L.A. Confidential: what does Microsoft have up its sleeve?

Summary: On Monday afternoon, at an exclusive media event, Microsoft will make a "major announcement." The event has been set up under a cloak of secrecy that rivals anything Steve Jobs ever did. Let the speculation begin!

At 3:30 on Monday afternoon, somewhere in Los Angeles, "an exclusive Microsoft media event" will take place.

Invitations (non-transferable) went out from Microsoft's PR agency, Waggener Edstrom, to the tech press on Thursday afternoon, a scant four days before the scheduled event.

That covers the who, what, and when. But the where and especially the why are still up in the air.

Microsoft says "additional information regarding the specific venue" will be sent to registered attendees on Monday morning. Until then, it's a closely guarded secret. I've booked a hotel on the Westside, close to the freeway, a short drive to Hollywood, hoping that that location will make sense on Monday morning.

The invitation concludes: "This will be a major Microsoft announcement – you will not want to miss it."

That's a pretty impressive build-up, downright Jobsian in its secrecy.

When Apple pulls this sort of stunt (which they do regularly) the company usually drops some sort of clue in the headline or the accompanying graphic. But Microsoft has offered nothing about the content of this announcement. Not the slightest hint.

So we in the tech press take wild guesses, and we talk to sources, and we try to connect the dots, as I'm about to do.

Here's what not to expect, in my opinion:

  • It's almost certainly not an acquisition, of Nokia or Yammer or anyone else. That type of move requires SEC filings and usually is done via a press release and accompanying conference call with analysts.
  • I don't think it's personnel-related. Yes, Steve Ballmer could announce his retirement tomorrow, and the new CEO could make his or her first public appearance. That would certainly be a shocker, but it wouldn't exactly be the kind of distraction Microsoft wants in the final runup to the launch of Windows 8.
  • It's not a developer tool or an incremental update to an existing product. No one summons the media across the country for a "major announcement" and then says, "We have a new SDK." The event planner wouldn't make it back to the airport alive.
  • It has nothing to do with Office or the Server and Tools Division.

So what possibilities are left? Here are my speculations:

  • The location suggests an entertainment tie-in. Has Microsoft finished putting together its top-tier pay TV service to go with the Xbox Live (nee Zune) music service? If so, that would be a big deal. A Very Big Deal. After Steve Jobs supposedly told his biographer that he had "cracked the code" for the next generation of Apple TV, everyone's been waiting for Apple to deliver on that bold promise. So maybe Microsoft gets there first, with a device that's already in lots of living rooms.
  • The timing hints at a full reveal for the first generation of Windows RT tablets. It's likely that Microsoft will release Windows 8 and Windows RT to manufacturing around the end of July. That's only about six weeks away. The traditional PC industry needs a few months to get its inventory together. The OEMs producing ARM-powered Windows RT tablets—an exclusive club, to be sure, with only Nvidia, Qualcomm, and TI allowed to play—have fewer such constraints. In theory, those devices could be ready to ship as soon as (or shortly after) the OS software is ready, which would mean an on-sale date in August or early September.
  • Wishful thinking has some people dreaming of a Microsoft-branded tablet device, perhaps a Kindle Fire competitor or even an Xbox tablet. It's not a completely implausible idea: the Xbox 360 and the Zune players have already established precedent for the concept. If such a device were to appear, it could be sold via the Microsoft Store, online and in its small number of physical locations.
  • I wouldn't be surprised to see the first glimpse of a new Xbox, with a full Metro interface that mirrors Windows 8 perfectly. Start screen instead of dashboard. Identical music and video apps on both platforms. Full SkyDrive integration. Timed to ship same day and date as Windows 8 devices.
  • Tim Cook might appear onstage and announce that Apple is using its cash stockpile to acquire Microsoft and he'll be the new CEO. OK, I just threw that one in to see if you were reading or just skimming.

Or (drum roll, please): Maybe all of the above (except for the Tim Cook bit, of course).

Ina Fried (former CNET, now WSJ) is convinced the answer is behind door number three and that the Monday event will "center around Microsoft’s tablet strategy":

Sources say that Microsoft concluded that it needs its own tablet, with the company designing both the hardware and software in an effort to better compete against Apple’s strengths. Microsoft’s tablets may include machines running ARM-based processors as well as models running on traditional PC processors, sources said.

Online site The Wrap reported this evening that Microsoft will manufacture its own devices, something that AllThingsD sources have also heard in recent weeks.

I'm not so sure of that. The topic of Microsoft getting into the hardware business comes up regularly (see "Should Microsoft get into the PC hardware business?"), and channel conflicts always emerge as the top objection. But maybe Redmond has cracked the code this time around.

Whatever Microsoft unveils tomorrow, I hope it's not another big announcement of an exciting future product that won't reach customers for 4-6 months or maybe even until next year.

Announce, excite, ship. If Microsoft has learned anything from Apple, that should be the biggest takeaway.

But maybe I'm just not being imaginative enough. If you want to add to the speculation, post your comments in the Talkback section below. But make sure you do it before 3:30.

See also:

Topics: Software, Hardware, Laptops, Microsoft, Mobility, Operating Systems, Tablets, Windows

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

133 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Agreed!!!

    "Announce, excite, ship. If Microsoft has learned anything from Apple, that should be the biggest takeaway."
    Couldn't agree more! This to me would be a sign of proper change and seriousness about competing.
    TechJunkiesCA
    • Truth be told

      In truth, most people love that too. Steve knew a thing or two about what people would respond to. While the press complain about this, really they love it (and so do we).

      I don't think Microsoft CAN do their own Tablet, the OEMs would go completely nuts. They'd have to - I mean if you were in the market for a Windows Tablet and Microsoft made one, would you buy anything else? (No, me neither)

      Oh and Ed - go take a look at an Xbox, that UI is VERY "Metro" indeed. Possibly a little more than you think. The only departure is the Xbox Live screen (ironically) where the Avatars are depicted standing freely (and not on "Tiles") - and even that has Metro elements.

      My guess? For once - I got nothing. Anything I can think of, I can also think of strong reasons against.
      jeremychappell
      • There could still be competition...

        While competing OEMs might not be thrilled with a Microsoft-branded tablet, there could still be room for competition. For starters, Microsoft's tablet would likely be a premium product with a premium price, unless... you sign-up for a two-year XBox Live Platinum contract. So, in other words, Microsoft could kind of subsidize it's tablets with Xbox membership. If a consumer didn't want all that, they might opt for a cheaper tablet made by a competing OEM instead. I think Microsoft is more concerned about selling the Windows 8 "ecosystem."
        metromalenyc
      • Xbox is half-baked Metro

        It has Metro Tiles and Navigation across the top. That is about it. The ability to move around the tiles and other such features are not there. Also, the Pop-up navigation is still the old style which is nice, but needs freshened up with the Segoe UI Typeface like Xbox needs throughout.
        spaulagain
      • Maybe no one else wants it

        [ul][i]I don't think Microsoft CAN do their own Tablet, the OEMs would go completely nuts[/i][/ul]It may well be that the traditional PC OEMs like HP and Dell have told Microsoft to go ahead... that neither they nor their customers are interested in ARM devices or Windows RT. Samsung appears to be having so much fun with Android that they probably don't care either. That leaves Nokia, but at this point I doubt that anyone in Redmond is comfortable leaving any part of Microsoft's future to Nokia.
        Robert Hahn
      • Competition with OEMs

        Could they plan to play in the ARM space, but leave the traditional processor territory to their partners? Obviously, Nvidia, TI, and Qualcomm are partners, too, but they're not HP, Dell, Lenovo...
        WebSiteManager
      • The choice of manufacturing partners suggests...

        The ARM tablet would be sold under the Microsoft brand. All of those are vendors accustomed to creating hardware that doesn't sport their logo on the device. They seem to be a good group to off-load the logistics of making the things while MS concentrates on selling them. It would also explain the exclusion of the big players in the distribution channel -- HP, Dell, Lenovo would just represent another layer in the food chain, and to be price-competitive, fewer layers are needed. I could see (and would expect to see) the ARM devices being sold by these major vendors, though, just not branded by them.
        jvitous
      • Intel OEMs would throw a fit if Microsoft started building their own ...

        ... Intel (x86/x64) tablets but Microsoft could very well decide to invite some traditional Android tablet OEMs to make Microsoft-branded WinRT tablets. Why not? These tablet makers are struggling to sell Android devices. Selling WinRT tablets as well could make their hardware much more competitive.
        M Wagner
      • Of course the problem with the current 360 look...

        Is that it's slower than molasses compared to what it used to be.
        Launching the 'quicklaunch' menu option itself takes almost a minute or more, and launching some games/apps that are 90-100% installed on the hard drive takes minutes.

        Yes, the hardware is years old, but don't make something for existing hardware that cannot be changed, that you KNOW will make it go so slow.
        jonrosen
      • I disagree

        @Robert Hahn
        It's obvious the OEM's want to sell a Win8 tablet.

        It's not like the Android tablets are flying off the shelves at any great speed compared to iPad and Kindle, So not actually sure if Samsung is really having all that much fun with Android, so that kind of rules that theory out

        I don't think this announcement will have anything to do with tablets, IMHO.
        William Farrel
        • Juicy Couture outlet

          Good quality, affordable, fashionable and attract many customers, as long as you like, you come in. Juicy Couture Outlet
          Juicy Couture Bag
          habee
      • XBox/TV

        For years, Microsoft has been spending money so that everyone knows that XBox is the first choice for gaming, and, oh yeah, you can watch tv/movies on it. (Sort of like the PS3, right?)

        I just don't see them making the pivot so that the one-liner about XBox is "It's tv and movies and you can play games too.)

        I think the video game industry has troubles and these are many of the same problems Hollywood is facing. How many of the top console games are big-budget sequels? That's not good. The latest boosts have come from ways to use the console to incorporate gestures through space and the games that use those the best and most intuitively are athletics simulators and not shoot-em-ups. Smartphones and the iPad have undercut the console game industry from below. Yes, the XBox is now the top selling console, but what is its penetration level in the US market and worldwide? What percentage of XBox owners did get the Kinect.

        As I remind myself, Microsoft has more MBAs than I do, so I'm sure they've got these issues well in hand.
        DannyO_0x98
    • Once upon a time, they did

      The Windows 95 launch party was as outlandish as anything Apple has ever done. And it did have geeks out in droves lined up for the midnight sale at Best Buys and other such places. Subsequent attempts at similar events came off progressively lame, and today I think only the most hopeless among us is willing to head out at midnight to buy a new version of their OS.

      The venue and the players suggest entertainment-related. Integrating Xbox into the Windows 8 ecosystem is an interesting move -- this would be going all-in as it leverages everything at their disposal. The question I would have would be if such an integration is more than superficial; what sort of real added benefits there would be in using a Windows 8 laptop, tablet, phone, and gaming console that supersedes what divergent products from other vendors could supply. I can imagine being able to access Xbox content on a phone or tablet could be a massive plus for Microsoft under the column "things an iPad can't do."
      jvitous
      • We don't need that

        [ul][i]"things an iPad can't do." [/i][/ul]True, but if they did that, there would suddenly be something an XBox couldn't do: provide any reason to parents to buy one, since the household PC could do all the same things. (But maybe Microsoft would just as soon get out of the PowerPC desktop business).
        Robert Hahn
      • For starters

        If I'm a consumer with a Win 8 Tablet, Phone, Xbox and PC my eco-systems are united and working together to give me the best possible end-user experience. Single Sign on with access to the resources and tools I use ever day and ease of use. This is something Apple and Google can't offer.
        Rob.sharp
      • Rob.Sharp

        [ul][i]If I'm a consumer...[/i][/ul]But you're so much more than that! You're a Microsoft salesman! You write notes on ZDNet that say things like, "the best possible end-user experience" and "ease of use." Just like any other objective consumer would, right? That's why your note got up-rated 5 -- count 'em -- 5 times! No doubt by other, totally objective consumers who just happened to be walking by, saw your note, and thought, "he said 'best possible end-user experience'. I'll have to up-rate that."

        Have you considered a career selling Oxy-Clean?
        Robert Hahn
    • One more piece to the puzzle

      MS has to advertise the hell out of it, not just announce it. Apple has spent years perfecting the formula you mention, and as result, get quite a bit of viral marketing out of it through tradional media, social media, word of mouth, etc. MS doesn't have that benefit, so they have to rely more on traditional marketing and less on buzz.
      piousmonk
      • Bingo

        Most of the geeks on here imagine that if a device only has the right wires sticking out of it, it will sell like hotcakes. And they also imagine that Apple sells things with 'coolness' and style. But don't kid yourself: all that coolness costs a fortune, which Apple is not shy about spending. When Apple has a new product, they carpet-bomb the TV shows with simple, effective ads that don't show the device so much as they show what people can do with it. As opposed to the stupid Motorola ads that have guys turning into space pods.
        Robert Hahn
    • Windows 8 is not released yet, so it won't be a Windows 8 consumer device

      I would think Microsoft will be announcing a WinRT Xbox surface developer device built from Nokia to give developers a toy to play with apps, integrate this device to Xbox 360 and Kinect, some leaked specs already have been out and looks this device will support USB 3.0, Gigabit Ethernet, long battery life and Qualcomm Chip, I just hope Nokia sells this device not too expensive when Windows 8 is released in Q3 2012!
      Gabriel Hernandez
  • It has to be Windows 8 related

    Anything else, no matter how exciting would just be a tremendous distraction.

    Even solving the TV puzzle as glamorous as that would be would still leave a big question mark around Windows 8 and all the devices that would need to interact with the Xbox.

    That would also be a distraction.

    IMHO, the iPad is too much of a clear and present danger to Microsoft in both the enterprise and consumer markets.

    Windows 8 should be addressed first and all the other pieces of the puzzle should come together.

    But that's just me. What the heck do I know.

    Onuora
    Windows8update.com
    Ammalgam