ie8 fix
madison

From Starter to Ultimate: What's really in each Windows 7 Edition?

By | June 3, 2009, 11:07pm PDT

Over the course of its Windows 7 development effort, Microsoft has been incredibly controlled about releasing details, pursuing an agonizingly deliberate disclosure plan. This week, they finally announced the official release dates: RTM next month, on sale beginning October 22. The last remaining pieces of the puzzle? There’s the price list, of course, which I don’t think will be revealed publicly until close to the on-sale dates. The other missing detail is the exact breakdown of features in each edition.

I’ve been pestering contacts at Microsoft for an official features list for months, and they’ve politely but persistently refused every one of my requests. So, as part of the research for Windows 7 Inside Out, I did the work myself. I installed copies of each Windows 7 edition from the Release Candidate (build 7100) code on a single machine, resulting in a five-way multiboot system. Then I tallied up which features were in each edition, trying out each one to see if I could identify unexpected behavior.

[Update 4-June noon PDT] Several people in comments complained that the original illustration I used above was hard to follow because I used different partition sizes. I was surprised to read that, because I had originally intended this screen shot to be an illustration showing that I had five operating systems installed on a single system (on a single drive, in fact). I didn’t realize that people would be interested in the numbers. So, dear readers, I went back and made those partitions identical in size and reshot the screen and uploaded it here and added this update. I installed a few utility applications in different partitions. For example, the Starter partition has Windows Live Essentials installed. None of the installed programs were large, but they do affect the numbers slightly.

If you’re wondering why Ultimate is using about 3 GB more disk space than Home Premium, there’s a simple answer. The Ultimate install is the original one for this system. Because it’s an older installation it has many more automatic restore points saved. The newer Home Premium install has about 400 MB of volume shadow (restore point) space in use. The Ultimate install has 3.1 GB in use. The difference between those two values, 2.7 GB, almost exactly accounts for the difference in size. And no, I’m not going to reshoot this screen again!

[Update 4-June 10AM PDT, revised noon PDT] : Several people asked about the differing disk sizes in the original graphic above. I used a mix of x86 and x64 editions; 32-bit for Starter, Home Basic, and Professional, 64-bit for Home Premium and Ultimate. Disk space was a constant. For 32-bit editions, the disk footprint is around 11 GB; for 64-bit editions, disk space used is about 13 GB. Actual usage for you will depend on the amount of RAM installed (which dictates swap file size) and whether you’ve hibernated the machine and thus created a hibernation file, which will be the size of available RAM. The fact that all editions install all bits is what makes the Anytime Upgrade feature work so well. Hope that clarifies.]

When I did this exercise for Windows Vista more than three years ago, I created tables to highlight the differences between editions. This time around, I decided that producing a monster feature table is the wrong way to present this information. Instead, in this post I’ve created profiles for each edition and given each one its own page. I start with a master list of features common to all editions, followed by high-level feature lists that describe the unique features added with each upgrade level.

With Windows 7, Microsoft has actually put together a basic feature set that makes sense across the board with a consistent upgrade strategy to move between versions based on your requirements and your budget. That is a first for the company and a huge improvement over Microsoft’s official Windows Vista feature list, which I once described as “practically incomprehensible … like a graduate thesis from the Rube Goldberg School of Business”. Every edition of Windows 7 contains all features of the previous edition, eliminating artificial divisions between consumer and business features. That makes the Anytime Upgrade strategy very clean and easy.

One caution in reading this post: Microsoft has already made at least one major change from the Windows 7 RC, dropping the three-app limit from Windows Starter. It’s possible they’ll make other changes between now and RTM, so this list is subject to change.

Here’s an executive summary, with links to more detailed pages.

Common features

Windows 7 offers a fairly broad set of features across the board, with a lineup that is far more consistent than in Windows Vista or Windows XP. This page contains a list of features you can count on being able to use in every edition.

Windows 7 Starter and Home Basic

Previously, Starter edition was known as “the one that wouldn’t let you use more than three apps at a time.” Fortunately, Microsoft reversed course on that one, and the final version of Windows 7 Starter should actually be capable of performing just about any Windows task. As long as you don’t want to watch a DVD or change your desktop background. Home Basic is the other “non-premium” edition, available only in emerging markets and not in the U.S., Europe, and other developed nations. It’s a little more interesting graphically than Starter, but lacks what Microsoft considers premium features like Windows Media Center.

Windows 7 Home Premium

This is the entry-level edition for most consumers. It has the full Aero interface, Windows Media Center, and a few interesting surprises depending on your hardware.

Windows 7 Professional

After a brief name change (to Business edition) in the Vista era, the preferred upgrade for businesses and enthusiasts returns to its roots, name-wise. The feature set is long and interesting, with the ability to run a Remote Desktop server, encrypt files, make network folders available offline, and join a Windows domain. Oh, and did I mention a licensed virtual copy of Windows XP for those one or two pesky legacy apps?

Windows 7 Ultimate/Enterprise

Two different names for essentially the same product. In the retail channel, Ultimate edition was perhaps the biggest marketing fiasco for Windows Vista, which is maybe why it’s being downplayed here. The biggest selling point is BitLocker disk encryption, which now works on USB flash drives as well. Enterprise edition is the same product, packaged separately for volume license customers who buy the Software Assurance program; they also get access (for an additional license fee) to the Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack.

Next: Which features are in every edition? –>

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
230
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: From Starter to Ultimate: What's really in each Windows 7 Edition?
Seminaw 20th Sep
Excellent post. I really like the way you have described everything. Thanks a bunch for sharing this. Social Network Design and Healthcare IT
0 Votes
+ -
Alternative media centers
alokgovil 4th Jun 2009
Can free alternatives for media centers like XMBC (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XBMC) or Boxee (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boxee) serve the purpose on the lower Windows 7 versions lacking Windows Media Center?
0 Votes
+ -
I like GB-PVR
mdemuth 4th Jun 2009
as a media center replacement.
www.gbpvr.com

purely a personal preference.

0 Votes
+ -
What about VLC media player?
deowll 4th Jun 2009
There have to a lot of ways to get a media player. I think adobe is pushing one and Apple too.

To be blunt the things they are leaving out can be had from other sources in most cases free.

It might be simplier to get them from MS but I'm not completely sure that having people turn in large numbers to other sources is even in MS's best interest.
0 Votes
+ -
Media Center is more than a Player
JustDave 25th Jun 2009
Media Center has full DVR capabilities, including
watching and recording TV, if your PC has
supported hardware. VLC is only a player (A good
one, that plays formats that Windows Media Player
does not), but it does not have all the options
that Media Center has.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Any of them will work
Ed Bott 4th Jun 2009
So will Sage TV and Myth TV.

The Windows platform offers a lot of diversity.
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks
LegendsOfBatman 6th Jun 2009
This is why I read you and tend to trust you more than most others. You don't take "no" for the final answer. You get out there and get the answer anyway.
I don't know about the other readers, but, I appreciate the work you went through to get us the answers we all want to know. The answers MS is so tightlipped about.
While I had the opportunity to give 7 a test drive, I am more concerned about the Home Premium, and how 32 bit will work. I assume based on my testing on Ultimate, 64-bit, it will work as well; just without the ability to run 16GB of ram (and does anything really require THAT much ram, or even take advantage of that much ram, now?)
Anyway, thanks. I know you went through a lot of work to do this. I for one appreciate it. Except for Virtual XP, I think there is very little I would need from a business version over a Home version. Thank you for simplifying things and taking the spin out.
Completely The Citizen be familiar with, online slots along with here canister carry out a batch of advantageous but you act it regularly.
0 Votes
+ -
they're not GPU accelerated
directory Updated - 4th Jun 2009
alternative media centers have low performances and they are not GPU accelerated
0 Votes
+ -
having a feature that allowed recording on two hard drives without having to target just one drive would have been enough to get me to buy Windows 7.

However, I'm not sure what would happen with DRM. Since my Vista x64 edition is specially tailored for cable compliance; I really wonder if trying to use anything different would be allowed by cable standards compliance.

