ie8 fix
madison

IE9 Release Candidate review: will Microsoft's big browser bet pay off?

By | February 10, 2011, 7:45am PST

Summary: With Internet Explorer 9, Microsoft has succeeded in building a fast, standards-compliant browser with a clean, modern design that integrates well with Windows 7. But is that enough to preserve its dominance in the workplace? Can it lure defectors back and excite web developers? We’re about to find out.

With Internet Explorer 9, Microsoft gets to show off some of its best work to an audience that is increasingly indifferent and hard to please, and in some cases downright hostile and dismissive. It is not an enviable task.

By any objective standard, Microsoft has succeeded at the task it set out to do: build a fast, standards-compliant browser with a clean, modern design that integrates well with Windows 7. But is that enough to preserve its shrinking lead in an increasingly competitive field of browsers? Can it convince defectors to end their experiments with Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox and return to the fold? Can it excite web developers and kick up its own tempo to keep up with younger, faster competitors? We’re about to find out.

Today in San Francisco, Microsoft is scheduled to officially unveil the release candidate for IE9. Years ago, I probably would have waited until the final shipping code to do a formal review. In the new, engineering-driven Microsoft, the RC label means exactly that: this is ready-to-ship code, out for one final spin to smoke out those pesky bugs that hide so well from automated testers. It’s ready to review. (To answer your question preemptively: No, Microsoft isn’t offering any hints on when the final release will be ready.)

Gallery Tour: What’s new, what’s changed in Internet Explorer 9

IE9 FAQ: How to download, install, uninstall, and tweak the IE9 RC

I’ve been running an escrow version of the IE9 RC for several weeks, on a variety of desktop and notebook PCs, and earlier this week upgraded to the final RC bits. It is a solid, polished package, and I have no trouble recommending it to anyone running Windows 7 or Windows Vista. (Sorry, XP users. This is yet another reason to upgrade your OS.)

You will find echoes of other modern browsers throughout IE9. But this is no clone or copycat, and in fact it has a few features that other browser developers would be wise to copy. IE9 has its own distinct personality  and visual style, especially when compared side by side with archrival Google Chrome.

The basic design of IE9 should come as no surprise if you’re one of the 23 million or so people who downloaded and installed the IE9 beta between its September 15 release and now. I’ve already looked at that build in great detail; if you haven’t seen my Internet Explorer 9 beta review: Microsoft reinvents the browser , I highly recommend that you go back and read it, just so you can get up to speed.

I won’t repeat my observations from the beta review here. Instead, I want to focus on some of the new features that have been added post-beta. Pinned Sites can now include multiple tabs, for example. There’s a new, very impressive Tracking Protection feature that gives users the upper hand (at least for now) in the ongoing skirmish with advertisers and marketers over online privacy. And if you’ve avoided IE because it lacks a way to block Flash-enabled sites, pay attention: the RC adds a new feature called ActiveX filtering that could easily be called FlashBlock Plus.

Ultimately, this long-awaited IE upgrade is a conservative and populist product. Much of its design is data-driven, based on input from the two biggest sectors of Microsoft’s enormous Windows-using base: managed corporate networks and nontechnical, mom-and-pop PC buyers. That focus creates an inherent bias to make things simpler, with fewer options. The resulting product might be a little too simple for browser elitists or those who prefer lots of tweaking options.

If you gave up on IE years ago because it was slow or buggy or insecure, it’s worth taking a second look at IE9, now that the beta label has been removed. (The installation is pretty low-risk: It’s easy to uninstall, and you can continue using your current browser as the default while you test.)

Performance in this build of IE9 is noticeably improved over the beta and better than any IE version I’ve ever seen. As usual, I’ll leave it to those with better lab setups to perform the detailed benchmarks, but in my experience, IE9 can keep pace with the fastest modern browsers. It no longer deserves to be called a slowpoke. Using the GPU for some page rendering tasks makes an especially big difference in performance.

Many of the most significant changes in IE9 are future-oriented, with solid support for HTML5, CSS3, and other emerging standards. Those changes are a big deal to developers, but it might be months or years before you see those technologies in widespread use. Meanwhile, IE9 does a decent job of coping with compatibility issues for current web pages that were designed for earlier IE versions.

In the rest of this review, I’ll look more closely at the IE9 user experience, at privacy and security features, and at how well it handles the crucial sticking points of performance and compatibility.

Page 2: The user experience –>

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

215
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

attent
Firat31 15th Aug
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet kanallari ? radyo dinle ? radyo dinle ?
mirc ? cet ? dul sohbet ? chat odalari ? chat odalari ?

? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? cet ? cet

turk chat - turk chat - cet
odalari
islami sohbet
dini sohbet
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
Beni takip edenin gotune koyim =)
Good to see that Microsoft hasn't lost its touch on quality software. The new IE is visually pleasing. As soon as the final build is released I will be recommending it to everyone.
@Loverock Davidson

You can't recommend it to everyone as nearly 60% can't use it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems
@Chipesh

I'll chip in with Loverock. But if you're still running a 10 year old OS then, hey kids, get with the program and go Windows 7. BTW, you know that IE6 doesn't run on a DOS machine. Don't hear many complaints about that.
@Alzie
Internet Explorer 9 DOES run on Windows Vista.
@Chipesh True..... but even more than that. Vista or Windows7 users only and we still have the monster IE6 users who refuse to trust Microsoft to upgrade. Plus those that aren't even online. Both IE7 and IE8 show very slow market penetration. Despite Vista's failure and Win7 being better accepted, the whole Desktop market is in Global decline. It's a market of replacement and defies the buy once days of trusted traditional capitalism. Replaced with new more corporate friendly use n toss capitalism of our modern age. Built to break and wear itself out...... even if you don't use it! wink
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Yesterday's battle
Economister 10th Feb 2011
@Loverock Davidson

Typical MS and LD
@Loverock Davidson

Yes it's going to be totally immune to malware and much faster than all the other browsers, good old Microsoft.
@Rubberduck Rabidson
Sunspider result is faster than Chrome 10 dev.
@Loverock Davidson

Well, barring any unforseen issues, this will likely be renamed from RC to final. Too bad too because it's still slower than Google Chrome and Opera :-/ Oh well, in 2 years when IE 10 comes out maybe it'll be faster.
@todbran@...

LOL! Did you even bother to read the review you idiot?
@JoeHTH Did you even know that Chrome 9 is an old version ?
@Loverock Davidson
Typo: you forgot the 'low' before 'quality'. Visually pleasing yes, and you forgot to mention pleasing as an attack surface for malware writers.
@willyampz
Typical troll.
@willyampz and you think everything else is immune? I have seen people get malware using firefox and chrome just as fast as they get it running IE, personally I am just glad its finally standards compliant, now to get people to quit using controls that ONLY work in IE, that would sure be nice.
@Loverock Davidson

When has Microsoft done any quality software?
@PMUP

Let's see! Windows 7, Windows Phone 7, Office, One Note, Security Essentials, IE9 RC, as this review clearly states. Do I need to continue? Keep trying dumba$$. Maybe hating Microsoft helps you sleep at night. But it doesn't make you right.
0 Votes
+ -
LOL
search & destroy 10th Feb 2011
@Loverock Davidson
@Loverock Davidson Why should I use IE9 instead of Chrome?
love u happy
www.awwgame.com
0 Votes
+ -
More things they fixed in the RC
easson 10th Feb 2011
You can now pin tabs to your task bar if it is vertically oriented. It didn't work at all in the beta.

Another frustration of the beta that is now gone is that to go back to your history of previously viewed sites, you had to press and hold the big back arrow, and wait several seconds. Non-intuitive! Now the history pops up after only a short wait.

Some major sites like Google Adwords did not work at all in the beta. Now they do. So does the browser-based interface to my RAID array.
@easson

You can also right-click on the back arrow and that worked before this RC version too.
I still won't be updating from XP:-) If it works why fix it and I am working just great. Had to revert a friend back to her previous version of IE 8 as the new one blocked her downloading from a particular site we all use:-( Thanks for the info anyway.
@jhodkinson@... "If it works why fix it"

It works? Last I checked, it's got more holes than Swiss cheese. I'm much more comfortable with the security of Windows 7.
0 Votes
+ -
People in the stone age with XP
jscott418 10th Feb 2011
@CobraA1
I really like Windows 7 and have to question those that still stick with XP.
0 Votes
+ -
Too many rip-offs
LTV10 10th Feb 2011
I really like Windows 7 and have to question those that still stick with XP.

@jscott418 - Probably due to all the FUD M$ has spread over the years. Call it "hype fatigue".

It wasn't too long ago we heard all this same shill nonsense over IE8.
0 Votes
+ -
The reason people stick with XP is ripoffs?
Michael Alan Goff 10th Feb 2011
@CobraA1

If you want FUD, you're barking up the wrong company's tree. Apple based all of their ads on "Microsoft sucks". People who use Linux typically spread the "Microsoft sucks" mantra around.
"Apple based all of their ads on 'Microsoft sucks'."

Yeah, back in the days of XP/Vista. I kinda noticed those ads died down with Windows 7.
0 Votes
+ -
With good reason
Michael Alan Goff 10th Feb 2011
"Yeah, back in the days of XP/Vista. I kinda noticed those ads died down with Windows 7."

Windows 7 is made of both awesome and win, they can't really find anything to criticize it about.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
AllKnowingAllSeeing Updated - 10th Feb 2011
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
I'm not sure I would agree to the same level.
DevGuy_z Updated - 10th Feb 2011
@CobraA1 In my view there is one main problem with XP or earlier Windows on the desktop. Generally everyone runs at administrator. I don't think it is so much that XP has tons of holes. It's that it has a single layer of defense. If you get past that you have access to everything. If you turn off UAC and run as administrator in Window 7, I doubt you are that much better off than someone running XP, assuming both are 32 bit.
@CobraA1 Nice FUD.
Let's not forget ASLR, kernel patch protection, a vastly improved firewall, Windows Defender being included by default, and improved DEP.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_and_safety_features_new_to_Windows_Vista

It's a lot more than just UAC, and UAC itself is more than just a dialog box. I'm sorry, but disabling UAC may make you more vulnerable, but nowhere near as vulnerable as running XP as admin.

But yes, you are opening a pretty big hole by turning off UAC. I wouldn't recommend it.
0 Votes
+ -
He is right
Michael Alan Goff 10th Feb 2011
If you turn off all of the changes that came in Vista/7, it will be just as bad as XP.

If you do that, you deserve to have your computer hit with a virus.
0 Votes
+ -
Linux doesn't need a nanny screen
search & destroy 10th Feb 2011
No UAC garbage annoying & treating the end user like a dummy, there...
0 Votes
+ -
Linux doesn't need a nanny?
Michael Alan Goff 10th Feb 2011
Then why is it that after every time somebody tries to install something on a Linux distro, it asks you for your password for privilege escalation.

Sometimes the screen even fades out to black, and then brings up a dialog box... depending on which distro you use.

Wait, is that like a UAC? Maybe?
0 Votes
+ -
Payback is a B-iatch...
Wolfie2K3 10th Feb 2011
@CobraA1
Yeah, back in the days of XP/Vista. I kinda noticed those ads died down with Windows 7.

Yah... But T-Mobile's been resurrecting the same ad format - gotta love it - this time with Apple and their iPhone taking the part of the loser...
0 Votes
+ -
Well @goob256...
search & destroy Updated - 10th Feb 2011
...if you had bothered to use Linux in the first place, you will notice that UAC in windoze doesn't ask for a password and is merely an idiot dialog box that asks you whether you want an action to happen and not as an automated process. Press yes or press no to continue.

Sudo on the other hand, elevates the current user to the root (in other words, as another SUPER user) and executes a command as that SUPER user . Sudo does ask for a password and allows a limited number of normal users to execute some commands that need to run as root, or other users.

Comprende? Or did I go too fast?

lol...
0 Votes
+ -
So the UAC in Linux is even worse
Michael Alan Goff 11th Feb 2011
I have been using Linux, you pompous windbag. And it's essentially the same thing, except you have to put in your password when you want to do anything. Want ti install a program? Better put in your password. Want to check if there are updates? Password. Update? Password. Add more accounts? Password.

It's like UAC.... but more annoying.
"Sudo on the other hand, elevates the current user to the root"

UAC elevates the user as well.

"Sudo does ask for a password"

If you are uncomfortable not asking for the password, you can tell UAC to always ask for the password.

In fact, if you were to set up limited users on a Vista/7 system, it would ask all of them for the admin password if they tried to do something that requires admin privileges.

You can certainly set up Vista and Windows 7 to act just like Linux in this regard.
0 Votes
+ -
goff: Not quite right
John L. Ries 11th Feb 2011
"Wait, is that like a UAC? Maybe? "

Reverse that. It's more like UAC is a lame imitation of sudo, which came first.

I would that UAC was more like sudo.

Of course, if you really want that "everyone can do everything" DOS feeling, you can always configure your Linux system accordingly (but I wouldn't recommend it).
0 Votes
+ -
@ John L. Ries
Michael Alan Goff 11th Feb 2011
I didn't mean to imply that UAC came first, and if it sounded like that then I apologize. I was merely meaning to say that sudo/su and UAC aren't all that different in the way that they function. I, for one, like both functions.
0 Votes
+ -
You haven't used Linux
LTV10 11th Feb 2011
I have been using Linux, you pompous windbag. And it's essentially the same thing, except you have to put in your password when you want to do anything. Want ti install a program? Better put in your password. Want to check if there are updates? Password. Update? Password. Add more accounts? Password.

That is so idiotic. What is it that you would do that would cause you to go into sudo all the time? I'm lucky if I have to log in under the root once a month.

Me thinks you're lying here, son...

~

And for the sake of argument, even if I believed that were true, the fact that you complain about using a password all the time is typical of lazy windoze users who are already logged as an admin by default, anyway. Who can't even grasp the concept of good password management.

Come back when you know what you're talking about.
"That is so idiotic. What is it that you would do that would cause you to go into sudo all the time? I'm lucky if I have to log in under the root once a month."

You obviously don't use Synaptic Package Manager, install things, update things, check for updates more than once a month, then.

"And for the sake of argument, even if I believed that were true, the fact that you complain about using a password all the time is typical of lazy windoze users who are already logged as an admin by default, anyway. Who can't even grasp the concept of good password management."

No, no, I understand it. And you seem to think that putting in a password takes oh so much effort? What the hell is wrong with you? Unless you have a 54 character password, Sudo is a very simple thing.

I'm not complaining about it being hard, difficult, or time consuming. I'm complaining about the fact that you have to put in your password to do pretty much anything.

Stop being a self-righteous Linux User.
0 Votes
+ -
You still don't know what you're talking about
LTV10 Updated - 13th Feb 2011
You obviously don't use Synaptic Package Manager, install things, update things, check for updates more than once a month, then.

Unlike windoze, in Linux there isn't always a need to rush installing the latest patch, so I don't why somebody would be in the package repository all the time , anyway. Unless they are intent on hosing their system in some way. Or they're just ignorant about what its all about, which is typical of many windoze users who expect Linux to behave the same way as windoze.

A password is all that's needed to download something from the package repository. One doesn't have to log into the terminal as sudo in order to do it. That's idiotic.

No, no, I understand it. And you seem to think that putting in a password takes oh so much effort?

On the contrary, all your whining up above about passwords seems to be a big deal to you. Or need I quote your little rant again?

In Linux, it been an accepted way of life from the beginning. The whole OS was built around user accounts, elevated user accounts, superuser accounts, partitions, etc... I use a number of passwords for different things, administrative and otherwise, so just because you can't seem to remember yours doesn't give you the right to whine about it.

What the hell is wrong with you? Unless you have a 54 character password, Sudo is a very simple thing.

I think you need a little education on what that is. Its not always a "simple thing".

http://www.gratisoft.us/sudo/intro.html

And be aware of the su command. Its not the same thing. That can be important once in awhile as well.

http://linux.about.com/od/commands/l/blcmdl1_su.htm

I'm not complaining about it being hard, difficult, or time consuming.

Yes you are.

I'm complaining about the fact that you have to put in your password to do pretty much anything.

Whaaa, whaaa, whaaa. Its always been that way. As a check to prevent you from acting like an idiot, not that it would do much good for you anyway based on your attitude up above.

Stop being a self-righteous Linux User.

As soon as you stop acting like a corporate tool-fool.
0 Votes
+ -
And so, just tell me
Michael Alan Goff 13th Feb 2011
It's better than UAC how?
0 Votes
+ -
...But if it breaks, you're SOL
Cylon Centurion 10th Feb 2011
@jhodkinson@...

Jus sayin.
@Cylon Centurion 0005
What do you mean?

"If Windows XP crashes, you're SOL"?
That's why system restore discs exist, and the options available to XP users to handle these situations haven't magically stopped working simply because its successors have been released.

"If you need technical support, you're SOL"?
True, Microsoft no longer offers mainstream technical support to customers running XP. But I've ever needed to use it anyway.

"If XP gets another publicised security breach, you're SOL"?
Outright false. Microsoft will continue issuing security patches for XP until April 2014. This week's patch Tuesday brought a new batch of updates to XP.

"If new websites make use of HTML features that were not supported by the final version of IE to be released for XP, hence breaking the 'Net, you're SOL"?
Hardly. Most other vendors of modern web browsers have shown no imminent signs of dropping support for XP. Heck, if you use Opera, you can pass Acid3 running Windows 95.
@lfmorrison

I mean, XP is long in the tooth. It's currently in the extended support phase, until 2014, which means nothing new will come for it except security bulletins. But what I really meant is, if worse comes to worse, XP is no longer sold through trusted outlets. And if hardware breaks, newer machines won't run it, the hardware would be wasted on XP.

Even third party support is waning. I know quite a few gamers that are quite heated to find out the upcoming "Battlefield 3" title will not be supported by XP. If you're sitting there thinking "Since XP still holds the lead among Windows installs, therefore I still expect new things to come along still supporting it", you're sadly mistaken.

Since 2014 is fast approaching, XP's share will sink like the Titanic. Destroying what little support remains for it.
@lfmorrison

System Restore disks? Umm....yeah....like I want to restore back to Windows XP SP1 or worst and watch my system set a speed record on time between reformat and malware infection. No thank you. Windows XP is malware cannon fodder and deserves a decent burial.
0 Votes
+ -
attent
Firat31 15th Aug
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet kanallari ? radyo dinle ? radyo dinle ?
mirc ? cet ? dul sohbet ? chat odalari ? chat odalari ?

? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? cet ? cet

turk chat - turk chat - cet
odalari
islami sohbet
dini sohbet
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
Beni takip edenin gotune koyim =)

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix