How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)

How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)

Summary: Amazon just brought back the best of the late, lamented Lala service that Apple killed. Yes, the recording companies are whining already. I have no doubt that legal teams from all of the major record labels are plotting their lawsuits right now. But Amazon's position is incredibly strong. Here's why.


1-April: Updated to include comment from Michael Robertson of MP3Tunes.

What Apple took away, Amazon has restored.

I'm talking, of course, about Lala, the pioneering digital music service that Apple purchased in December 2009 and shut down more than a year ago. The first thing Apple did, almost immediately after purchasing the company, was to disable its Music Mover feature, which allowed Lala members to upload their personal music collections to a cloud-based locker where they could play it from any web browser.

Yesterday, with the double-barreled launch of its Cloud Drive storage service and the tightly linked Cloud Player, Amazon brought that capability back to a mass audience. They've executed their strategy brilliantly, and they've painted the recording industry and their archrival Apple into a corner.

As far as I'm concerned, Amazon just moved the needle significantly on the music industry. Yes, the recording companies are whining already. I have no doubt that legal teams from all of the major record labels are in war-room mode right now. But their legal case is nonexistent. Here's what they'll find out if they try.

No sharing? No legal case.

Every analysis of the new Amazon services I've seen has brought up the example of the lawsuit against Michael Robertson's by EMI. Superficially, that service is similar to what Amazon is offering. But there's an absolutely crucial difference. Amazon allows you, personally, to upload your music files to a digital locker and then play them back through a browser or an Android app. By contrast, includes a full API that allows developers to "create cool apps and device access to the MP3tunes Locker."

That might sound awesome, but it arguably violates the license agreement for digital downloads. I've looked carefully at those agreements before. If you haven't read that post, it's worth going back for a revisit. All of the major online music providers, including Apple and Amazon, have been selling tracks and albums for years. Those agreements have been accepted by the major record labels without any challenge.

Here's what's in section 2.1 of the Amazon agreement (iTunes has similar terms):

Upon your payment of our fees for Digital Content, we grant you a non-exclusive, non-transferable right to use the Digital Content for your personal, non-commercial, entertainment use, subject to and in accordance with the Terms of Use. You may copy, store, transfer and burn the Digital Content only for your personal, non-commercial, entertainment use, subject to and in accordance with the Terms of Use. [emphasis added]

Amazon's new cloud services allow only personal, non-commercial use and don't allow any sharing. This identical language is found in the terms of service for both Cloud Drive and Cloud Player:

You agree not to use the Service in any other way, including to store, transfer or distribute files of or on behalf of third parties, for any form of file sharing, to operate your own file storage service or to resell any part of the Service.

You have to sign in with your personal Amazon account, where you can copy, store, and transfer your personal saved files. You can't give anyone else access. Again, per the terms of service:

You may not use a name, username or email address that you are not authorized to use or share your username and password with others for purposes of allowing others to use the Service through your account.

And Amazon hasn't made the mistake of allowing third-party apps to access those personal files, either, as has. Game, set, match.

But wait, it gets better…

Page 2: The cloud is just another disk -->

<-- Previous page

There's another big trap waiting for the music industry as well. Wisely, Amazon has split its cloud services in two. Its Cloud Drive service is directly analogous to DropBox, Windows Live SkyDrive, and other online file services. Which leads to two inescapable, incontrovertible facts:

The cloud is just another disk. Today, you can copy music files to a flash drive, a writable CD, a shared network drive, or a different folder on your local PC. That activity clearly falls into the "copy, store, and transfer" activities permitted under the license agreement. Does the recording industry seriously want to argue that once you've downloaded a file it must remain in its original folder in perpetuity? I'd love to testify as an expert witness for the defense in that case.

Which leads to…

A digital music track is just another file. If I upload a digital music file to DropBox, have I violated a license agreement? Of course not. If I use an online backup service to mirror my hard drive to an online service, am I required to exclude digital music files from the backup? Don't make me laugh. Any record executive who tried to make the argument that you can't back up purchased files would be laughed out of court.

Amazon has already set the stage for that perfectly reasonable argument by including four default folders in Cloud Drive: Documents, Music, Pictures, and Videos. Yes, you can search for and upload your supported music files with a tool that is nearly identical to the late, lamented Lala Music Mover. But you can also manually upload other types of files as well. (And how long do you think it will be, by the way, before Cloud Drive is competing with DropBox?)

This, of course, puts Apple in an awkward position. If they try to outdo Amazon by adding features that go beyond this narrow set of capabilities, they risk running afoul of license agreements. If they support Amazon legally, they look like they're offering a me-too service and they validate Amazon's approach and its leadership role.

Ultimately, size and experience matter. Amazon has built a tremendous reputation for reliability and performance with its Amazon Web Services. (I 've used them for years to back up my digital photos and other personal files.) I have a tremendous amount of confidence in the company. I'm still angry at Apple for killing Lala and invalidating the time and energy I spent uploading my music files to that service. I know that whatever energy I expend in uploading my personal files to Amazon will not be wasted—Apple isn't going to be buying Amazon and killing Cloud Drive.

And finally, there's the privacy issue, which sent my ZDNet colleague Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols into a quasi-paranoid flight of fancy yesterday. I actually laughed out loud when I read his reference to the Amazon terms of service as "draconian privacy violations." I'm not worried about Amazon handing my files over to the RIAA—exactly the opposite, in fact. Amazon is one of only four companies in the world that have the money and the muscle to stand up to the music industry, and I expect a vigorous defense on their part.

Ironically, the alternative service that Vaughan-Nichols recommends, SoundCloud, has some terrible language in its terms of service:

SOUNDCLOUD reserves the right to block, remove or delete any Content, communications, postings, and/or other data or information if SOUNDCLOUD, in its own sole and unfettered discretion, has reason to believe that such Content and/or other data or information may infringe the rights of a third party, and in particular if SOUNDCLOUD deems such Content and/or other data to be … possibly in violation of a copyright, trademark, patent, trade secret, or other intellectual property right….

SOUNDCLOUD will terminate a user's access to its Services if, under appropriate circumstances, the user is determined to be a repeat infringer. A user is considered a repeat infringer if SOUNDCLOUD receives more than three (3) legitimate infringement notices for such user’s account or in any other reasonable case.

And it gets worse. According to one recent report, SoundCloud has recently implemented a "digital fingerprinting" technology, like the ones used by Google for YouTube, which they have already used to take down content based on complaints from the copyright owners.

I've been a happy Amazon customer for more than 16 years. They've proven by their actions that they deserve my trust, and I like what I see in both of these new cloud services. I'll stick with them, thank you very much.

Update: Via e-mail, Michael Robertson CEO of MP3Tunes, disagrees with my characterization of the differences between his company's service and the one Amazon offers:

MP3tunes doesn't allow ANY sharing. Never has. Everything is password protected. EXACTLY like Amazon. The entire premise of your article is wrong.

We do allow developer access but that doesn't mean there's sharing. In fact there are hundreds of hardware and software devices which connect to the MP3tunes cloud music service and not one allows sharing. This is because developers can't set access controls. That's set by MP3tunes and we require a username and password for every access.



See related coverage:

Topics: Hardware, Amazon, Apple, Mobility

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)

    Oh, the music industry fighting technology again. Where have I heard that before?
    • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)

      Sorry but why use this service??? I can't run or bike and be logged on my an amazon account just to get my music (3g fees), much easier to sync and go... I already have 5 ipods.. I'm happy. Only time will tell whether Amazon really outsmarted Apple.
      • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)

        @Hasam1991: Do what works for you. I got a Droid with an unlimited data plan and threw away my iPod, GPS, etc. Now I stream music from Amazon, Pandora, and Shoutcast in my car and everywhere else.
      • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)

        You can sync your songs from the Could Drive, or stream them. Your choice.

        Oh! "Choice!" That word Apple users hate!
      • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)


        Thanks for the tip about Ubuntu One, I had completely forgotten about that one!
        terry flores
      • Re: &iuml;&iquest;&frac12;Apple users hate&iuml;&iquest;&frac12;

        @Hasam1991... not sure where you get that idea. I use Apple computers specifically *because* of choice. I'm not tied to a single operating system; I'm not tied to particular brands of peripherals (e.g. many MP3 players); I'm not tied to lousy compression schemes; I'm not tied to crappy software; I'm not tied to malware; I'm not tied to horrible tech support; in short, I have choice specifically *because* I use Apple devices.

        I don't deny that there are a few things other companies do better than Apple; there definitely are. I also dont deny that Apple is a fairly evil company, although unfortunately, so are most of their competitors. But to say that Apple users hate choice is like saying that Barack Obama hates change. Like it or not, it's a completely inaccurate statement.
      • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)


        Boy your the Perfect Apple client, Dumb and likes to spend Money dumber. What Happen do the days when Apple users were the Uper echelon of techs. ohh thats right they are no longer a computer company but an applicance one, Let all the idiots in
      • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)


        You know, you're not automatically tied to any of these if you're using PCs (and any system in general). Sure, you go with Apple due to these reasons if you don't want to do any research... but then you pay the price for it....
      • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)

        @Hasam1991 As a happy Verizon customer, I have a real unlimited data package. The fact that you're paying per gig is your own fault for picking a crappy carrier.
      • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)


        It doesn't take long for an Apple guys to post and cry foul.

        As for cloud services...No Thanks! I like to know where my data resides and who can access it. Do you really trust a company with your data? I don't. As time goes on people have forgotten the importance of data security which is exactly what these companies want. These services are just another way to nickle and dime us. I don't know about you, but I don't need another monthly bill. I don't need a cloud to to host my files. Crap, you can buy a flash drive and carry it with you. Sure an I-Pad user can't do that but that's why we have PCs because they do everything!
      • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)

        @Hasam1991 <br><br>You could use it when out running/biking if your mobile device has internet access, but this isn't targetted at portable MP3 players, instead it gives you the ability to logon to any internet connected PC in the world and access and play (or download to a device) your stored music tracks, ie on a 2 week holiday abroad, and get bored of the albums you took along, get on the internet and pull down a different load of tracks from your collection; or sitting at work and fancy some tunes, take your pick from your own collection.<br><br>All sounds very good to me and nobody loses out from any angle I can see, well done Amazon.
      • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)

        And you FAIL to refute a single point. Is it fun in hater-ville?
      • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)

        @Driod 101 Apple fans don't dislike choice - they chose to purchase Apple products. I chose to purchase my iPhone, my HP Pavilion laptop, and my Dell XPS desktop... Choice is not a "4 letter word" by any means. The more rabid ones say that Apple is the be all end all just like you rabid Android fans say the same about all things Google.
      • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)

        @Hasam1991 Typical iDiot response. You have 5 ipods, 6 macs, 4 ipads, 7 iphones, and are probably standing in line for whatever they release next, so they can sell you content for it. But your'e right, you don't need this, it doesn't have a big apple logo on it so it can't be any good.
      • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)


        You have... 5... ipods... wow... I mean... wow... Where do you live? Egypt? You need 5 iPods in case your military dictatorship decides to turn off the internet again?
      • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)


        You make no sense. iTunes uses a proprietary and heavily DRM'ed extremely compressed format. I think it's overall efficient compression. I'm not anti-compression at all. The point is if you buy music on iTunes, you can play it on iTunes. If you buy your music on Amazon by contrast, or ANY MP3 that I know of, you can play it on Windows, Linux, Unix, iTunes, Mac, cloudplayer, VLC on any of the above platforms, etc. Apple is therefore relatively, if no absolutely, CLOSED.
    • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)

      @tkejlboom Apple stopped selling DRMed music a few years ago.
  • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)

    Great move by Amazon, albeit not original. Canonical's Ubuntu One ( launched this exact service several months ago, is already available on Android and iOS, is truly global and supports more music formats.
    • Message has been deleted.

      • RE: How Amazon has outsmarted the music industry (and Apple)

        @betelgeuse68 Too lazy to click on icons to run programs, or install them, or anything? It's the same as running Windoz for Gods sake. How can it get any simpler?