I may have to wait until Microsoft comes up with a special edition like the one I'm using. I wished it was Ultimate instead of Home though. If my silly apartment rules allowed satelite service, none of this would be a problem.
@alokgovil

You complete a adjust closing stage by the side of weight loss pills, good affair!
Altogether must be accordingly blissful along with casino online afterwards live casino for the reason that this online casino canister be aware of so good!
Rupeetalk.com offers home loan , credit card , personal loan , health insurance , car loan , life insurance in India and anyone can compare these policies emi, interest rate, pre-payment charges....etc.
Seriously, a comprehensive table would have done better.
0 Votes
+ -
+1
bishofthedump Updated - 4th Jun 2009
I entirely agree. Six pages of yawn where a one page table would have sufficed. And having different partition sizes for each install kinda defeats the point of showing the graphic on the first page.

And what's with sentences like:
"Windows 7 Starter should actually be capable of performing just about any Windows task. As long as you don?t want to watch a DVD or change your desktop background."

Uh, unless you don't mind installing non-MS software? Or will Win7 Starter somehow cripple your DVD drive from using opensource alternatives?

To be completely frank, I fail to see the point in releasing different flavors of the same OS. Sure a 32bit system and 64bit one makes sense, but beyond that, why complicate things? Can't they just tailor their prices to the the markets they sell in, but still give everyone the full system? Since all systems install all components, how do they justify charging extra to unlock certain features? I thought Win7 was going to be about creating clear water, but this is only slightly less muddy than Vista.

It's nice of Ed to attempt to clarify things a little, but this article - like MS's choice of different editions - is more than a little convoluted.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Two responses
Ed Bott 4th Jun 2009
"Uh, unless you don't mind installing non-MS software? Or will Win7 Starter somehow cripple your DVD drive from using opensource alternatives?"

Go read what I wrote in the full page.

"Can't they just tailor their prices to the the markets they sell in"

What about multiple segments in the same market? If you use an average price istead of segments, you reward the wealthy and punish the price-conscious. A $50 OS for a $500 PC and a $150 OS for a $1500 PC makes perfect sense. If you give everyone everything and charge an average of $100, then you've just bumped the price of that $500 PC by 10% and given the high-price buyer a $50 break. Thanks!
0 Votes
+ -
unethical
mathcreative 4th Jun 2009
some of the differences are feature's that were in microsofts previous
versions. Like the differences in features between Windows7 Home and
Pro, aren't different from the feature's that windows XP pro had. Those
features were already payed for, so they should come for free.
0 Votes
+ -
Are you serious?
gfkBill 4th Jun 2009
Except that most of the code will have been rewritten since XP. Stick with XP if you're happy nothing has changed, and it will indeed cost you nothing to do so.
0 Votes
+ -
Really the only way we're ever going to get it through to Microsoft that we're sick of them selling multiple crippled versions of an OS for outrageously scaled prices is by not buying it. Vote with your dollars. They'll eventually listen or go under to be replaced by somebody who actually DOES listen.
0 Votes
+ -
how do you think that MS desided this??
Ez_Customs 7th Jun 2009
MS is doing what the public wants. All of the big companies that are out there for the most part don't just sit on the butts taking complaints, and MS isn't one to stray there. Just like Apple, MS will listen to there customer base, and they will do this by having people go out into the online forums to read the requests in order to get something new. Windwos Vista yes big Flop, 7 is success. for all the gaming demands and you people out there buying all the latest games then goto forums asking for help to get the game to work correctly, and asking how to enable different things is exactly what makes OS developers force the upgrades.


Here is how you will stop this hate you are pushing;

1.) convince everyone in Windows environments to stop calling MS for support.

2.) stop buying the new games begging for ways to get all the Graphics to come out

3.) Don't ever upgrade the PC and this includes buying new software.



If you can acheive this the OS developers will stop moving forward in the home market, but what are you going to do about the industry market? tell them to stick to slow unproductive Methods!!
0 Votes
+ -
Agree Also
Enorton42@... 8th Jun 2009
If it aint broke, dont fix it. I have no problem with XP and I never use MS Support so it matters not if they close it down.

Upgrading does nothing but pad the pockets of an already to large MS. People hell bent on upgrades are just socialites needing to feel like they are up to date with the money suckers.
0 Votes
+ -
Unless you're one of the
rtk Updated - 8th Jun 2009
clueless few who think service packs and monthly security patches are some strange conspiracy, you use MS Support every time you hit Windows Update.

There's no need to rush if what you're using works for you, but that doesn't mean the world should stop around you and wait.
0 Votes
+ -
Seriously
LegendsOfBatman 6th Jun 2009
Then do all the work Ed did, do it, and don't complain.
Sheesh. All you have to do is read it. He actually did all the dang hard work, and you only complain?
Gimme a break.
You forgot Enterprise edition :P
0 Votes
+ -
The same as Ultimate
djmik 4th Jun 2009
I believe he included Enterprise with Ultimate because they are essentially the same. The only difference seems to be the distribution channel, retail vs. volume license.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
It's there
Ed Bott 4th Jun 2009
Combined with Ultimate on the last page.
0 Votes
+ -
No Home Basic for us thanks
timiteh 4th Jun 2009
I live in Ivory Coast(West Africa) and i don't know anyone who would want Home Basic.
What people want is either Windows 7 Home Premium or Windows 7 Professional at a reasonable price.
Personally, i would use Windows 7 Enterprise.
0 Votes
+ -
Regarding boot from VHD
timiteh 4th Jun 2009
I can see at least one useful use for it:
Faster,simpler and safer deployments than the imaging solution.
Not forgetting that it would be easier to recover from a damaged system by just replacing the VHD by a safe backup.


The main advantage over virtualization is obvious, you can take advantage of the full power of your PC hardware. Thus this solution would be significantly faster than a virtualization solution.
0 Votes
+ -
The reason for VHD boot...
Joe_Raby 4th Jun 2009
is because it allows IT admins to shift from virtual to physical machine deployments and back again. It's just a migration-helper feature.

Imagine if you're working within a management console with multiple server OS's running on Hyper-V or whatever, and you notice that one OS is being squeezed out of resources by others that are expanding their requirements over time. If the lighter server OS doesn't need much in the way of hardware, you could move it from a virtual environment over to a cheap physical environment with minimal impact or work.

Of course, speaking about Windows 7, if you need to move a VDI image to a physical machine because that user needs a bit more power, the same is true. You might be using MED-V for legacy apps or just sandboxing, but if you need to migrate to a physical platform for a few users because they need special access to a high-powered app, all you do is move the VHD to the physical hardware and configure the bootloader. Later, you could always move that VHD back into a VDI setup for maintenance or whatever. If network bandwidth is limited, you could just copy the VHD over to a transportable storage device, mount it into a virtual environment in your IT lab, do your maintenance, and then move it back onto the physical machine for the user.
0 Votes
+ -
Legitimate, yes...
Thunderbuck 5th Jun 2009
...but let's face it, these are fairly arcane scenarios.

I like the boot from VHD feature, at least from the standpoint of technical interest, but it's not a game-changer for most of us.
to keep it simple and leaner and a lot cheaper for everyone:

why oh why not 1 flavor instead of xx varieties?

to make a buck and call it $100 (hundred)

that's enough, even I can afford it...
LOL
0 Votes
+ -
*GOOD* article
wolf_z 4th Jun 2009
Excellent article. A detailed list showing the features and just as imporantly, demonstrating Windows 7 versions are supersets of the prior version.

Also, good to know that Ultimate and Enterprise are really the same thing with different names (and presumably licensing).

Now all we need is a reasonable pricing schedule to go with the reasonable feature-partitioning...
0 Votes
+ -
Lack Of Home Basic
GameOvR 4th Jun 2009
Kind of upsets me a bit. Why cant they make all versions available? Why just make the cheaper version of Windows for emerging markets? That is definately a cash grab from the richer countries.
0 Votes
+ -
A cash grab? Not a fair assessment ...
mwagner@... 4th Jun 2009
Rich countries SHOULD subsidize poor countries:

Drug companies could not provide AIDs drugs to poor African nations at all if the industrialized world didn't pay a premium for those drugs.

If people were not willing to pay a premium for cars with luxury features, the cost of the basic car would go up for those with less money to spend. It's the same with computers.

New technology always costs early adopters more than it costs late adopters because developers must recover their development costs - or go broke!

In the end, prices are based upon what the market will bear and if volumes are too low for developers to recover their costs, they go out of business.

Technologically superior solutions often fail in this model (token-ring, for instance) but this model encourages greater innovation (1000base-T, as an example) because the rewards of success are so much greater than the cost of failure.

Microsoft made blunder after blunder in their marketing of Vista - which is finally a very good product - but Windows 7 is better and Microsoft has learned its lesson.

Maybe you can't get basic upgrades of Windows for $99 anymore (the price we've paid for upgrades since the days of MS-DOS) but sooner or later you will upgrade from XP Home (or Vista Home Basic) to Win7 Home Premium for $129. (Hmmm ... isn't that what Apple charges for each new upgrade of MacOSX? Sounds like Microsoft was leaving money on the table.)

OR ... You will buy a computer with Home Premium already installed, and that computer will cost you half of what you paid the last time you bought a computer!
Windows 7 Home Basic was available for Vista and that's what caused problems. Laptops were being loaded with Home Basic and with a Vista Ready sticker on them. That's what sparked the whole thing, personally I would rather Microsoft just take off Starter and rename Home Basic to Starter or just take off Home Basic all together.

Lighten up, if you want starter, buy a NetBook, other than that, if you are really that tight on money that you can't afford 30 more dollars for an operating system that gives you Media Center, Media Player, etc. then you don't need Windows 7 anyways. Besides, have you ever heard of Windows 7 Upgrade Editions? They are around $100.
0 Votes
+ -
You lighten up, Overmind.
kat313 4th Jun 2009
Renaming OSs and, while we're at it, I guess you wouldn't bother helping out the developing nations either with the Starter edition that you don't think should be around. Well, don't worry, it won't be around here to bother you, so what do you care?
And, btw, that $100. upgrade to Windows 7 only works if you already have VISTA, which most of us (2/3 is the number I read) were too smart and/or underfunded to purchase.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Upgrade pricing applies to XP also
Ed Bott 4th Jun 2009
Thought that might help you be less angry.
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks Ed
kat313 4th Jun 2009
I was wrong, and that's very good news for me, thanks!
Sorry to sound so angry, but some people who post here just get me going sometimes.
0 Votes
+ -
That is true, but
mjolnar@... 4th Jun 2009
If you check it out, they are saying that it is extremely hard to get it right if you skip the Vista install. I have heard that things break down, you are almost forced to do a clean install. Features work so much different between XP and Windows 7.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
You're confused
Ed Bott 4th Jun 2009
You're mixing up the technical details of upgrading your OS with the details of purchasing an upgrade license. An XP user will be able to purchase an upgrade license at a reduced cost. They will not be able o use that to perform an in-place upgrade.

Common mistake.
0 Votes
+ -
They want a clean install for XP
deowll 4th Jun 2009
I'm not absolutely sure why they couldn't do an install and just save your software and data files while removing your old OS but that doesn't seem to work so...
0 Votes
+ -
It depends on the type if install you do
mwagner@... 5th Jun 2009
It is (and always has been) problematic to do an in-place upgrade installation. They haven't worked well since Windows 95 integrated the underlying OS (MS-DOS) with the Windows GUI.

The conventional wisdom is to always do a clean install. With Windows 7, that means, all of your old data files will be saved in a folder called "windows.old" so you can retrieve them easily. Of course, you will have to reinstall all of your applications but ...

If you defy conventional wisdom and try to do an in-place upgrade from XP to Windows 7, you are likely to run into problems because lots of older XP programs were not "well-behaved" (meaning they were not written to MS API guidelines). These are the culprits that will give you the most trouble. The same problems can arise with old peripherals and their drivers.

If you do an in-place upgrade from Vista to Windows 7, you have already dealt with all of that old code and peripherals in moving to Vista so there will be many fewer problems. Still an in-place upgrade is never a good idea.

It may be a lot of trouble to re-install all of your favorite applications but, if something goes wrong with an in-place upgrade, troubleshoot the problems that you encounter can be far worse than biting the bullet and re-installing your favorite applications over a clean installation of Windows 7.
0 Votes
+ -
Windows Easy Transfer FTW!
Thunderbuck 5th Jun 2009
There will be no option to upgrade in place from XP to Win7, and you don't really want one, anyway.

However, there is a feature built into Win7 that works EXTREMELY well: Windows Easy Transfer. This app takes ALL (and I do mean "all") of your user settings, preferences, bookmarks and such, and moves them, either to a USB hard drive or network share. After you've transferred these files, you complete a clean install of Win7, and run the program to retrieve and replace all your stuff.

It was introduced with Vista, but it's been improved considerably since.

Two catches: it's time-consuming (I had to leave it running overnight when I was pulling files from my Vista laptop). And second, it doesn't pull applications over (though it will faithfully copy each users' app SETTINGS). You'll have to reinstall all your applications. With a clean install, though, this is a good idea, anyway.
0 Votes
+ -
Every time that I have upgraded an in-place OS, it
has caused me headaches, that were not there when
I did a clean install.

I recommend this to anyone upgrading an OS.
0 Votes
+ -
He told you why...
deowll 4th Jun 2009
To many people in emerging markets would use linux or use a stolen copy of the software if they had to pay full price.

We can't have that now can we?
0 Votes
+ -
God forbid, no...
Wintel BSOD 4th Jun 2009
We can't have the monopoly lose 0.5% of a percentage point, now can we. That would mean some people have escaped total absorption.
0 Votes
+ -
Interesting
mathcreative 4th Jun 2009
yur name's interesting. Yu must love microsoft!
0 Votes
+ -
0.5%...? Wanna rethink that..?
Wolfie2K3 4th Jun 2009
0.5%? Dude.. If that WAS the case, then Conficker wouldn't have been as big a deal as it turned out to be. The patch for the bugger was available in October 2008 - and yet, in March, we keep reading there are 3 MILLION+ infections - mostly in China.

Even though MS has stated time and again that SECURITY updates are FREE for EVERYONE - including those who have a questionable license, many people with pirated copies are probably scared stiff to update and get those patches.

When you can walk down certain parts of Asia and find bogus copies of XP, Vista, Office, and other warez for $2 USD per disk, why ever would you even think about spending 50 times that to get a legit copy for $100? Especially when you're working for what we would consider chump change...

That's why there's a Home Basic edition for emerging markets.
0 Votes
+ -
I was being sarcastic
Wintel BSOD 4th Jun 2009
As if 0.5% out of 90+ would be that big a deal to them.

Obviously, it seems it is. (sigh)
0 Votes
+ -
Yes, we got the sarcasm.
Thunderbuck 5th Jun 2009
The trouble is, that in the developing world the vast majority of Windows installs are pirated. MS's biggest competition in the developing world isn't Linux, but pirated copies of XP.

Starter and Home Basic give MS low-cost products to offer that won't cannibalize sales of Home Premium or Professional.
0 Votes
+ -
Linux ...
mwagner@... 5th Jun 2009
... is less of a threat to Microsoft in emerging markets than is piracy.

In less cynical parts of the world, people would rather pay for Windows than use a product which is free (and thus perceived to be inferior). Plus, Linux is only free for those who have the knowledge and ability to download and install it. That's a pretty small segment of the market - even in the USA.

The best way for Microsoft to deal with software pirates is to undercut them. If Microsoft sells a basic product in emerging markets for a fraction of the cost of the full-package sold in the USA, they make it harder for pirates to make any money selling illegal copies - even of more robust editions.

Once the user has a basic PC with a copy of (any edition of) Windows on it, they can download (or otherwise legally acquire) a vast array of open-source software for almost every need.
Excellent post. I really like the way you have described everything. Thanks a bunch for sharing this. Social Network Design and Healthcare IT

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix