can it be as good as a wire. You have some other problems Ed. Even HDV streams (the kind coming from a camcorder) only use 28 mbps. A stabil 100 mbps switch should be able to sustain 80 mbps. I think you might have some duplex mismatch issues or something which would reset the link every few seconds.

Of course, gigabit switches are dirt cheap and they're great when you need to transfer large files in the gigabyte range. If I were you I would transfer some large files and watch the throughput meter built in to WinXP's task manager. Make sure it stays north of 70 mbps at all times. If it can't, you got some weird problems with one of the end points or your network.
0 Votes
+ -
Could be autosensing on NIC or routers
bharris0@... 31st May 2006
I would hard strap all of the devices to the maximum speed and full duplex. Autosensing is great in theory but causing far too many problems in practice.
0 Votes
+ -
In my experience, there are far more problems when trying to use manual duplex/speed settings. Sometimes it's needed but it's more likely to get you in trouble. The best solution is to do the throughput test. There is no reason that Fast Ethernet shouldn't be stable.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Faster networks, please
cheap mp3 players 4th Sep
It is really cell phone batteries point in time to boost the cheap electronics years
By means of russian brides and metal buildings as might relate to this site | here | this | here
0 Votes
+ -
I agree
anythingbutmine0 7th Jun 2006
However, it sounds like you're saying you're using a gigabit network already, Ed. As George points out, even a 100mb network should be enough to handle that. There has got to be something wrong with your setup.

Furthermore, if your wired gigabit network isn't able to keep up, why would a wireless gigabit network be any better?
0 Votes
+ -
About that Router...
chris@... 31st May 2006
When you said it was passing through a router, I take it you meant a switch built into a router, not actually being routed (as in two seperate network segments in your house)? I've never seen a router even remotely affordable for home use that would give you more than a 10mb WAN port, so running anything across network segments would be bad.

Same pretty much goes for the switch in the router. None of the consumer-focused routers I've seen have built-in gigabit switches (yet), they're limited to 100mb.

As far as the multiple switches and long cable runs, I'd be surprised if that turned out to be the problem. Unless they're poor quality switches and / or poor quality VERY long cables, they should be alright.

If you ever get it worked out, I'd be interested to know what you found the problem to be.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Router with gigabit switch
Ed Bott 31st May 2006
D-Link's DGL-4300 has four Gigabit Ethernet ports.

http://games.dlink.com/products/?pid=370&#DGL-4300
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Faster networks, please
JohnSmitJoseph Updated - 11th Jul
cool On condition that you get Viagra weight loss pills generic-propecia.biz and anxiety pills

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix