I would dare to say it's still popular as Google
allows for song previews via lala when a search
result matches a Lala database item. In addition I
use it every day in my office and anywhere else I
want access to my music - by the way it matched
every song I own.
Update 30-April: It’s official: Apple shuts down Lala music service.
So long, Lala, it was nice to know you.
Last year at this time, I compared six music services to iTunes and came away most impressed by a tiny company called Lala. (I was still impressed in this follow-up post six months later.)
Lala was an indie upstart in April 2009, with 30 employees (all but five of them writing code). They had a unique business model—one insider told me, “We want to be a cloud music app”—and a high-octane software development cycle that had the company releasing new versions of its web-based client every two to three weeks.
Lala’s founders cashed out last December, selling the company to Apple for an undisclosed price. And since then? Lala’s innovation has stalled. Or, more accurately, it’s shifted into reverse. At least one key feature has been removed, the much-anticipated iPhone app has been scuttled, and support has turned sluggish.
Lala’s signature feature when I looked at it a year ago was its Music Mover app, which allowed you to build a music collection in the cloud. If the program matched a tune in your collection to one in the Lala catalog, your account was given the right to stream that tune on-demand to any PC using a web browser. If Music Mover couldn’t find the file, you were given the option to upload it. Although others have tried this business model in the past, Lala was the first one that did it with signed contracts from all the major labels. (Interestingly, reports I’ve read suggest that those agreements are not transferable to Apple. If that’s true, it means that Lala’s streaming rights can’t be easily integrated into the iTunes player or store.)
The Lala Help page still touts this feature: “Music Mover will add the music you own to your Lala collection for free if it can be matched against our legally licensed catalog. For music that is not matched you will need to use the Manual Uploader available from your collection view.”
But that text is out of date. The upload option vanished in March of this year. I noticed the change by accident, when I needed to install Music Mover on a new PC and saw this notice on Lala’s web site:
I asked my contacts at Lala for more details on the “technical issues” that led them to disable this feature and on why and when this decision was made. I also asked if someone was willing to talk to me about he future of Lala. They bounced me to Apple PR, which gave me this crisp response after a couple days of exchanging phone calls and e-mail messages:
We don’t have a comment beyond the language that was posted on Lala in January addressing the MusicMover change.
So today, unlike a year ago, Music Mover will credit you with streaming rights only for tracks in your collection that it can match perfectly to its catalog. That matching process takes a long time but seems to work well enough. It succeeded for two albums that I bought recently as downloads from eMusic and the Zune Marketplace and for tracks I ripped from a newly purchased CD. Unfortunately, it failed for some obscure but legally downloaded recordings that aren’t in the Lala catalog.
The error message complained about “format or metadata problems.” The upshot? Music Mover can no longer faithfully replicate your entire music collection to the cloud.
The pay-to-play option is still available from Lala. For 10 cents a track—a buck or two an album—you can buy the rights to stream that track but not download or burn it; the dime is credited to the purchase price if you decide to buy the track later.
