ie8 fix
madison

Finally, Adobe releases a 64-bit Flash Player

By | October 6, 2011, 2:37pm PDT

Summary: After years of promises, Adobe has finally delivered a Flash Player that offers full support for 64-bit browsers. Flash Player 11 also includes a wide range of performance, reliability, and security improvements. Is this enough to rehabilitate Flash’s tattered reputation?

Adobe has finally released a Flash Player that includes full native 64-bit support for 64-bit browsers on Windows, Mac, and Linux. The official announcement of the availability of Flash Player 11 is here, and the download itself is here.

It’s been a long time coming. Back in July 2008, more than three years ago, I noted that Adobe’s official support page for the Flash Player included this text:

Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We have not yet announced timing or release dates.

And now, with little fanfare, it’s here.

When I visited the Flash Player download page on a system running the 64-bit version of Windows 7, I was greeted with this dialog box:

Two aspects of that screen are noteworthy.

The first is the message that a single installer adds both 32-bit and 64-bit support. I was impressed with the new streamlined installer, which finished quickly and didn’t require any confirmations or check boxes after I clicked Run. When I opened the 64-bit version of Internet Explorer, I was able to play Flash content—something that was impossible before except using experimental code.

Unfortunately, that installer screen also shows Adobe’s continuing commitment to foistware—in this case, the Google toolbar that the company continues to push as part of the Flash Player installation. I’ve complained about it before, but in this new version that check box is still selected by default.

A separate installation of Flash Player 11 on the latest version of Firefox included an offer to install McAfee Security Scan Plus; here, too, the option was pre-selected and I had to clear the check box to ensure that I didn’t install an unwanted security program. (Google Chrome already contains the latest Flash Player and doesn’t require an update.)

Flash Player 11 includes a number of significant security and privacy improvements. But the performance and reliability improvements, continuing work that Adobe has been pursuing for the past couple years, are especially noticeable. Back in May 2010, I called Flash “the new Vista,” pointing to its dismal record on issues of reliability and performance. Without a lot of fanfare, Adobe has improved that record substantially.

In that earlier post, I was able to identify dozens of crashes and hangs that were specifically traceable to Internet Explorer’s Flash utility. Just now, I checked on my primary system, which has been in service for more than six months. The Windows Reliability Index shows an average of one problem with Internet Explorer per week during that period—usually a website that stops responding and has to be manually reloaded. During that time, I have not recorded a single crash or hang that can be traced to the Flash Player.

There’s no question that Flash has developed a terrible reputation over the years, with Steve Jobs’ April 2010 “Thoughts on Flash” being a particularly low point.

It remains to be seen whether Adobe can successfully rehabilitate the reputation of Flash Player, but there’s no question that this is a step in the right direction.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
29
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Re: Funny ...
ldo17 12th Oct
@Michael L Jones Linux, of course.
-1 Votes
+ -
OSX
D.Leerius 6th Oct
...and flash video still doesn't always work on OSX.
-1 Votes
+ -
Just a matter of time. The 64bit version is nice, but so what. With the weekly exploits for Flash, and the proliferation of HTML5, Flash (and Silverlight) will disappear. Maybe not right away, but they will go.
1 Vote
+ -
Totally useless, IE9 64 bits no have Chakra JIT (32bit IE9 runs script up to 4 times as fast as 64bit), Firefox only Nightly builds (no add-ons) and Chrome no 64 bit version for Windows.
Oh boy, there's that stupid Google toolbar again.

Blah... ;(
-1 Votes
+ -
So much for 'Do no evil'
DeRSSS 6th Oct
@ScorpioBlue
1 Vote
+ -
The sleazy "opt-in"
ScorpioBlue 7th Oct
So much for 'Do no evil'

The same sleazy way Chrome sometimes gets on people's machines without their knowing it.

Blah... ;(
-1 Votes
+ -
still no sandbox? bye bye flash
This is good news for the future of 64-bit computing but until there official 64-bit builds of Firefox and/or Chrome it means little in reality to me.

I so rarely use IE9 I may as well stick to the 32-bit version.
flash screws up my firefox hardware acceleration, the release candidate was more stable.
Linux with nvidia 275.
This is good for Mac users, where Safari and Firefox have been 64-bit for some time.
1 Vote
+ -
Hate that Google Toobar.
Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate 7th Oct
And thanks for mentioning the 'L' word
-1 Votes
+ -
How I hate that Google Toolbar.
Dietrich T. Schmitz * Your Linux Advocate 7th Oct
It creates more problems than helps.
Thanks for mentioning the 'L' word.
1 Vote
+ -
No go for me
techvet 7th Oct
I tried to install and the downloader hung. We're behind a user proxy for the Internet, so I am not sure if that's why it failed.
1 Vote
+ -
Ed,

Now if you could just talk MS into a 64 bit Silverlight player, we'd all be able to ditch our 32 bit IE on 64 bit Windows for the 64 bit version. Alas, I can't watch Netflix without it. :/

Michael
@Michael L Jones Silverlight 5 (currently at Release Candidate) has a 64-bit runtime.
Wow, you completely missed the story. 64-bit support is a footnote compared to GPU accelerated 3D. Save this blog post, it'll be funny in the future.
They did not give Windows VISTA 64bit the new Flash 11 and Windows VISTA won't be discontinued until 2012
Well, at least if I click on the 64 bit version of IE by mistake I'll be able to view a flash site - I guess there's some solace in that.
0 Votes
+ -
When I went to the download page, it said I have a 32-bit system, so I had to change it. Twice -- for IE and other browsers.

Instead of trying to foist the Google toolbar on me, it tried to install McAfee, which can cause really bad problems because I'm using another vendor's AV. Why does Adobe have such contempt for its users?
0 Votes
+ -
I have even noticed on my HP 110 Netbook that Flash 11 now runs better with almost no choppy video or out of sync video/audio. It is nice Adobe is finally making Flash work better.
0 Votes
+ -
Now if they would just fix the constantly crashing 32 bit version of flash....
Why isn't there any decent alternative to Flash?

Why do web designers have to build web sites that are burgeoning with Flash?

Poor web site design has resulted it taking ages for all the Flash adverts etc to come down the line. The World Wide Web needs a better alternative
I've had this for a while lol its been in beta
0 Votes
+ -
Thought I would be Running Flash 11 64 bit on IE 9 64 bit on a Vista x64 system. When downloading Flash from 64 bit IE, I see a message "Flash Player does not support 64-bit versions of Windows XP and Vista. Flash Player 11 now includes support for Windows 7 64-bit." So I tried it on Windows 7 x64 instead. @Bafoo thanks for the Chakra JIT info, but I'm not sure I would notice the difference in my daily use on a quad core system. I wanted to try to switch my default browser to 64 bit, but found that in Internet Options : Programs it says Internet Explorer (64-bit) cannot be the default browser." For now I've just changed all my shortcuts so that I tend to run the "right" one. I am surprised by the difference between the Manage Add Ons "Show: all add-ons" list of toolbars and extensions. It appears that I can't play QuickTime movies or view PDF files using browser plug-ins in 64 bit IE. And as a Norton Internet Security user, I can't take advantage of Symantec Intrusion Prevention to prevent malicious drive-by downloads. Maybe the shame first directed at Adobe should be directed elsewhere now!
0 Votes
+ -
Funny ...
ldo17 8th Oct
... I've been using 64-bit Adobe Flash for about two years, and a 64-bit browser for over five.
0 Votes
+ -
@ldo17 Funny, you don't say exactly how you've done that? Snark factor = HIGH.
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Funny ...
ldo17 12th Oct
@Michael L Jones Linux, of course.
0 Votes
+ -
Flash X64-Bit
tenchidbz 9th Oct
I personially have been waiting sence the dawn of my first 64-Bit PC Build for this day. Though I will waite a bit longer for a Flash X64-Bit for Chrome/ Windows/ Linux/ OSX to be supported. Also, would be great for a Generation 2.0 of the Flash X64 Bit. You know its going to have buggs... we will see, maybe if the reviews are good.....
0 Votes
+ -
@EdBott Now if we can only get Microsoft to put out a 64 bit Silverlight, we could all enjoy 64 bit IE and all the nice additions to it over the 32 bit version..... until then, no Netflix, etc.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix