ie8 fix
madison

It's official: Microsoft is out of the Vista doghouse

By | May 18, 2010, 8:25am PDT

Microsoft has won back the customers it lost during the three years when it was best known for the unloved and much-mocked Windows Vista. In fact, a new survey from an independent group finds that Microsoft’s customer satisfaction levels in the wake of the successful launch of Windows 7 are at an all-time high. The report also includes some bad news for AT&T Mobility and for the cable and satellite TV industries.

You can see the results for yourself in this year’s comprehensive American Customer Satisfaction Index report, released today by the University of Michigan. The annual survey covers 10 economic sectors, 44 industries, and more than 200 companies or Federal and local government agencies. Each entity is scored on a scale of 0-100, with higher numbers representing greater satisfaction.

Back in 2006, before Vista was released, Microsoft’s ACSI score was a respectable 73. (To put that number in perspective, the highest satisfaction score for 2010 is an 83 for Sempra Energy.) In 2007, the year of Vista’s launch, Microsoft’s ACSI score dropped significantly, to 70, and it dropped another point in 2008, to 69, inching up to 70 again in 2009. Those numbers are remarkably consistent and significantly lower than the pre-Vista ratings.

Last fall, Microsoft introduced Windows 7. Today, roughly six months later, the company’s ACSI score has spiked impressively, to an all-time high of 76.

ACSI didn’t publish customer satisfaction scores for any other hardware or software companies in this release, so direct comparisons with Apple and other rivals aren’t possible in this quarter. Apple’s numbers in the Personal Computer catgegory for previous years are available, however. Its 2009 rating of 84 (down from 85 in 2008) is impressive and significantly higher than the second-ranked company in that category, Dell, which earned a 75.

I found one set of peripherally related numbers interesting. AT&T Mobility, the sole U.S. provider of services for Apple’s iPhone, earned a dismal 2010 ACSI score of 69, below all other rivals; Verizon Wireless and T-Mobile are ranked at 73. AT&T’s score is an improvement over last year’s 67, but it still has a long way to go.

One final data point: The American people don’t like their cable and satellite TV companies much. Overall rankings for the industry are a a dismal 66, with the two bright spots also being the most technically advanced. Verizon Communications’ FIOS service earns a 73 score, while AT&T U-verse trails slightly at 72.. Time-Warner Cable and Comcast are tied at 61, and Charter Communications brings up the rear at 60.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

174
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: It's official: Microsoft is out of the Vista doghouse
FAULKNE 13th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Windows users only: If you were to rank your satisfaction with Microsoft right now on a scale of 0-100, what would your number be, and why?
0 Votes
+ -
Windows user but not by choice
HollywoodDog 18th May 2010
@Ed Bott or rather by choice of the IT department at work. I was a huge Microsoft and Windows fan in the mid 90's. Today it's here, and there's nothing I can do about it. Score: 30
0 Votes
+ -
@HollywoodDog, I wouldn't work for an employer who forced me to use Windows. Fortunately, I've never had to. happy
  • Flagged
@HollywoodDog

I can take some pride as my employer is rolling out Linux to our workforce. We have made the decision to cut the shackles that have had us chained to the deck of the M$ Titanic.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Huge Microsoft and Windows fan in the 90s?
Lester Young 18th May 2010
@HollywoodDog Why? Were you a masochist? I think I get it. The better the current release of Windows, the lower you rate Windows.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
MS is not quite out of my doghouse!
tonyhunterajh Updated - 18th May 2010
@Ed Bott I use windows at work (.NET developer) Mac at home and mobile. I have used EVERY version of windows and I think MS is starting to begin, to head in the direction of eventually get it right! The OS still "Thunks" (if you don't know - don't ask!), application installation/removal is still a huge hassel, and worst of all is the constant vulnerability to viruses! I make my living coding MS technologies but I have to give MS a score of 40!
0 Votes
+ -
@tonyhunterajh you're right, however, I do think that Microsoft need to standardise on MSI and make the 'Windows 7 compatible' sticker conditional on meeting a set of requirements, including using the built in MSI format rather than a customised installer. Until Microsoft has a set of rigid requirements for the 'Windows 7' compatibility logo, the logo itself will hold no weight in the marketplace as so far as compatibility and reliability.
0 Votes
+ -
@Ed Bott
I would give them 90
Over the last two years they have really improved the performance of their products and response to the needs of their users. I use many of their products together several products of their competitors (including open-source software).
0 Votes
+ -
@Ed Bott
-90, They lost me @ DOS 5, when they promised a multitasking DOS and then pulled it and the last minute.

DRDOS/OS 2/Linux/OS X/BSD
@Ed Bott I rate it at 20
0 Votes
+ -
@Ed Bott I would give them an 80. They have been doing very well at the enterprise level lately as well.
@Ed Bott

I believe that they get an 80. Windows 7 is a notable improvement from both Vista AND XP. They have done well in improving their programming environments, too.
@Ed Bott As an average consumer I think 75 is a fair score. Microsoft has done a lot to make the product more accessible and easier to navigate. As has been pointed out, IT people are less impressed. You won't get a good score out of the tech savvy customer until MS releases a Singularity-based operating system. The day that happens, it'll make even the best XNU/UNIX/LINUX build look like a Model-T.
0 Votes
+ -
My rank
nanomartin 18th May 2010
@Ed Bott
If you asking me about the WHOLE M$ft products, I'd say: 30
If you ask me about all the (customer) Windows versions (I'm using windows since 3.1) : 50
And this is a detailed rank:
Win7: 90
Vista: 00
XP: 75
Me: 10
98: 60 (It was really good at your age)
95: 50
3.11 / 3.1: Not applying
BTW: I still love DOS and everything that looks like a terminal happy
Don't get mad, I know sounds contradictorious: "I love shell and don't use linux"... well, I'm getting friendly with it.

Glad to express myself.

Cheers,
Pampa
to catch up, but they did and when they did everyone saw Vista is a very solid OS. Much better than XP, well at least in the opinion of those I know who use it regularly. I did use it before win7 and I only upgraded because I'm a fan of the latest technology, but for that 2 year period I had no gripes. I had the Vista Ultimate x64 version and it ran very well on my laptop with 4GB RAM and of course, 64 bit processor. Never a problem. But then I didn't have any hardware or apps that were pre XPSP2, or the ones I did ran fine.
All XPSP2 apps and drivers run on Vista just fine...if they were written to spec for XPSP2 that is.
ABMers bashed it and failed to note that sometimes compatibility mode was required to load older drivers and programs. I have a circa 2003 Sony handicam and the driver loaded in xpsp2 compatibility mode w/o a hitch.
That is the part that is left out by the MS hating Linux and Apple zealots who treat the subject like their religion and they have no tolerence for any but their own.
But it's done well for itself and has a very significant marketshare.
0 Votes
+ -
A fair and balanced assessment
becabill 22nd May 2010
@nanomartin
more so than mine I guess. I'm amazed, however, that the more negative comments to this post have been *flagged*!???
@Ed Bott You are right they bounced back from WinVista. I'm a super happy customer with Win7, I will grade my satisfaction today on a top 95!
@Ed Bott -> I'd say my satisfaction level is somewhere between 65 and 70 percent.

They do a lot of good things, but there are some things they absolutely can do better.

BTW, the same holds true with other operating systems: There are some things they do great, and there other things where they could do better.
@NatanElias Why? Deleted
@Ed Bott
XP - 60
Vista - 15
Win 7 - 85

I am sure there is much room for improvement, but for the time being I am very satisfied with Windows 7. Vista was way too much of a resource hog and 7 seems significantly better in this regard. 7 feels more responsive, vista felt laggy and slow. Recently I upgraded 2 PCs at home from XP to 7.
0 Votes
+ -
As a Windows user and hard-core gamer...
D2 Ultima Updated - 18th May 2010
@Ed Bott
... I must say I would give them a 60. I love windows Vista and it's still a great OS, but MS hasn't done anything in terms of proving that. I can understand them wanting to move on instead of changing peoples' minds, but they just rebranded Vista as 7 and made windows 7's interface incredibly dumbed down to use, and people went gaga over its shiny-ness.
But they still didn't include any security policies in the home premium version of the OS (secpol.msc and gpedit commands don't work) which is the version most sold; and it's nearly impossible to purchase any computers with Vista anymore. Choice seems to be a bit removed.

I think they're doing better with office 2010 though, so that's a plus there. If MS keeps actually doing things well, they might shape up to being a good company again. But as of right now, they have a lot of work to do...
And let me not get started on their stupid Games For Windows Live DRM nonsense that they input into games, or when they pay off developers so that only Xbox 360 controllers are recognized in their PC games. If I wanted to use an Xbox 360 controller with my game instead of my Logitech Cordless Rumblepad, I'd have bought the game for the Xbox 360.
Aside from the above, MS seems to be doing well enough.
0 Votes
+ -
Er.. I gotta disagree...
Wolfie2K3 18th May 2010
@D2 Ultima
... but they just rebranded Vista as 7 and made windows 7's interface incredibly dumbed down to use, and people went gaga over its shiny-ness.

And that's where you'd be wrong. While it IS true that Windows 7 is based on the Vista core, Microsoft's programmers went through the code and optimized it to make things run better. Consequently, Windows 7 runs better than Vista and even XP to a large extent on hardware that isn't the latest generation. My Windows 7 box is a 4 year old system with an Athlon 64 3400 single core chip with 1 GB of RAM - and yet, it still runs very nicely.

As far as Vista's availability goes... You would appear to be in the minority as MOST people still think Vista sucks and as such - why would anyone want to buy a box with Vista on it when Windows 7 is better in most every way?
0 Votes
+ -
@Wolfie2K3
I prefer Vista because every time I sit down at a Windows 7 PC, I have some sort of problem with it. Some interface or other (most notably the wireless interface for laptops, since I don't actively use desktops at all) is either lacking in information or options that I feel I need and/or use quite often. While I'm sure it is there, I dislike having to hunt for things that are readily available on other systems.
Also, Windows 7 only had two main things optimized over Vista. Number 1 is that its AERO interface has been improved to require less RAM and be less intensive on a GPU. The second is how programs at startup fight to check online for updates or establish their normal connections so that when it booted, if you tried using the computer before your programs loaded, it wouldn't cause some of them to *not* start up, which sometimes happens in Vista.

My preference for Vista is just a preference though, but the choice should be there. As long as Vista is actively looked after, I don't really *want* 7. And yes I've used 7. Quite a lot actually; I'm not just saying this on others' speculations. I've installed windows vista ultimate x64 enough times to know its RAM usage. The exact base ram usage for windows Vista x64 (inclusive of wireless networking and discrete GPU driver functions) is around 966MB of RAM. Installing programs after that will raise the RAM usage. x86 Vista uses around 800MB of RAM under those same conditions. If AERO is disabled in Vista and Win 7 as well, their RAM usage becomes nearly identical.

Also, the only reason most people think Vista sucks is because they have some sort of mental block to it and refuse to give it a chance, OR, they've used bad versions of the OS (any pre-SP1 version is bad, even if updated to SP1 later; and Home Basic versions are bad on the whole).

Anybody whose hated Vista before and has used my laptop thinks I use Windows 7 because they have no problems, when I tell them it's Vista, they look at me funny and say I must be a madman to use Vista by choice. But they still can't find any problems no matter what they do. As for your old machine, I can't say I've put vista on anything that low-spec, but I've used it on a sempron single core machine with 2GB of ram (x64 version though, not the x86; I anticipated more RAM in the future) and it did everything well. From my sister's art and Social Studies projects with MS Office 2007 to playing Call of Duty 4 and Batman Arkham Asylum. Yes; on those specs.

People see Windows 7 as something new and fresh and are eager to try and use it, but truth be told no matter how hard I look, the only real difference between Vista and 7 for users that don't do much other than play music, watch youtube videos and check facebook, is that windows 7's interfaces are more easy-to-use. That and they hear good things about it.
@Ed Bott

I still hate Microsoft. I bought my wife an expensive laptop with Vista which made the laptop useless and I had to pay a huge amount to upgrade to Windows 7 which I think is only slightly better than Vista. Why does MS make me pay for their mistake? I will never buy Windows PC crap ever again. I will pay for Apple for my wife and I will stick to Ubuntu. I have had it with MS crap. I give them a 0.
0 Votes
+ -
@Goldcds
... that was made uhh.. "useless" by vista? Because I use Vista as my preferred OS on my "expensive laptop" and I rather it over windows XP or 7. I also have no problems with it at all, so I don't understand why your post is as such.
I am not saying anything about your choice of apple or linux OSes, I simply want to know what everyone's massive "problems" are with vista; and so far nobody (and I mean NOBODY) has been able to give me substantial reasoning.
@Ed Bott I was FORCED into purchasing Windows 7 or malicious software was going to attack my XP as it has many of my friends. If I was not broke from fixing my PC and purchasing anti-virus software, speed booster, registry cleaners, Driver updates programs etc. perhaps I could have afforded to buy the Apple I wanted in the first place. But purchasing a PC was supposed to be LESS expensive. No one tells of all the hidden costs over the...MONTHS. Apple RULES and I am saving because I too am disabled to purchase an Apple on CREDIT...ASAP.
BTW Windows 7 runs fine.
0 Votes
+ -
Uhh... No.
D2 Ultima 19th May 2010
@reslyn
Let's see. I use windows Vista on my laptop. And I would love to know of these "hidden" costs you speak of. For one, my desktop has no viruses (and is not used by me just so you know. It's shared for my family), and has been running without an antivirus for months. As for my personal laptop, I use bitdefender 2010 total security, which I don't even *PAY* for, because I won a free license key for it by being a good beta tester for them. Beta testing 2010 was free and open to the general public, and gave me quite a substantial AV for approximately 4 months until it ended. Then I got my free key. And I will be beta testing 2011 or 2012 when they come out too. It also has a registry cleaner built in; but it was simple enough to find a free and simple-to-use HDD defragger/optimizer which also had registry cleaners AND junk file cleaners from the same designers. Driver update "PROGRAMS"? What is this you speak of? I use no such thing, and my drivers are either up-to-date or (by my choice) at a specific, older version which does everything I could want it to do.

If you cannot find any good, free programs or keep your users' habits which would infect your system with such viruses in check, then that's your fault, not microsoft's. And in addition, the only reason windows has so many viruses, is because it is THE most widely used OS on the planet. If Macs and Windows flipped sides in terms of number of users, Macs would be begging for AV companies to support them and windows users would be the ones laughing at Mac people because of all the viruses they dealt with.
0 Votes
+ -
Right. You're broke from Vista
John Zern Updated - 19th May 2010
If I was not broke from fixing my PC and purchasing anti-virus software, speed booster, registry cleaners, Driver updates programs etc

Free MS security Essentials for AV, and who told you you needed the rest of that software, the guy selling to you?

Those software packages are probally what's causing your system to crawl, and of course the guy at the store says "to fix that you just need to buy..."
0 Votes
+ -
Right. Vista made you go broke?
John Zern 19th May 2010
If I was not broke from fixing my PC and purchasing anti-virus software, speed booster, registry cleaners, Driver updates programs etc

Free MS security Essentials for AV, and who told you you needed the rest of that software, the guy selling it to you?

Those software packages are probally what's causing your system to crawl, and of course the guy at the store says "to fix that you just need to buy..."
0 Votes
+ -
What the hell are you doing?
Cylon Centurion 20th May 2010
@reslyn

If I was not broke from fixing my PC and purchasing anti-virus software, speed booster, registry cleaners, Driver updates programs etc.

Why are you using all of that junk? I can tell you right now that you don't need "Speed boosters", and registry cleaners. Nothing good ever comes from that junk as most of it is malware in itself. Whoever told you do install that **** needs to be fired.

PS: You don't need programs to update drivers. Windows does it automatically via Windows Update.
@Ed Bott I'd say 90 to 100. It just works.
@Ed Bott
I'd give them a 75. 7 is terrific, but I had no complaints with Vista after SP1 either.

Apple? 80, which is down from about a year ago with me. They are still the best bet going, but damn is the front edge of my 15" MacBook Pro sharp and a pain in the wrists.
0 Votes
+ -
The iPhile or something, to file off those rough edges...
happy
@Asiafish did you switch to hardware midstream?
Do you really think OS X (XNU) is the best OS going?
It might very well be, if it weren't controlled so tightly as to make it less of an OS and more of a specialty software package for specific purposes only....per Steve Jobs of course.
0 Votes
+ -
I give them 100. Period
Rama.NET Updated - 18th May 2010
@Ed Bott
Ed I give them 100 because I live by working on their products and technologies. I used to have Linux shop and I never made money and lost investments and time. But when I switched to Microsoft products I started making money instead of losing. I give Apple also 100 and at the same time Linux also 100. Because it is technology after all and will be progressive.

I give FOSS and especially GPL -100 (negative). They are none for good because it is nothing but litigation. Commercial software shines on IPs and FOSS shines on litigation with GPLed code. I know FOSS is more than GPL, but as long as GPL is one of its main promotion, it is no good. "If I am donating my code, I don't expect something in return including carrying my name or something. Period." GPL is same as IP litigation. If the FOSS advocates here consider software IPs are no good for software progression, GPL and its derivativee are also carry the same effect, stopping the progression and creativity.


--Ram--
@Ed Bott

I'll have to give 'em a 90.
@Ed Bott Since Apple doesn't really want to compete, Microsoft has had a monopoly; so why should they care about customer satisfaction? Just come out with a "new and improved" version like the soap manufacturers used to do...marketing ... everybody has to buy it with their computer like it or not. I used Apple 1985-1990 then Microsoft since. Rather than improve on their product I see stagnation. Rating 30... When will there be another big boy to compete with Apple and Microsoft?
Most of the machines shipped with Vista still run Vista ... I really doubt those users feel any better about Vista than they did. Further, unless Microsoft offers to replace the OS while they retain the data via some in-home or in-store process ... nobody with Vista will be impressed.

BTW - if you get rid of the Microsoft DOG you won't need the DOGHOUSE.
0 Votes
+ -
Luckilly for me, Laraine
John Zern 19th May 2010
I had the chance to walk into a company, literally scrap their entire Linux setup, and get them back on track with Windows 7.
Turns out the majority of people I've encountered really enjoy using Windows 7, even over the latest "free" Linux distros out there, so I'll have to ask them at that company how they would rate MS today, and report back to this blog.
happy
@John Zern I'm guessing most are just surprised you found a company with an entire Linux setup to scrap. wink
@Ed Bott I would rate microsoft a 10 since they don't offer backwards compatibility when every thing they release is 100 percent backwards compatible then i will raise it but if upgrade right now i would loose almost 10000.00 dollars worth of software. Not a good number.
@Ed Bott
I have upgraded all my home machines to win7 and office 2007.. I have no complaints. My kids and wife use them with no issues. Based on the, 'Don't have to worry about it,' factor, I give them a solid 85.
0 Votes
+ -
Win7 compared to Vista
jlandheer 19th May 2010
@Ed Bott Vista Gold was terrible, Vista SP1 was an improvement and Vista SP2 works fine.

As far as I'm concerned, Windows 7 does add a lot of eye candy but as far as performance differences between Vista SP2 and Windows 7, it isn't that much as the media claims. (See http://news.softpedia.com/news/Windows-7-vs-Vista-SP2-vs-XP-SP3-Performance-Comparison-124820.shtml for example)

Nevertheless, Windows 7 is nicer to work with and clearly an overall improvement.

Vista RTM: 50, Vista SP1 : 70, Windows 7: 75.
0 Votes
+ -
@Ed Bott Windows 7 was the first version of Windows that actually gave me 'lust' and 'desire' for the Windows world. Prior to that I've been running Mac OS X and before that FreeBSD - every time I used to look over to Windows world it was either 'damn that is horrible' or 'hmm, that's interesting'. Fast forward to 2010 and Microsoft has a new manager in charge of Windows development, they're finally harmonising their user interface across all their divisions, and the focus is on pushing Windows forward in a methodological way rather than big leaps forward that result in a massive wake of unforeseen issues arising.

As for my mark, I would give Windows 7 a 90/100 - Windows 7 does have short comings but they pale in comparison to the huge positives that come with the operating system.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: It's official: Microsoft is out of the Vista doghouse
BrentRBrian Updated - 22nd May 2010
Windows:
A - Easy to use
A - Proprietary Application Support
C - Open Source Application Support
B - Drivers self install, don't require help
C - Easy to maintain OS (defrag, clean-up, updates)
F - Easy to keep virus free (almost impossible)
D - Timely and effective application updates
C - Timely and effective security updates

I gave up on Windows as a primary work environment with XP ... I only run Linux now with Windows in a VirtualBox where I can snapshot / restore the file system when things go badly.


Linux:
Easy to use, fair support
0 Votes
+ -
Low, maybe 65
becabill Updated - 22nd May 2010
@Ed Bott
Ed, it seems to me that with each version of Windows, We lose something simple that we took for granted before. I still miss *paintbrush", probably the easiest-to-use program of it's type, from WIN 3,1. It's been one little thing dropped after another, for the sake of fancier graphics and more restrictive apps! Greater speed is required for the much larger footprint, and the larger footprint is for more automation, and the automation leads to less flexibility, requiring larger and larger drivers for fewer and fewer peripherals. Call me a Luddite, but don't call it progress.
@Ed Bott 100. Without Windows, the internet would be what it was in 1990. Letting everyone participate has made it the wonderful place it is.
To you dummies who have nothing but viruses and blue screens: take your computer to a reputable repair shop, and your problems are over.
0 Votes
+ -
@Ed Bott Your numbering scheme has 101 numbers happy Should be 1 to 100.

My score: 20

I'm a huge fan of cloud services.

A few months ago I tried to get into Windows Azure development but was stopped technically at every turn. My score for Microsoft would actually be 0 if it were not for the awesome staff there. The software sucks, the people are great.

There are a number of issues I have with Microsoft's software:
1. Activation scheme is frustrating. Too many times I've had to call India and spend my time on the phone reading them a huge number (35 digits or something like that) rather than making money working.
2. A need to reboot for everything. It seems even the smallest changes require a full system reboot.
3. Windows Vista was horribly slow.
4. Removal of overlay control in Windows Media Player on Windows 7. (Why does new software have less features than old?)
5. Extremely confusing software packages. Right now there's Home Basic, Home Premium, Home this, Pro that. Customers have no idea what to buy. But, I know what customers want when they want Windows: Windows. Make one box. One box. That's it.
6. Any OS that requires Antivirus before it is safe to use is broken. Especially in 2010. This is completely inexcusable. Linux and Mac do not have this issue, why does Windows?
7. Visual Studio 2008 took over an hour to install with the service pack. Why? So much lost productivity...

I could go on, really, but I don't want to be "that guy." happy
0 Votes
+ -
For Windows and Office only: 85

That's because Windows 7 and Office 2007 are much better than any competition.
Nevertheless, I think desktop operating systems need a "revolution".

For other Microsoft products, excluding Windows and Office: 69

That's because the integration between their products is very, very bad - despite that they've been repeating the "three screens and a cloud" slogan for some years, they've not delivered at all so far.

I hope that gets better with Live Wave 4 - but I'm not holding my breath.
0 Votes
+ -
This comes from the perspective of a student and as someone who does Technical Support with End-users: I'm happier with Microsoft than I have ever been. I give them a 87.

1) Windows 7 is great on new and older hardware. It's very useful and I find myself missing the features whenever I need to work on a 2000, XP or Vista Machine. Also, of the hundreds of PCs that I've worked on in the months since 7 came out, I have not gotten one virus complaint. Actually, all but 1 of the viruses I've seen are on XP, with the other being on Vista when the client turned off UAC.

2) Office 2007 was a pleasure for me, and now 2010 addresses a lot of the previous concerns of customers, including me.

3) Blue screens are extremely rare on 7. I think I saw it once on a unit I upgraded from Vista. I will be doing a clean upgrade on the unit sometime soon.

I understand why some people may still hate Microsoft. As for me, though, I'm as pleased as I can be.
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix